{"id":110848,"date":"2008-06-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008"},"modified":"2018-08-16T10:37:03","modified_gmt":"2018-08-16T05:07:03","slug":"the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Nagappa Ningappa … on 26 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Nagappa Ningappa … on 26 June, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Registrar Judicial<\/div>\n
\ufb01r\n\n,.o.\n\n   _'\u00a7Yv.\u00ab'\/LC\/\u00a7.Q\/Ext;-,9.\n\nI . 'W'-V \u00bb-'t_\n. IQ}. *5 2' 4\n'\u00a343 \/51.510?\n\n1 \u00ae C.\u00a311\/l(.G\u00bb';\"'l._e.C9 Lp--!oQa. C \n 3-3-_2_Qn_3g___\n\nMI-'A 7080104 and   H\n--  ' ' -F\u00e9rjlaks\n\nn\n\n ~.   <5', -\ufb01ixi \u00ab\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT. .iiA1\\i(\u00a7T\u00a71gOi\u00a7E' ; Ak   7\nDATED THIS THE 7"' DAY 0F..1\u00a7'EBRU_}{R'!{  f    A\nPRESENT '   L x   L\n\nAI~Ii.:i_   A\nTHE HoN*m;;H   NAGARAJ\n\nIvmgx.   I   ND. 94 i ziiiis\nM.F.A. No. em.(,\u00b0m:;D. No. 9512005\nM.F.A. No. "mm  (3303. No. 95 I 2005\nM Ir A He. 7\u00a2.,-am   (,'!l.0l.l. N1): 97 129;:\n\nETC.' II II\n\nM.F.A. N6; 3154 1 2001 cm. cnon. No. 172 I 2005\n\n_ No. 3i'55f 2?I'i*i, N1'.F.A. N0. alas I auu-T A1V'\ufb01\n' '  _ M.F'.A-a.ANa.A3157 \n\nnIi~rI*\\iii.A_rar.2I.rrgovEAns,\n  * 1.\"?! \".*;'.':'\u00a7\u00b0';\"\"*\n]T)?\u00e9\u00a3':ri31:3':l,.K0r. .. cnoss-oasacron\n\n%___<"'f'*-------.\n\n\n\nUp'\n\nMBA muuma and \n\n'I1iESPEClALLANDAOQUlSII'IONOFFICl\u00a7:1?.,    \n\nBILAGI. .; A91\u00e9ELLANT   \n\nIn mink N0. omens:\n\n1.  SIG\nKALLAMBHATTAJOSHL k   %    \nAGEDABOUTBS   '\n\n2. v1-gnmmsu sic  a \n\nAoenanotjrosxnzmgs, % \n\n3. KASHlNA'i'.H8iU     %\nKALLAMBHATTAJQSHL.  \nAGED .A.Iar..~v.,I1*'.rE.A~.1m;  \n\nV'A..TAL:Bi'l.A(31       '\nD_1sT:BAGAu<(xr. <. .. "' cs" "aniiwraas\n\n""--'.--___ A,'-II  'A\n . I-455513 _\n\n  Y '  'S?EClALLAND AoQU'1sTn "N ""F"iC'ER.\n\n  .. APPELLANT\n\n   5s1a_1, \nA s\/o HANAMANTH BILAGI,\n\n%ED AP:'u"u"I' 55 V'""*9\n\n' Id' 1%!\n\n4...\n\n'4 '7'-awn-5?.-5\n\nL \n\n\n\n.2' '4\u00bb\n\n:4\n\nrun' (!'l'h'l 1 'lT|lA1(A'kl"l"'l-'I\nD1 051 I...\u00bb Ulvlnnx-u\n\nAug- an AI! 1"\n\nsin. I&A1.1.ArrF\\.\nSIO BHEEMAPPA BILAGL\nAGED AKJUT 50 YEARS.\n\nSR1. SADAPPA.\n\nnan -In-IIUIHIQI I Aihll I T)" Af'1'I'\n\nSID H1-usnmnrrn Dlhnun,\n\nAGED ABOUT 48 YEARS.\n\nSRL B.A_SA__PPA \nSIO BHEEMAPPA BI1.A(31;'* ~ ._\n\nLl"5'B'l'\\ A'l'_1rI'll"l" Al _\nAUDI) \ufb02nvun -ta suruw,\n\nSR1. GOVINDAWI3-;.,       \n\nS10 R.A.MAPPA"BH;\u00abAGL \n\nvnAn&'~. . _ \n\nAGED    \n\nSRLS11.-!11~1'IM.    '  \n\nWlOHANAMAN'I'H.?V. % %\n\nAGED       %\n\nsax. c1=.=..4~.1e":~.?.4;:*!*:S;.% "    \ns\/o gmuamamn BILAGL\n"E9  k"'""""'**"'*s'\n\n.% 3&1 .MAL!I$$l*L._\n% em n-nrAn\u00ab:Az~11*11 BILAGL\n\nllli%16'\u00ab\u00a7l\n\nAGED  as YEARS.\nSMT...1'iJl.!LSAWWA.\n\n aw\/oH.amAMANmm1A61\n;\u00a2~ 5:31.29 A.BQLl'1'46Y_F_.ARS.\n\n       GALAGAI..l.\n\nTAL: BILAGI.\nDIST; BAGALKOT.\n\nA\n1 [|IfILVp an\n\nM!-'A  \n\n\n\n,' ",\n\n% x Aer-mABoUr3oYEARs,\n\n"i SR1. BM. A\ufb01\ufb02mi A1-':13 sax RAVI. s. B.A...A1!A_M13A,1gLBHA1TAJosHL% FL \n\nAGED ABOUT 65  ~~.. Q_\n\n2. sm. SHRISI-IAIL RAMAPISA 3    \n\nAGEDABOUT2,1 Y'BARf3';\"\"\"--..: % A\nnorm AIIESLU6   1     \n\nI. -.   ' V\nDIST: BAGAI .1(_OT;  _ \n1.. rrnon;'ai0.94t2m\u00a72:L\ufb01%     \n\n'I'\ufb01E 39301;-J;,..A.1~1IJA.cc;yI_:1;3rr1oN ovmcnn,\n\nU.K.P.. '   %\n\n   \n\n1.% sk1\u00a7)1'r;  JOSHI,\n\nAGED ,\u00a3'ii'\u00a7i'.iE:T Sf': 'I:'Enn.n\" M,\n\n  %  ..SMT..VLiAYAAN1LCH\ufb02iAG'\"N\"L\n\n\" V.-\"\u00a3.L\"\u00a7\u00a7'.:'.) .A.BQU!' 3.5 \n\n\"1('iJ'I\\riA'|'r.1-9'!\n\n \n\n L1. \n  KALLAMBHATTAJOSHI.\n A % ..ACf\u00a7ED'ABOUT as mus,\n\n  2.kAv:=.\u00a7i1<.A'rr:su s\/o\n\n' HAWA a'0'S"'m,\n\nA x v\u00ab~ A.GEDABOIJT65 YEARS,\n\n5\u00bb "\n\n.|.\u00a2..A..S- _LN.A_1'11 810\nKALLAMBI-lA'I'I'A JOSHL\n\nAGEE :'uEu"C:"u"F % YF.mw" 9.\n\nt-s{\\"'\\-.,_.mv\n\n\n\n-II\n\nAIIAI I\n\nTAL:BILA(JI,   "  D\nDlS'I':BAGALKOT.  .. TA _  \n\n-- avg-nan.-n. \ufb01fth \ufb01ijlill\ufb02-\n\nTHE SPECIAL LAND AoQU1srTiDN 'ff "'"';1i;**\n\n'amour- cg\n\n1. SRI.LA}{IM.N;  A  \nam  EE.A<E, \n\nAGED Amurkjss  '    \n\n2. sm.    \nS10 BHEEMAPPA, H  "\n\nAGED A..E.\u00ab';EIr 5.9 ~.=.'EA1.=E,. \n\n        \nA   s\/DEHEEMAEPA BILAG,\n A AGED  43 YEARS,\n\n   4. % s1i1.ADAsAEEA;%\nV 31-69' ._'li'5i'!'_-E':-l?2:'\\:i3'!.i"F\u00a3'\\ '\ufb01I"LAGI,\n\n1 AGED  45 YEARS,\n\n*  A  iSP;i;..QOV!.NDA.?P2';\n  VSIOARAMAPPA BILAGI.\nAGED Au-our '.*E.,....,m\u00b0.\n  *5. sm. SHANTEAWWA.\nA " W10 \nAGED ABOUT SOYEARS,\n\n7. SR1. CHANNAPPA,\n\nK',-Y1"-"'-:--s\u00a2'\n \n\n\n\nMI"A'?0tlJl04uIdooIudnd\n\n810 HANAMANTH BILAGI,\nAGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,\n\n8. sm. MALLESH.   \n\nEff)' HAN  BI':':'...:'-'\u00a31,\n\nAGED ABOUT 28 YEARS.\n\n9, EMT. TLJLJLSAWWA\n'Wl0 HANAMANTH BILAGI,\n\nAGEn%L*r4e\u00a51='..A.2.\u00aba,\n\nTAL:BlLAOl, %      \n\nDIST: BAGAI.1\u00a7C\ufb01'.v.__    aasronbnwrs\nTHE srwm \nBILAGI.  _    ...RESPONDEN'l'\n\n(BY sm  ;\u00e9Lo.A. FOR smo IN ALL CASES\n\n  -51:1. BM ANQADI )%N1)..sRI RAVI. s. BALIKAI, AT)V. Fran Gram\n\n % z.,L1;n, a\n\n' FFi'"'E'R.\n\n \n\n  %   ' .. APPELLANT\n\n  s'.:iLUMAKANTHAN, Am)\n\n" A 1. YALLAWWA,\n\nD\/O PBERAPPA MADAR,\n\nI-WW\n\nf.' -7.,\n\n \n\n\n\n.1',\nVP\n\nmum 7030104 \n\n1 1 A'I'h'I"!'l'Il'III' A\nMAKDW WA\n\nDIO PEERAPPA MADAR.\n\ngs}?\n\n51*'\n\nSAYAWWA\nW10 PEERAPPA MADAR.\n\n4. SHANTAWWA S. MADAR.\n\nUs\n\n, LILNAWWA, H. MADAR,\n\nnu-;1.\\nnA D AMADDA v   \nI't'Dl'I:I'I'l'\\l.\\al".ILlrI.|aI.annr--r V.  I\n\n'I'\n\n_GH.\n\nSHWAFFA    \n\nsm:-:KAP1=A    A \n\n399\u00b0?'\n\nYALLAVWVPPA i A\n10.RAW:;MANIEIC\u00a7\ufb01???\u00a73A3'i3*GAR*\n\npd\n-u\n\n'I\n1..\n\nA....AWWA \n  12  "'*..;;i;1..-3L're'.*}=A1J..A.1m..x1.\n'rzt.L\u00a3.I!c:LII.i4Ai;3L;TL%A&%% E\nDIST:BAGAL1\u00a7.0T -- RESPOND "I3\n\n    '(BY SR1. lm. ANGADI AND sm. mm. s. BALIKAI. ADVS.)\n1' V}   '  {Mm  ansmom\n\n*    r. syrscm. IAN!) A_...L-.1'1'10N omcnn.\n  IJ.KP.,\n\n(BY SR1 LUMAKANTHAN. AGA)\n\ngm\n{ \n- \n<\/pre>\n
AHIL<\/p>\n
j<\/p>\n
. YALLAWWA.\n<\/p>\n
we PEE”‘m-u-‘ “PA Man’ “an \u00b0<\/p>\n
2. MAREWWA
\nmu P!’_’.L1R_AJ’PA
\nSA’1’A’v”v”v’v’r’\\.\n<\/p>\n
w\/o PEERAPPA MAI)A3.’.. M   &  <\/p>\n
$4.’?\n<\/p>\n
4; S1LA.NTAWWAS;*1!9)EAI.)2\\R.:;  * <\/p>\n
U!
\nI
\nI\u00bb
\nE.\n<\/p>\n
iv-\n<\/p>\n
.1
\nE
\n..\u00bbP* ‘
\n\ufb01
\nE
\nD
\n.1’
\nD
\n6<\/span><\/p>\n
my<\/p>\n
PEERAs3_E
\nsA1DLIs_ABa”AP:1fASAB”BHAGAWAN,<\/p>\n
 9\u00b0 .~= 9-\n<\/p>\n
oAii3UsAB4prAsAB BHAGAWAN,
\nfAPP.A_SAJ_3 BHAGAWAN.\n<\/p>\n
k % 11. “”*f'”I$a”I’.’wT\\i-T*’z’A  BAJ..A.N’r9.I,<\/p>\n
 L Y ” %  ALL Animi\/o GALAGALI
\n % \u00bbf1′.A.!;L1!$.: B!L.A_C_a’r1; %
\n  Dzs*r:3AGALKorr. — RESPONDENT3<\/p>\n
 f ~ (air SR1. BM. ANGADI AND sm. RAVI. s. BALIKAL ADVS.)<\/p>\n
ll.lIEA.E2:.\u00a71\u00a7’1&
\n4-7″”‘*’s_\\–._,<\/p>\n
ii<\/p>\n
25<\/span>
\nab
\nii
\n5:\n<\/p>\n
,5!
\n5;\n<\/p>\n
B571;\/r E N-\n<\/p>\n
VVI-… IV \u00a2<\/p>\n
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFHQER _ A  A II    A
\nmen    <\/p>\n
(BY sm LUMAKANTHAN, AGA} A k
\nAND: D A<\/p>\n
A I)  D 3 V
\nIViEL\ufb01PA {‘\ufb01..%@Al-‘rA Emmi 11\\.I.’;. _<\/p>\n
Rl0GAL.AGALl L
\nBILAGITALUK. %  j   I
\n13Ac;ALxoTD1s<i1u~;:'r;\n<\/p>\n
“W 01”. B.M.;\u00a2.%mAn1  I .\n<\/p>\n
3%.\n<\/p>\n
II
\n4!<\/p>\n
H?’<\/p>\n
2.<\/p>\n
\u00a31!<\/p>\n
\u00a31!
\n. P
\nIll<\/p>\n
:2
\nD<\/p>\n
‘><\/p>\n
e
\n<<\/p>\n
l\ufb01<\/p>\n
\\-\/<\/p>\n
'l'HESE  BY 'l'HE APPl2'.l..LAN'l'8 U\/854(1)
\nOF THE LA   AND AWARD DATED
\n'1'.-'H3-'c PASSED IN E..A';',.;".'(..'_$.'2l!*..".!l, 217101, 21911.11, 229101 AND
\n1456\/00* -AND  MFACROBS ARE FILED BY THE<\/p>\n
 " \u00bb.   0R"!)ER 41 RULE 22 C":-C AGAIN
\n"  'FEE Jll1)GMEP4.'1' AND AWARD D'l'.22.l.04 PASSED IN LAC 1456\/01,\n<\/p>\n
7.] 45.7f200(‘–.\\,_ 1458\/’20()0, AND 1459\/2000 RESPFCTIVELY, ON THE FILE<\/p>\n
(EF  AIl9!}L.C’5!f\u00a7L JULYJE (SILDNE) JA_M_K_!L*\\_NDl,<\/p>\n
 AND CRG””‘. A’v”:.N BEEN HEARD AND<\/p>\n
 L TRESER’JED FOR JUDGMENT AND comma ON FOR
\n  PR,0NOU’NCEMEN’l’ 01-‘ .|Ul)GM!:’.N’l’ ‘mus DAY, Amu N.4(‘i’ARA.i,
\n‘  D J; IV)!’-.LI_\\.-“.|E–!?.I1.L|  PDLLQWLNG;<\/p>\n
C~’t-I-____<\/p>\n
BILAGI.\n<\/p>\n
“V at<\/p>\n
\/’ . 0 .  ~ r\u00e9qfg\ufb01\ufb02tiv Qvncntgg m’ the renlstmdent-crnsg_1\ufb01g_3;(_31-g,=<\/p>\n
MFA 70e0i04amiconnecuu._f ‘<\/p>\n
 \ufb02<\/p>\n
” 1 Ann<\/p>\n
(‘lull “W<\/p>\n
anneal ‘<\/p>\n
Land Acquisition Act (“hereinafter fef\ufb01lf\ufb02tiritt as    V’<\/p>\n
Land Acquisition Officer (hereina\ufb01er  as “the. SLe5i05*},
\nKrishna Project, Bilagi, aggrieved \u00abby    dated<\/p>\n
7.4.2004 and 22.1.2004 the respeeuyeiteairemjts miiL;A(i;Nm.217\/01 to<\/p>\n
2.001 ..:1.-d 145:-0 1457; 143;: mi: 14.59′: _\u00a3*_f_’u_\u00a7M;)  by the teamed<\/p>\n
A jji 1 ____;’.\\__.__<\/p>\n
Aau1.L’;ivii Judge (iieie’i:iauf'”ier rezemeu” to as “the<\/p>\n
reference Judge’:*).   7003 of 2004 and 3154 of 2005<\/p>\n
I the respondent_ e’Q]a”g’m ants’   respective cross-objection<\/p>\n
Nos.94\/05 to 97\/0; and 172×05 we “M1-‘.A.Nos. 3155, 3152 and 3157 of
\n rej  cietntsfiutye  to file their cross-objections. Since<\/p>\n
nu-an _nI\\:Anl:n.u:s on \ufb02int’ An than annulus<\/p>\n
 “1   uIv5″vuJwvuuun also nnvu un um nnluv
\nmm and’~a1’i the meat in question which came to be acquired under the
\ni   are situate in the same village, these appeals and<\/p>\n
\ufb02u ‘ ‘  \u00ab  are disposed of by this common judgment.<\/p>\n
it  ‘V  }Heard the arguments of the learned Addl.Govt.Advoeate and the<\/p>\n
i-Levine
\nU<\/p>\n
‘n-l-r—-w- u — – vwvu —- — – —r w———-.— V- —-<\/p>\n
‘-J’lF’\\d*-‘<\/p>\n
f I<\/p>\n
s we \ufb01l… -.-……… “Minn 34’l’}~cf_t.W-  <\/p>\n
,i\ufb02I_ _A.I_ AL-\n<\/p>\n
heard the arguments or com me side’: it is rue-tiu”e’d a’II|
\nreference made by the SLAO to the refereneeaillflso    i.
\nvarious dates of relevant noti\ufb01cations  tire’    u
\npossession of the respective lands    <\/p>\n
c.p9\\–F’<\/p>\n
respective respondent;-cisima\ufb01nts to   the market
\nvaiue of\ufb01ne larxds a.-..–*-=-  gee,  wine is disptlted
\nis the nature ofthe land   3.-e-.-…-. thw-en,
\nthe quantity of    price of the sugarcane
\nconsidered   at the market value of the<\/p>\n
     is that the<\/p>\n
5.9<\/p>\n
I    respective 3″-ts under acquisi’.i<.e-. as M<\/p>\n
   at the market value thereofat the rate ofRs.16,iiiiiii-<\/p>\n
  sales statistics but the reference Judge come '<\/p>\n
 .    said lands as irrigated ones growing sugar<\/p>\n
i  crop and in  the market value by adopting the
\n "nethucd by tel\ufb01r-.3 45 tc-.~.e cf 9.-.geree.r.-..e as per sere yield and<\/p>\n
V V V" ._   price of the sugarcane at Rs.756I'- per ton. i-ie  s\ufb01r\ufb01nitted that the
\nreference Judge ought to have deducted more than 50% of the gross income<\/p>\n
towards cost of cultivation. As against  the learned advocates for the<\/p>\n
<.—–'\\*'\\iT-\n<\/p>\n
 _*’<\/p>\n
respective respondent. – (ids:-objem”” ‘<\/p>\n
‘I<\/p>\n
though Exs.P.24 and F72, the yield     do?’
\nAgticultnre,which are not disputed by the
\nthe relevant year i.e., 1996-97 per  ‘of  <\/p>\n
wu Somme, <\/p>\n
P3?! 1<\/p>\n
ea-.,…. _.. price Em<\/p>\n
torus. ‘i”xie’y fa;-1-‘tar a’au.u’–‘-‘.*.$ %~.c”;t3-.”-.=-9.31.3, <\/p>\n
issued by
\nwhich ame also    that per ton ptice of
\nsugarcane    ps., the reference Judge
\n  unset. and therefore the market<\/p>\n
value …..’..-..r:-.’-3.-ad” at  94\u00a2-.t_.e;  -.s.:,1;.1’t.L(,lt.)t_)_I- pet  of lands under<\/p>\n
–  nit   and ii” “”136 raced”: m E m’.”.e.'”*…%
\n reepectld 9  need to be mod1\ufb01’ “ed  ‘y. ‘\ufb02ue iearnea’
\n      cross objector in M.F.A.3l54I04 further<\/p>\n
A_._.,<\/p>\n
 comm’   learned reference Judge committed’? “rum in treating’ 2
\n9   ostooo in survey No.2l4 involved in LAC No.l456\/00 as dry land
\n the *””-.-.e as wet. la.-ad me:-.’.9.e cf g.ree-.vi:-.g .eu;I.I..rce_n.e e_n_t_l<\/p>\n
9′   fore award inthatcaseaisoneeds’ motmcaiion.<\/p>\n
4. Onpcnxeeloftltesaidimpugnedconnnonjudglnentnitieseen<\/p>\n
um Exs.P.23 and pm which are the price has and l:’.xs.P.24 and 9.72 the<\/p>\n
r~””””.\/_’<\/p>\n
u .. ‘n.-g,,’__V n___A__’ ‘___ ‘LA A’ .’A’-‘ A. an V’
\nytel\ufb02 ceruncam 185000 93; use I.?u””‘u:puI.Um. s-us””~”‘u.s…ae-e age nee. <\/p>\n
huthet, as rightly submitted by the  s- <\/p>\n
cross-objectors per acre yield of   is  4}<\/p>\n
shown in Exs.P.24 and 9.72 as     <\/p>\n
   per  es  in an<\/p>\n
 i’)\u00a7v'”‘*-i Beach is;-:3!’ .. dated. 13:.Lt.It’_: id<\/p>\n
M.F.A.No.5’749l04 (3.59), tc  .i. was s  i’:\n<\/p>\n
was    ‘ an error in taking
\n45 tons as  the yield certi\ufb01cate was to
\nthe effect  was 50 tons during the relevant<\/p>\n
year. 1’-‘-.:.-‘.1-…-‘V; ester.-..=.-.!:\u00a5.i  migln\u00e9ll by the reference Judge in the<\/p>\n
 ‘l(‘n”iI’:ifJ6i”\ufb01.\\”a’6 5.”-Id efsaig-es.-‘% i:-.the<\/p>\n
 ‘undetjaequzi\u00e9iaien instead of taking so tons as  in Exs.i=.24<\/p>\n
  2 produced in the respective cases. Thelefcre,<\/p>\n
 esrenovsis-.3  judgment we anc of the considered view that the<\/p>\n
‘    eught to have taken 50 tons per acre as the yield of<\/p>\n
flier.’ V\n<\/p>\n
5. Aperusal ofExs.P23 and P.7l, price lists, issuedbythe Managing
\nDirector, ‘i~:sndi Sahaknra Sakkare Karkheue Niyam|the,’ Knalmamgm” ,<\/p>\n
c.-f””.”‘<\/p>\n
n\ufb01al \ufb01
\nIl\ufb01l Vulllllwvuiu<\/p>\n
which documents are not  it eeiiid be
\nsugarcane for the relevant year 1996-97 is  as  ‘is.
\ninclusive of Rs. sou\/. being aelnal
\ntramportetion expenses of Rs.89.3’5:.  _   H
\n,i-…\u00ab,:,ree_-me  eeuld be   the   taken the<\/p>\n
namely for the yeate 1994.95 e(Re.~?{vp\/-);  and
\n97 (Rs.800I-)     east of cutting and
\n inc of Rs.87.52, 15.90.31 and
\nRs.89.35     M<\/p>\n
6. whi\u00a7e._4r%efe.-:9-\u00a7.=:gut.<:  ..f 9.1g'en_ne 1.1.1.19.– by Lhe learned<\/p>\n
._._..I .. -….-I 1.'… AL-<\/p>\n
    ee \ufb01ne  shown in i:’.x.i’23  ieameu cc-cm… IUI um
\nV   average price of Rs.826\/- per ton of sugarcane
\n % _ ceeeeene  em at by takingthe average ofthe prices at Rs.787.52,<\/p>\n
9   c”‘.’i.E-eAA,5!(9.9 es: -_ _e,a_:a9;s;  for the years 1994-95, 1995-96 and<\/p>\n
 If:\n<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
‘   “‘iii”‘i “ices  irceiaeive sf M~’w… of e*.:’.ti::g .e.’-4′. ‘.r%-0-‘*..,……….!-\ufb01esa.<\/p>\n
‘ n-” .1<\/p>\n
h V     the ieamed’  supporiingihe View
\nbythereferenee Judge submiuedlhatthe eostofeuttingandtrampmtetion
\nofsugareane wouldbe paidtothe farmers only if they deliverthe supreme<\/p>\n
\u00a2…..r-~—\u00ab-‘-\n<\/p>\n
u <\/p>\n
MFA 7080\/04 and connected<\/p>\n
to the factory and therefore that ca-nnc M inc.-….._ i.– __e mice or<\/p>\n
sugarcane to be taken for determining market vaiue.<\/p>\n
‘7. Having heard both the rival contentions as to  ~<\/p>\n
sugarcane to be considered for determination: of <\/p>\n
acqune-J. lands we  of the opinion    <\/p>\n
committed an error in taker’ the average  for three.  of * i’<\/p>\n
taking the price of sugarcane during the.rre}ei**”ri’~ryeaa~ i.e;,vv.l9.ri’es,., t_.e
\ncontention of the learned counsel    cross-objectors that
\nthe learned reference  ‘should    of sugarcane at<\/p>\n
-.s=_2(>!- per ton  for the said three years<\/p>\n
“”rti’-it is inclusive ”   and transportation of
\nsugarcane   he  iijiiierefere, the correct price to he
\nconsidered for   value of the iands under acquisition
\nat} the  beiiiRs’;~’\u00a2tt:0\/- per ton which is the actual price paid to
\n  the relevant year 1996-97.\n<\/p>\n
3;  and per ton price of the sugarcane are taken<\/p>\n
” ” -1\u00a7res_pectiveiy at_51’i} ‘*1 ” “id Rs.8t}’J!= the. total rnrnual gross income comes to<\/p>\n
  acre. If St)”\/in of this inerrne is d%ected mt-.’er…. c-st -1′<\/p>\n
  the net annual income comes to Rs.20,000I’- per acre. <\/p>\n
it it ‘i ” multiplying this amount with the multiplier 10 we get the market value of<\/p>\n
\u00ab~”‘..”‘<\/p>\n
the lands under acquisition at iv’.s.2 ir:’u:i’n’s ‘pee acre. ‘P-..e=~e.”\u00a2\u00a7,’ ‘oi? Lise<\/p>\n
considered view that the market value of’1he     *4″! >  <\/p>\n
the cases is required to be  ‘  ”  ”<\/p>\n
and the respective mponaem.  an ihese   <\/p>\n
the ea.’-.~.e 9.19413  41.1! Llze    __<\/p>\n
to 7-83 I 2004<\/p>\n
_– .. .L2 1:11′<\/p>\n
  the moss-uuguu\ufb01a  ‘*;j!,’;i>*’..45;.\u00ab&i.-.;;o 5?’)-<\/p>\n
I-\n<\/p>\n
and 3154 of 2005   vaiiie ii iii: rate of
\nRs.l,95,000\/-    and they have paid the
\ncourt fees   submitted
\nt.ls,ott_hey nee not  iralue atthe me of R32 lakhs which<\/p>\n
i- ‘-1 \ufb01'”‘6″nS   !!._sL\u00a7,l.ll_ll.).t’-  acre. Per ooutta placing<\/p>\n
 ‘.1’elian4;:ei.ot1LA”&’!1e de\u00e9ioion of ihe }ioii”o}e I-‘.1-ex Co-.3.-t \u00e9.-3 1!-…A 9….–e of<\/p>\n
;m.;;..~.;g:…. Ta\ufb01nry qfchaalnfigal-in  iilii lc 1575; <\/p>\n
learned.’    ‘ for the respective cross-objector clumIms’<\/p>\n
   claimants cannot be deprived ofthe reasonable amount<\/p>\n
e   havenetpaidtheeourtfeeonthe<\/p>\n
V’   a.-e e*..i*.!& gig obeetvedby<\/p>\n
 o  Hon’ble Supreme Court at para 3 oi’i’ne j1id\u00a7oia’n ‘use. the e*……….-=—-t<\/p>\n
nhouldmubedeniedthebaue\ufb01tofmluneedeonxaauationmemelybeoaue
\nhehadnothnitiallypaidptopetunommtofeounieemdtheapptoeehofthe<\/p>\n
,..(‘”1\/”””\n<\/p>\n
9 I<\/p>\n
court should not he too technicai in this regard. i*”ii'”v’e’i.-‘.3 t.eie<\/p>\n
we hold that the cross-objector claimants in the said
\nthe enhanced market value at this rate of
\ns*.atutm  less the amount which they have
\nto payment of deficit mart .ee on
\nvalue. x it  in it<\/p>\n
10. As to the  ;_Of   — ciaitm-..’:*.e
\nin M.F.A.Nos.315\u00a7,     they have not filed<\/p>\n
cross-objectiortc  in the market value of the<\/p>\n
‘lands u:”:r’*r mg.-.ii.i;ci*.i…u..*g   eeepeeeee eases, the learned advocates<\/p>\n
     these %e submitted that by
\nreason; of    they eouid not \ufb01le their c-reI_=a-<\/p>\n
 ‘. ” these  and therefore in order to render complete justice
\n   exercising its appellate powers under Order 41 Rule<\/p>\n
  rate a ‘v-“P-isle 1%  claimants in other appeals,
\n= <   we-J-J ire. V
\n" _ ' who have filed their cross-objections, "*'" '"– a-.-.'a…….. .A.s  this
\n  .._the learned Addl.Govt.Advoca:te submitted  since the reice
\nrespondent claimants in these MI~'As. have not chosen to tile  cross-<\/p>\n
ebjectjonc  further enhancement in the market value and they have<\/p>\n
t
\nI
\nI<\/p>\n
r-"'"""""\n<\/p>\n
MFA 7080104 and connected<\/p>\n
not paid any court fee they cannot be awarded enhanced market<\/p>\n
these nmealst
\n“I’l.’<\/p>\n
-wu<\/p>\n
seek enhancement of the compensation before @tppe1iee\u00a2oun  <\/p>\n
one granted by the Reference Court he haste tile    ;<\/p>\n
his cross-objections to the appeal \ufb01led by  by the<\/p>\n
 awarded by the  ” absence of such an<\/p>\n
‘””‘ ** *-” “”‘”~”‘*r-‘. to $eV~~app-ea}; “co-e.. wmtld not<\/p>\n
award in his favour.  A    re-determining the
\nmarket value. :’ reasonable compensation to a
\nland loser is the dutp ofthe.  __therefore the land loser, who would
\notherwise be  tovthe  on facts and in law and<\/p>\n
t..ere.m  _i.-.rou..d be _;-new res:ao..a_-e _or this (Joust to award  same,<\/p>\n
 same,.,si1ouid.not’oe “‘””ved on ti” technical ‘*”o”‘td t}”” $e” did not
\n._ V _V  _  ._ 3′ 3<\/p>\n
  ehoose.toi’\ufb01le or cross-objections to the appeals of the<\/p>\n
   the appellate court or that having filed such an appeal<\/p>\n
 has not paid the required amount of court fees. Under<\/p>\n
  the appellate court, with view to render complete<\/p>\n
 j\ufb02fuw<\/p>\n
:;;.’.”4.. 1. I
\n‘ I. ‘L116 1533<\/p>\n
cu.\n<\/p>\n
Hi
\ni’
\nE.\n<\/p>\n
:-\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
\nV
\n5<\/span>
\nQ
\n>
\n‘E
\n5%<\/p>\n
.er I…-tder \u00a2.)rd..e: 41<\/p>\n
Rule 33 of’CPC and award just and reasonabie compensation in<\/p>\n
MFA 7080104 and connected<\/p>\n
his favour despite he not \ufb01iing  o—-.-. appeai ct’ \u00a3.’!\u20ac.’.’i”.;-f..’._;–._4i\u00a3\\.!i_!VS-.:iil’l:3.._1l1e
\nappealofthe\ufb02ovemment. A  I V A4\n<\/p>\n
12. In the present batch of cases it
\nclaimants in M.l*’.A.Nos.7080 to 7033 and \u00e9lsrtiofizilc\u00e9  t’il;ttt:lii\u00ab.-pit
\nand 315″‘! of  hav’ ‘-not ii-.366′.   Bri
\nB.M.Angadi, the leamed Oolnlceiiiiftlrciai\ufb01”-1:’-“$3, in Lhes-
\nappeals submitted  cf their poverty and
\nilliteracy, could ttpt tp iii; by making payment
\ncf r.*eI.i.r! face?  tiny pleased to award enhanced
\ncompenauu”‘   — claimants by exercising the
\nappellate    4: Rails 3.3 9!’
\n  is, tl   M.F.As. in which the respondeiit — ciai-1-.a.”.’.s
\niiiiliyeiiileti   crow-objections and also oiltet M.F.As. in which<\/p>\n
i i   the  have not \ufb01led their ctoas-objections have arisen<\/p>\n
V   pattern andthe same  ‘u’rn6crthe’sc 6’ii’t”.t”-3a”.’\u00a3.’:.”.\u00a5’.%, ifLh.c
\n  ‘A iiirespondent — claimants in these appeals, who have not flied  <\/p>\n
objections, are denied the benefit of enhanced market value which is<\/p>\n
4!’-I-_.r<\/p>\n
4% I
\n(_—–…f ‘ .\n<\/p>\n
_4..-..|.-.I<\/p>\n
MFA   ourlllnnuu’<\/p>\n
awarded in favour of all the tespondem – claimants in oiiioi <\/p>\n
ground that they have \ufb01led their cross-objections
\noisimsois have not done so, it would result  iiosioos ‘
\nthis  -seize -rm \u00ab.I.i’w. sis  of Anioio <\/p>\n
India  provides  oi-goose”.–..=\u00ab.issiijiFos ssoss-L-.~.g   so i<\/p>\n
_- .’I..:’I!4,!;:…\n<\/p>\n
denied to any one by season ofhis   disisemues. ‘r”iii”u”.e-.’,<\/p>\n
the interest” of the State so far asit    . 3 ofcouit fee by the<\/p>\n
by is-.ii_n,g   concerned to deduct \ufb01om<\/p>\n
out of the    such amount of court
\nfee as they  he   to %o”sit the some it-.t.c the C-..u.rts<\/p>\n
‘l’hetefore, we   View that the respondent – ciaimants <\/p>\n
 ltiiil-‘,Ail\u00a7los;3l.5:’>,..3l5iV tt\ufb01ti”3l57 of2004, who have not filed their cross-<\/p>\n
  be entitled to receive the same amount of<\/p>\n
V     at tho oiiiisnooa rate ofmarket value for theit<\/p>\n
AL-\n<\/p>\n
‘ ”   as use rcwcit\ufb01tit = cleirt-.st.’-ts in ethos’ appeals are<\/p>\n
14. so far as cross-objection No. 17212005 in M.F.A.3i54iti4 is<\/p>\n
 –\u00ab iiconcerned the \ufb01irther contention of the learned counsel for the cross-<\/p>\n
cb_I;ectot’s  is that the learned reference Judge committed serious<\/p>\n
._._i:’*–;—-“‘
\n‘\u00a7 <\/p>\n
MFA 7080\/04 and connected<\/p>\n
error in heiding that an “‘x’te-in cf two aeres e. la… …….
\nextent of 6 acres 38 guntas in Sy.No. 37:14 invoived in L
\ndry land and in determining its and tll\ufb02rk\ufb01. value  @r
\n93,000\/- per acre. As against this   ii
\n. submitted that based on the oral  11.1e–i3
\nreference J-edge rigitly erri  the   Agmibfb acres 38
\ngames of hard in survey No\ufb01 19\u00a2    i
\nand the remaining ei:terIt._cf    it\n<\/p>\n
14. As    14 totally measuring’ 6
\nacres 38 guntas   reference Judge at para No.13
\nof the    the record of rights, pertaining to
\nthe said iarid   sag-area-.e in an  of 4 acres
\n    maize and jowar crops in the r'”isir””*
\n of  and therefore the claimants are entitled to the market
\nvaliie.\u00bb’iitVlis.93,0()()\/- per acre in respect of the said two acres of<\/p>\n
  _ V_  i  asitheiiseme was dry land.<\/p>\n
A  the entire 6 acres 33 gumas of land is shown as hhagayaih iand i.e.,<\/p>\n
irrigatedene,thoughsugarcanewas growninanareaof4acres 38gun1as<\/p>\n
H\ufb01fh?’\n<\/p>\n
——\n<\/p>\n
24<\/span><\/p>\n
MFA ?0li)i(l4 and <\/p>\n
and jowar and sun \ufb02ower crops were grown in an area of  of
\nthe remaining two acres. Simply because jowar and
\n  two acres of the said land the reference
\nconsidered the “*6 twe acres as     it
\nits market value on  basis.   should
\nhave considered in   the fwhether the eritire
\nextent of the said land as  er sugarcane instead of
\n were   period. Further, it
\ni– –.~+. we  tliat~any speci\ufb01c portion ofthe said
\nland    potential enouy or unfit for
\ngrowing we are of the considered View t…-I.t t..e<\/p>\n
market eeiue  respect of.two;acres ofthe said land also should have <\/p>\n
i it     e as the major crop as has been done in<\/p>\n
 e..,,__; 33 games of the land in the said survey number.<\/p>\n
  hold that me respoitdent –~ cross-objector — claimants in<\/p>\n
 L ”  e   M.l~’.A.N.o.3154IIl4 (Croh.No.i72f’d5′ are eiitit…-.. m the …._rl-Let value at the
\n Rs.2,00,000l- per acre for the entire extent of 6  :3 -1.i.-seas
\n     No.2l4, which is inclusive of the extent of two acres, in respect<\/p>\n
whereof the Reference Judge determined the market value holding it as dry<\/p>\n
,5——-~..r
\na <\/p>\n
 , urmefje it “is   that c”ost*t-objector e1ai\ufb01’:at”tts irt 1v1.r.<\/p>\n
8:?\n<\/p>\n
V:\n<\/p>\n
….t __-._J:.._I-. 1.- …-……1 ..-……..I 2..  ”;.,.;;_.a..
\nlimo. Atsutnumgly, inc uwtuu puuuu I  “\u00a33-53 <\/p>\n
modi\ufb01cation.\n<\/p>\n
15. In view of out foregoing tee ‘}tt\u00a71c4t:’t.V’iat’.’i.Ei:’tlte””‘~. V<\/p>\n
M.F.A.Nos.’7080\/04 to 7083\/04’, aistiitigt, 3155104.,  3i5″f!tH
\n  \ufb01led by the  are  respective<\/p>\n
f”\u00a20tr|n\u00a3I_l”‘|;A(1I’;%I  %   (‘Anni-ire % be aginurntl<\/p>\n
\\.avnn”\\.ruJwuu   ……….
\nAccordingiy, aii    and the respective
\n_   with costs holding
\nthat the  – eieimente are entitled to
\nthe market veiueet  teteei*iie.t2,oo,ooo\/- per acre with all statutory<\/p>\n
bene\ufb01ts 1;!<\/p>\n
…–…   tee, tite  e1_ree=iy received by titettt,<\/p>\n
|.\\__ .41.\n<\/p>\n
1.: I: A n….I.\n<\/p>\n
tl’1.e\\.aIUD.\n<\/p>\n
ieeiimgtizzztttieiittiietiie M.F.A.No.3l54\/2004 are entitled to market value at<\/p>\n
tiiis tee  dt\u00e9,oti,ouo\/- pa acre with en the consequential statutory<\/p>\n
 ‘   eoststhereon for the entile extent of6 acres 38 guntas<\/p>\n
K i  ASy.*No.iVi4 involved in LAC 1456\/2000 treating the same as irrigated<\/p>\n
–   i-Aim… ….t…t ct :………\u00a2. in }’tl_}.\u00a7_A_g%_31\u00a7_-5′ 350 out 31 “7 A4′<\/p>\n
QQKQGIJI _ ,, II
\nIII LIE l\ufb01\ufb01yultlt\ufb01ult “‘ Ilullrllll\ufb02 In 1 sun! In<\/p>\n
 _”‘v.\u00a7ti’04witohavenotfiiedtiieircross-obgeen” “onssitaiia1so’ ‘beentitI””edtot’lIe<\/p>\n
same market value at Rs.2,00,000\/- per acre of their respective lands as the
\nrespondent — cross-objector — claimants in other appeals are entitled. The<\/p>\n
e <\/p>\n
: \u00ab–\n<\/p>\n
‘3!<\/p>\n
MFA ?’.l84J.-‘LL4. ;-.:-..r! was-<\/p>\n
respective respondent –  in ii! these u[JpUu1′””””S \ufb01aii pay ttteide\ufb01eit  <\/p>\n
court fee in their respective appeals  four  iiom   it ‘* <\/p>\n
judgment<\/p>\n
16. The Appeals and respective erossfebijectiexzsi _  it<\/p>\n
aw.\\rt.l.i.1rI.g!y  casts! The respective awards  irifiterms<\/p>\n
u. ,_<\/p>\n
ofihis j’uu31I1″‘”‘e\ufb01i.\n<\/p>\n
  ii  SA I…\n<\/p>\n
  A “I 3”\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n
:3:<\/span>
\n‘E<\/p>\n
Sd\/-4″\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Nagappa Ningappa … on 26 June, 2008 Author: Registrar Judicial \ufb01r ,.o. _’\u00a7Yv.\u00ab’\/LC\/\u00a7.Q\/Ext;-,9. I . ‘W’-V \u00bb-‘t_ . IQ}. *5 2’ 4 ‘\u00a343 \/51.510? 1 \u00ae C.\u00a311\/l(.G\u00bb’;”‘l._e.C9 Lp–!oQa. C 3-3-_2_Qn_3g___ MI-‘A 7080104 and H — ‘ ‘ -F\u00e9rjlaks n ~. <5', -\ufb01ixi \u00ab IN THE […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-110848","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Nagappa Ningappa ... on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Nagappa Ningappa ... on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-16T05:07:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"20 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Nagappa Ningappa … on 26 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-16T05:07:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":3089,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008\",\"name\":\"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Nagappa Ningappa ... on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-16T05:07:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Nagappa Ningappa … on 26 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Nagappa Ningappa ... on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Nagappa Ningappa ... on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-16T05:07:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"20 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Nagappa Ningappa … on 26 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-16T05:07:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008"},"wordCount":3089,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008","name":"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Nagappa Ningappa ... on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-16T05:07:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-nagappa-ningappa-on-26-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Nagappa Ningappa … on 26 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110848","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110848"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110848\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110848"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110848"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110848"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}