{"id":110645,"date":"2009-05-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009"},"modified":"2016-02-08T21:35:51","modified_gmt":"2016-02-08T16:05:51","slug":"sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri S Vasudevan vs M\/S S R S Travels Rep By Its Prop on 29 May, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri S Vasudevan vs M\/S S R S Travels Rep By Its Prop on 29 May, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala<\/div>\n<pre>M. EA No.1 1129\/2005\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA \nDATED THIS THE 2961 DAY OF     A'\nBERQRE, \\   2   4'\n\nTHE HON'BLE Dr. JUsT1\u20ac:1\u00e9;_  \n\nMISCELL_ANEOUS F\u00a5I4\"ESV3' I \"'2F\u00a7PPE\u00a7AL--_1\\ia&gt;. (MVP; T'\nBETWEEN:  V   . \n\nSIi.S.Vasudevan,  - 1\n\nAged about 45 years,  V V\nS\/0.SI'i.P.R.Subba.Rao\u00ab,.:\"\nR\/a.No.2\u00a3);A1V\u00b0*_'F1o\u20ac)_r,\u00a7  . \"\nKa1ikamf:aTeinpEe'St:1*e\u00a2t, _ \u00ab fa\n\n      \n   A_  \nB:\"mga1o3\ufb01;_-560?-2 026;. \u00a7 2   .  v . ..APPELLANT\n\n(By Si+i..\u00a7\u00e9.I\u00a7:i\u00e9.h\ufb01.a.VReei.\u00a31y 3.-,\n' \u00bb S1i.C1urugop.inath, Advs.)\n\n  'V  s; S;Ru;S.Trave1s,\n\n by its Pzopiictor,\n Rajashckar,\n\"No.32 1 \/ 3, T. S.P. Road,\n\n\" V Kaiasipalyam,\n\nBangalore-S60 002.\n\nVV ' '  The New India Assurance Co.L1:d,,\n\nNo.40, Lakshmi Complex,\n\n2*\" Floor, K.R.Road, Fort,\n\nBa.ngalore--56{) 002,\n\nRep. by its Manager. ...RESPONDEN'I'S\n\n(By Sri.D.S,S1'idhar, Adv. for R-2)\n\n\n\n\u00a5\\3\n\nM.F.A NQ11129\/2005\n\nThis M.F.A. is filed 11\/ s.173(1) of MV Act against the\nJudgment an Award dt.22.'7.2005 passed in \nNo.5323\/2004 on the \ufb01le of the IV Add}. Judge,  \n\nSmall Causes 8:; Member, MAUI', Metropolitan  A,=~eaj_\nBangalore (S(3CH--6) partly allowing the claim peftitiof1,L_for:__ \n\ncompensation 85 seeking enhancement of compensatigzzt.' 4. \n\nThis M.F.A. comm' g on for admission,.:   \n\nCourt delivered the following-\n\nThe appellant] claiment  --N._o.5('\u00a723\/20\u00a7()4 on\nthe \ufb01le of Court of    M.A.C.'I' at\nBangalore city, :31 for enhanced\ncompensa\ufb01c-xi;   'A t t  \n\n2:.1oWit'h   the leaxned counsels for the\n\nparties, heard'    disposal.\n\n V'  _ 5\"3.:_L:eaz'.\u00a71ed  for the appellant submits that the\n\n  working as a Cash Collector for cable\n\ncor:;;.teetio\u00ab1.1\"Vt\u00a3i33tier S. Rajesh on a sala1y of Rs.3,8(\u00a50\/-- per\n\n\",_n:1o11th,~.  T\ufb01bunal has not awarded any commnsation\n\nA X1' loss of earning during the period of treatment and\n\nt  rest at least for a period of three months. He further\n\n\n\nM.F*'.A No.11129\/2005\n\nsubneits that the claimant had sustained \n\nplater fracture with laterial condyle fracture of  \n\nthe claimant was aged about 44 years and the  V\n\ngot disablement to the extent of    ._\n\nlower Iimb and 10\u00b0\/o to the 'V V\n\nTribunal has not awarded  vtowaixds loss\nof earning capacity. V if as?  that the\nclaimant has stated  b.\u00a7:\u00a75j;~\u00a2V.\"  that as the\nclaimant     hence, he left the\njob.  awarded towards pain and\nsu\ufb01e\ufb01n\ufb01    is on the lower side and no\n\ncoe1pensa'eioh\"' .. heen awarded towards attendant\n\n    Therefore, he submits that the impugned\n\nI   may be modi\ufb01ed and additional\n\n may be awarded,\n\n2 ~   4.\" Learned counsel for Respondent No.2\/Insurance<\/pre>\n<p> tfotzdpany submits that the Tribunal has awarded<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217; Eeasonabxe compensation of Rs.S5,000\/&#8211; with interest and<\/p>\n<p>the same has been deposited and isaid to the<\/p>\n<p>Le<\/p>\n<p>M.P&#8217;.A N\u00a24..1Vi\u00bb1\u00a29;2oe5<\/p>\n<p>appellant] claimant and there is no  <\/p>\n<p>enhancement of compensation;  \u00ab<\/p>\n<p>5. It is pertinent to -1_;.1cx3.\ufb01&#8221;c;:(t&#8221;it\u00a71:V-at  htgts<br \/>\nawarded compensation in  pf   as under:<br \/>\n $ _ ._  &#8216;  ks-\n<\/p>\n<p>Pain and      25,ooo~oo<br \/>\nMed\u00a7ie:\ufb01::t!%xpe\u00a5:se:3t   ~  5,ooo~oo<br \/>\n     % 1o,0oo~o<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;&#8221;&#8221;  ~\u00e9;Ed.:&#8217;:1ou1\u00a7VSIiii1cnt<br \/>\n&#8216; cf-:xpc11*scs_ &#8216;o<\/p>\n<p>Total Rs.55,000~(}0<\/p>\n<p>  \u00e9ktxtxittedly, the Tribunal has not taken into<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;j_tI1&#8217;c salary of the claimant and no compensation<\/p>\n<p>Itas awarded towards loss of eaxnjng during the period<\/p>\n<p>At  \ufb01iatxnent and rest. Keeping in View the nature of<\/p>\n<p> i\ufb01t1j11I&#8217;i\u20acS sustained and \ufb01eatntzent taken by the claitaazlt, he<\/p>\n<p>could not have done anything for a pcziod of three: months.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the claimant was entitled for compensation<\/p>\n<p>L_t<\/p>\n<p>M.F&#8217;.A N0, 11129\/2005<\/p>\n<p>towards loss of earning during the period of <\/p>\n<p>rest for three months. The emplayer of the   <\/p>\n<p>examined. The claimant has pleaded\u00bb geh\ufb01ai-._  <\/p>\n<p>Rs.3,800\/- per zzaonth. In  <\/p>\n<p>satisfactory evidence, earnm Vgei\u00e9jf ._tl1e  f 4Be&#8221;SVe.fe1y &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01xed at Rs.3,000[ ~ p.133&#8230;&#8221;  isventistled for a<br \/>\nsum of Rs.9,000\/-  _ t\u00e9eernjng during the<br \/>\nperiod of treatment  &#8216;   Oi\ufb01cer has<br \/>\ndeposed    to the extent<br \/>\nof  to  :iower&#8221;li:a1b. In my View permanent<br \/>\n\u00e9isabhteeetot  be safely \ufb01xed at 10%; of<\/p>\n<p>the j\u00e9vhele  V_ &#8216;I&#8217;i&#8217;:1e  was 44 years. In View of the<\/p>\n<p>    by the H0n&#8217;b1e Apex Court in Civil Appeal<\/p>\n<p>1  .tt3&#8243;O,_348i\u00a7&#8217;i\u00ab200[8v.*:&#8221;on 15.04.2009 (SARALA VARMA AND<\/p>\n<p>(3&#8217;1&#8217;HEI2_E3&#8242; .,\u00a7&#8217;\/s.DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATEON AND<\/p>\n<p>   i\ufb01is a \ufb01t case to apply multiplier 14 and award<\/p>\n<p> eatxtgiensa\ufb01on towards loss of future caxnings. Thus, the<\/p>\n<p>    is entitled for cozzepensation of R&#8217;s.50,400[-<\/p>\n<p>(Rs.3,w\u20ac)\/~ x 10% X 12 x 14) towamds loss of earning<\/p>\n<p>capacity. As no compensation is awarded towards<\/p>\n<p>L_\/H<\/p>\n<p>M.F&#8217;.A No.11129\/2005<\/p>\n<p>attendant charges, it would meet the ends _c;f&#8221;~f:p<\/p>\n<p>awani a sum of Rs,1,00\u20ac)\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>Compensation awarded by thgz&#8217;    &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>heads does not call for enhancexai\u00e9pi &#8212;  A<br \/>\n&#8216;7. Thus, the cla1ma&#8217; D&#8217;V&#8217;VL&#8217;:ktVVV&#8217; T for &#8216;v\ufb01addifionai<br \/>\ncompensation as   &#8216;A &#8216; L H H<\/p>\n<p>Loss  d:11:ii1g&#8221;t}\u00a7:\u00e9  L<br \/>\n Qf  &#8216;rest .\n<\/p>\n<p>(Rs;.3,(;foQ\/-xaggjjg. \u00e9&#8217;   9,000-00<\/p>\n<p> (R;s.~3,OOI3&#8217;i-: x ;(29g;;&#8217;;:__12-x 14) 50,4o0~oo<\/p>\n<p>Azt\u00a7nd\u00a7n=t  J 1900-00<\/p>\n<p>3    claimant is entitled for additional<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9ompgna\u00e9ti\u00e9n of Rs.60,400\/ &#8211;.<\/p>\n<p>AA   in the result, the appeal is partly alkswed hoiding<\/p>\n<p>  the appeilantj ciaimani is entitled for aciditioznal<\/p>\n<p>L<\/p>\n<p>M.F.A No.11129\/2005<br \/>\ncompensation of Rs.60,400\/ &#8211; along with interest a1 t&#8217;ac rate<\/p>\n<p>of 6% p.a., from the date of petition till   ~ <\/p>\n<p>The Respondent No.2]II1sura.nce   <\/p>\n<p>to deposit the award amount    1<\/p>\n<p>months from today.\n<\/p>\n<p>The Tribunal is at  t9  order<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri S Vasudevan vs M\/S S R S Travels Rep By Its Prop on 29 May, 2009 Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala M. EA No.1 1129\/2005 IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA DATED THIS THE 2961 DAY OF A&#8217; BERQRE, \\ 2 4&#8242; THE HON&#8217;BLE Dr. JUsT1\u20ac:1\u00e9;_ MISCELL_ANEOUS F\u00a5I4&#8243;ESV3&#8242; I &#8220;&#8216;2F\u00a7PPE\u00a7AL&#8211;_1\\ia&gt;. (MVP; T&#8217; BETWEEN: V [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-110645","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri S Vasudevan vs M\/S S R S Travels Rep By Its Prop on 29 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri S Vasudevan vs M\/S S R S Travels Rep By Its Prop on 29 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-08T16:05:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri S Vasudevan vs M\/S S R S Travels Rep By Its Prop on 29 May, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-08T16:05:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009\"},\"wordCount\":517,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri S Vasudevan vs M\/S S R S Travels Rep By Its Prop on 29 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-08T16:05:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri S Vasudevan vs M\/S S R S Travels Rep By Its Prop on 29 May, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri S Vasudevan vs M\/S S R S Travels Rep By Its Prop on 29 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri S Vasudevan vs M\/S S R S Travels Rep By Its Prop on 29 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-08T16:05:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri S Vasudevan vs M\/S S R S Travels Rep By Its Prop on 29 May, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-08T16:05:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009"},"wordCount":517,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009","name":"Sri S Vasudevan vs M\/S S R S Travels Rep By Its Prop on 29 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-08T16:05:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-vasudevan-vs-ms-s-r-s-travels-rep-by-its-prop-on-29-may-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri S Vasudevan vs M\/S S R S Travels Rep By Its Prop on 29 May, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110645","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110645"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110645\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110645"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110645"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110645"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}