{"id":110762,"date":"2010-11-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010"},"modified":"2016-06-21T21:06:21","modified_gmt":"2016-06-21T15:36:21","slug":"jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Jayamma vs Sampangi Raju S\/O Rangaraju on 29 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Jayamma vs Sampangi Raju S\/O Rangaraju on 29 November, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.Kumar And Nagaraj<\/div>\n<pre>i\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nBETVVEEN\n1.\n\nDATED THIS THE 29'1\"\" DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2010\n\nPRESENT \nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N KUMAR\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARALI   *\n\nW.A No.2741\/2099 (LR). 'V  I .'_g., J \n\nSmt.Jayamma, _\nW \/ 0.1ate Channegowd 21. \nAged about 65 years.  ''\n\nSri Lokesh,     I \nS\/0.1ate Cha.nn\u00e9go'.vd--:_1,3';-,':. ' '\nAged about 40 yEarSV.  1\n\n,       .\n S \/ 0 ,1\u00e91tr.':j--v CVh3ann.\u00a2g0yvda.~,\nAged abmj:..3'0 yearTs._\n\nSrri'L'~..VaraIakS'hTI'1Rinma,\n\n1 ' \"\/0.H0nV\ufb01e'gov'cda and\n'  \/' 0,, Chaflnegowda,\nabout 38 years.\n\n \n\nW 0 Qbvindaraju,\nAge'd\"35 years and\n\n\" _D}'0.1ate Charmegowda.\n\nR\/0.KriShI1apura Doddi,\n\nI Ramangaram T aluk.\n\nRamanagaram District.\n\n\n\n[K-2\n\n6. Smt.Gangamma,\nD\/0.late Channegowda,\nAged about 25 years.\n\n7. Smt.Gowramma,\nD\/0.late Channegowda,\nAged about 25 years.   \n\nAppellants 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7 are _ A\n\nR\/ a.H0sah0nr1agana Doddi -Halli,\"  .\nMaranahalli Dhakale, Kasab_a'*Hobli,  ' --\nKanakapura Taluk, Ramanagaram .' A \nDistrict, formerly Ba_n{\u00a7alore'\"D'ist:'ic\"t,._ .. lgggfghffamg\u00e9\n\n[By Sri G B ManjL1natli2_1_;'Ad.vl;)::'\n\nAND:\n\nSampang-i\"Rajui.:'..  l' 'A\nS\/o.RangaR'aj;a, \" _  ._\nSince\u00bb cl'ea..cl:ljy \n\n1. \n\nW}! c.lrate\"Sarf1p_a'ng\"i' Raj L1,\n_ Aged. abou 5?} ye-a1's.\n\n   ----- \n\n _S._(0,late Sampangi Raju.\n T. ;A,gedl'ab'Qut 41 years.\n\n 1 &amp; 2 are\n\nR \/ a. Pailwan Govindappas\n\n Hou'sg,_'1~No. 1, Beedhi,\nV.  ., \"xi ivekanandanagar,\n'  'Ka_n?akapu1'a Town.\n\n\"Ramanagaram District.\n\n\n\n3. Smt.Baby,\n\nD\/o.1ate Sampangi Raju,\n\nand wife of Manedallali Arasu,\nAged about 46 years,\n\nC\/ o.Somashekar,\nChunchaghatta Main Road,\nRenukambanagar,   \n\n51\" Cross, Konanakunte \u00a5?ost,._. Af; \n\nBanga1orew56O 062.\n\n4. Smt.Venkata1akshn\ufb01a\u00a3\ufb011*na,\nW\/o.1ate P Ramaraju, ' _\nAged about 53:'3{ears;\"\"' * \"\n\nR\/a.Venkateshwara'Te3;_1tu.Roa.d','~ t _\nNear Arun Store, K Rt'vFL1{'am.\u00a7\"'--  \n\nBanga1ore356Q.-'G8 . :,:=\n\n5. Sm_t.).MaL{{u1;_a.'v '} M V\n\nD\/    \n      \n\n6. Vi\"-'Sri  \nS  o.1ate._P' Ra1'r1a\u00e9r'aj.u',\nAged about 29\" gzaars.\n\n \/o;1ate P Ramaraj u ,\n about 27 years.\n\n VSmt.1\\Ia'nda. .\n\nt'  5 to '7 are\n\nR,' a.V\u00e911kateshwara Tent\nRoad, 'Near Arum Store,\n\n\"  at K R Puram,\n' ,Ba'nga1o're~560 036.\n\n\n\n8. The Land Tribunal,\nKanakapura Taluk,\nKanakapura, formerly\nBangalore District,\n\nNew Ramanagaram District.\n\n9. State of Karnataka,\nRepresented by the\nSecretary to Government, a  9\nRevenue Department, '' \nlVIulti--st0ried Buildings, ,   ~ _ .  \nBangalore -- 560 001,   . Reisp0nde=nt's \n\n(By L S Chikkanagoudar &amp;l}'is:sleciates~f0rel;~5{l  \nSri M B Vishwanath,  and R9)_'\n\nThis W.A is filed  of the Karnataka\n\nHigh Court-..Acft,-.'_pra\u00a7,rir1g te set aside the order dated\n8.4.2009 p_a'ssed'=-- bjifvetllie.,,,-learned Single Judge in\nw.p.No,.,20e_i\"37.2003\"by*ire1.e:ng the same is opposed to\nlaw and quash the e:~cie1~ dated 8.4.2003 passed in Case\nl\\lo.LRF[A) .  'by the Land Tribunal,\nKanakapu ra '   \" Kanakapura, Ramanagaram\nDistrict,\" iorrnerly Baiigalore District, Vide Annexure--H.\n\n lv'l\"his  .c,Q_nf1ing on for orders this day, KUMAR J\n\nl  \" .  deth ed' fellowing:\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>,._Kl&#8217;l&#8221;1t&#8217;?:&#8217;:&#8221;V&#8217;A appellant has preferred this appeal<\/p>\n<p> is Challenging the order passed by the learned Single<\/p>\n<p> who has upheld the Order of the Land Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;and rejected the claim of the appellant. <\/p>\n<p>2. The subject matter of this proceedings is the land<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">bearing Sy.No. 122 \/ 2 measuring 24 <\/span><\/p>\n<p>Sy.No.155\/ 1-D measuring 5 guntas and <\/p>\n<p>measuring 19 guntas situated at,.H_alii llivanjd <\/p>\n<p>Chikkamudavadi villages, Kana&#8217;}~:ap[ur&#8217;a<br \/>\nRural District. It is the?&#8217;-&#8216;$15? of&#8221;  thatm<br \/>\nunder a lease agre_ementd&#8230;eif1&#8217;tered. intol-:.l:3etv\\7een the<br \/>\nparties on 1 5.   _ _  V Raju and<br \/>\n  }\\I0.l and 2 in<\/p>\n<p>the writ the  was handed over to the<br \/>\n1st   didxnot vacate the possession<br \/>\nof thehland after&#8217;:.1con1.p1e1;1on of the lease period, legal<\/p>\n<p>notice was issued as per Annexure &#8212; R2. Thereafter on<\/p>\n<p>d  159:74h&#8217;Aforcihlvllhe was evicted from the land in<\/p>\n<p> q&#8217;t1&#8217;CS1ti&#8217;Ol1:&#8217;1.._hIlifiict, the land owner has given evidence on<\/p>\n<p>1129.1.979A\u00ab:&#8221;&#8221;admitting the tenancy. Since the entries<\/p>\n<p>  made  the revenue records for the year 1974-75 and<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;hi&#8221;s&#8221;name has been in the Cultivators column in respect<\/p>\n<p>it    the land in question, the Land Tribunal as well as the<\/p>\n<p>k\/,a<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><br \/>\nlearned Single Judge committed error in rejecting his<\/p>\n<p>claim of occupancy right and committed serious error in<br \/>\ngranting occupancy right in favour of SarnpanVgi.4:_lli&#8217;aju,<\/p>\n<p>who in turn had mortgaged the <\/p>\n<p>fallen to his share under a partition. The&#8221;Laridll&#8221;i%ribhnlal&#8221; . <\/p>\n<p>as well as the learned Single J<br \/>\nprior to the appointed date.._V:vt&#8217;herellis    L&#8217;<br \/>\nshow that the appellar1tspe..vvlgA3&#8217;i*e &#8220;in.  and in<br \/>\ncultivation of the lar1ld:lli_r1  therefore merely<\/p>\n<p>on the admission ofjthe  even the evidence of<\/p>\n<p>the sol  the occupancy right<br \/>\ncannot the claim of the appellants<\/p>\n<p>was &#8211;.rejected. &#8216;vsikggrieved by the same, the appellants<\/p>\n<p> &#8221; . have E&#8217;preierred  &#8216;appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>I    &#8216;V-l;ea1&#8217;n.ed&#8221;counsel for the appellants submitted that<\/p>\n<p>the 1:4 &#8216;i&#8217;espondent even though he is not in possession<\/p>\n<p> A. and enjoyment of the land in question, he has not tiled<\/p>\n<p>7:lp&#8217;roper application in Form No.7 and he tampered Form<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">7<\/span><br \/>\nNo.7 as noticed by the Authority. When once mutation<\/p>\n<p>entries are made in the name of the appellant for the<\/p>\n<p>year 1974-75 onwards and the owner adrniVts&lt;&lt;l_:&#039;it=hat<\/p>\n<p>Channegowda, the husband of the 18&#039; <\/p>\n<p>father of appellants No.2 to  tenarxtl&#039;_&#039;:as&quot;&#039;:oi1V the <\/p>\n<p>appointed date, which evidence.&#039;is1&#039;_&#039;eo&#039;rrob_o&#039;rate\u00a7i :b3I.&quot;l&quot;the<\/p>\n<p>Ir<\/p>\n<p>evidence of the adjoining ofthee1\u00a71ii.Fl\u00a7:..;&quot;:l7he&quot;lLancl.it<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal as well as the Iea..rne&#039;d_ Single&#039; Ju.dge:lwere not<br \/>\njustified in rejectingfhe  thepappellants and<\/p>\n<p>upheld the c1.ain1_of   We do not see<\/p>\n<p>any   suhrnission. It is specifically<br \/>\npleaded that  the husband of the 181<\/p>\n<p>appellantlllaridfather of appellants No.2 to 7 was the<\/p>\n<p>  fi\ufb01pthellllllands in question since 1957-58.<\/p>\n<p>   to the appointed date, there is no<\/p>\n<p>rI1&quot;utat.1oriV:entries in the RTC and there is no receipt<\/p>\n<p>  having&#039; paid rent to the landlord. There is no material<\/p>\n<p> show that neither he has grown the Crops nor he has<\/p>\n<p>it &quot; paid rent to the landlord nor in any way he has enjoyed<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">8<\/span><br \/>\nthe property in question. From the fact it is clear that<\/p>\n<p>his name appears after the appointed date. In those<\/p>\n<p>circumstances, the two fact finding authorit&#8217;1esi~.V_on<\/p>\n<p>appreciation of the material on record have_.rec&#8217;oi*wdfe&#8211;d&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>categorical finding that he has__fai_led  <\/p>\n<p>case of tenancy prior to the ldateioi&#8221; appointed:&#8221;ii&#8217;-date.<\/p>\n<p>Hence, we do not see anyherror cor&#8217;m\u00a2n1t;tedv.Vby_:t&#8217;1*ie1&#8243;;i andw &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>do not find any justi\ufb01catiopn&#8212;-to&#8217;-interfere&#8221;wiithsthe order<\/p>\n<p>passed by the  fxccordingiy, the<\/p>\n<p>appeal is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7\u00a7<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;S\u00e9.;&#8217;f&#8221;&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>RIDGE<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>IUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Jayamma vs Sampangi Raju S\/O Rangaraju on 29 November, 2010 Author: N.Kumar And Nagaraj i IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BETVVEEN 1. DATED THIS THE 29&#8217;1&#8243;&#8221; DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2010 PRESENT THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE N KUMAR THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARALI * W.A No.2741\/2099 (LR). &#8216;V I .&#8217;_g., [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-110762","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Jayamma vs Sampangi Raju S\/O Rangaraju on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jayamma vs Sampangi Raju S\/O Rangaraju on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-21T15:36:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Jayamma vs Sampangi Raju S\\\/O Rangaraju on 29 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-21T15:36:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":653,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Jayamma vs Sampangi Raju S\\\/O Rangaraju on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-21T15:36:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jayamma vs Sampangi Raju S\\\/O Rangaraju on 29 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jayamma vs Sampangi Raju S\/O Rangaraju on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jayamma vs Sampangi Raju S\/O Rangaraju on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-21T15:36:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Jayamma vs Sampangi Raju S\/O Rangaraju on 29 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-21T15:36:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010"},"wordCount":653,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010","name":"Jayamma vs Sampangi Raju S\/O Rangaraju on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-21T15:36:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayamma-vs-sampangi-raju-so-rangaraju-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jayamma vs Sampangi Raju S\/O Rangaraju on 29 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110762","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110762"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110762\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110762"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110762"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110762"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}