{"id":11050,"date":"2009-03-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009"},"modified":"2018-11-08T10:44:39","modified_gmt":"2018-11-08T05:14:39","slug":"xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Xavier vs Soumya Kuries And Loans (P) Ltd on 13 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Xavier vs Soumya Kuries And Loans (P) Ltd on 13 March, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRP.No. 516 of 2006()\n\n\n1. XAVIER, S\/O.EDAKALATHUR CHANGALAYI\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. SOUMYA KURIES AND LOANS (P) LTD.,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. M.G.SREENIVASAN,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.JIJO PAUL\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.V.R.KESAVA KAIMAL\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN\n\n Dated :13\/03\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                      K.T.SANKARAN, J.\n                 ---------------------------------------------\n                       C.R.P.No.516 of 2006\n                 ---------------------------------------------\n              Dated this the 13th day of March, 2009\n\n\n                                 ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>      The petitioner who was impleaded as additional second<\/p>\n<p>respondent in E.P.No.360 of 2003 in O.S.No.10 of 1999 on the<\/p>\n<p>file of the Sub Court, Thrissur has challenged in this Civil<\/p>\n<p>Revision Petition the order dated 22nd June 2006 passed by the<\/p>\n<p>executing court.    By the order impugned, the court below<\/p>\n<p>rejected the objections raised by the petitioner to the notice<\/p>\n<p>under Rule 66 of Order XXI CPC. It was held by the court below<\/p>\n<p>that the judgment debtor sold the property to the Revision<\/p>\n<p>Petitioner after the property was attached.<\/p>\n<p>      2.   The suit was filed by Soumya Kuries and Loans (P)<\/p>\n<p>Ltd. against M.G.Sreenivasan on 4.1.1999. The property of the<\/p>\n<p>defendant was attached before judgment as per the order dated<\/p>\n<p>14.1.1999. According to the decree holder, the attachment was<\/p>\n<p>effected on 16.1.1999. The petitioner, who is not a party to the<\/p>\n<p>suit, purchased the property as per the registered assignment<\/p>\n<p>deed dated 2.2.2000 from the defendant. The suit was decreed<\/p>\n<p>on 21.11.2002.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP 516\/2009                    2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      3.   In execution, the property purchased by the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>was proceeded against. The judgment debtor contended that he<\/p>\n<p>had transferred the property to the Revision Petitioner. The<\/p>\n<p>decree holder filed application to implead the purchaser and<\/p>\n<p>accordingly, the Revision Petitioner was impleaded as additional<\/p>\n<p>second respondent in the Execution Petition. He filed objections<\/p>\n<p>and objected to the sale of the property. The Revision Petitioner<\/p>\n<p>contended that he is a bonafide purchaser for value, that he was<\/p>\n<p>not aware of the attachment before judgment and that the<\/p>\n<p>transaction between the defendant and the Revision Petitioner is<\/p>\n<p>legal and valid. He also raised a contention that attachment was<\/p>\n<p>not made in accordance with law and therefore, the attachment<\/p>\n<p>is invalid. If the attachment is invalid, it is contended by the<\/p>\n<p>Revision Petitioner that the bar under Section 64 of the Code of<\/p>\n<p>Civil Procedure will not apply. If so, in execution of the decree<\/p>\n<p>against the transferor, the property now in the hands of the<\/p>\n<p>transferee cannot be proceeded with.\n<\/p>\n<p>     4.    Before the court below, none of the parties was<\/p>\n<p>examined. The court below considered the materials on record<\/p>\n<p>and came to the conclusion that attachment was effected in<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP 516\/2009                     3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>accordance with law and that the objections raised by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner are not sustainable.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5.   Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was under the erroneous impression that the burden<\/p>\n<p>of proof is on the decree holder to establish that there was valid<\/p>\n<p>and legal attachment.      The petitioner did not adduce any<\/p>\n<p>evidence since the decree holder did not adduce evidence. The<\/p>\n<p>counsel submits that the petitioner may be afforded an<\/p>\n<p>opportunity to adduce evidence and to substantiate his<\/p>\n<p>contentions. According to the petitioner, the crucial question to<\/p>\n<p>be considered is whether there was a valid attachment by<\/p>\n<p>effecting the order of attachment in accordance with law. This<\/p>\n<p>contention can be proved by examining the Amin who effected<\/p>\n<p>the attachment and by producing the relevant documentary and<\/p>\n<p>oral evidence. The petitioner submits that he is prepared to<\/p>\n<p>adduce relevant evidence, so that an effective and complete<\/p>\n<p>adjudication of the dispute will be possible.<\/p>\n<p>      6.   The learned counsel for the decree holder submitted<\/p>\n<p>that the attempt of the petitioner is only to protract the<\/p>\n<p>proceedings and to delay the execution of the decree.         He<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP 516\/2009                    4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>submitted that the petitioner having purchased the property<\/p>\n<p>after the attachment was ordered and effected, no further<\/p>\n<p>enquiry is necessary. According to the counsel, the question of<\/p>\n<p>bonafides does not arise for consideration in a case which is to<\/p>\n<p>be dealt with under Section 64 of the Code of Civil Procedure.<\/p>\n<p>     7.    Taking into account the submissions made by the<\/p>\n<p>counsel on either side, I am of the view, without expressing any<\/p>\n<p>opinion on the merits of the case, that an opportunity can be<\/p>\n<p>afforded to the Revision Petitioner to adduce evidence and to<\/p>\n<p>establish his contentions.    Granting this opportunity is not<\/p>\n<p>without any condition. The Revision Petitioner shall deposit a<\/p>\n<p>sum of Rs.85,000\/- before the executing court for payment to the<\/p>\n<p>decree holder as a condition for availing this opportunity. If the<\/p>\n<p>amount is deposited, the executing court shall afford an<\/p>\n<p>opportunity to the petitioner to adduce evidence and to produce<\/p>\n<p>documents. On failure of the petitioner to deposit the amount,<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner would lose the benefit of the opportunity granted<\/p>\n<p>to him.\n<\/p>\n<p>     The Revision Petition is accordingly disposed of as follows:<\/p>\n<p>     The order dated 22nd June 2006 passed by the executing<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP 516\/2009                    5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>court in E.P.No.360 of 2003 will stand set aside on condition that<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner shall deposit before the executing court for<\/p>\n<p>payment to the decree holder a sum of Rs.85,000\/- on or before<\/p>\n<p>30.5.2009. On failure on the part of the petitioner to deposit the<\/p>\n<p>amount, the Civil Revision Petition will stand dismissed and the<\/p>\n<p>order passed by the executing court will stand revived. If the<\/p>\n<p>amount as aforesaid is deposited within the aforesaid period, the<\/p>\n<p>execution court shall afford an opportunity to the petitioner to<\/p>\n<p>adduce evidence and to produce documents. The decree holder<\/p>\n<p>will be entitled to produce evidence and to adduce evidence in<\/p>\n<p>reply.   The executing court shall dispose of the Execution<\/p>\n<p>Petition expeditiously. It is made clear that on deposit of the<\/p>\n<p>amount, the decree holder will be entitled to withdraw the<\/p>\n<p>amount.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                            K.T.SANKARAN,<br \/>\n                                                 JUDGE<br \/>\ncsl<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP 516\/2009                      6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                           K.T.SANKARAN, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                   &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>                       C.R.P.No.516 of 2006\n<\/p>\n<p>                   &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;\n<\/p>\n<p>               Dated this the 19th day of June, 2009<\/p>\n<p>                               ORDER<\/p>\n<p>      This case is posted for spoken to. The office noticed that<\/p>\n<p>there are two mistakes in paragraph 1 of the order wherein<\/p>\n<p>mention is made as Writ Petition instead of Revision Petition and<\/p>\n<p>Writ Petitioner instead of Revision Petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>      These mistakes shall stand corrected.         In paragraph 1<\/p>\n<p>instead of Writ Petition, it shall be corrected as Civil Revision<\/p>\n<p>Petition and for the expression &#8216;Writ Petitioner&#8217;, it will be<\/p>\n<p>corrected as Revision Petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                    K.T.SANKARAN,<br \/>\n                                                       JUDGE<br \/>\ncsl<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Xavier vs Soumya Kuries And Loans (P) Ltd on 13 March, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRP.No. 516 of 2006() 1. XAVIER, S\/O.EDAKALATHUR CHANGALAYI &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. SOUMYA KURIES AND LOANS (P) LTD., &#8230; Respondent 2. M.G.SREENIVASAN, For Petitioner :SRI.JIJO PAUL For Respondent :SRI.V.R.KESAVA KAIMAL The Hon&#8217;ble [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11050","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Xavier vs Soumya Kuries And Loans (P) Ltd on 13 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Xavier vs Soumya Kuries And Loans (P) Ltd on 13 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-08T05:14:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Xavier vs Soumya Kuries And Loans (P) Ltd on 13 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-08T05:14:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":991,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Xavier vs Soumya Kuries And Loans (P) Ltd on 13 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-08T05:14:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Xavier vs Soumya Kuries And Loans (P) Ltd on 13 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Xavier vs Soumya Kuries And Loans (P) Ltd on 13 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Xavier vs Soumya Kuries And Loans (P) Ltd on 13 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-08T05:14:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Xavier vs Soumya Kuries And Loans (P) Ltd on 13 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-08T05:14:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009"},"wordCount":991,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009","name":"Xavier vs Soumya Kuries And Loans (P) Ltd on 13 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-08T05:14:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/xavier-vs-soumya-kuries-and-loans-p-ltd-on-13-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Xavier vs Soumya Kuries And Loans (P) Ltd on 13 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11050","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11050"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11050\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11050"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11050"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11050"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}