{"id":110873,"date":"2009-08-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009"},"modified":"2014-07-10T07:00:48","modified_gmt":"2014-07-10T01:30:48","slug":"anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Anilkumar.R. vs State Of Kerala on 7 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Anilkumar.R. vs State Of Kerala on 7 August, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRL.A.No. 1150 of 2003()\n\n\n1. ANILKUMAR.R., S\/O. LATE RAJU,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN\n\n Dated :07\/08\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                     M.N. KRISHNAN, J.\n              = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n               Crl. Appeal NO. 1150 OF 2003\n              = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n         Dated this the 7th day of August, 2009.\n\n                      J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>     This appeal is preferred against the conviction and<\/p>\n<p>sentence passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Adhoc-II,<\/p>\n<p>Ernakulam in S.C.60\/02.     Accused was charge sheeted for<\/p>\n<p>offence u\/s 55 (a) (i) of the Abkari Act and was convicted<\/p>\n<p>thereunder and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment<\/p>\n<p>for a period of one year and a fine of Rs.1,00,000\/- and in<\/p>\n<p>default to undergo further imprisonment for a period of six<\/p>\n<p>months. It is against that decision the accused has come up<\/p>\n<p>in appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>     2.   The points that arise for determination are:<\/p>\n<p>    (1)Whether the materials are sufficient to convict the<\/p>\n<p>      accused u\/s 55(a) of the Abkari Act?\n<\/p>\n<p>    (2)   Is there anything to interfere with the decision<\/p>\n<p>      rendered by the Court below?\n<\/p>\n<p>Crl. Appeal NO. 1150 OF 2003<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               -:2:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      Points 1 and 2:\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.   Heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well<\/p>\n<p>as the Prosecutor. The learned counsel for the appellant had<\/p>\n<p>pointed out and brought before me the fundamental mistake<\/p>\n<p>that has crept in, which if accepted should go to the benefit of<\/p>\n<p>the accused. It is the case of the prosecution that the accused<\/p>\n<p>was found in possession of 26 bottles of John&#8217;s Old Marshell<\/p>\n<p>Brandy and 28 bottles of whisky and he was apprehended,<\/p>\n<p>examined and the articles namely the liquor were seized from<\/p>\n<p>the house of the accused. Now the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>appellant would contend before me that the chemical<\/p>\n<p>examiner&#8217;s report, Ext.P7 would reveal that what is examined<\/p>\n<p>by the chemical examiner is a liquid of 250 ml which is a clear<\/p>\n<p>and coloured liquid. A reading of the seizure mahazar would<\/p>\n<p>reveal that the sample taken is from the bottles which were<\/p>\n<p>there in the house itself. There is no whisper of transferring<\/p>\n<p>the liquid from its original container to another bottle for the<\/p>\n<p>purpose of sampling and then sealing. In the paragraphs in<\/p>\n<p>the seizure mahazar it is also seen that two bottles were<\/p>\n<p>opened, tasted and they were sealed after tying it with a cloth<\/p>\n<p>Crl. Appeal NO. 1150 OF 2003<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               -:3:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>and twine and then sealed. So prima facie it appears that the<\/p>\n<p>sample is also the original liquid which is to be taken. Now<\/p>\n<p>this gets support from the occurrence report.          In the<\/p>\n<p>occurrence report it is stated that 27+25 full bottles were<\/p>\n<p>taken and one bottle of brandy and one bottle of whisky were<\/p>\n<p>taken as sample of two bottles. So it will be (25+27+2=54).<\/p>\n<p>So prima facie from the seizure mahazar and the occurrence<\/p>\n<p>report no sample is separately taken at all.<\/p>\n<p>     4.    Now we refer to the forwarding note.            The<\/p>\n<p>forwarding note would reveal that what is seen as sample are<\/p>\n<p>(1) Sample of 250 ml original Choice Fine whisky in 375 ml<\/p>\n<p>bottle labeled and sealed. (2) Sample of 250 ml John&#8217;s Old<\/p>\n<p>Marshell Brandy in 375 ml bottle labeled and sealed. It is<\/p>\n<p>again reiterated that both these samples are contained in 375<\/p>\n<p>ml bottles. So what is sent for chemical analysis is the liquid<\/p>\n<p>which is taken in a bottle having the capacity of 375 ml.<\/p>\n<p>There is no case for the prosecution anywhere that from the<\/p>\n<p>place where it is alleged to be seized liquor had been<\/p>\n<p>transferred to a 375 ml bottle so as to take it as a sample.<\/p>\n<p>But on the contra what will appear is that from the total<\/p>\n<p>Crl. Appeal NO. 1150 OF 2003<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  -:4:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>number of 54 bottles of whisky, one bottle of brandy were<\/p>\n<p>opened and a small quantity was taken for the purpose of<\/p>\n<p>tasting and the balance was tied with a cloth, then sealed. So<\/p>\n<p>it is the original of the bottle seized that is taken as sample as<\/p>\n<p>per the materials.     But what is sent for chemical analysis is a<\/p>\n<p>bottle of 375 ml capacity. To crown all these things when we<\/p>\n<p>go to the chemical analyst&#8217;s report the liquid that has sent for<\/p>\n<p>chemical analysis is only 250 ml.           Suppose a negligible<\/p>\n<p>quantity from a 750 ml bottle is taken for the purpose of<\/p>\n<p>testing it by taste and smell then necessarily 750 ml bottle<\/p>\n<p>should be left with at least 700 or 650 ml of liquid in those<\/p>\n<p>bottles. But the chemical analysis report reveals that only 250<\/p>\n<p>ml liquid was received for the purpose of examination. So it<\/p>\n<p>has to be stated that all is not well with the case and the<\/p>\n<p>prosecution has not succeeded in proving the factum that (1)<\/p>\n<p>the liquid which was found in possession of the accused was<\/p>\n<p>taken as sample (2) that it was that sample that was sent<\/p>\n<p>before Court and ultimately it is also not proved that the said<\/p>\n<p>sample seized was sent for chemical analysis. When these<\/p>\n<p>things which have to be a chain, falls, necessarily the Court<\/p>\n<p>Crl. Appeal NO. 1150 OF 2003<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                -:5:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>has to hold that there is no evidence to prove that the accused<\/p>\n<p>was in possession of illicit liquor or liquor without permit as<\/p>\n<p>contemplated by law.      A Court of law cannot and is not<\/p>\n<p>expected to find out what is the liquid from the very mere<\/p>\n<p>sight. The Court has to rely upon scientific materials for the<\/p>\n<p>said purpose. As stated by me there is a total confusion and<\/p>\n<p>necessarily the benefit has to go to the accused.        So the<\/p>\n<p>accused is entitled to an acquittal on the basis of the benefit of<\/p>\n<p>doubt. Therefore the appeal is allowed and the conviction and<\/p>\n<p>sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge u\/s 55(a) of<\/p>\n<p>the Abkari Act is set aside and the accused is found not guilty<\/p>\n<p>and acquitted and set at liberty.\n<\/p>\n<p>     Since the matter has ended in acquittal if any amount is<\/p>\n<p>in Court deposit by way of the direction of this Court for the<\/p>\n<p>purpose of suspending the sentence necessarily it has to be<\/p>\n<p>reimbursed to the accused on proper application.<\/p>\n<p>                                 M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>ul\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Anilkumar.R. vs State Of Kerala on 7 August, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRL.A.No. 1150 of 2003() 1. ANILKUMAR.R., S\/O. LATE RAJU, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN Dated :07\/08\/2009 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-110873","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Anilkumar.R. vs State Of Kerala on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Anilkumar.R. vs State Of Kerala on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-07-10T01:30:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Anilkumar.R. vs State Of Kerala on 7 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-10T01:30:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":974,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Anilkumar.R. vs State Of Kerala on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-10T01:30:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Anilkumar.R. vs State Of Kerala on 7 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Anilkumar.R. vs State Of Kerala on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Anilkumar.R. vs State Of Kerala on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-07-10T01:30:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Anilkumar.R. vs State Of Kerala on 7 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-10T01:30:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009"},"wordCount":974,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009","name":"Anilkumar.R. vs State Of Kerala on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-10T01:30:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anilkumar-r-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Anilkumar.R. vs State Of Kerala on 7 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110873","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110873"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110873\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110873"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110873"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110873"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}