{"id":111643,"date":"2009-11-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009"},"modified":"2015-06-18T01:47:34","modified_gmt":"2015-06-17T20:17:34","slug":"shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Shamima Khatoon & Ors vs Rajesh Kumar Sahu & Ors on 24 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n
Shamima Khatoon & Ors vs Rajesh Kumar Sahu & Ors on 24 November, 2009<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI\n             W.P.(C) No. 5353 of 2008\n1. Shamima Khatoon\n2. Md. Parwej Khan\n3. Firoz Khan\n4. Sahnawaj Khan\n5. Sahwaj Khan\n6. Shadeb Khan                             ...     Petitioners\n                         Versus\n1. Rajesh Kumar Sahu\n2. Dayanand Kumar Sahu\n3. Kundan Kumar Sahu\n4. Rukaiya Begum\n5. Bashir Ahmad Khan\n6. Sabir Ahmad Khan\n7. Dr. Nazir Ahmad\n8. Rahina Parween\n9. Quaizer Ahmad                           ...     Respondents\n                         ---------\n<\/pre>\n
CORAM:       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.PATEL\n                         ---------\nFor the petitioners:     Mr. R.N.Sahay, Advocate\nFor the respondents:     Mr. Arvind Kr. Sinha, Advocate\n                         ---------\n                th\n10\/ Dated: 24 November, 2009\n\n<\/pre>\n
1.   The present petition has been preferred mainly being
\n     aggrieved by an order passed by the Sub-Judge I, Giridih,
\n     dated 10th September, 2008 in Partition Suit No. 8 of 1976,
\n     which is at Annexure 4 to the memo of present petition.\n<\/p>\n
2.   Learned counsel for the petitioners (original plaintiffs), who
\n     have instituted Partition Suit No. 8 of 1976, has vehemently
\n     contended that a Pleader Commissioner was appointed
\n     under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure,
\n     upon an application preferred by the purchasers-defendants
\n     and in the measurement by the Pleader Commissioner, there
\n     was some description about northern boundary, which was
\n     incorrectly mentioned in the suit property by the original
\n     plaintiffs and, therefore, there was a need of rectification of
\n     northern boundary in the original plaint and, therefore, an
\n     application for amendment of the plaint was preferred, but,
\n     the same was dismissed by the trial court and, therefore, a
\n     writ petition bearing W.P.(C) No. 1869 of 2007 was preferred
\n     before this Court and this Court vide order dated 10th July,
\n     2007 dismissed the claim of the present petitioners and it
\n     was observed by this Court that at an execution stage, no
\n     amendment in the plaint is allowed. Nonetheless, the Pleader
\n     Commissioner will act as per the evidence on record, at the
\n     time of drawing final decree in the Partition Suit.\n<\/p>\n
                                 2.<\/span><\/p>\n
3.   It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners
\n     (original plaintiffs) that the Pleader Commissioner has given
\n     a report, which is annexed as Annexure 6 along with I.A. No.
\n     33 of 2009 and as per the detailed map, given at internal
\n     page no.10 of the said report, the plot, in dispute, is narrated
\n     by boundary ABCD and this plot is to be measured. As per
\n     the learned counsel for the petitioners, this is not only Plot
\n     No.337, but, it includes Plot No. 123 also, whereas the
\n     contesting respondents submitted that the said boundary
\n     ABCD is a boundary of Plot No. 337 and the land, in
\n     question, and no error has been committed by the Pleader
\n     Commissioner in the trial court. Learned counsel for the
\n     petitioners has relied upon several documentary evidences.\n<\/p>\n
4.   Be that as it may, the order passed by the trial court dated
\n     10th September, 2009 in Partition Suit No. 8 of 1976, at
\n     Annexure 4 to the memo of petition, states that the Pleader
\n     Commissioner must be allowed to measure the said plot,
\n     which is now drawn as ABCD in the Pleader Commissioner’s
\n     report, keeping all the contentions of the parties to the suit
\n     open and if anybody is interfering with the measurement,
\n     those hindrances and barriers ought to be removed. If the
\n     doors are closed by anybody, then the doors are bound to be
\n     broken open, but, the learned counsel for the petitioners
\n     very fairly submitted that there is no need of breaking any
\n     door or window and they are always inviting the Pleader
\n     Commissioner for measurement of the boundary ABCD, and
\n     all the contentions and rights of the parties in Partition Suit
\n     No. 8 of 1976 must be kept intact, as they are. The
\n     measurement is not a problem at all for the original
\n     plaintiffs, but, the learned counsel for the original plaintiffs
\n     vehemently submitted that they have objection if the
\n     measurement is treated as an admission of any fact on the
\n     part of the plaintiffs.\n<\/p>\n
5.   Learned counsel for the purchasers-defendants submitted
\n     that at present no final decision has been taken by the trial
\n     court in Partition Suit No. 8 of 1976 and final decree is yet to
\n     be prepared. Only the measurement process is going on and,
\n     as stated at Annexure-6, which is demarcated at ABCD is to
\n     be measured by measuring boundary ABCD. No contention
\n     of the original plaintiffs and no contention of the original
\n                                      3.<\/span>
\n     purchasers-defendants is deemed to have been waived or
\n     settled. All the contentions and rights of the parties have
\n     been kept intact, as they are, and left open for a decision by
\n     the trial court, but, the measurement process ought to be
\n     completed and the original plaintiffs cannot interfere with
\n     the measurement proceedings of the plot, demarcated at
\n     ABCD at Annexure 6, which is stated in I.A.No. 33 of 2009.\n<\/p>\n
6.   In view of the aforesaid limited submissions and looking to
\n     the impugned order, passed by the Sub-Judge I, Giridih,
\n     dated 10th September, 2008 in Partition Suit No. 8 of 1976, it
\n     appears that the trial court wants a measurement to be done
\n     of a plot, demarcated as ABCD, as stated at Annexure 6 to
\n     I.A.No. 33 of 2009. If the plaintiffs are interfering with the
\n     measurement process or method, then it has been stated in
\n     the impugned order that the Pleader Commissioner can
\n     break open the door and measure the boundary, demarcated
\n     as ABCD, but, it is fairly submitted by the learned counsel
\n     for the original plaintiffs that there is no question of breaking
\n     of any door or window, as they are ready to co-operate the
\n     court-commissioner. So long as the contention of the original
\n     plaintiffs are concerned, all their contentions are kept open,
\n     about Plot No. 337 and pertaining to the entries in the
\n     revenue records and such other arguments, which are going
\n     to be canvassed by the original plaintiffs before the trial
\n     court are left as they are for adjudication by the trial court.
\n     The original plaintiffs are ready for measurement, as per the
\n     order, passed by the trial court dated 10th September, 2008,
\n     at Annexure 4 to the memo of petition and, therefore, as the
\n     willingness is already shown in the process of delivery of
\n     justice, I see no reason to entertain this writ petition. What
\n     is ought to be kept in mind by the Pleader Commissioner is
\n     that whenever they are going for measurement, they shall, in
\n     advance, intimate the original plaintiffs, so that all the doors
\n     and windows may be kept open for measurement. The
\n     Pleader Commissioner shall carry out the measurement
\n     process as early as possible and practicable, without any
\n     loss of time.\n<\/p>\n
7.   In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition as also
\n     I.A.No. 33 of 2009 are hereby disposed of. Full cooperation
\n     shall   be   given   by   the   original   plaintiffs,   so   far   as
\n                                       4.<\/span>
\n             measurement process is concerned and if there is a
\n             cooperation for measurement of a plot, demarcated as
\n             ABCD, as stated at internal page no.10 of the Pleader
\n             Commissioner’s report (Annexure 6 to I.A. No. 33 of 2009),
\n             there is no need of any police force to be taken by the
\n             Pleader   Commissioner    along   with   him,   while   doing
\n             measurement.\n<\/p>\n
                                                  (D.N. Patel, J)<\/p>\n
A.K.Verma\/\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Jharkhand High Court Shamima Khatoon & Ors vs Rajesh Kumar Sahu & Ors on 24 November, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 5353 of 2008 1. Shamima Khatoon 2. Md. Parwej Khan 3. Firoz Khan 4. Sahnawaj Khan 5. Sahwaj Khan 6. Shadeb Khan … Petitioners Versus 1. Rajesh Kumar […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-111643","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nShamima Khatoon & Ors vs Rajesh Kumar Sahu & Ors on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shamima Khatoon & Ors vs Rajesh Kumar Sahu & Ors on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-17T20:17:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shamima Khatoon & Ors vs Rajesh Kumar Sahu & Ors on 24 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-17T20:17:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1085,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Shamima Khatoon & Ors vs Rajesh Kumar Sahu & Ors on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-17T20:17:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shamima Khatoon & Ors vs Rajesh Kumar Sahu & Ors on 24 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shamima Khatoon & Ors vs Rajesh Kumar Sahu & Ors on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shamima Khatoon & Ors vs Rajesh Kumar Sahu & Ors on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-17T20:17:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shamima Khatoon & Ors vs Rajesh Kumar Sahu & Ors on 24 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-17T20:17:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009"},"wordCount":1085,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009","name":"Shamima Khatoon & Ors vs Rajesh Kumar Sahu & Ors on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-17T20:17:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamima-khatoon-ors-vs-rajesh-kumar-sahu-ors-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shamima Khatoon & Ors vs Rajesh Kumar Sahu & Ors on 24 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111643","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=111643"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111643\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=111643"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=111643"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=111643"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}