{"id":111417,"date":"2010-01-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010"},"modified":"2018-09-06T11:09:58","modified_gmt":"2018-09-06T05:39:58","slug":"k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"K.Surendran Pillai vs Kerala State Road Transport &#8230; on 6 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">K.Surendran Pillai vs Kerala State Road Transport &#8230; on 6 January, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 36383 of 2009(P)\n\n\n1. K.SURENDRAN PILLAI,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. S.SAJAN,\n3. S.SATHEENDRANATH,\n4. G.SREERANJAN,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC\n\n Dated :06\/01\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                       ANTONY DOMINIC, J.\n              --------------------------------------------------\n               W.P.(C) Nos.36383\/09 &amp; 36558\/09\n              --------------------------------------------------\n            Dated this the 6thday of January, 2010\n\n                           J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>      Exts.P7 and P8 are challenged in WP(c).No.36383\/09 and<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P7 is challenged in WP(c).No.36558\/09. Issue raised in these<\/p>\n<p>writ petitions being common, reference is made to the facts as<\/p>\n<p>stated in WP(c).No.36383\/09.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2. Petitioners retired from the service of the respondent<\/p>\n<p>Corporation between the period from February, 2007 to 31st May<\/p>\n<p>2008. Subsequent to their retirement, by virtue of the settlement<\/p>\n<p>entered into between the Management and the Unions                     on<\/p>\n<p>28.11.2008,    pay     and     other    benefits     were     revised with<\/p>\n<p>retrospective effect from 1.3.2006. Consequent on the said<\/p>\n<p>development, Corporation issued Ext.P5 order dated 2.3.2009,<\/p>\n<p>revising the pension and pensionary benefits. According to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners, substantial number of the beneficiaries who have<\/p>\n<p>retired prior to them, were extended the benefit of Ext.P5, within<\/p>\n<p>one month of issue of the said order. However, in respect of those<\/p>\n<p>who have retired for the period from 1.3.2006 to April, 2009, the<\/p>\n<p>benefits were not released.\n<\/p>\n<p>WPC.No.36383\/09 &amp; anor.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 :2 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      3. Complaining of delay in disbursing the benefits due to<\/p>\n<p>them under Ext.P5, petitioners approached this court by filing WP<\/p>\n<p>(c).No.27982\/09. That writ petition was disposed of by judgment<\/p>\n<p>dated 6.10.2009, directing the respondents to consider the claim<\/p>\n<p>for the benefit of Ext.P5. Complaining that the judgment was not<\/p>\n<p>complied with the petitioner again approached this court by filing<\/p>\n<p>COC.No.1443\/2009. During the pendency of the said petition, the<\/p>\n<p>first respondent issued Ext.P7 order dated 25.11.2009, rejecting<\/p>\n<p>the request and placing reliance on Ext.P8, an order issued on<\/p>\n<p>19.11.2009, fixing a schedule for paying the benefits due under<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P5 to the retired employees like the petitioners. It was on<\/p>\n<p>receipt of    Exts.P7 and P8 that this writ petition is filed<\/p>\n<p>challenging the said orders.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4. Counsel for the petitioners contends that a section of the<\/p>\n<p>beneficiaries of Ext.P5 having been paid the revised benefits,<\/p>\n<p>non-payment or delay in payment of the benefits due, amounts<\/p>\n<p>to discrimination in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of<\/p>\n<p>India.   Yet another submission made by the counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is that as substantial part of the work for quantification<\/p>\n<p>and disbursement of benefits have already been completed, there<\/p>\n<p>WPC.No.36383\/09 &amp; anor.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 :3 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>is absolutely no rationale in delaying the disbursement of benefits<\/p>\n<p>in the manner as ordered in Ext.P8.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5. I have considered the submissions made by the counsel<\/p>\n<p>for the petitioner and also the learned Standing Counsel<\/p>\n<p>appearing for the respondents, who placed reliance on Ext.P8<\/p>\n<p>referred to above. It is an admitted fact that the petitioners, who<\/p>\n<p>being retired employees, are entitled to the benefit of Ext.P5. The<\/p>\n<p>only question is whether the respondent can be faulted or this<\/p>\n<p>court is to interfere on the ground that the benefit of Ext.P5 has<\/p>\n<p>been inordinately delayed violating Article 14 of the Constitution<\/p>\n<p>of India. Answer to this question      depends upon the facts as<\/p>\n<p>disclosed in Ext.P8. A reading of Ext.P8 order shows that there<\/p>\n<p>are 5854 employees similar to the petitioners who have retired<\/p>\n<p>from the service of the Corporation subsequent to 1.3.2006. It is<\/p>\n<p>stated that in view of the paucity of               manpower and<\/p>\n<p>corresponding increase in the workload, there has been delay in<\/p>\n<p>revising the benefits as ordered in Ext.P5. It is stated that despite<\/p>\n<p>all this, with the available limited manpower,        benefits have<\/p>\n<p>already been quantified in respect of the employees who have<\/p>\n<p>retired till November, 2006. It is stated that in view of the<\/p>\n<p>WPC.No.36383\/09 &amp; anor.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 :4 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>limitations     in manpower and corresponding increase in the<\/p>\n<p>workload and in order to ensure expeditious settlement of the<\/p>\n<p>claims of the petitioners, Corporation has formulated a schedule<\/p>\n<p>in terms of which the entire claims would be settled before 31st<\/p>\n<p>December, 2010. The details of the schedule fixed is also given in<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P8.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6. Having gone through Ext.P8 and in the absence of any<\/p>\n<p>material on record to conclude that the reasons stated in Ext.P8<\/p>\n<p>are either arbitrary or mala fide, I do not find any substance in<\/p>\n<p>the submission made by the counsel for the petitioners. In this<\/p>\n<p>situation    the case      does not    call for  interference in a<\/p>\n<p>proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. I am<\/p>\n<p>also not impressed by the contention raised by the counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner that there is a case of discrimination. As already seen,<\/p>\n<p>the benefit of Ext.P5 is due to be paid to the entire beneficiaries.<\/p>\n<p>In view of the limitations pointed out by the Corporation as above,<\/p>\n<p>benefits could be disbursed only in stages and benefits have been<\/p>\n<p>given to one section and in so far as others are concerned, they<\/p>\n<p>are not denied payment but are being paid in the manner as<\/p>\n<p>stated in        Ext.P8. This does not disclose any case of<\/p>\n<p>WPC.No.36383\/09 &amp; anor.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  :5 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>discrimination.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Writ petitions fail and are dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                        (ANTONY DOMINIC)<br \/>\n                                             JUDGE<br \/>\nvi\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court K.Surendran Pillai vs Kerala State Road Transport &#8230; on 6 January, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 36383 of 2009(P) 1. K.SURENDRAN PILLAI, &#8230; Petitioner 2. S.SAJAN, 3. S.SATHEENDRANATH, 4. G.SREERANJAN, Vs 1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN For Respondent : No Appearance [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-111417","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>K.Surendran Pillai vs Kerala State Road Transport ... on 6 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K.Surendran Pillai vs Kerala State Road Transport ... on 6 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-06T05:39:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K.Surendran Pillai vs Kerala State Road Transport &#8230; on 6 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-06T05:39:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":822,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010\",\"name\":\"K.Surendran Pillai vs Kerala State Road Transport ... on 6 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-06T05:39:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K.Surendran Pillai vs Kerala State Road Transport &#8230; on 6 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K.Surendran Pillai vs Kerala State Road Transport ... on 6 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K.Surendran Pillai vs Kerala State Road Transport ... on 6 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-06T05:39:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K.Surendran Pillai vs Kerala State Road Transport &#8230; on 6 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-06T05:39:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010"},"wordCount":822,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010","name":"K.Surendran Pillai vs Kerala State Road Transport ... on 6 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-06T05:39:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-surendran-pillai-vs-kerala-state-road-transport-on-6-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K.Surendran Pillai vs Kerala State Road Transport &#8230; on 6 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111417","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=111417"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111417\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=111417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=111417"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=111417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}