{"id":110899,"date":"2010-06-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-06-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010"},"modified":"2017-01-03T16:25:30","modified_gmt":"2017-01-03T10:55:30","slug":"mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Shri Sartaz Ahmad vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 June, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Shri Sartaz Ahmad vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 June, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                             Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n\n                                                                                            CIC\/OP\/C\/2009\/000140\u00adAD\n                                                                                                   Dated\u00a0June\u00a025,\u00a02010\n\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant                                    :    Shri\u00a0Sartaj\u00a0Ahmed\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority                             :    Northern\u00a0Railway\u00a0HQ\n                                                              New\u00a0Delhi\n\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p>1.      The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0 filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0 application\u00a0dt.1.12.08\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Northern\u00a0Railway\u00a0HQ,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        seeking\u00a0the\u00a0transfer\u00a0policy\u00a0of\u00a0JEs,\u00a0SEs\u00a0and\u00a0SSEs\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0information\u00a0on\u00a0\u00a0whether\u00a0the\u00a0transfers\u00a0are\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        being\u00a0done\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0the\u00a0policy.\u00a0The\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0Northern\u00a0Railway\u00a0HQ\u00a0transferred\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        concerned\u00a0division\u00a0on\u00a08.12.08.\u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.27.1.09\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0(Copy\u00a0not\u00a0in\u00a0file)\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0transferred\u00a0by\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0Northern\u00a0Railway\u00a0HQ\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        to\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0DRM\u00a0Office,\u00a0Northern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0on\u00a029.1.09.\u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        response\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0First\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0complaint\u00a0dt.26.5.09\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.\u00a0The\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Commission\u00a0vide\u00a0its\u00a0order\u00a0dt.11.5.10\u00a0directed\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0by\u00a015.6.10\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        to\u00a0appear\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a025.6.10\u00a0at\u00a02.30\u00a0pm\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0written\u00a0explanation\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        showcause\u00a0notice\u00a0issued\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Commission.<\/p>\n<p>2.      The\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit,\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0scheduled\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0for\u00a0June\u00a025,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        2010.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.      Shri\u00a0Mohar\u00a0Singh,\u00a0Sr.DMM,\u00a0DRM\u00a0Office,\u00a0Northern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Hemant\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Kohli,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        ADEE,\u00a0Northern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Ghaziabad\u00a0and\u00a0shri\u00a0Rakesh\u00a0Tyagi,\u00a0Dy.\u00a0G.M.(Law)\u00a0represented\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Authority.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4.      The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>5.      The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0complete\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0on\u00a024.12.08.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        A\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0produced\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0cadre\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        control \u00a0 is \u00a0 under \u00a0 the \u00a0 jurisdiction \u00a0 of \u00a0 Sr.DEE\/RS\/Ghaziabad \u00a0 and \u00a0 that \u00a0 transfers \u00a0 are \u00a0 done \u00a0 as \u00a0 per\u00a0<br \/>\n          requirement \u00a0 based \u00a0 on \u00a0 administrative \u00a0 grounds. \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 Respondent \u00a0 also \u00a0 produced \u00a0 before \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         Commission\u00a0the\u00a0speed\u00a0post\u00a0receipt\u00a0indicating\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a0of\u00a0dispatch\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0information.<\/p>\n<p>6.       The\u00a0 Commission\u00a0 holds\u00a0 that\u00a0 complete\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0 \u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0prescribed\u00a0time\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         period \u00a0 and \u00a0 hence \u00a0 drops \u00a0 the \u00a0 penalty \u00a0 proceedings \u00a0 against \u00a0 the \u00a0 PIO \u00a0 and \u00a0 closes \u00a0 the \u00a0 case \u00a0 at \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         Commission&#8217;s\u00a0end.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                         \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                                 Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy:\n<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Shri\u00a0Sartaj\u00a0Ahmed<br \/>\n         S\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Abul\u00a0Barkal<br \/>\n         #508,\u00a0Kaila\u00a0Road<br \/>\n         Ghaziabad<br \/>\n         Uttar\u00a0Pradesh<\/p>\n<p>2.       The\u00a0PIO<br \/>\n         Northern\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n         Headquarter\u00a0Office<br \/>\n         Baroda\u00a0House<br \/>\n         New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p>3.       Officer\u00a0incharge,\u00a0NIC<\/p>\n<p>4.       Press\u00a0E\u00a0Group,\u00a0CIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Shri Sartaz Ahmad vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 June, 2010 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission CIC\/OP\/C\/2009\/000140\u00adAD Dated\u00a0June\u00a025,\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant : Shri\u00a0Sartaj\u00a0Ahmed Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority : Northern\u00a0Railway\u00a0HQ New\u00a0Delhi Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0 filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0 application\u00a0dt.1.12.08\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Northern\u00a0Railway\u00a0HQ,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0 seeking\u00a0the\u00a0transfer\u00a0policy\u00a0of\u00a0JEs,\u00a0SEs\u00a0and\u00a0SSEs\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0information\u00a0on\u00a0\u00a0whether\u00a0the\u00a0transfers\u00a0are\u00a0 being\u00a0done\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0the\u00a0policy.\u00a0The\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0Northern\u00a0Railway\u00a0HQ\u00a0transferred\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0 concerned\u00a0division\u00a0on\u00a08.12.08.\u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.27.1.09\u00a0 with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0(Copy\u00a0not\u00a0in\u00a0file)\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0transferred\u00a0by\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0Northern\u00a0Railway\u00a0HQ\u00a0 to\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0DRM\u00a0Office,\u00a0Northern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0on\u00a029.1.09.\u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0 response\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0First\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0complaint\u00a0dt.26.5.09\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.\u00a0The\u00a0 Commission\u00a0vide\u00a0its\u00a0order\u00a0dt.11.5.10\u00a0directed\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0by\u00a015.6.10\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0 to\u00a0appear\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a025.6.10\u00a0at\u00a02.30\u00a0pm\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0written\u00a0explanation\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0 showcause\u00a0notice\u00a0issued\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Commission. 2. The\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit,\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0scheduled\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0for\u00a0June\u00a025,\u00a0 2010.\u00a0\u00a0 3. Shri\u00a0Mohar\u00a0Singh,\u00a0Sr.DMM,\u00a0DRM\u00a0Office,\u00a0Northern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Hemant\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Kohli,\u00a0 ADEE,\u00a0Northern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Ghaziabad\u00a0and\u00a0shri\u00a0Rakesh\u00a0Tyagi,\u00a0Dy.\u00a0G.M.(Law)\u00a0represented\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0 Authority. 4. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing. Decision 5. The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0complete\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0on\u00a024.12.08.\u00a0 A\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0produced\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0cadre\u00a0 control \u00a0 is \u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-110899","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Shri Sartaz Ahmad vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Shri Sartaz Ahmad vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-06-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-03T10:55:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Shri Sartaz Ahmad vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 June, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-03T10:55:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010\"},\"wordCount\":367,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.Shri Sartaz Ahmad vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-03T10:55:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Shri Sartaz Ahmad vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 June, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Shri Sartaz Ahmad vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Shri Sartaz Ahmad vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-06-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-03T10:55:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Shri Sartaz Ahmad vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 June, 2010","datePublished":"2010-06-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-03T10:55:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010"},"wordCount":367,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010","name":"Mr.Shri Sartaz Ahmad vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-06-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-03T10:55:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-shri-sartaz-ahmad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-june-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Shri Sartaz Ahmad vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 June, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110899","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110899"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110899\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110899"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110899"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110899"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}