{"id":110868,"date":"1984-04-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1984-04-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984"},"modified":"2017-02-12T06:46:34","modified_gmt":"2017-02-12T01:16:34","slug":"arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984","title":{"rendered":"Arabinda Guha vs Giribala Debi And Ors. on 9 April, 1984"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Calcutta High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Arabinda Guha vs Giribala Debi And Ors. on 9 April, 1984<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: AIR 1984 Cal 203<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: R K Sharma<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: R K Sharma<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p>  Ram Krishna Sharma, J.  <\/p>\n<p> 1. This rule arises out of an application filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Arabinda Guha &#8212; the petitioner owned  and possessed  some laud  pertaining to Plot No.   1549 of Mouza  Sultanpur.     Giribala   Devi  &#8212; opposite  parly   filed an application under Section 4 of the West Bengal Acquisition and Settlement of Homestead  Land  Act.   1969  before  the Collector, 24-Parganas, and her case was that  she had constructed a house on a land pertaining to plot No. 1549 of Khatian No. 537 measuring .04   acres  equivalent   to  more   or   less   0.016 hectare  where she had  been  residing     continuously since 21st June,  1952.    She prayed before the Collector that the said land may be acquired and settled with her under the provision of the aforesaid Act.    The petition went to the   Sub-Divisional   Magistrate,    Barrack-pore who, under a Notification of the West Bengal Government dated 27th August,  1969 had   been authorised  to  discharge  the  function of a Collector under the aforesaid Act. Tile Notification was numbered as   16314 L. The learned Sub-Divisional   Magistrate    had an  enquiry held by the Block  Development Officer concerned who submitted a report to the learned Magistrate.    The report is dated 17-5-1973.     Having  received   the  report   the learned Magistrate    perused    the    file,    and heard both parties and passed his order   on May 28, 1973.    By his order he allowed the application of the opposite party and ordered the homestead land to be demarcated, and settled with the petitioner Giribala as vested land of the State.    Being aggrieved the petitioner before me went up in appeal    before the Collector, 24 Parganas     The appeal was heard  by the  Additional  District Magistrate, 24-Parganas,  as   Appeal   No.    2   of    1973-74 under Act XV  of 1969.    By his order dared 27th of November,   1973, the learned Additional District   Magistrate,  24-Parganas,    upheld the order of the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate.     Being    aggrieved  the    present Rule has been obtained.\n<\/p>\n<p> 2.    Mr. Dhruba Kumar Mukherjee, learned Advocate for the petitioner, submits    in the first place that the learned appellate Court below was wrong in holding that the petitioner had admitted that Giribala bad been in possession of the disputed land as an occupier for more than three years after constructing a but thereon. Mr. Mukherjee also contended that the learned appellate Court was in error in holding that such an admission had been made before him. He submits that in fad, no such admission had been made.\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. Mr. Anil Kumar Sett, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the opposite parties, submits that this question cannot be agitated new because the same had not been agitated when the judgment was delivered by the appellate Court below. In this connection be draws my attention to a case reported in the matter of Kesbab Ch. Dutta v. Ballygunge Estate Pvt. Ltd., (1973-77 Cal WN 5C7). I have considered the matter. If an admission had not been made the proper course was to bring this fad to the notice of the appellate Court below. Since ibis was not done, I cannot permit the petitioner to agitate this point. Therefore, the objection raised by Mr. Sett regarding the agitation on this point at this stage has to be sustained.\n<\/p>\n<p> 4. Mr. Mukherjee draws my attention to lie definition of the word &#8216;homestead&#8217; as given in the West Bengal Estate Acquisition Act, 1953, because the same definition applies under Section 2(d) so far as the West Bengal Act XV of 1969 is concerned. Thereafter Mr. Mukherjee draws my attention to Sections 4 and 5 of the aforesaid Act 15 of 1969. In this connection be also draws my attention to the report submitted by the Block Development Officer, it has been observed in para 1 &#8220;that the petitioner Sm. Giribala Devi bas been residing in her house constructed on her purchased land i. e. C. S. Plot No. 1548 since 1953 constructing there of a katoha but and as per statement of most of the above witnesses it is learnt that since occupation, of the said plot by the petitioner, there was a sign board of &#8216;Sanjibani Ousadhalaya&#8217;&#8211; Proprietor Sri Gopal Chan-dra Chakraborty, who happens to be a son of the petitioner. The said sign board has Hot been found during enquiry.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p> 5. Mr. Mukherjee submits that this paragraph of the report has not been properly taken into consideration. Section 4 requires that &#8220;where an occupier has constructed a homestead on the land in his possession and has been residing therein continuously for a period of not less than three years immediately before the date of coming into force of this Act, he may, within two years from such date, make an application  in such manner and containing such particulars as may be prescribed, to the Collector having, jurisdiction&#8221;. He submits that read with the report, it would be clear that the applicant Giribala had not been residing in the case land but had been residing in her own house constructed on her own land. The person who was actually residing might have been her son, but he is not the applicant for settlement of the homestead land.\n<\/p>\n<p> 6.    Mr. Sett who appears for the opposite parties raises two    questions.    In     the    first place,   be   submits   that  a   question   of   fact cannot be entertained in considering the application  under   Article  227 of  the Constitution.    In this connection he relied upon the  case of   <a href=\"\/doc\/1244187\/\">India    Pipe   Fitting    Co.    v. Fakruddin   M.   A.   Baker<\/a>   . Next be submits that even an error   of   law cannot   be  corrected  by   hearing  an   application   under   Article   227   of  the  Constitution, In support of this proposition    of    law,    be refers  to the case  <a href=\"\/doc\/26503\/\">Mobd. Yunus   v.  Mohd., Musraqim<\/a> .   As regards  the propositions of law,    I have no quarrel but the facts have also got to be considered   in which  connection    these    propositions    had been enunciated or  adumbrated by  the  Supreme Court.    After bearing Mr. Mukherjee and perusing the law applicable in this case, I am of the opinion that  the learned appellate Court below has sturred  over the point regarding    whether    Giribala    was    actually residing   in   the   case   land   or   not.   The learned  Court below  also  did  not  consider whether actual residence on the suit plot was necessary to succeed in an application under the  West   Bengal  Acquisition  and   Settlement of Homestead  Land,   1969   or not.    There fore,   in   my opinion,    the    appellate    Court below did not properly bear the matter and it is the duty of every Court    to    hear    the matter  properly   and adequately.    To decide a  case without hearing  the matter  properly, or adequately in some    way    infringes    the principles of natural justice.\n<\/p>\n<p> 7. Having considered the different aspects of this case, I am of the opinion that the learned Court below should rehear the matter, and decide  the appeal in accordance with law.\n<\/p>\n<p> 8. The Rule is allowed to the extent indicated above and made absolute. I make no order at to costs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Calcutta High Court Arabinda Guha vs Giribala Debi And Ors. on 9 April, 1984 Equivalent citations: AIR 1984 Cal 203 Author: R K Sharma Bench: R K Sharma ORDER Ram Krishna Sharma, J. 1. This rule arises out of an application filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Arabinda Guha &#8212; the petitioner [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[22,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-110868","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-calcutta-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Arabinda Guha vs Giribala Debi And Ors. on 9 April, 1984 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Arabinda Guha vs Giribala Debi And Ors. on 9 April, 1984 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1984-04-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-12T01:16:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Arabinda Guha vs Giribala Debi And Ors. on 9 April, 1984\",\"datePublished\":\"1984-04-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-12T01:16:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984\"},\"wordCount\":1152,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Calcutta High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984\",\"name\":\"Arabinda Guha vs Giribala Debi And Ors. on 9 April, 1984 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1984-04-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-12T01:16:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Arabinda Guha vs Giribala Debi And Ors. on 9 April, 1984\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Arabinda Guha vs Giribala Debi And Ors. on 9 April, 1984 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Arabinda Guha vs Giribala Debi And Ors. on 9 April, 1984 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1984-04-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-12T01:16:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Arabinda Guha vs Giribala Debi And Ors. on 9 April, 1984","datePublished":"1984-04-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-12T01:16:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984"},"wordCount":1152,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Calcutta High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984","name":"Arabinda Guha vs Giribala Debi And Ors. on 9 April, 1984 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1984-04-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-12T01:16:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arabinda-guha-vs-giribala-debi-and-ors-on-9-april-1984#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Arabinda Guha vs Giribala Debi And Ors. on 9 April, 1984"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110868","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110868"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110868\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110868"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110868"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110868"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}