{"id":110950,"date":"2011-07-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-07-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011"},"modified":"2018-07-01T17:51:38","modified_gmt":"2018-07-01T12:21:38","slug":"mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Kailash Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 July, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Kailash Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 July, 2011<\/div>\n
                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                      at\n                                                  New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                        File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001247\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a020,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a020,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n\n\n           Appellant\n\n\n\u00a0          Shri\u00a0Kailash\u00a0Prasad,\u00a0C\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Surendra\u00a0Prasad,\u00a0\n           Sultanpur,\u00a0Near\u00a0Si.\u00a0Bha.\u00a0Ma\u00a0School,\n           Danapura\u00a0Cantt,\n           Patna\u00a0801\u00a0503\n\n\n           The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present.\n\n\n\n           Respondents\n\n\n           Northern\u00a0Railway\n           Office\u00a0of\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager\n           State\u00a0Entry\u00a0Road,\n           New\u00a0Delhi\n\n           Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Shri\u00a0S.P.\u00a0Mahi,\u00a0ADRM\/T,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Jagjit\u00a0Singh,\u00a0SR\u00a0DMM,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Parveen\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0ADEN,\u00a0\n           Shri\u00a0S.P.\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0DPO\u00a0and\u00a0Ms.\u00a0Seema\u00a0V.\u00a0Verma,\u00a0APO\u00a0CT&C\u00a0\n\n                   Information\u00a0Commissioner     :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                     In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                      at\n                                              New\u00a0Delhi\n                                                                              File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001247\n\n\n                                                   ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Background<\/p>\n
1.     The\u00a0Applicant,\u00a0through\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0dated\u00a026.10.2010,\u00a0filed\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Northern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0<\/p>\n
       New\u00a0Delhi,\u00a0sought\u00a0certain\u00a0information\u00a0(9\u00a0points)\u00a0regarding\u00a0the\u00a0finalization\u00a0of\u00a0vigilance\u00a0case\u00a0(No.\u00a0156\u00ad<\/p>\n
       07\u00adcomml\u00adI)\u00a0against\u00a0him.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO,\u00a0on\u00a023.12.2010,\u00a0gave\u00a0point\u00adwise\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant.\u00a0The\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Applicant,\u00a0 however,\u00a0 \u00a0being\u00a0 aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO’s\u00a0reply,\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a01st\u00adappeal\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Authority\u00a0(AA)\u00a0which,\u00a0according\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0decided\u00a0by\u00a0him.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0thereafter,\u00a0<\/p>\n
       filed\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0petition\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a025.04.2011\u00a0listing\u00a0out\u00a0the\u00a0documents–identified\u00a0<\/p>\n
       in\u00a0(iv)\u00a0items–he\u00a0presently\u00a0needed.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n
\nDecision<\/p>\n
2.     During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0they\u00a0have\u00a0recently,\u00a0on\u00a016.06.2011,\u00a0supplied\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
       requested\u00a0 document\/information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0item\u00a0nos.\u00a0(i)\u00a0to\u00a0(iii)\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0present\u00a0<\/p>\n
       appeal\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0they\u00a0have\u00a0transferred\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant’s\u00a0request\u00a0\u00a0with\u00a0respect\u00a0to\u00a0item\u00a0no.\u00a0(iv)\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Jodhpur\u00a0for\u00a0response.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0however,\u00a0informed\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0yet\u00a0seen\u00a0<\/p>\n
       the\u00a0above\u00a0information\u00a0dated\u00a016.6.11\u00a0and\u00a0hence\u00a0is\u00a0unable\u00a0to\u00a0comment\u00a0on\u00a0its\u00a0quality.<\/p>\n
3.     Since\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0have\u00a0supplied\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0item\u00a0nos.\u00a0(i)\u00a0to\u00a0(iii)\u00a0mentioned\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n
       the\u00a0present\u00a0appeal\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0no\u00a0direction\u00a0need\u00a0be\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0regard.\u00a0However,\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0<\/p>\n
       to\u00a0information\u00a0listed\u00a0at\u00a0item\u00a0no.\u00a0(iv),\u00a0which\u00a0according\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0is\u00a0held\u00a0by\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Jodhpur,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n
       directed\u00a0that\u00a0the \u00a0PIO,\u00a0Jodhpur\u00a0 should\u00a0furnish\u00a0this\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0within\u00a0 \u00a020\u00a0days\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
       receipt\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order,\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0present\u00a0PIO\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0serve\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Jodhpur\u00a0for\u00a0compliance.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4.     The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0also\u00a0complained\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0delayed\u00a0supply\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0which,\u00a0on\u00a0perusal\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
       records,\u00a0was\u00a0found\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0there\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0level\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority.\u00a0However,\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0submissions\u00a0
\n          during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0because\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0delay\u00a0in\u00a0putting\u00a0up\u00a0the\u00a0file\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0AA\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0AA\u00a0could\u00a0not\u00a0<\/p>\n
         dispose\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0appeal\u00a0on\u00a0time.\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0is\u00a0therefore,\u00a0directed\u00a0 \u00a0to\u00a0showcause\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0a\u00a0penalty\u00a0<\/p>\n
         should\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0imposed\u00a0upon\u00a0him\u00a0for\u00a0seemingly\u00a0obstructing\u00a0the\u00a0supply\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0by\u00a0not\u00a0putting\u00a0up\u00a0<\/p>\n
         the\u00a0file\u00a0in\u00a0time\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0AA.\u00a0His\u00a0explanation\u00a0to\u00a0reach\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a025\u00a0August,\u00a02011.\u00a0<\/p>\n
6.       Since\u00a0there\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0a\u00a0delay\u00a0in\u00a0supplying\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0the\u00a0amount\u00a0collected\u00a0from\u00a0<\/p>\n
         him\u00a0towards\u00a0supply\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0refunded\u00a0to\u00a0him.<\/p>\n
7.       Appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
                                                                                             (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                                                                                    Information\u00a0Commissioner
\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
(G.Subramanian)
\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
Cc:\n<\/p>\n
1.       Shri\u00a0Kailash\u00a0Prasad,\u00a0C\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Surendra\u00a0Prasad,\u00a0
\n         Sultanpur,\u00a0Near\u00a0Si.\u00a0Bha.\u00a0Ma\u00a0School,
\n         Danapura\u00a0Cantt,
\n         Patna\u00a0801\u00a0503<\/p>\n
2.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority
\n         Northern\u00a0Railway
\n         Office\u00a0of\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager
\n         State\u00a0Entry\u00a0Road,
\n         New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n
3.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer
\n         Northern\u00a0Railway
\n         Office\u00a0of\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager
\n         State\u00a0Entry\u00a0Road,
\n         New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n
4.       Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC
\n Note: \u00a0 In \u00a0 case, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission’s \u00a0 above \u00a0 directives \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 complied \u00a0 with \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents, \u00a0 the\u00a0
\nAppellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct,\u00a0giving\u00a0
\n(1)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication,\u00a0(2)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0PIO’s\u00a0reply,\u00a0(3)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0(4)\u00a0copy\u00a0
\nof\u00a0the\u00a0Commission’s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(5)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0considers\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0
\nthe\u00a0complaint.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\/\u00a0Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Kailash Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 July, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001247 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a020,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a020,\u00a02011 Parties: Appellant \u00a0 Shri\u00a0Kailash\u00a0Prasad,\u00a0C\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Surendra\u00a0Prasad,\u00a0 Sultanpur,\u00a0Near\u00a0Si.\u00a0Bha.\u00a0Ma\u00a0School, Danapura\u00a0Cantt, Patna\u00a0801\u00a0503 The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present. Respondents Northern\u00a0Railway Office\u00a0of\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager State\u00a0Entry\u00a0Road, New\u00a0Delhi Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Shri\u00a0S.P.\u00a0Mahi,\u00a0ADRM\/T,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Jagjit\u00a0Singh,\u00a0SR\u00a0DMM,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Parveen\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0ADEN,\u00a0 Shri\u00a0S.P.\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0DPO\u00a0and\u00a0Ms.\u00a0Seema\u00a0V.\u00a0Verma,\u00a0APO\u00a0CT&C\u00a0 Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001247 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant,\u00a0through\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0dated\u00a026.10.2010,\u00a0filed\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Northern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0 New\u00a0Delhi,\u00a0sought\u00a0certain\u00a0information\u00a0(9\u00a0points)\u00a0regarding\u00a0the\u00a0finalization\u00a0of\u00a0vigilance\u00a0case\u00a0(No.\u00a0156\u00ad 07\u00adcomml\u00adI)\u00a0against\u00a0him.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO,\u00a0on\u00a023.12.2010,\u00a0gave\u00a0point\u00adwise\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant.\u00a0The\u00a0 Applicant,\u00a0 however,\u00a0 \u00a0being\u00a0 aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO’s\u00a0reply,\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a01st\u00adappeal\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0 Authority\u00a0(AA)\u00a0which,\u00a0according\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0decided\u00a0by\u00a0him.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0thereafter,\u00a0 filed\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0petition\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a025.04.2011\u00a0listing\u00a0out\u00a0the\u00a0documents–identified\u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-110950","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Kailash Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Kailash Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-01T12:21:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Kailash Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 July, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-01T12:21:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011\"},\"wordCount\":573,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Kailash Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-01T12:21:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Kailash Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 July, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Kailash Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Kailash Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-01T12:21:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Kailash Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 July, 2011","datePublished":"2011-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-01T12:21:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011"},"wordCount":573,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011","name":"Mr.Kailash Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-01T12:21:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-kailash-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-july-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Kailash Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 July, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110950","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110950"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110950\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110950"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110950"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110950"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}