{"id":110403,"date":"2009-09-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009"},"modified":"2017-03-19T10:16:37","modified_gmt":"2017-03-19T04:46:37","slug":"gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"Gopalan vs The Kerala State Election &#8230; on 15 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Gopalan vs The Kerala State Election &#8230; on 15 September, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 20397 of 2009(T)\n\n\n1. GOPALAN, AGED 68 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTION COMMISSION,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE SECRETARY\/BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,\n\n3. THE SECRETARY,\n\n4. VENMONY SUDHAKARAN, PRESIDENT,\n\n5. ABDUL KALAM, MEMBER, WARD NO.8,\n\n6. SAJI, MEMBER, WARD NO.3,\n\n7. JOLLY OOMMEN, MEMBER, WARD NO.12,\n\n8. JESSY VARGHESE, MEMBER, WARD NO.1,\n\n9. ELIZABETH SAMUEL, MEMBER,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.R.T.PRADEEP\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC,K.S.E.COMM\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN\n\n Dated :15\/09\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n            THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.\n                  -------------------------------------------\n                  W.P(C).No.20397 OF 2009\n                  -------------------------------------------\n           Dated this the 15th day of September, 2009\n\n\n                              JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>                                                                   &#8220;C.R.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>1.The petitioner, the vice president of the third respondent<\/p>\n<p>  grama panchayat, challenges notice of a motion of no-<\/p>\n<p>  confidence against the 4th respondent, the president of that<\/p>\n<p>  panchayat.   The fundamental plea projected is that Ext.P4<\/p>\n<p>  motion contains a signature, as that of the 5th respondent<\/p>\n<p>  Abdul Kalam, a member, though he is not in India.                  It is also<\/p>\n<p>  pleaded that the proposed motion is vitiated by fraud.<\/p>\n<p>2.Ext.P3 does not contain the signature of Abdul Kalam. Ext.P4<\/p>\n<p>  is the Malayalam version of the form referable to Rule 15(2) of<\/p>\n<p>  the Kerala Panchayat Raj (Procedure for Panchayat Meetings)<\/p>\n<p>  Rules, 1995.     That form does not require the signatures<\/p>\n<p>  therein to be attested by any authority.                   Ext.P3 contains a<\/p>\n<p>  signature as that of Abdul Kalam. Ext.P5 is the English version<\/p>\n<p>  of the form in terms of Rule 15. That also carries a signature<\/p>\n<p>  as that of Abdul Kalam in the presence of the Consulate<\/p>\n<p>WPC.20397\/09<\/p>\n<p>                            Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>  General of India, Jeddah. Along with these materials, by now,<\/p>\n<p>  the 5th respondent has filed a counter affidavit, challenging the<\/p>\n<p>  very foundation of the writ petition and even charging the<\/p>\n<p>  petitioner of having made a false statement in relation to the<\/p>\n<p>  5th respondent&#8217;s signature.     He further seeks leave of this<\/p>\n<p>  Court to file appropriate application to prosecute the<\/p>\n<p>  petitioner. One thing is certain from that counter affidavit;<\/p>\n<p>  that the 5th respondent stands by his signatures in the disputed<\/p>\n<p>  documents.     With that counter affidavit, I do not find any<\/p>\n<p>  justification to continue the       interlocutory order issued<\/p>\n<p>  deferring the consideration of the motion.<\/p>\n<p>3.Now, the only issue that remains is the correctness of Ext.P8<\/p>\n<p>  decision issued by the Election Commission, taking the view<\/p>\n<p>  that a member who is abroad with leave, is entitled to initiate a<\/p>\n<p>  motion of no-confidence.     A member could be deprived of<\/p>\n<p>  certain rights if he proceeds abroad without leave. But if he<\/p>\n<p>  goes with leave, he cannot be deprived of any of his rights in<\/p>\n<p>  terms of the statutory provisions. He is entitled to receive<\/p>\n<p>WPC.20397\/09<\/p>\n<p>                            Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>  honorarium also. Deprivations, if any, could be only in<\/p>\n<p>  accordance with the statute. There is no prescription in law<\/p>\n<p>  disabling a person who is abroad with leave from participating<\/p>\n<p>  in a no-confidence motion. Hence, he will not be incapacitated<\/p>\n<p>  even from being party to the exercise of moving a no-<\/p>\n<p>  confidence motion. Therefore, Ext.P8 stands.<\/p>\n<p>4.There are two intervening situations. It is stated that there<\/p>\n<p>  was a by-election while matters were pending consideration<\/p>\n<p>  either before the Commission or before this Court.         The<\/p>\n<p>  question whether the member so elected is entitled to vote is<\/p>\n<p>  not an issue directly arising for decision here. However, that<\/p>\n<p>  has been substantially pointed out by the learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>  appearing for the panchayat on the premise that lack of clarity<\/p>\n<p>  in that regard may lead to confusion. It also appears that<\/p>\n<p>  apart from the motion of no-confidence that led to this writ<\/p>\n<p>  petition, notice of yet another motion of no-confidence is also<\/p>\n<p>  given. The question is whether both the motions could be<\/p>\n<p>WPC.20397\/09<\/p>\n<p>                            Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>  considered or whether the one that led to the writ petition,<\/p>\n<p>  which is earlier in point of time, has to be given precedence.<\/p>\n<p>5.Adverting to the different provisions in Section 157 of the Act,<\/p>\n<p>  judgment dated 17.8.2009 in W.P(C).23447\/09 was delivered<\/p>\n<p>  holding, among other things, that the situs of the jurisdictional<\/p>\n<p>  fact generating the prohibition contained in sub-section 13 of<\/p>\n<p>  Section 157 is the meeting. To hold so, it was further held that<\/p>\n<p>  the copy of the motion given along with the notice of the<\/p>\n<p>  intended motion becomes alive for generating the incidentals<\/p>\n<p>  that could arise therefrom only on its presentation in the<\/p>\n<p>  meeting, by the presiding officer, reading it out and declaring<\/p>\n<p>  it open for debate.    Applying that law,      the motion of no-<\/p>\n<p>  confidence, for which notice was issued at an earlier point of<\/p>\n<p>  time, cannot gain any precedence if there is also another<\/p>\n<p>  lawfully moved motion of no-confidence, with lawful notice in<\/p>\n<p>  terms of the statutory provisions, when the motion notified<\/p>\n<p>  earlier is read out and put to debate and voting, if necessary.<\/p>\n<p>  Therefore, if the authorised officer decides to hold a meeting<\/p>\n<p>WPC.20397\/09<\/p>\n<p>                            Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>  for consideration of both the motions of no-confidence in a<\/p>\n<p>  consolidated manner, it will not infract any statutory provision.<\/p>\n<p>6.Now, with the law as noticed above, the legal incidents<\/p>\n<p>  referable to no confidence motion arise at the meeting in<\/p>\n<p>  which it is presented, unless the meeting falls for want of<\/p>\n<p>  quorum. As a necessary consequence, all persons who are<\/p>\n<p>  members of the panchayat at the time of the meeting are<\/p>\n<p>  entitled to participate in the consideration of that motion.<\/p>\n<p>  Therefore, a member elected in a bye-election, after notice of a<\/p>\n<p>  no-confidence motion, is also entitled to participate in the<\/p>\n<p>  consideration and voting in relation to that no-confidence<\/p>\n<p>  motion. Hence, the member of the panchayat who came in<\/p>\n<p>  following the bye-election is also entitled to participate in the<\/p>\n<p>  meetings in which the motions of no-confidence would be<\/p>\n<p>  considered.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>7.For the aforesaid reasons, vacating the interim order granted<\/p>\n<p>  in this case and affirming the legality of Exts.P3, P4, P5and P8,<\/p>\n<p>WPC.20397\/09<\/p>\n<p>                            Page numbers<\/p>\n<p> it is ordered that the authorised officer will schedule a meeting<\/p>\n<p> of the panchayat for consideration of the motion that has led to<\/p>\n<p> this writ petition and also the subsequent motion Ext.R1(a), if<\/p>\n<p> that is otherwise in order, and put both those motions to<\/p>\n<p> debate and vote compositely. This will do complete justice<\/p>\n<p> between the parties. The notices to be issued shall be on the<\/p>\n<p> basis that the notices of the motions have been received today,<\/p>\n<p> i.e., on the date of this judgment. The writ petition is ordered<\/p>\n<p> accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                  Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                          THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,<br \/>\n                                                Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>kkb.17\/9.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Gopalan vs The Kerala State Election &#8230; on 15 September, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 20397 of 2009(T) 1. GOPALAN, AGED 68 YEARS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, &#8230; Respondent 2. THE SECRETARY\/BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, 3. THE SECRETARY, 4. VENMONY SUDHAKARAN, PRESIDENT, 5. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-110403","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Gopalan vs The Kerala State Election ... on 15 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gopalan vs The Kerala State Election ... on 15 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-19T04:46:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Gopalan vs The Kerala State Election &#8230; on 15 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-19T04:46:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":976,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009\",\"name\":\"Gopalan vs The Kerala State Election ... on 15 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-19T04:46:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gopalan vs The Kerala State Election &#8230; on 15 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gopalan vs The Kerala State Election ... on 15 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gopalan vs The Kerala State Election ... on 15 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-19T04:46:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Gopalan vs The Kerala State Election &#8230; on 15 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-19T04:46:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009"},"wordCount":976,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009","name":"Gopalan vs The Kerala State Election ... on 15 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-19T04:46:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gopalan-vs-the-kerala-state-election-on-15-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gopalan vs The Kerala State Election &#8230; on 15 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110403","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110403"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110403\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110403"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110403"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110403"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}