{"id":111637,"date":"2007-03-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-03-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007"},"modified":"2017-11-07T19:14:40","modified_gmt":"2017-11-07T13:44:40","slug":"ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007","title":{"rendered":"M\/S. Hill Wood Traders vs The Intelligence Officer (Ib) on 8 March, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S. Hill Wood Traders vs The Intelligence Officer (Ib) on 8 March, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWA No. 277 of 2007()\n\n\n1. M\/S. HILL WOOD TRADERS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER (IB),\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.K.DAMODARAN (SR.)\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice MR.K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN\n\n Dated :08\/03\/2007\n\n O R D E R\nWA 277\/07 Etc.                                 1\n\n\n\n\n\n               K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, Ag. C.J. &amp; M.N. KRISHNAN, J.\n\n       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n                       Writ Appeal  Nos. 277, 288, 293 and 303 of 2007 &amp;\n\n                               W.P.C. Nos  5911, 5912 and 5916 of 2007\n\n       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n                               Dated :  8tth   March, 2007\n\n\n                                       JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Radhakrishnan, Ag.C.J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       Facts of these cases have been  elaborately dealt with by the learned<\/p>\n<p>single  judge  while  disposing  of   the  writ  petitions.       We  therefore    find   it<\/p>\n<p>unnecessary to reiterate all those facts for disposal of these cases.<\/p>\n<p>       2.   The   main   contention   urged   by   the   Senior   Counsel   Sri   M.K.<\/p>\n<p>Damodaran   is   that   no   effective   opportunity   was   given   to   the   appellants<\/p>\n<p>before   initiating   proceedings   under   section   45   A   of   the   Kerala   General<\/p>\n<p>Sales Tax Act, 1963.   Referring  to  sub-section (2) of Section  45-A of the<\/p>\n<p>Act, counsel submitted that no order under sub-section (1) shall be passed<\/p>\n<p>unless the person on whom the penalty is proposed to be imposed is  given<\/p>\n<p>an   opportunity   of   being   heard   in   the   matter.         Contention   raised   by   the<\/p>\n<p>counsel  has to  be examined in the light of the facts of the cases.<\/p>\n<p>       3. We may therefore  briefly refer  to the  facts  for the  disposal  of all<\/p>\n<p>these   appeals.     Writ   petitioner   in   W.P.C.   No   33646   of   2005   is   filed   by<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WA 277\/07 Etc.                                  2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Moideen,   Proprietor,   Al-Ameen   Wood   Industries,   Kanhangad   raising   the<\/p>\n<p>allegation   that   all   the   purchases   were   effected   by   the   parties   in   the<\/p>\n<p>proceedings using his name which resulted in this court ordering a vigilance<\/p>\n<p>enquiry.       Vigilance   enquiry   was   accordingly   conducted   and   report   was<\/p>\n<p>placed   before   this   court.       This   court   after   perusing   the   report   passed   an<\/p>\n<p>order   directing   the  Commissioner   to   take   appropriate   action   against   those<\/p>\n<p>who have made bogus sales and accounted the same at concessional rates in<\/p>\n<p>the   name   of   Moideen,   proprietor   of   Al-Ameen   Wood     Industries,.<\/p>\n<p>Kanhangad.       Commissioner issued notice to all the parties.   Parties were<\/p>\n<p>represented by advocates and various documents were produced. Witnesses<\/p>\n<p>were   cross-examined   and   ultimately   it   was   revealed   that   the   bogus   sales<\/p>\n<p>were effected in  the name of Moideen  which resulted in imposing penalty<\/p>\n<p>under section 45-A  on the appellants herein.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>        4. Section 45A notices were issued to all the parties.  Date of hearing<\/p>\n<p>was fixed specifically stating that the objection should be filed within seven<\/p>\n<p>days.   Section  45-A notice  was  issued  to  Hill  Wood  Imports  and   Exports<\/p>\n<p>Private   Limited   on   26.9.2006   fixing   the   date   of   hearing   in   respect   of   the<\/p>\n<p>assessment   year   2001-2002   as   28.10.2006.     Same   was   the   date   fixed   for<\/p>\n<p>hearing   for   the   assessment   year   2002-2003   as   well;   so   also   for   the   year<\/p>\n<p>2003-2004.    It was specifically stated in the notices that objection, if any,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WA 277\/07 Etc.                                  3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>should   be   filed   within   seven   days   and   date   of   hearing   was   notified   as<\/p>\n<p>28.10.2006.     Section 45-A notice was also issued to Hillwood Traders on<\/p>\n<p>29.09.2006   fixing   the   date   of   hearing   as   28.10.2006   relating   to   the<\/p>\n<p>assessment   years   2001-2002,   2002-2003   and   2003-2004.       Section   45A<\/p>\n<p>notice  dated  25.09.2006  was  also  issued  to Hillwood  Industries  fixing  the<\/p>\n<p>date   of   hearing   as   28.10.2006   which   relate   to   the   assessment   year   2001-<\/p>\n<p>2002.       Notices   dated   26.9.2006   were   also   issued   to   Hillwood   Industries<\/p>\n<p>fixing the date of hearing as 28.10.2006 in respect of the assessment years<\/p>\n<p>2002-2003 and 2003-2004.     Notices dated 27.09.2006 were also issued to<\/p>\n<p>Mangali   Timbers   fixing   the   date   of   hearing   as   28.10.2006.       Above<\/p>\n<p>mentioned  facts would clearly indicate that   at least one month&#8217;s time was<\/p>\n<p>granted to  the parties  to file their  objection  and  date of hearing was fixed<\/p>\n<p>after one month from the date of notice.   That would be sufficient for the<\/p>\n<p>purpose of   filing objection and to get ready for the hearing.   Nobody was<\/p>\n<p>prepared to appear on the dates notified.   Later, on 27.10.2006 yet another<\/p>\n<p>notice was issued to the parties stating that no adjournment would be given<\/p>\n<p>and   the   date   of   hearing   was   fixed   as   8.11.2006.       Nobody   got   ready   for<\/p>\n<p>hearing on the said date.  Again parties were seeking time. Considering the<\/p>\n<p>facts   and   circumstances   of   the   case,   we   are   not   prepared   to   say   that   the<\/p>\n<p>Department  had  not   given  any effective  opportunity to   the   parties.    When<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WA 277\/07 Etc.                                  4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>date   of   hearing   was   fixed   and   notice   was   sent   to   that   effect,   it   is   the<\/p>\n<p>responsibility of the parties to get ready for hearing on the date notified.<\/p>\n<p>        5.   We are also not prepared to say that there is any violation of the<\/p>\n<p>principles   of   natural   justice       taking   note   of   the   entire   facts   and<\/p>\n<p>circumstances of these cases.   Decisions cited by the appellants would not<\/p>\n<p>apply to the facts of this case.  In any view of the matter,   appellants have<\/p>\n<p>got   alternate   remedy   of   appeal   before   the   appellate   authority.     Therefore<\/p>\n<p>appellate authority would examine the contentions raised by the  appellants<\/p>\n<p>herein while disposing  of the appeals.   We make it clear, if the appellants<\/p>\n<p>have not filed appeals so far, they are given two weeks&#8217; time to file appeals<\/p>\n<p>in the event of which appellate authority would take note of the contentions<\/p>\n<p>raised by the appellants and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.<\/p>\n<p>We further  make it clear we are not expressing any opinion on the merits of<\/p>\n<p>the   case   since   appellants   have   to   avail   of   the   alternate   remedy   of   appeal.<\/p>\n<p>The appeals and the writ petitions  are disposed of as above.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                 SD\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                        K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN<\/p>\n<p>                                                        Ag. Chief Justice<\/p>\n<p>                                                                 SD\/-<\/p>\n<pre>\n\n                                                        M.N. KRISHNAN\n\n08\/03\/2007                                              Judge\n\nen\/                     [TRUE COPY]\n\n\nWA 277\/07 Etc.    5\n\n\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court M\/S. Hill Wood Traders vs The Intelligence Officer (Ib) on 8 March, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WA No. 277 of 2007() 1. M\/S. HILL WOOD TRADERS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER (IB), &#8230; Respondent 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, For Petitioner :SRI.M.K.DAMODARAN (SR.) For [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-111637","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S. Hill Wood Traders vs The Intelligence Officer (Ib) on 8 March, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S. Hill Wood Traders vs The Intelligence Officer (Ib) on 8 March, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-03-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-07T13:44:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S. Hill Wood Traders vs The Intelligence Officer (Ib) on 8 March, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-03-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-07T13:44:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007\"},\"wordCount\":835,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S. Hill Wood Traders vs The Intelligence Officer (Ib) on 8 March, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-03-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-07T13:44:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S. Hill Wood Traders vs The Intelligence Officer (Ib) on 8 March, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S. Hill Wood Traders vs The Intelligence Officer (Ib) on 8 March, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S. Hill Wood Traders vs The Intelligence Officer (Ib) on 8 March, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-03-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-07T13:44:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S. Hill Wood Traders vs The Intelligence Officer (Ib) on 8 March, 2007","datePublished":"2007-03-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-07T13:44:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007"},"wordCount":835,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007","name":"M\/S. Hill Wood Traders vs The Intelligence Officer (Ib) on 8 March, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-03-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-07T13:44:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-hill-wood-traders-vs-the-intelligence-officer-ib-on-8-march-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S. Hill Wood Traders vs The Intelligence Officer (Ib) on 8 March, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111637","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=111637"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111637\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=111637"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=111637"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=111637"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}