{"id":110165,"date":"2010-02-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010"},"modified":"2014-10-26T09:46:19","modified_gmt":"2014-10-26T04:16:19","slug":"balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Balaji S\/O Motiram Hullyale vs State Of Karnataka on 22 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Balaji S\/O Motiram Hullyale vs State Of Karnataka on 22 February, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ajit J Gunjal<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA\n\nDATED THIS THE 22NI&gt; DAY OF FEBRUA C: '._:' \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE   \n\nWRIT PETITION NO. 33503 A(}I\u00a3_'*\"\"2009V\u00bb{G:.:1'\\.\/VII:~I\u00a7tE'.':_j's). I\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nBa1ajiS\/0 Motiram H_1q\"H.yaI.e,  I  ~ I '\n\nAge 40 years, Occ: BusiI_1'es's.,_  \n\nR\/0 Viliage Kandgul,  \n\nTq: Aurad-B, D:i'st; Bigjdar.'  .. \n       Petitioner\n\n(By Sri. M1'. .5s.'1_1};.'_I; IIi=.:n\u00a7I?i.'s1A.4;&amp;voc\u00e9;g:\u00e9)\n1. TheASI\u00e91te \nRepresented by }?'.I*i1Ieipa1 Secretary\n\nRevenue Dep'aI\"I;In'eI1i,\n._f *V.i(I:1T_hlVE:11'1\"' Soudha_,.. \u00ab\n\nI' \u00ab _ Ba\ufb01ga1_o1*e.\n\n 2';-\"__Th'ev \u00a73epLi.'\u00a73*\"\"Commissioner,\n\nI A _ BidaI,' 'I\u00a7'_2_is\"1:: Bidar.\n\n 3. The Assistant Commissioner,\n\nAA .\u00ab__Sub\u00a5D1'Vision. Bidar.\n\n\n\nK)\n\n4. The Tahsildar,\nAurad~B, Tq: Aurad-B,\nDist: Bidar.\n\n5. The Executive Officer,\nAu1'ad--B, Tq: Aurad~}3.\nDist: Bidar.\n\n6. The Secretary \nGram Panchayat, Chick1i~J , '\nTq. Aurad--B, Dist: Bidaij. _\n\n Respondents<\/pre>\n<p>[By Sri. S.S. Kumman;  d<\/p>\n<p>This Writv.Petition..:i_S&#8217;V\u00bbfiled,u&#8221;nd&#8217;er::&#8217;-Articles 226 and<br \/>\n227 of the Con_s&#8217;_titution of I-nd~i&#8217;a,VVpr\u00e92ayi1ig to direct the<br \/>\nrespondents:-._ tQf&#8217;ipay&#8221;.0&#8243;f.&#8217; RS,].:;&#8211;44,4f3&#8217;0\/- with banking<br \/>\ninterest, to the&#8221;&#8216;petitio{n.e&#8217;r,~ fifofii the date of default of<br \/>\npayment   till\u00bb vrealisatio\u00e9n and to direct the<br \/>\nrespondents}; to &#8220;if ppay\ufb01ot&#8217; the&#8221; petitioner a sum of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.5O:,__OO.0&#8211;,\/-V  cost, in the interest of justice<br \/>\nand equity. &#8216; &#8221; T&#8217;  ~<\/p>\n<p>_ ~petitio;n A&#8217;eorriing on for preliminary hearing<br \/>\nthisppday, the Court made the following:\n<\/p>\n<p>0 R D E R<br \/>\n&#8216;  learned Government. Advocate<\/p>\n<p>taires  for Respondents 1 to 5.\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8211;.  however even as on today the<\/p>\n<p>1  lresp&#8217;orid.ei1t:shave not paid the amount.\n<\/p>\n<p> ith&#8221;e..&#8217;petitioner has aiready subrni\ufb02ied the requisite bills.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. Even though the matter is listed for preliminary<\/p>\n<p>hearing, with consent it is taken up for final disposal.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. It appears the respondents called:<br \/>\ntenders for supplying of iii\u00e9lel<br \/>\ngoods carriage permit vehicle.\n<\/p>\n<p>the tenderer and was  the<br \/>\nwater to Gram PanEfh.?1YEtt,~t&#8217;a&#8217;tl:..Af_ira.d~Bl, ll Uistrlet Bidar.<br \/>\nThe Case of the  owns a Vehicle<br \/>\nbearing No.5.   the order of<br \/>\n has supplied drinking<br \/>\n  The grievance of<br \/>\nthe  been in correspondence<\/p>\n<p>with the eon_eerned&#8221;anthorities for payment of the bill of<\/p>\n<p>l ..  Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that<\/p>\n<p>,<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  .notiVced\u00ab.ntha_t. much correspondence has taken piace<br \/>\nbetween dtE1_eA.t3&#8217;petitioner and the fifth respondent. Now<\/p>\n<p> purst1ant to Annexure-&#8216;U&#8217; issued by the second<\/p>\n<p>But however the same was returned pursuant. to<br \/>\nAnnexure~&#8217;M&#8217; dated 01.03.2006 indicating<br \/>\nsignature of the petitioner was not found   V&#8217;<br \/>\nHence the petitioner was directed to<br \/>\nthe said biils. Indeed thereaftder<br \/>\ntaken place interse  the&#8217;<br \/>\nsecond respondent V zagd   to the<br \/>\npayment of amount.    respondent<\/p>\n<p>has issued a .vcorn&#8221;inu1:iicati.o&#8217;n &#8216;at&#8221;i&#8217;&#8211;&#8216;\\jic*ineXVf1&#8217;1re-&#8216;U&#8221;.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. Mr.-._ S;.fS.._. Kumr1_&#8217;1an_,. jiearned Govt. Advocate<\/p>\n<p>appearing   submits that indeed the<br \/>\nbills i}a(hic1*1 _p -&#8216;by the petitioner were not<br \/>\nsigned, thgyi cvou&#8217;1d&#8221;&#8216;n&#8217;ot  the bill.\n<\/p>\n<p>  Vhai.re&#8221;-pe_r1_ised the papers. Apparently it is to<\/p>\n<p> idiiirection is required to be issued to the third<\/p>\n<p>respondent. certain information is sought. from the<br \/>\nfourth respondent. indeed the second respondent.-,phas<br \/>\nstated that the outstanding amount<br \/>\npetitioner is pending since 3 to 4<br \/>\nreasons are not forthcoming<br \/>\nfourth respondent to supp&#8217;1y._theiiiiecessal\ufb01&#8217;<br \/>\nso that the bills of the petitiioner can  This V<\/p>\n<p>communication is datefi  _<\/p>\n<p>7.    Vviiact that the<br \/>\n the petitioner and the<br \/>\n  Ai_hd&#8217;iVcate that the process of<br \/>\npayrnhentii is  &#8216;But however it is further<\/p>\n<p>noticed iasthovf communication is of the year<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  regard to the totality of facts and<\/p>\n<p>cir\u00e9cdrriistances of the case, I am of the View that the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; V&#8217;  . ap&#8217;pearItance.,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>respondent to process the bili of the petitioner for<\/p>\n<p>payment of the amount.\n<\/p>\n<p>9. Let a writ of Inandamus be issuedpto  <\/p>\n<p>respondent to consider the rec;z:est&#8211;.oAf the pe::::\u00a2m%,::. for<\/p>\n<p>payment of the amount as  &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>16.07.2008 issued by Vti3_ef&#8221;~~..pseco11~d.&#8217;&#8211;respdo~nde&#8217;nt. in&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>accordance with law.    *    .,<\/p>\n<p>10. Compliance;-no.threepprnontnsilfrom the date of<br \/>\nreceipt of ist\u00e9nds disposed of<\/p>\n<p>accordingiygcpp is <\/p>\n<p>1\\R\/I-rd S.S.-   \u00bb. iearned Government Advocate<\/p>\n<p>for the responder-1ts&#8217;v.isspermitted to fiie his memo of<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/*5<br \/>\nJUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Balaji S\/O Motiram Hullyale vs State Of Karnataka on 22 February, 2010 Author: Ajit J Gunjal IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED THIS THE 22NI&gt; DAY OF FEBRUA C: &#8216;._:&#8217; BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE WRIT PETITION NO. 33503 A(}I\u00a3_&#8217;*&#8221;&#8221;2009V\u00bb{G:.:1&#8217;\\.\/VII:~I\u00a7tE&#8217;.&#8217;:_j&#8217;s). I BETWEEN: Ba1ajiS\/0 Motiram H_1q&#8221;H.yaI.e, I ~ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-110165","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Balaji S\/O Motiram Hullyale vs State Of Karnataka on 22 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Balaji S\/O Motiram Hullyale vs State Of Karnataka on 22 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-10-26T04:16:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Balaji S\\\/O Motiram Hullyale vs State Of Karnataka on 22 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-10-26T04:16:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":586,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Balaji S\\\/O Motiram Hullyale vs State Of Karnataka on 22 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-10-26T04:16:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Balaji S\\\/O Motiram Hullyale vs State Of Karnataka on 22 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Balaji S\/O Motiram Hullyale vs State Of Karnataka on 22 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Balaji S\/O Motiram Hullyale vs State Of Karnataka on 22 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-10-26T04:16:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Balaji S\/O Motiram Hullyale vs State Of Karnataka on 22 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-10-26T04:16:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010"},"wordCount":586,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010","name":"Balaji S\/O Motiram Hullyale vs State Of Karnataka on 22 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-10-26T04:16:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balaji-so-motiram-hullyale-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Balaji S\/O Motiram Hullyale vs State Of Karnataka on 22 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110165","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110165"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110165\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110165"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110165"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110165"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}