{"id":111556,"date":"2010-02-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010"},"modified":"2017-07-02T19:23:12","modified_gmt":"2017-07-02T13:53:12","slug":"shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Shri Mukul Srivastava vs Indian Institute Of Banking &amp; &#8230; on 9 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shri Mukul Srivastava vs Indian Institute Of Banking &amp; &#8230; on 9 February, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                         Central Information Commission\n             Complaint No.CIC\/SM\/C\/2009\/00610-SM dated 24.02.2009\n                Right to Information Act-2005-Under Section (18)\n\n                                                       Dated: 09 February 2010\n\nName of the Complainant           :   Shri Mukul Srivastava,\n                                      H. No. 233, 1st Floor, SBI Colony,\n                                      Paschim Vihar, New Delhi.\n\nName of the Public Authority      :   Public Information Officer,\n                                      Indian Institute of Banking &amp; Finance,\n                                      The Arcade, World Trade Centre,\n                                      2nd Floor, Tower - 4, Cuffe Parade,\n                                      Mumbai - 400 005.\n\n\n        The Complainant was present in person.\n\n        On behalf of the Respondent, Shri Kishan Rawat, Advocate, was<\/pre>\n<p>        present.\n<\/p>\n<p>        This case was posted for hearing on 17 November 2009.<\/p>\n<p>2.      In this case, the Complainant had approached the Indian Institute of<\/p>\n<p>Banking and Finance (Institute) on February 24, 2009 seeking a number of<\/p>\n<p>information in respect of the JAIIB Examinations held on 18 November 2007<\/p>\n<p>including the complete scores\/marks obtained by the candidates for both<\/p>\n<p>the exams with their respective answer sheets. On behalf of the Institute,<\/p>\n<p>in a reply dated 19 March 2009, he was informed that it was not a Public<\/p>\n<p>Authority     under the Right to Information (RTI) Act and, hence, could not<\/p>\n<p>provide him with any of information.       The Complainant has, thus, come<\/p>\n<p>before the Central Information Commission seeking direction to the Institute<\/p>\n<p>for providing him with the desired information.<\/p>\n<p>3.      We heard this case in several sittings. The main issue for decision in<\/p>\n<p>this case is whether the Institute is a Public Authority within the meaning of<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/SM\/C\/2009\/00610-SM<br \/>\n Section 2(h) of the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Section 2(h) reads as<\/p>\n<p>under:-\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>     &#8220;public authority means by authority or body or institution of self-<br \/>\n     government established or constituted &#8211;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>           (a) by or under the Constitution;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>           (b) by any other law made by Parliament;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>           (c) by any other law made by State Legislature;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>           (d) by notification issued or order made by the appropriate<br \/>\n               Government<\/p>\n<p>           and includes any &#8211;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>           (i) body owned, controlled or substantially financed;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>           (ii) non-Government organization substantially financed,<\/p>\n<p>           directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate<br \/>\n           Government&#8221;.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>4.         Obviously, this Institute is a Non-Governmental Organisation. A Non<\/p>\n<p>Governmental Organisation becomes a Public Authority               only when it is<\/p>\n<p>substantially financed directly or indirectly by funds provided by the<\/p>\n<p>appropriate Government. From various records and documents furnished to<\/p>\n<p>us by both the Complainant and the Institute, such as, the Memorandum and<\/p>\n<p>Articles of Association of the Institute, its annual reports for the previous<\/p>\n<p>three years and the contributions made by various Banks and financial<\/p>\n<p>institutions for availing of various services from the Institute, the following<\/p>\n<p>facts emerge:-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>     (i)      This Institute was first incorporated as the Indian Institute of<br \/>\n              Bankers on 4 April 1928 under the Indian Companies Act, 1913;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>CIC\/SM\/C\/2009\/00610-SM\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>     (ii)    the initial subscribers to this Institute included, among others,<br \/>\n            the Bank of India and the Imperial Bank of India;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>    (iii)   the present Governing Council of this Institute consists of a<br \/>\n            President, two Vice-Presidents and 18 members. All these, the<br \/>\n            President, the Vice-Presidents and majority of members of the<br \/>\n            Governing Council are from the Public Sector Banks;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>    (iv)    one the major activities of the Institute is to conduct<br \/>\n            examinations for Banking Personnel, such as, JAIIB and CAIIB.<br \/>\n            Since passing these examinations is a pre-condition for career<br \/>\n            promotion in Public Sector Banks, the majority of the candidates<br \/>\n            who take these examinations are from these Banks and far out-<br \/>\n            number the candidates who appear in all other examinations<br \/>\n            conducted by it;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>    (v)     the Institute charges fees from all    those who take the above<br \/>\n            examinations conducted by it as well as for other services it<br \/>\n            provides;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>    (vi)    the Member Banks and financial institutions give an annual<br \/>\n            subscription to the Institute;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>    (vii)   though the subscription from the Member Banks including the<br \/>\n            Public Sector Banks is declining over the years, the fees collected<br \/>\n            against various services including the above examinations is on<br \/>\n            the increase and the bulk of the corpus of the Institute consists<br \/>\n            of the examination fees and the subscriptions paid by the Member<br \/>\n            institutions;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>    (viii) consistently over the years, its Governing Council and its<br \/>\n            Executive Committee, that is, two most important decision<br \/>\n            making bodies, have consisted of the CMDs and other senior<br \/>\n            functionaries of the Public Sector Banks;<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/SM\/C\/2009\/00610-SM\n<\/p>\n<p>      (ix)   over the years, income of the Institute consists more from the<br \/>\n            Examination fees paid by the candidates appearing in the various<br \/>\n            examinations conducted by it and since the employees and<br \/>\n            officers of the Public Sector Banks, as a matter of service<br \/>\n            requirement, have to take these examinations, indirectly the<br \/>\n            finance of the Institute consists of direct subscription by these<br \/>\n            Banks as well as the indirect support extended through<br \/>\n            compelling their employees and officers to take up the Institute&#8217;s<br \/>\n            examinations.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.      Thus, the scenario that emerges is that not only the policy making<\/p>\n<p>and executive bodies of this Institute are substantially manned by the senior<\/p>\n<p>executives of the Public Sector Banks and the bulk of its finances also come<\/p>\n<p>directly or indirectly from those Banks. The services of the Institute are<\/p>\n<p>largely subscribed to and enjoyed by the Public Sector Banks and their<\/p>\n<p>employees. There is a very close relationship between the Public Sector<\/p>\n<p>Banks and this Institute, almost verging on mutual dependence.              The<\/p>\n<p>defining characteristics of a Non-Governmental Organisation as a Public<\/p>\n<p>Authority, as per Section 2(h)(ii), is that it should be substantially financed<\/p>\n<p>directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate government. This<\/p>\n<p>Institute, is a Non Governmental Organisation being substantially financed<\/p>\n<p>by the Public Sector Banks directly and indirectly is nothing but a Public<\/p>\n<p>Authority. We, therefore, hold that this Institute is a Public Authority    and<\/p>\n<p>the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act shall apply to it<\/p>\n<p>completely.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>6.      Besides, as far as its activities are concerned, this Institute conducts<\/p>\n<p>various examinations for the officers and the employees of the Banks,<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/SM\/C\/2009\/00610-SM<br \/>\n predominantly from the Public Sector Banks. The services rendered by it<\/p>\n<p>through holding of examinations and setting standards for the Banking sector<\/p>\n<p>is a public service even if the participants have to pay a fee for taking the<\/p>\n<p>examinations.       There is a little difference this Institute and other such<\/p>\n<p>bodies as the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE), Indian Institute<\/p>\n<p>of Chartered Accounts, Institute of Cost and Work Accountants of India and<\/p>\n<p>others which conduct various examinations in their respective fields with a<\/p>\n<p>view to setting benchmarks and standards and giving marks\/scores and<\/p>\n<p>certificates on the basis of which the society evaluate the merits of those<\/p>\n<p>individuals. Thus, this Institute not only fulfils the condition of substantial<\/p>\n<p>financing as stipulated in Section 2(h)(ii), it also performs public service<\/p>\n<p>covering a vast section of population. Therefore, there is no doubt that this<\/p>\n<p>Institute is a Public Authority within the meaning of Section 2(h) of the Right<\/p>\n<p>to Information (RTI) Act and subjected to that the provisions of the Right to<\/p>\n<p>Information Act shall extend to it.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>7.      In view of the above, we direct that the Institute must appoint a<\/p>\n<p>Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) within 30 working days from the<\/p>\n<p>receipt of this order and provide the desired information to the Complainant<\/p>\n<p>within the same period.         A compliance of our order be sent to us<\/p>\n<p>immediately thereafter.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>8.      The Commission ordered accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.      Copies of this order be given free of cost to the parties.<\/p>\n<p>                                                          (Satyananda Mishra)<br \/>\n                                                    Information Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/SM\/C\/2009\/00610-SM<br \/>\n        Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied<br \/>\nagainst application and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the<br \/>\nCPIO of this Commission.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                 (Vijay Bhalla)<br \/>\n                                                            Assistant Registrar<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/SM\/C\/2009\/00610-SM\n <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Shri Mukul Srivastava vs Indian Institute Of Banking &amp; &#8230; on 9 February, 2010 Central Information Commission Complaint No.CIC\/SM\/C\/2009\/00610-SM dated 24.02.2009 Right to Information Act-2005-Under Section (18) Dated: 09 February 2010 Name of the Complainant : Shri Mukul Srivastava, H. No. 233, 1st Floor, SBI Colony, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi. Name of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-111556","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shri Mukul Srivastava vs Indian Institute Of Banking &amp; ... on 9 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Mukul Srivastava vs Indian Institute Of Banking &amp; ... on 9 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-02T13:53:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Mukul Srivastava vs Indian Institute Of Banking &amp; &#8230; on 9 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-02T13:53:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1181,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Shri Mukul Srivastava vs Indian Institute Of Banking &amp; ... on 9 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-02T13:53:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Mukul Srivastava vs Indian Institute Of Banking &amp; &#8230; on 9 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Mukul Srivastava vs Indian Institute Of Banking &amp; ... on 9 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Mukul Srivastava vs Indian Institute Of Banking &amp; ... on 9 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-02T13:53:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Mukul Srivastava vs Indian Institute Of Banking &amp; &#8230; on 9 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-02T13:53:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010"},"wordCount":1181,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010","name":"Shri Mukul Srivastava vs Indian Institute Of Banking &amp; ... on 9 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-02T13:53:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-mukul-srivastava-vs-indian-institute-of-banking-on-9-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Mukul Srivastava vs Indian Institute Of Banking &amp; &#8230; on 9 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111556","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=111556"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111556\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=111556"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=111556"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=111556"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}