{"id":110174,"date":"2010-02-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010"},"modified":"2014-08-31T04:21:22","modified_gmt":"2014-08-30T22:51:22","slug":"bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Bharath Gold Mines Education &#8230; vs The Prl Secy To Govt Pry And &#8230; on 4 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Bharath Gold Mines Education &#8230; vs The Prl Secy To Govt Pry And &#8230; on 4 February, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ram Mohan Reddy<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2010\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN \n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1\n\nWRIT PETITION N0.25143 OF 20o.2\u00b0{sv\u00a7.:\u00a7jV?'Ej\"'   E-\n\nBHARATH GOLD MINES EDUECATION CR0MM1'm~:.E~._R\"*--,\nSUVARNA BHAVAN. OQI:2_(3AUM---- POST \" ' '  \nK.G.F. 563 120. R\u00a3+3PRES.E1\\1TED By V\n\n1'18 SECRETARY   'W\n\nBHARAT1~1 GOLD  _ \nOORGAUM POST' ':13? 5631-.1:.20\"--j:  A\nREPRESENTED BY I'i'S_  ' ~ = \n\nPERSONNEL _MANA(;ER E   'PETITIONERS\n\n[BY sR1f_1* 'R1xJAi1z;-94:;;IJCAT1_ D EPARTM ENT.\n._ \" ..1V%\u00abG0\\I_\u00a313Ngv1'ENT OF KARNATAKA.\n'  BA:NG'A_I;ORE.\n\n REVATH1\nW'\/0. VIJAYA GOPAL\n\n\"~_.MAJOR. R\/AT ROBE'.R'1'SONPE3'I'\n' \u00b0GEET}-IA ROAD, K.G.F.\n\nTERESA VIOLET J EREMAIAH\n\nD\/ O. CYRIL JAMES J EREMAIAH\n'.52\n\nk.\/\n\n\n\nASSISTANT TEACHER.\n\nBGIVIL. ENGLISH NURSERY SCHOOL\n{PARKINSON MEMORIAL]\n\nOORGAON POST. K.G.F.\n\n4 M RAJAN. D\/O. RKASHINATHAN\nMAJOR, ASSISTANT TEACHER. BGML.\nENGLISH NURSERY SCHOOL\n(PARKINSON IVIEMORIAL}\n\nOORGAON POST. K.G.F.\n\n5 S ALPHONSO\nASSISTANT TEACHER.\n\nSINCE DEAEQ) BY PIER , _  \nMOTHER L.R. SIVIT. LOURDA MARY .\nLAKSHIVIISAGAR VILLAGE\u00bb  \" .\nANEJERSONPEI' PO. I&lt;.G.I\u00abf_...  \n\n6 JAYA BHARAT}-II   _\nASSISTANT TEACHER _ .   _ \nBGML ENGLISH I\\IU&#039;RS:5:RY&#039; SCHOOL&#039; \n\n(RAIRI&lt;.II\\I&#039;SOI\\I*1:M.\u00a3\u00ab:IvTORIAL;~....,,,..P\nCI_ORGAOI&#039;:{ I{O?ST&#039;,--.IV&lt;f.&#039;v&lt;}.F._ -\n7 CORM&#039;ELIA,I?&#039;A-Riiliifi &quot; \nW\/O&#039;;H.I_,EwIS_ . &quot; \n_ E~?.E&#039;I&#039;D. ASSISTAN&quot;-I&#039; I\\?IISTRI\u00ab:SS\n.. \u00abQBGML T2NGI..ISI-~-I NURSERY SCHOOL\n\n  &#039;(R.ARRINSON IVIEIVIORIAI.)\n\n OORGA&#039;O,N POST. K.G.F.  RESPONDENTS\n\nIIIBY.\u00a73\u00abRI&quot;SI&#039;_I\u00a7.E.ASHIWATIIIANARAYANA. ADV. FOR R24 5: S8:\n&#039; __SI\\\/IT, .I\\\/1&quot;.\u00a7&#039;.;I\\IAGASIi REE. I-ICGP FORR1)\n\n&#039;E&#039;IfII&#039;;&#039;3 WI&#039; FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &amp; 227 OF THE\n\n,ICTO1\\:STITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH &#039;I&quot;HE ORDER\n\n  &quot;\u00ab.IDT.II&#039;_.--3--2OO2 PASSED BY PRL. SECRETARY TO GOVT. IN\n APPEAI, NO. I2\/2000 (ED 68 PIVEC 2000] VIDE AI\\IN.I).\n\nN\n\n\n\nTI-HS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING. THIS DAY\nTHE COURT MADE THIS FOLLOWING: \n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>The 15% petitioner an Edueatiorgf&#8217;Conirriit.t{ee\u00b0\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>constituted by the 2m petit.ioner&#8221;t.o&#8221;maI&#8217;iage&#8217;:tE\ufb01e i&#8217;1&#8217;t1ii:sery O<\/p>\n<p>section of the school run by&#8217; the 2.?'&#8221;&#8211;pet.ition.e1*&#8217;\u00bbwas~;_not&#8221;&#8221;a<\/p>\n<p>recipient of gra1&#8217;tt.win\u00abaid<br \/>\nRespondents 2 to 7   Teachers<br \/>\nin the BGML English  promised all<br \/>\nbenefits admigssiiidle&#8217; teirrnss  code or<\/p>\n<p>whatever the St&#8221;a.t,e GoV_e15.&#8217;n.3nent. allows, from time to time.<\/p>\n<p>The 1&#8217;it?_petiit.ioner;V&#8211;_it.&lt;;ipp:ears_ -rep1&#039;esent.ed to the State for<\/p>\n<p>grar1t&#039;\u00abi1&#039;1\u00abai:i_ &#039;in VV&#039;res&#039;;)e{.&#039;,t&quot;_.&#039;t&#039; bf the Ntiixseiy wing of the<\/p>\n<p> edue;:23tt&#039;,ioi3a1 i11s&#039;t.&#039;i1_uHt.i()i,&#039;i. When Respondems 2 to 7 were<\/p>\n<p> 11ot.*paid_t:he.._re\\{ised scales of pay&#039; provident fund&#039; gratuity<\/p>\n<p>and&quot;p&#039;e1&#039;1vs1oij12ij\ufb01f bene1&#039;it&#039;.s with effect from 1\u00bb 1\u00bb 1987 despite<\/p>\n<p>&#039;.V_repeetted*.:_ requests. filed a petition before the let<\/p>\n<p>A &#039;~:if1&#039;es;p&quot;ci\u00abnde11t. invoking Sections 131 and 133 of the<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p>Karnatiaka Education Act. 1983 for short: &#039;the Act&#039; for the<br \/>\nfollowing reliefs: l<\/p>\n<p>&quot;[1] Issue a direction  ;_. &#039;<br \/>\nRespondents to consider and pay&#039;<br \/>\nPay Scale as revised  &#039;.V\u20ac&#039;\u20acf\u20acCt<br \/>\nl-1~1987 and thereafter    &quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>principles of equal<br \/>\nconsequential benefits   of<br \/>\nsalary, allovvanc;,e\u00a7&#8221;&#8216;p\u00ab&#8211;  interest of<\/p>\n<p>justice:\n<\/p>\n<p>ii) l._di1-ecito 1fespc_1&#8217;iderit.s \u00b0to&#8221;gi&#8217;ve all service<\/p>\n<p>benlefitslto  No&#8217;.&#8221;\/\u00e9\ufb01consequeiit. to her<br \/>\nreti1&#8217;en1entfon&#8221;1O*.Q.l~1\u00a79&#8217;98 as per with other<\/p>\n<p>ret.ired e11iploy&#8217;ees_&#8221;&#8216;\u00ab~._ &#8216;<\/p>\n<p> l3et:it&#8217;.ione&#8211;rS.___\u00a2}_I&#8217;.Iiaigned as Respondents l and 2. on<\/p>\n<p>riotice. &#8211;ven~teiied.._appearance and resisted the petition by \u00bb&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>t&#8217;iling&#8217;lStateine1i1t of objections dated &#8216;nil&#8217; Annexure-&#8220;C&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>lV._tnt,eralta.&#8217;3_adrr1it.t.ing that the 2&#8243;&#8221; respondent. [H petitioner<\/p>\n<p>ftherci.11) was appointed as Assistant. l\\\/Iistress in the<\/p>\n<p>  Nt\u00a7trse1&#8217;y School on 22-06-1977 on a consolidated salary of<\/p>\n<p>\ufb02,}&#8217;\u20ac\u00a3\\<\/p>\n<p>Rs.30O\/H per month; the 7&#8243;&#8216; respondent. (Gm petitioner<\/p>\n<p>therein), was appointed as Assistant. Mis.tr.es\u00ab.si&#8217;~..von<\/p>\n<p>consolidated salary of R5257\/~ per <\/p>\n<p>Respondents 3 t.o 6 (Pet.it.ioners~~2\u00bb._to <\/p>\n<p>appointed as Assistant Mistresses the pay <\/p>\n<p>Rs.3-40-15~\/400-20- 5oou25~sorj}&#8217;aom75&#8217;o:_2:3isQo&#8217;;&#8217;~\u00ab\u00a7&#8221;i &#8221;wit.hout&#8217; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>payment of Dearness&#8217; ..aiiowanee&#8217;.:&#8217; &#8216;i&#8221;nstead&#8221;oAf V-oontinuing<br \/>\nthem on payment of  it was stated<br \/>\nthat the scale  .Vt_o;jRespo11dents 2 to 7<br \/>\nthough    Consolidated salary. it<br \/>\nwas  school in which they<br \/>\nwere tvoi\ufb01aiiug  grant under the grant.-in~aid<\/p>\n<p>(ZOdE&#8217;.,~&#8217; &#8211;.1t speoifiealiyi&#8221;-denied that the appointments were<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;&#8221;i1(V)tV,&#8221;&#8216;in thee time scales simiiar to the scale of pay drawn by<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;i&#8217;r__i&#8221;e,d5ueational institutions. receiving grant. from<\/p>\n<p>the&#8221;&#8216;\u00ab\u00abSt.a._t.&#8217;e aiider the grant-in&#8211;aid code. in addition, it is\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>Jsitated &#8220;that the appointments and the pay seaie were<\/p>\n<p>_&#8217; based on the financial position of the 1*&#8221; petitioner &#8212;<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;&#8216;Cornmit.t.ee though some arnouni&#8221; was extended as grant: by<\/p>\n<p>()<br \/>\nthe 2&#8243;&#8221; respondent W Company. At: the request. of the<br \/>\nteachers. it is stated that the B.S.M. Education Committee<br \/>\ntook up the cause to the 2m&#8217; petitioner who sane&#8217;t.ioned<\/p>\n<p>some amount of grant \/ donation as a one-tin.1e&#8217;4*rneasure<\/p>\n<p>to extend to the teachers working in the  V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>with effect from 01.04.1982. the   <\/p>\n<p>teachers as applicable to Prirnaiy  teacifier&#8217;s <\/p>\n<p>in aided educational lnstltutiolrisfi\u00bb When._t_h&#8217;e later<\/p>\n<p>on reduced the requestof the t_eacheV1&#8217;s.to extend the pay<br \/>\nscales applicablepto P1&#8217;irn_ary_  due to loss<\/p>\n<p>occasioned yeafruafti-lzrl y_ea\u00ab1f.&#8217; was denied on the premise that<br \/>\nneither t&#8217;he*l*t &#8216;peti.tione.r'&#8221;&#8216;noi&#8217; the 2&#8243;&#8221; petitioner had the<\/p>\n<p>capacity to pay. &#8216;the 1+\u00bb }&#8217;jet.itioner it was asserted was an<\/p>\n<p>lllilidepelndientj~_bodyvHmconstituted for the welfare of the<\/p>\n<p>is-chools vvin&#8217;v&#8211;.the:&#8217;.1ni&#8217;ning township While the main business of<\/p>\n<p> the &#8216;2&#8230;&#8221;&lt;t pe&#039;Litioner being mining activity was controlled by<\/p>\n<p>H  ;Cen&#039;tral Government. and having occasioned losses in<\/p>\n<p>_l -_b&quot;L1s&#039;i&#039;ness, the \u00a35&#039; petitioner had no capacity to pay nor<\/p>\n<p>source to generate additional resources to meet the<\/p>\n<p>MK<\/p>\n<p>additional liability of payment of revised pay scales to<\/p>\n<p>teachers of primary schools. The teachers havingdfiled<\/p>\n<p>W.P.l\\los.34250, 35060 and 35063\/1999,.$&#039;_:t,&#039;hisfj-Cfoii-.i,_r&#039;t:_<\/p>\n<p>rejected the petitions reserving liberty to&quot;t1&#039;1~e:&#039;_petiti&#039;oners&quot;. <\/p>\n<p>therein t.o seek appropriate remedies&quot;u&#039;nd&#039;e.r  S\u20ac%c:.ti6ns<\/p>\n<p>130 and 133 of the Ka1&#039;11af.E1k;ci&#039;&quot;E\u00a71Ll{?&#039;&amp;i&#039;&quot;t.ic)1&#039;1  lsastlyil&#039;<\/p>\n<p>it was contended that 2&#039;I&lt;&#039;l.\ufb02p*eti&#039;tione1.9 Lstgonjipaliy was<br \/>\nfacing a closure and   pending before<br \/>\nthe .BIFR    and Financial<br \/>\nReeonstructi&#039;()hl._pa~hd___ the 15&#039; petitioner<br \/>\n  by its letter<br \/>\ndated all the schools managed by it.\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;I&#8217;he ._1&lt;ure.~\u00bb&quot;D&quot; allowed the<\/p>\n<p>it . repi&#039;-es&#039;e11i&#039;,ation and directed the l-&#039;~&#039;* petiiiioner to release the<\/p>\n<p>MK<\/p>\n<p>admissible salaries and pensionary benefits including<br \/>\narrears to the teachers for the period they had worked_. in<\/p>\n<p>accordance. with law. Hence. this writ petitioni.  3&#039; &#039;<\/p>\n<p>4. Petition is opposed &#8216;_t_)y..__filing&#8221;&#8216;&#8221;Stiatei&#8217;;&lt;ie&#039;I1t .._vo&#039;f@&#039;<\/p>\n<p>objections of Respondents 2 to  a.,&#039;nd&quot;62an&#039;(:|_:&quot;7\u00abuiri&#039;tera1ia<\/p>\n<p>reiterating the averments  &#039;out. in&#039;&quot;the petvitiori&#039;-iiinvoking 3<\/p>\n<p>Sections 131 &amp; 133 of. the Elxd-ur.\u00a7ation_Ac:t..&quot;&#8211;Res;aondents 2<br \/>\nto 7 seek t.o sustain  as being well-\n<\/p>\n<p>rnerited, fully. interference. it<\/p>\n<p>is pointed  No.5 is re&#8217;port.edly dead<\/p>\n<p>and inliae&#8212;r&#8217; plzi(::e&#8217;:-,Re\u00bbspoi&#8217;1dent No.8 who is the widow is<br \/>\nsubst.itut.e&#8221;d.. &#8221; .\n<\/p>\n<p> The i&#8217;i1&#8217;st;Vst;_bi:&#8217;1issirin of the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;pet&#8217;itio1i.er~th_a1:the petition under Sections 131 and 133 of<\/p>\n<p>ti*ie&#8221;i{arnat.a1V{aVEducation Act. 1983 is not maintainaible,<\/p>\n<p> cleserttesfto be rejected. This contention must. necessarily<\/p>\n<p>A  the light of the decision of a Division Bench of this<\/p>\n<p>  C\u00a7)1,1rt. in VIDYAVARDI-IAKA SANGHA BY ITS<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p>L;\n<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/doc\/106231978\/\">HONORARY SECRETARY vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA<\/p>\n<p>BY ITS SECY. AND OTHERS1<\/a> holding that under VS-3ect.io&#8217;n<\/p>\n<p>i45{2){xL) of the Act, the State Govcrnrnerit <\/p>\n<p>with the power of framing appropriate  <\/p>\n<p>purpose of implementing the p&#8217;rovi&#8217;s&#8217;inAn&#8217;s of.lVlt&#8217;h.eVAc=t&#8217; to<\/p>\n<p>provide for the procedure or ijegulate  t&#8217;un:t:vtio1*1.i:*1g:lg&#8217;=.ot&#8217;*~they<\/p>\n<p>pre+prirnary and nonwformal&#8217;=e\u20aciucational&#8221;-institutions or<\/p>\n<p>the procedure 1&#8217;equii=ed &#8221; yfollowedull for the<br \/>\nestablishment of such &#8216;l&#8217;ecl&#8217;ucla\u20ac;lion~aI=l[ins~titutions while<\/p>\n<p>Section 3{2}Lj}_'&#8221;  on the State<\/p>\n<p>Gove1&#8217;nyn1enti&#8217;tr} &#8216;V_pei5rnii_4la1;i&#8217;cl es1.:al)lish institutions or seeks<br \/>\nfor pre~&#8217;priln1a&#8217;ry_ E-.~c&#8217;Iu.e.2it&#8217;4ilt3e:.1V &#8220;anti non\u00bbformal education. In<br \/>\nthe light llthel&#8217; decision of the Division Bench, it is<\/p>\n<p>needl;essc..t.o st,at.e&#8221;t.lhe1tl&#8217;t,he petition filed by Respondents 2<\/p>\n<p>.&#8221;tr) 7- lldifcl not suffer from any lack of jurisdiction or<\/p>\n<p> inscornpe.t.e1&#8217;1cet.o invoke the provisions of the Act to grant<\/p>\n<p>their-e1ie.l&#8217;  for by Rcsponderits 2 to 7.<\/p>\n<p>.   .y;1_:.Vi&#8217;2,2&lt;ji&#039;r1;5 ;&lt;,=x;&quot;&lt; 490? <\/p>\n<p>m\n<\/p>\n<p>6. As regards the next. contention. eoneededly.<\/p>\n<p>petitioners extended to Respondents 2 t.o 7 the of<\/p>\n<p>pay scales as applicable to primary school:__t.eaehe1\u00a7s*&#8217;.._.ir:.V<\/p>\n<p>aided institutions. in that view,..,o&#8217;I_&#8217; t,he&#8221;Vrnat&#8217;I;erh.&#8221;&#8216;rii.erely&#8217;\u00bb <\/p>\n<p>because the 2&#8243;&#8221; petitioner has oeieasioited i&#8217;o_u&#8217;si_nessvV&#8217;iiosses<\/p>\n<p>and is a subject: matter of dee_ision niakiizg ox\/e&#8217;11_jWh.e&#8217;t.jher it V<\/p>\n<p>ought to be liquidated  &#8216;in Conipar\ufb01 Petition<br \/>\nNo.180\/2000, that  more cannot<br \/>\ndisentitle  &#8216;t_.u(j~.V_t&#8217;1&#8243;ie&#8221;;frvvi1its of the order<\/p>\n<p>impugned. 5U&#8217;rirdoLavtj&#8217;t._ed1-y.._1.11.3first petitioner is the creator<br \/>\nof the Z3?&#8221; pei&#8217;tit}io11e.7r,&#8217; t:()&#8221;&#8216;rnar1age the affairs of the schools<br \/>\na.nd edutiationai in&#8221;s.t,&#8217;ivt t,it:~i.o&#8221;1&#8217;is;&#8221;&#8216;()i* the 2&#8243;&#8221; petitioner company<\/p>\n<p>and t.J;1&#8211;e. direc?t.i..()n&#8217; in the order impugned is against the 1*&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;p&#8217;etit.i&#8217;or1e-id&#8217;; The order inipugned Cannot be found fauit<\/p>\n<p>wit.h.i;   &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8217;71.  learned Single Judge of this Court in S.S.<\/p>\n<p>   AND OTHERS vs. THE MANAGEMENT 01:&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>  GANDHI VIDYA PEETA (REGDJ.\n<\/p>\n<p>tori<\/p>\n<p>BANGALORE AND ANOTHER? heid that teachers in<\/p>\n<p>unaided private educ2it.i()nal instit,ui.ions are eriti-t_41ei:1 to<\/p>\n<p>same pay scales  admissible to emp]0ye_e\u00e93_ <\/p>\n<p>equivaient posts in aided institutigns.<\/p>\n<p>8. Viewed in the light of theA:.afc\u00a7_re.said._deeisi&#8217;brii;&#8211;.iiivejre<\/p>\n<p>is no iegal justification f.()&#8217;a_\u00e9i1y  the&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>right to equal pay for equal  t1r1e&#8221;0rdeijf\u00a7impugned<br \/>\ncannot be said to be  $0&#8242; suffer from any<br \/>\narbitrariness s(}f\u00a21.s&#8221;&#8216;to    Writ. petition is<br \/>\nwithout rne.I&#8217;iii&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>sd\/~<br \/>\nJUDGE<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;V V  33   A.   &#8230;.. .. V<\/p>\n<p>_V   i*&#8217;;9:&lt;&#039; 33:; Km :93<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Bharath Gold Mines Education &#8230; vs The Prl Secy To Govt Pry And &#8230; on 4 February, 2010 Author: Ram Mohan Reddy IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2010 BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN BETWEEN: 1 WRIT PETITION N0.25143 OF 20o.2\u00b0{sv\u00a7.:\u00a7jV?&#8217;Ej&#8221;&#8216; E- [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-110174","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bharath Gold Mines Education ... vs The Prl Secy To Govt Pry And ... on 4 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bharath Gold Mines Education ... vs The Prl Secy To Govt Pry And ... on 4 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-08-30T22:51:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bharath Gold Mines Education &#8230; vs The Prl Secy To Govt Pry And &#8230; on 4 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-08-30T22:51:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1483,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Bharath Gold Mines Education ... vs The Prl Secy To Govt Pry And ... on 4 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-08-30T22:51:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bharath Gold Mines Education &#8230; vs The Prl Secy To Govt Pry And &#8230; on 4 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bharath Gold Mines Education ... vs The Prl Secy To Govt Pry And ... on 4 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bharath Gold Mines Education ... vs The Prl Secy To Govt Pry And ... on 4 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-08-30T22:51:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bharath Gold Mines Education &#8230; vs The Prl Secy To Govt Pry And &#8230; on 4 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-08-30T22:51:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010"},"wordCount":1483,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010","name":"Bharath Gold Mines Education ... vs The Prl Secy To Govt Pry And ... on 4 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-08-30T22:51:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-education-vs-the-prl-secy-to-govt-pry-and-on-4-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bharath Gold Mines Education &#8230; vs The Prl Secy To Govt Pry And &#8230; on 4 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110174","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110174"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110174\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110174"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110174"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110174"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}