{"id":111672,"date":"2009-12-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009"},"modified":"2015-11-18T23:10:59","modified_gmt":"2015-11-18T17:40:59","slug":"sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Suresha vs Sri D Ganesh Kumar on 10 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Suresha vs Sri D Ganesh Kumar on 10 December, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Anand Byrareddy<\/div>\n
'.r'~2< '\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 1n"' DAY on DECEMBER 2(.}(19n\n\nBEFORE:\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A_N.AND   \n\nMISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEALIAP-J4L).:\u00a72"i';3 (SF 2i<).0$\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSri.Suresha,\n\nSon 0fRang21ppz.-1, -- 'A  .\n29 Yeiars, BSNL Employee. " \n27"'C1i0ss, Kuver11p:iT\u00bbI_agz::\u00a72{;' _  .  :\nHasszm.      \n(By S hri .G . V . Na rzifgi  mu 1f\u00a3h'j{;, i\/()C';-11%.')\n\nI. S1'i.DLC}zinesh wKLI':i1:az:9,"' \nSon of K' _S1"vi:1iva1_sz==L,._V S V \nAg{':;f..:nz1j()1'\u00bb,_A A V' A '\n   ---------- \n. ' 2 , Uid PQ:';.t C-'..fficer,\n  '[')\u00a331f_i"i1.EVi@S'E1a1"1-t1._'ci"?OSt,\n-- A " '--B\u20ac'lt11zigz1.di'fIfaiL:k,\n-.I_):.1i<:.\u00bbi~'ni1_'1'Lf':..- K:mnada District.\n\n_ T Unitfsd India Insurance Company Limited\nV V \u00b0BQ1'anch ()ffict':,\n E51'abE1u Building,\n1" F100;', Opposite Arun The&.tc1'.\nMain Road, Put1n_=571 201.\n\n\/5\n\n\n\n~ . 'C()l\u00a5}T_\u00bb"Ji.'~:;1f15s"\u00a21{-1()l"1.\n\nI{ep1"es'1lowii1g: ~\n\n6\n\n\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
Heard the i.'(,)LEE1.’H’Cl for the pe:.iti.0ne1″_<\/p>\n
7. The appellant is aged about  and lieiWztS’_’vle1i*:pleyed <\/p>\n
with the Teleeom Depart.ment. The z1ppella_nt’*iwakaa’xaiiictiiititifiiiti<\/p>\n
road accident had stlfferetl head inj;;1,i’iies. whiclji 1’et_1L1″ii’e’d1Sustaiined ”<\/p>\n
treatment. Even after tifeatV_mei”1t;””‘;teiet’):'(tj.gg u-)”1.he.vv’Medj\u00a2;1|<\/p>\n
Practitioner who had tendered   the appellant,<\/p>\n
the appellant had s_\u00a7at?feiietl. fifoii\u00e9,  ‘7i%’wpe:5i’nVa_11e..}it disability. It is on<\/p>\n
this basis thatthef.appe.lla11t_Viha’dpap-p1’0ia<;hed the Motor Accident
\nClaims T.1flbt_iI't\u00a31lVViSE:<3l\u00a7iE'iigi4t?tiI'npC1Jisa{l()11. The Tribunal having<\/p>\n
awarded ::0n1pelnsz1ti'o_i'1ixin'ii; total sum of Rs.l,E_8,U(}(}\/–, the<\/p>\n
"'.;1ppelVl"aht isil:-<:Vf()1.'e ti'iis:_C_Q.u:"t seekin_g:_ enhancement.<\/p>\n
 ._  i'Tll'G,,i_C(vi.l}v1'i'S\u20acl for the appellant would point out that the<\/p>\n
.award"i0w=ai'(l's'inedical expenses is on the lower side and that the<\/p>\n
]ap}5e'1l–ant ii; entitled for a larger coinpensation having regai'd to the<\/p>\n
"\u00ab\u00ab–'m1t'a1'e. of injtiries sustained and the t'reatmen_t Lmdergone, the<\/p>\n
6'<\/p>\n
compensation towards medical expenses ought to be enhanced
\neven if the appellaiit has not been able to t'Ln'nis1'i E.!.dB~qtiI;-[E6
\n1'nate1'ials; in suppott of his Claim.\n<\/p>\n
4. However, the counsel w0L1ld_p0i.nt jt’)Lil7.l_ t’h;;it-__ii’ist~).fzii”<\/p>\n
1()$s of fntiire e’.-trning capacity vi:S’\u00ab._{pi’es\u00a7ed by the
\nMedical Pmetititmei’ to 10% iii-23″; i’ne”diic’:a1 evidence in this<\/p>\n
regaid. Thei’ef0i’e_, .thev..appeI1z1tit’httsibeeii tietnfik\/ed of the just and<\/p>\n
proper measufe (‘if=4.)(3’iT1ip_\u20actl\ufb01iti-i_()’\ufb01. ‘()5 at<;'cs};1*i1t of L'tE'biIi"&11"y decision
\nof the Ti'\ufb01'bunti1 eAt.c};f,i'ec1ti%;e the JCi'iS\u00a31'{)iiiit}" to 1()%<\/p>\n
5. I*’Lirt_he:j insj<)t"a:r ";i.$i"_;e!t)ss of tnnenities is concerned, the<\/p>\n
"'~,.t1sn()2.jn5t. ;tw;1,i'cied ii'is.____i_ne;1gi"e. and re.quii'es to be enhanced<\/p>\n
[The–.awai"d towards conveyance, nourishment and<\/p>\n
 and t.0wai'ds thture me.dic.a1 expenses is awarded<\/p>\n
attendniit ehtit:\n<\/p>\n
  21 SL1.i1’\u00a773V__it’Ji’ Rs.1(),()0()\/~ in all, which requires to be enhanced<\/p>\n
 _ iS’1.1\\l’J:-?..1\u00a3’1″Li1ti’d1i}’.\n<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
6. The counsel for the respondent would further resist the<\/p>\n
appeal and would submit that in zibsenee of inaterh,-il. thentetlieal<\/p>\n
expenses ezninot be enh’.-inced and even Rs.7,0{l()\/- 2iwi;ii;tietlo’_’b..y “the<\/p>\n
Tribunal is in excess zmd therefore the :1ppe_llant \u00abis”not:ent’EtledV for <\/p>\n
any \u20acl”1l12111C\u20acITlc’R{. lnsof:,11′ us zlwznd tow*in”ds’_i_il(>ss t5\u00a5.f’Ut;i’1~:\u00e9 le..2i1’\ufb01iiig<\/p>\n
czlpaeity cone.e.rned. the same is..__lon_M the” speet1lation””‘thatl the”<\/p>\n
appellzmt suffeis from disability of’ 3(i_)’I?oll”‘T his isnotwtenable in
\nView of the appellant cc)ntinLiiiig toble\u00a5leinp’i’oiyed’with the telecom<\/p>\n
department in wliiei\ufb02ie was eiintgiloyeitlfe–:a1’_liefi’ and hence there is
\nno palpable li>ss,–i:_\\_5’\/;\u00a7’_iicli” *to* be Coinpensated, even if the
\naippel_lanti_sut?l’ers, lfi’3oriv1_.tlielsoicnliecl disability. Insofar as the other<\/p>\n
heads of C.l;l1li’\u00a3i11lart?llC(‘)l’H\u00a7\u20ac’1″1}\u00e9.\u00a3l, the T:”ibunz-1! has awarded fairly<\/p>\n
” ‘~ .suffir: l\u00e9:t1t:;_1i’11()L!ntsii i1n<l,___he.:v'1ee there is no wazrmnt for inte:'fe1'enee..<\/p>\n
 ._  "'C\u00a3ivei1l.l'Vtl1'e above circumstance. the award of Rs.'7.0(l{)\/–<\/p>\n
— t()x=i\/ziiids i’netl’iCi3l expenses is eertzunly on the lower side. even in<\/p>\n
4:11;: nbseilce of innterinl evidence. given the nature of treatment,<\/p>\n
‘  the appellant is entitled for an enlmnced C()I11pCnS\u00a31tl(.)I]. Hence, the<\/p>\n
8<\/span><\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
appellant is held entitled to an additional sum of Rs.l(‘),O(..l(‘)\/–<\/p>\n
towards medial expenses. However. “.1 sum of Rs. l(}.()()(‘)\/- 2uy2i’i’tled<\/p>\n
tow:-11’ds future loss of earning is c0neerne.d, the eonte_n’ti'<)n.itthziti1lhex<\/p>\n
appellant continues to be employed zmd ,1l"ijC1'\u20acli()I7c" 'tlieife bil[s'~.1it*ylusj_s <\/p>\n
vocation or 21ppreh_ension and ought F1(l'i'.'I07.._li)iti~ 'ie0i'1side_rer;l l'at"e—:1lllA:1it$<\/p>\n
not tenable. The disability wl1ielr:th,e l\\\/lt\u00e9fdltlztl_vl3i'V;1C'tif[lU11\u20acI'l had i<\/p>\n
expressed was to the whole' .boclylt}1_e dis2tbil–ity:.~f10t having
\nmanifested to disable the ;ippe~ll\u00e91nt'frdi11 W(.)~1fikvl.llig\u00bb.fL11'thell" is not the<\/p>\n
criteria.\n<\/p>\n
8,”l.lti”is’ueiirc uiilfirs’t:,1nee’tl1z1tt’l’1e~–appel’l2-mt would have to bear
\n:1 larger ei’7f()i'<t in –eai'i'yi1ilg\u00ab.ni'i-the activity that he was capable of<\/p>\n
d0ii1g,e3.i'lieif is tyne.ehns'i.dei*ati0ii and the second consideration i_s<\/p>\n
thew' lii'inpel'nclii1gp_ loss llltiif employment and prospect of future<\/p>\n
itgie'n_fipil0yihei1t.ti:i.t'–"'the appellant, which requires to be addressed<\/p>\n
and l.t:'he1*el't)1*e""lthe Tribuirt-Ll liziviiigg adopted l()',:'\/c as wh0le.~b0dy<\/p>\n
l_"..(lli.'s2ll'-\\4_i.li\u00a7y"l is without the basis of :1 second medical opinion which<\/p>\n
i' hzgcl lll{ll<'.'2;E[L'Cl that there was wl10le–b0tly disability of 3()% that the<\/p>\n
8<\/span><\/p>\n
appellant harboured. Hence, the c(_>mper1sz1tion granted towards<\/p>\n
loss of future e.aming ought to be Rs.1,83,(a(_)(.)\/– (3000 x  X<\/p>\n
30%) instead of Rs;.61,’2()0\/~. Hence, an additional ctt\u00a7\u00a7’iiip–e’r;–s;.n_tiion”\u00ab _<\/p>\n
of Rs. 1 ,22,4()()\/– (Rs. i .83.6()(‘) \u00bb- R:.4.(1l,2()\u00a3))__t<)wzf1'1'tiS"  fLI_tLl}T:\u00e9 <\/p>\n
earning is amended.\n<\/p>\n
Further, the appeilant is  to an;aenitie.s in
\na larger measure. He1ace,A”\u00ab–.ti*\u00a73. ‘  eintitied to an
\nadditional sum of   ‘{n:~;ofar
\ncompensationi.   and attendant<\/p>\n
charges Arie'”iCm1{;fe1″1ae’Eii,”*th”‘.Su1ne “iL<;"u'iso enhanced by a sum of<\/p>\n
Rs. 1 (),0()o\/Q \u00ab<\/p>\n
_~"1fhe_xzippe1l_an'tw i$v___t_i}u..a entitied to an additional. compensation<\/p>\n
 "_(f)'f5\u00a7\u00e9.'\u00a7."1,A5'2',%\u00a2OL}}[%.'('-_100()O + 122400 + ioooo + 10000) with at 6%<\/p>\n
inteie\u00e9t \u00a7)\u20ac1.'.'\u00e9t'l"'i,i:_i_!'.I::1} from the date ofciaim petition.<\/p>\n
sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Suresha vs Sri D Ganesh Kumar on 10 December, 2009 Author: Anand Byrareddy ‘.r’~2< ' IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 1n"' DAY on DECEMBER 2(.}(19n BEFORE: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A_N.AND MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEALIAP-J4L).:\u00a72"i';3 (SF 2i<).0$ BETWEEN: Sri.Suresha, Son 0fRang21ppz.-1, — 'A . 29 Yeiars, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-111672","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Suresha vs Sri D Ganesh Kumar on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Suresha vs Sri D Ganesh Kumar on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-18T17:40:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Suresha vs Sri D Ganesh Kumar on 10 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-18T17:40:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1135,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Suresha vs Sri D Ganesh Kumar on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-18T17:40:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Suresha vs Sri D Ganesh Kumar on 10 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Suresha vs Sri D Ganesh Kumar on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Suresha vs Sri D Ganesh Kumar on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-18T17:40:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Suresha vs Sri D Ganesh Kumar on 10 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-18T17:40:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009"},"wordCount":1135,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009","name":"Sri Suresha vs Sri D Ganesh Kumar on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-18T17:40:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suresha-vs-sri-d-ganesh-kumar-on-10-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Suresha vs Sri D Ganesh Kumar on 10 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111672","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=111672"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111672\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=111672"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=111672"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=111672"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}