{"id":111469,"date":"2008-12-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-12-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008"},"modified":"2019-03-12T16:26:59","modified_gmt":"2019-03-12T10:56:59","slug":"agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008","title":{"rendered":"Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; vs Shahnawaz Kasim Shaikh &amp; Ors on 15 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Bombay High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; vs Shahnawaz Kasim Shaikh &amp; Ors on 15 December, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: Anoop V.Mohta<\/div>\n<pre>dgm\n gm                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY\n\n                                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION\n\n                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 4923 OF 2008\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                                                      \n           Agricultural Produce Market Committee Petitioners\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                      \n                          Vs.\n\n           1. Shahnawaz Kasim Shaikh &amp; ors.                                                               Respondents.\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                     \n           Mr.Sandeep Dilip Shinde for the Petitioners.\n\n           Mr.V.Z.Kankaria i\/by Mr.Rahul D. Motkari for the\n           Respondents 1 to 4, 10 and 11.\n\n\n\n\n                                                                \n                                                       CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.\n<\/pre>\n<pre>                                        ig             DATED : 15th December 2008.\n\n           P.C.\n                                      \n                          The                    petitioners            have           challenged              the                 impugned\n\n           order            dated         30th          May,           2008          passed        by          the         Civil      Judge,\n\n           Senior            Division,                  Nasik,          whereby          it      is           held       that            the\n         \n\n\n           valuation                   made            by        the           respondents\/plaintiffs                and                 the\n      \n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>           court fee paid thereon is proper and, therefore, the<\/p>\n<p>           plaint cannot be rejected.\n<\/p>\n<p>           2.                   The              petitioners           are         Agriculture                 Produce               Market<\/p>\n<p>           Committee            (for          short,          &#8220;APMC,                Nasik&#8221;)           who,            in           pursuance<\/p>\n<p>           to           Agricultural                   Produce           Market          Committee                    Act,              (for<\/p>\n<p>           short,      &#8220;APMC             Act&#8221;),             entitled          to        levy            and          impose          market<\/p>\n<p>           fees            and          supervision           charges          in        respect          of         the              goods<\/p>\n<p>           imported by the plaintiffs\/respondents in Nasik city<\/p>\n<p>           along with others.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                      ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 14:08:46 :::<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                     (2)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     3.                 The             respondents                 are                    traders                  engaged                 in         the<\/p>\n<p>     business of selling and buying various types of fruits<\/p>\n<p>     from different districts and selling it on wholesale<\/p>\n<p>     and            retail               basis                 within                Nasik                   district                  which             is<\/p>\n<p>     notified                  market          area         under             Section            4           of           the          APMC           Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>     They                  have          filed           the           present            suit           for          declaration                     and<\/p>\n<p>     injunction                whereby                   they              are         claiming                     an                 order            of<\/p>\n<p>     restrainment                            against             the               petitioners                 from                levying            and<\/p>\n<p>     imposing                  market                fees               and                      supervision                       charges              in<\/p>\n<p>     respect               of       ig the          goods         imported             by            them            in          Nasik                city.\n<\/p>\n<p>     There          are          also           averments               made              in          the            plaint              for        refund<\/p>\n<p>     of           the             amount                  which           they        have           already          paid                 to          the<\/p>\n<p>     petitioners.                                  The          market               fees             and                supervision               charges<\/p>\n<p>     are fixed and well within the knowledge of the<\/p>\n<p>     respondents as they are paying since long.\n<\/p>\n<p>     4.                    They              have        valued           Suit            at         Rs.4000\/-             and            paid       court<\/p>\n<p>     fee            of             Rs.80\/-             under        Section           6(iv)          J         of                the              Bombay<\/p>\n<p>     Court Fees Act, 1959 (for short, &#8220;Bombay Court Fees<\/p>\n<p>     Act&#8221;).\n<\/p>\n<p>     5.                   An             application            under          Section           8        of                Bombay                  Court<\/p>\n<p>     Fees         Act,          read          with          Order             7,          Rule           1          of           Civil           Procedure<\/p>\n<p>     Code                 (CPC)              was         moved            by          the            petitioners                objecting               to<\/p>\n<p>     the        valuation          of           the         suit.                    In          pursuance                 to          Section         9A<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                           ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 14:08:46 :::<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                         (3)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     of CPC, an application was also moved for framing<\/p>\n<p>     preliminary issue.\n<\/p>\n<p>     6.                  However,                  the             Court          rejected           the             same                   on              both<\/p>\n<p>     counts                 holding                that             the                prayers         in               the                 suit              are<\/p>\n<p>     declaratory                    in             nature                 and          does          not       pertain                      to               any<\/p>\n<p>     specific                   recovery              of          any            amount          and           neither                the                    suit<\/p>\n<p>     is         for             recovery               of           abovesaid                 amount               and,               therefore,               it<\/p>\n<p>     is               not                  susceptible                   to       the         monetary                        valuation                      and,<\/p>\n<p>     therefore, not covered under Sections 6(iv) and 9 of<\/p>\n<p>     the Bonmbay Court Fees Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>     7.                      The           Court           need          to       consider            once          the         objection                      is<\/p>\n<p>     raised                    about            the          improper             valuation.                       In          the                        present<\/p>\n<p>     case,         the              learned           Judge             failed          to           see           that          the               suit        is<\/p>\n<p>     against             the             action              of          petitioners             who               are               claiming                and<\/p>\n<p>     recovering                          the                    market           fees          and            supervision                             charges.\n<\/p>\n<p>     They             are             doing               pursuance               to          the            AMPC                     Act.                   The<\/p>\n<p>     respondents\/plaintiffs                               are                     paying               accordingly.                                          The<\/p>\n<p>     amount                    is          fixed       and          well          within             the       knowledge                    of                the<\/p>\n<p>     plaintiffs.                               Once           declaration              as        sought             &amp;            if                       granted<\/p>\n<p>     the                    petitioners               will         definitely                loose           the              said                        money<\/p>\n<p>     (market                        fees              and           supervision                            charges)                   and                     the<\/p>\n<p>     respondents\/plaintiffs will gain by not paying the<\/p>\n<p>     same.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                              ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 14:08:46 :::<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                (4)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     8.                                 The            respondents                    have               in              fact            specifically                     averred<\/p>\n<p>     in            paragraph                       5         of          the          plaint             and             demanded                  the                    refund<\/p>\n<p>     of            the                        amount                so          collected                by            the                   petitioners                      till<\/p>\n<p>     this               date.                          There              cannot                be           any          dispute                 that          there           is<\/p>\n<p>     and                  there                 will               be              voluminous                     transaction                of                       purchase<\/p>\n<p>     and                  sale                of             imported                 agricultural                     produce               made               by            the<\/p>\n<p>     respondents                          and                other             such              persons.                           We              are              concerned<\/p>\n<p>     with                 the                 plaint               and             prayers              made              in           the               present             suit.\n<\/p>\n<p>     Therefore,                     I         am             of          the         view              that            such           Suit          as                    framed<\/p>\n<p>     is                 susceptible                     to               monetary                    evaluation                and            subject                          to<\/p>\n<p>     Schedule                   I          ig of        Article                7          of           the             Bombay            Court              Fees             Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>     The               trial                    Court              has         gone              on          foundation               that           it         is              a<\/p>\n<p>     suit              for                      declaration                         only.                      While                     considering                          the<\/p>\n<p>     valuation                 of                      the          suit,           the          total            frame             work                   of                 the<\/p>\n<p>     suit                including                     its             contents                 is           important.                           Once               it         is<\/p>\n<p>     clear               that                          whole              attempt               is           to          seek           declaration                          and<\/p>\n<p>     injunction                            against                     the            petitioners                      which               will                            result<\/p>\n<p>     into                 an               order                  of           restrainment                    against                AMPC                 to             collect<\/p>\n<p>     the                fixed                 market                fee             and              supervision                charges.                                    This,<\/p>\n<p>     in           my                    view,                 is               susceptible                        to            the                 valuation                  as<\/p>\n<p>     contemplated                        under                     the         Bombay                  Court            Fees                  Act.                           The<\/p>\n<p>     plaintiffs would definitely gain monetarily. The<\/p>\n<p>     petitioners would loose accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p>     9.                  Therefore,                           taking                      all         this                   into                 account,                    the<\/p>\n<p>     impugned                           order           is             quashed                 and            set            aside.                       The             learned<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                                         ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 14:08:46 :::<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                               (5)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     Judge          to         reconsider        the    detail    aspect          of          relevant<\/p>\n<p>     provisions           of    Bombay          Court   Fee      Act    and            pass      fresh<\/p>\n<p>     order accordingly. The petition is accordingly<\/p>\n<p>     allowed. No costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                ( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                           ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 14:08:46 :::<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; vs Shahnawaz Kasim Shaikh &amp; Ors on 15 December, 2008 Bench: Anoop V.Mohta dgm gm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4923 OF 2008 Agricultural Produce Market Committee Petitioners Vs. 1. Shahnawaz Kasim Shaikh &amp; ors. Respondents. Mr.Sandeep Dilip Shinde [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-111469","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Agricultural Produce Market ... vs Shahnawaz Kasim Shaikh &amp; Ors on 15 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Agricultural Produce Market ... vs Shahnawaz Kasim Shaikh &amp; Ors on 15 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-12T10:56:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; vs Shahnawaz Kasim Shaikh &amp; Ors on 15 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-12T10:56:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008\"},\"wordCount\":718,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008\",\"name\":\"Agricultural Produce Market ... vs Shahnawaz Kasim Shaikh &amp; Ors on 15 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-12T10:56:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; vs Shahnawaz Kasim Shaikh &amp; Ors on 15 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Agricultural Produce Market ... vs Shahnawaz Kasim Shaikh &amp; Ors on 15 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Agricultural Produce Market ... vs Shahnawaz Kasim Shaikh &amp; Ors on 15 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-12-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-12T10:56:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; vs Shahnawaz Kasim Shaikh &amp; Ors on 15 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-12-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-12T10:56:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008"},"wordCount":718,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008","name":"Agricultural Produce Market ... vs Shahnawaz Kasim Shaikh &amp; Ors on 15 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-12T10:56:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-shahnawaz-kasim-shaikh-ors-on-15-december-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; vs Shahnawaz Kasim Shaikh &amp; Ors on 15 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111469","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=111469"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111469\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=111469"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=111469"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=111469"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}