{"id":110212,"date":"2011-03-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011"},"modified":"2018-05-26T18:35:02","modified_gmt":"2018-05-26T13:05:02","slug":"ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011","title":{"rendered":"M\/S A.M.L.Steel &amp; Power Ltd. &amp; Ors vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 31 March, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S A.M.L.Steel &amp; Power Ltd. &amp; Ors vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 31 March, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI\n                      Cr.M.P.No.1345 of 2010\n         1. M\/s AML Steel &amp; Power Ltd.\n         2. Ashok Agarwal, Managing Director of AML Steel &amp;\n         Power Ltd.\n         3. Mrs. Anita Agarwal.\n         4. Ankit Agarwal.\n         5. Ajay Agarwal, Director of the Company.\n         6. Bishen Singh, General Manager of the Company.\n         7. Om Prakash Jangir, Manager of the Company. ... ...Petitioenrs\n                            -Versus-\n         1. The State of Jharkhand.\n         2. Shree Shyam Minerals.          ... ...  ...    ...      ...Opp. Parties\n                            ------------\n         CORAM:       THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K.SINHA\n\n\n         For the Petitioenrs:       Mr. A.K.Sahani, Advocate.\n         For the State:             A.P.P.\n         For the O.P.No.2:          Mr. M.K.Dey, Sr. Advocate.\n                           ------------\n         C.A.V. on 03.03.2011                   :Pronounced on 31.03.2011\n                           ------------\nD.K.Sinha,J.         The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court\n         under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the quashment of the\n         order dated 03.07.2010 by which the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate,\n         Seraikella found a prima facie case against them under Sections 420\/406 and\n         120B of the Indian Penal Code after enquiry in P.C. Case No. 36 of 2010 and\n         accordingly directed for summons to be issued to the petitioners-accused.\n                      The prosecution story in short was that the complainant-O.P.No.2\n         filed Complaint Case No. 36 of 2010 alleging, inter alia, that the petitioner\n         No.1 M\/s AML Steel &amp; Power Ltd. had placed purchase order dated 21.08.2009\n         to the complainant for supply of dolomite for the cost of Rs.858000\/- which was\n         to be supplied by 15.11.2009. Pursuant to such order, the complainant O.P.No.2\n         had supplied dolomite as per terms to the accused company between\n         22.08.2009<\/pre>\n<p> and 15.11.2009 against the challans invoice and transporter bill and<br \/>\n         the consignments were delivered at its destination on different dates to which the<br \/>\n         accused-Company issued a computer print of the company ledger account to the<br \/>\n         complainant showing the balance amount payable to the complainant by the<br \/>\n         Company and its officials. The complainant further stated that though the<br \/>\n         accused company received the consignment of dolomite supplied by the<br \/>\n         complainant but the accused company and its officials viz. the petiioner did not<br \/>\n         care to pay against the bills in accordance with the terms of payment shown in<br \/>\n         the purchase order. The complainant on bonafide belief and in good faith<br \/>\n         supplied the materials to the accused company according to the purcahse order<br \/>\n         dated 21.08.2009 total worth Rs. 800325.35\/- but in spite of repeated reqeusts<br \/>\n         the officials of the accused company did not care to make payment to the<br \/>\n         complainant towards supply of dolominte.\n<\/p>\n<p>                      The complainant further alleged that he realized that the accused<br \/>\n         company and its officials had malafide intention to cheat the complainant with<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the very inception and to deprive him from valuable security and put him to<br \/>\nwrongful loss presuming that the complainant was a young business man and<br \/>\nshall not be acquainted with the business policy. He lastly sent notice to the<br \/>\npetitioner No.2 on the address of the Head Office and site office also through his<br \/>\nlawyer which was received on 22.02.2010 and 24.02.2010 respectively but in<br \/>\nspite of acknowledgement, the accused company and the other petitioners did<br \/>\nneither give any reply to the notice nor try to make a contact with the<br \/>\ncomplainant for the settlement of dues. The complainant informed the local<br \/>\npolice at Seraikella but when no action could be taken against the accused for<br \/>\nlong, he filed the complaint by furnishing all the papers and in that manner he<br \/>\nexplained the delay. The petitioners hatched up and pursuant to criminal<br \/>\nconspiracy cheated the complainant by causing criminal breach of trust.\n<\/p>\n<p>              Mr. A.K. Sahani, learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that<br \/>\nthe occurrence as alleged took place in the month of August, 2009 but the<br \/>\ncomplaint was filed on 03.04.2010 without offering any plausible explanation of<br \/>\nsuch inordinate delay. The complainant admitted that there was no written<br \/>\nagreement between the parties and therefore violation of any term and condition<br \/>\nof the agreement did not arise. No relevant document could be brought on<br \/>\nrecord in support of the allegation as levelled against the petitioners and at the<br \/>\nsame time no evidence could be adduced during enquiry to make out a case to<br \/>\nthe effect that the petitioners had intention to cheat him. It would be relevant to<br \/>\nmention that failure on the part of the accused persons to pay the alleged<br \/>\namount would not come within the definition of cheating rahter it would give rise<br \/>\nto civil liability, for which the criminal case was not maintainable. A criminal case<br \/>\ncannot be the recourse to release the amount due on account of contractual<br \/>\nobligation, the learned Counsel added.\n<\/p>\n<p>              On the other hand, Mr. M.K.Dey, learnd Sr. Counsel appearing for<br \/>\nthe Opposite Party No.2 strongly controverted the contention raised on behalf of<br \/>\nthe accused-petitioners and submitted that the intention of the accused could be<br \/>\ninferred from the very inception that they did not even care to reply the notice<br \/>\nwhich was sent to them calling upon to make payment of the cost of dolomite,<br \/>\npursuant to the purchase order made by the accused company. The complainant<br \/>\nhad filed several documents along with the complaint petition in support of the<br \/>\nallegation and the mala fides of the petitioners but not a single document has<br \/>\nbeen annexed with the present Miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 of<br \/>\nthe Code of Criminal Procedure, and such documents were intentionally<br \/>\nsuppressed. During course of enquiry, the witness produced on behalf of the<br \/>\ncomplainant though prima facie supported the allegation and the learned<br \/>\nA.C.J.M. having been satisfied with the materials collected in course of enquiry<br \/>\nfound a prima facie case against the petitioners hence directed summons to be<br \/>\nissued against the petitioners to appear and stand charge. The order impugned<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                       3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>recorded by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella in the facts<br \/>\nand circumstances did not call for interference and hence this petition may be<br \/>\nrejected.\n<\/p>\n<p>                  Heard the learned A.P.P. on behalf of the State.\n<\/p>\n<p>                  Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,<br \/>\nargument advanced on behalf of the parties, perusal of the oder impugned I find<br \/>\nthat the learned A.C.J.M. having been satisfied with the evidence adduced in<br \/>\ncourse of enquiry on behalf of the complainant found a prima facie case for the<br \/>\nalleged offence under Sections 420\/406\/120B of the Indian Penal Code in P.C.<br \/>\nCase No. 36 of 2010 and accordingly directed summons to be issued against the<br \/>\naccused to which I do not find any illegality, irregularity or impropriety in the<br \/>\norder so as to call for interference. There being no merit, this petition is<br \/>\ndismissed. However, the petitioners are at liberty to agitate their defence at the<br \/>\ntime of framing of charge by filing appropriate petition.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                [D.K.Sinha,J.]<br \/>\nP.K.S.\/N.A.F.R.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court M\/S A.M.L.Steel &amp; Power Ltd. &amp; Ors vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 31 March, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P.No.1345 of 2010 1. M\/s AML Steel &amp; Power Ltd. 2. Ashok Agarwal, Managing Director of AML Steel &amp; Power Ltd. 3. Mrs. Anita Agarwal. 4. Ankit [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-110212","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S A.M.L.Steel &amp; Power Ltd. &amp; Ors vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 31 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S A.M.L.Steel &amp; Power Ltd. &amp; Ors vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 31 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-03-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-05-26T13:05:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S A.M.L.Steel &amp; Power Ltd. &amp; Ors vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 31 March, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-26T13:05:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011\"},\"wordCount\":901,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S A.M.L.Steel &amp; Power Ltd. &amp; Ors vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 31 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-26T13:05:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S A.M.L.Steel &amp; Power Ltd. &amp; Ors vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 31 March, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S A.M.L.Steel &amp; Power Ltd. &amp; Ors vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 31 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S A.M.L.Steel &amp; Power Ltd. &amp; Ors vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 31 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-03-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-05-26T13:05:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S A.M.L.Steel &amp; Power Ltd. &amp; Ors vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 31 March, 2011","datePublished":"2011-03-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-26T13:05:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011"},"wordCount":901,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011","name":"M\/S A.M.L.Steel &amp; Power Ltd. &amp; Ors vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 31 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-03-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-26T13:05:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-a-m-l-steel-power-ltd-ors-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-31-march-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S A.M.L.Steel &amp; Power Ltd. &amp; Ors vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 31 March, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110212","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110212"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110212\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110212"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110212"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110212"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}