{"id":111693,"date":"2011-01-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-01-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011"},"modified":"2015-08-23T00:51:31","modified_gmt":"2015-08-22T19:21:31","slug":"abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011","title":{"rendered":"Abdul vs State on 19 January, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Abdul vs State on 19 January, 2011<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ks Jhaveri,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCA\/7659\/2006\t 7\/ 7\tJUDGMENT \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 7659 of 2006\n \n\n \n \nFor\nApproval and Signature:  \n \nHONOURABLE\nMR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI\n \n \n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nABDUL\nGAFURKHAN AIYUBKHAN PATHAN - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nSTATE\nOF GUJARAT &amp; 2 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nAR MAJMUDAR for\nPetitioner(s) : 1,MR NK MAJMUDAR for Petitioner(s) : 1, \nRULE\nSERVED for Respondent(s) : 1 - 2. \nGOVERNMENT PLEADER for\nRespondent(s) :\n3, \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 21\/07\/2006 \n\n \n\n \n \nORAL\nJUDGMENT<\/pre>\n<p>1.0\t\tThe<br \/>\npetitioner-detenu<br \/>\nhas filed this petition challenging the order of detention dated<br \/>\n26.12.2005 passed by District Magistrate, Bharuch City under the<br \/>\nprovisions of sub-Section (2) of Section 3 of the Gujarat Prevention<br \/>\nof Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the<br \/>\n&#8216;PASA Act&#8217;).\n<\/p>\n<p>2.0\t\tLearned<br \/>\nAdvocate for the petitioner has invited my attention to the order of<br \/>\ndetention dated 26.12.2005 by which petitioner-detenu was arrested<br \/>\nand sent to District Jail, Jamnagar as well as to the grounds<br \/>\nsupplied by the detaining authority, therein.  As the ground of<br \/>\ndetention,  one criminal case is shown as registered against the<br \/>\npetitioner-detenu being C.R. No.1190\/05 dated 06.12.2005 at Jaghdia<br \/>\npolice station, Dist. Bharuch punishable under Section 66B, 65A,E,<br \/>\n116(B) and 81 of the Bombay Prohibition Act.  In connection with the<br \/>\nsaid offence the authority seized 3502 bottles of English liquor and<br \/>\nbeer with other things, in all valued at Rs.18,11,950\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.1\t\tHe has<br \/>\nfurther submitted that in the order of detention it was stated that<br \/>\nthe petitioner-detenu is carrying on anti-social activities and on<br \/>\nthe basis of solitary offence of &#8216;bootlegging&#8217; registered against the<br \/>\npetitioner-detenu, he was termed as &#8216;Bootlegger&#8217; within the meaning<br \/>\nof Section 2(b)of the P.A.S.A. Act.  It was also stated in the<br \/>\nimpugned order that as the said bootlegging activities of the detenu<br \/>\nare dangerous and affecting maintenance of &#8216;public order&#8217; and &#8216;public<br \/>\nhealth&#8217;, order of detention has been passed against him.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.2\t\tHe<br \/>\nhas further submitted that on the basis of only one criminal case<br \/>\nregistered against the petitioner-detenu, he cannot be termed as<br \/>\n&#8216;Bootlegger&#8217;.  In support of his case he has placed reliance<br \/>\non a decision of this Court passed in the case of ?SSohanlal<br \/>\nSurajram Visnoi Vs. State of Gujarat and Ors.??<br \/>\nreported in 2004(2)GLR 1051 wherein it was held as under,<\/p>\n<p>?SIt<br \/>\nmay be noted that the contention advanced on behalf of the<br \/>\npetitioners that no preventive detention order can be recorded in a<br \/>\nsolitary incident or instance or offence cannot be accepted in toto.<br \/>\n  The detaining authority can pass the order of detention even on<br \/>\nthe basis of a solitary incident or instance, provided there is<br \/>\njustifiable subjective satisfaction on objective material and<br \/>\nconsideration that such incident or offence is likely to create<br \/>\ndisturbance of ?SPublic Order??.  Emphasis is laid on ?SPublic<br \/>\nOrder?? and not on ?SLaw and Order?? which belongs to the<br \/>\nrealm of general law.  After having taken into account the statutory<br \/>\ndefinitions of the persons branded as ?Sbootlegger?? or ?Sdangerous<br \/>\nperson?? under the P.A.S.A. Act, and detailed factual matrix of each<br \/>\ncase, the solitary incident or instance in question in these<br \/>\npetitions has not been shown or spelt out from the record as<br \/>\naffecting the ?SPublic Order?? or likely to create public<br \/>\ndisturbance or prejudicial or adverse to the maintenance of ?SPublic<br \/>\nOrder??, and therefore, the continued detention of the detenus in<br \/>\neach case has not been shown to be justifiable, &#8230;??\n<\/p>\n<p>2.3\t\tHence,<br \/>\nhe has submitted that the impugned order deserves to be quashed and<br \/>\nset aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.0\t\tOn the<br \/>\ncontrary, learned A.G.P. for respondent-detaining Authority has<br \/>\nsupported the order of detention as well as grounds stated therein<br \/>\nand has contended that the Authority has passed the impugned order<br \/>\nafter taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of<br \/>\nthe case, and hence, no case is made out calling for interference of<br \/>\nthis Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.0\t\tAs a<br \/>\nresult of hearing and perusal of the record it appears that in this<br \/>\ncase the only material is one criminal case registered against the<br \/>\npetitioner-detenu and on the basis of that it cannot be said that the<br \/>\nactivity of the detenu has become a threat to the maintenance of<br \/>\n&#8216;public order&#8217; and &#8216;public health&#8217;.  The offence committed by the<br \/>\npetitioner pertains to prohibition to which I have already made<br \/>\nreference in my earlier part of the judgment.  Mere involvement of<br \/>\npetitioner in bootlegging activities may not amount to dangerous<br \/>\nactivity by petitioner-detenu and mere mention of them  unless<br \/>\nsupported by any evidence cannot be said to be material and germane<br \/>\nfor the purpose of arriving at subjective satisfaction that the<br \/>\nactivity of the petitioner-detenu is prejudicial to the maintenance<br \/>\nof &#8216;public order&#8217; and &#8216;public health&#8217;.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.1\t\t I am,<br \/>\ntherefore, of the view that the detaining authority has passed the<br \/>\norder of detention without there being any credible or cogent<br \/>\nmaterial on record in this behalf.  I have  considered factual and<br \/>\nlegal aspects emerging from the record of the petition and considered<br \/>\nthe rival submissions and the facts of the case and also considered<br \/>\nthe judgment of this Court in the case of Sohanlal<br \/>\nSujaram Visnoi (Supra).\n<\/p>\n<p>In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case and also<br \/>\nratio laid down in the case mentioned above, the order of detention<br \/>\ncannot be sustained and it deserves to be quashed and set aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.0\t\tIn the<br \/>\nresult, this petition is allowed. The order of detention dated<br \/>\n26.12.2005 passed by District Magistrate, Bharuch city is hereby<br \/>\nquashed and set aside.  The petitioner-detenu is, therefore, ordered<br \/>\nto be set at liberty forthwith, if he is not required in connection<br \/>\nwith any other case by the Authority.  Rule is made absolute<br \/>\naccordingly.  Direct service is permitted.\n<\/p>\n<p>(K.S.\n<\/p>\n<p>Jhaveri,J.)<\/p>\n<p>Umesh\/<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Abdul vs State on 19 January, 2011 Author: Ks Jhaveri,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SCA\/7659\/2006 7\/ 7 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 7659 of 2006 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI ========================================================= ABDUL GAFURKHAN AIYUBKHAN PATHAN &#8211; Petitioner(s) Versus [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-111693","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Abdul vs State on 19 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Abdul vs State on 19 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-22T19:21:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Abdul vs State on 19 January, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-22T19:21:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011\"},\"wordCount\":876,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011\",\"name\":\"Abdul vs State on 19 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-22T19:21:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Abdul vs State on 19 January, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Abdul vs State on 19 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Abdul vs State on 19 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-22T19:21:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Abdul vs State on 19 January, 2011","datePublished":"2011-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-22T19:21:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011"},"wordCount":876,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011","name":"Abdul vs State on 19 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-22T19:21:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-vs-state-on-19-january-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Abdul vs State on 19 January, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111693","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=111693"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111693\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=111693"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=111693"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=111693"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}