{"id":112075,"date":"2008-08-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008"},"modified":"2016-12-01T13:42:40","modified_gmt":"2016-12-01T08:12:40","slug":"dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"Dr Bharatraj N Banavalikar vs National Institute Of Mental … on 6 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Dr Bharatraj N Banavalikar vs National Institute Of Mental … on 6 August, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n
 V I \u00bbAge:.Mmjar, Cfc National Imt\ufb02xtc of Mental\n\nF\"TTT,P;B.N'o.29oo, Hosu: road,\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT 0:? KARNATAKAAT\nBANGALORE   f     \n\nDATED THIS THE 06\"' DAY OF  Q *   \n\nTHE H()N'BLE MRJIJSTI(fEA\ufb01!fLU\u00a7A!;;iI;G.iI\u00a7M'E\u00a7H\n\n   \n\nWRIT PET1T1oNTTS6.1o10oT mi  %\nBETWEEN:   \"    % H\n\nDr.Bharauaj.N.Banava}ikar',..  \"\nSfoN.M.Ba:;azralik;ar,'   ' \nAge: 24  Muh\u00e9ssaf' \n    \n\n5* Block, ':a.'..*1'V:Ma.i'l'4$ T'-':3? \n\nBeizimi.  \"  '  \"\n\n    T\n\n    ..PE'I'ITIONER\n\n(By Sri.Vighnegl\u00a7waT..S.SiTastn;')SdTT') \n1 .Nan'ona1' Hwth\n7 &;\u00ab-Nsuro   University),\nPiB.No.29oo,Ham Road,\n '\ufb01aggal\u00e9mj-29,  T\n \"  M\u00a7da,\n*  Nauru Science (Deemed Univers\ufb01y),\n\nBamgalcro-29. ...RESPONI)ENTS\n\n\n\n\n\n(By Mfs.P.S.Rajagopal Associates, Adv. for CIR-1  \nThis Writ Pe\u00a31uon' ' is \ufb01led under Am:  of\n\nthe Constitution cf India praying to  _\n\n R], as per Ann-E a1adf:2tc'.,\u00bb----. A \" \n\nThis Writ I>eem' eemmg'   eye in   \n\n'B' Gtoup this day,theCoi:st_f9}1cu\u00a7v\u00a7:nag;_v_VV \noe.pe,__e;.__e    \nPeti\ufb01oner   of writ of eereeeeee\n\nqueehieg the ee-ae.\u00bb  ;eo.*z\u00a79:s%e\u00a3 'E' wssed by the\n\n  issue a writ er a direcihon doclarm' g\n\nthe     e  N02 to D.M.Neumlogy course in\n\n%.  1*  in place of petitioner as i\ufb01egal and\n\ne  e  oflaw and fee such other reliefs.\n\n  u  2. Aeeeedmg to the  after completing his\n\n . :>:\"jlA'\\5.B.B.S. degree Emu Mysore Medical eenege being interested\n\nis: DJUI. Ncumlogy course: on the applicatimas \u00ab\ufb02ied for by the\n\nl\"'respondentforthcsaidooutw,peitiiioncta@r\ufb01form<\/pre>\n
writ1:enexmina\ufb01onwm*einhewassuccm\ufb01dmtdsecmed4&
\n3%”\n<\/p>\n
. V  2   t smtan’ g tha the 2″ respondent was
\nF tn; the original cerufm on or befene<\/p>\n
 on 9.7.08 he produced the mac and \ufb01zat he has<\/p>\n
mask in the entrance test. The seiected candidates  to<\/p>\n
appear for counseling and before which, they  in<\/p>\n
produce their original eer\ufb01\ufb01cates for  <\/p>\n
a.m. on 2.7.03 failing which   <\/p>\n
for counseling. The 2″‘
\nrank who had appeared :0.-e\u00a7c.mse:;ng   head
\npmduce any of the   in the
\ninstructions  as   and \ufb01ne petitioner<\/p>\n
who  course<\/p>\n
and the emznseligiyghiesee said to have
\nsubmitted ali his   time of counseling
\nand pursuant   hhehshas paid the registration
\nfee     expecting his admissien
\n he was mlecmd in the selection<\/p>\n
 end tehhhiais  ‘elmck he received 3 letter dated 10.7.03<\/p>\n
 admitted mad the ease of the petitioner would be<\/p>\n
9*”\n<\/p>\n
4<\/span><\/p>\n
considered in any future vacancies. Stating that permitting the
\nTdrespondenttoproducetheoxiginalcerti\ufb01catasetalaterdate
\nis contrary to the rules and the same is discrimiigatmy and<\/p>\n
arbitzary and that petitioner should have <\/p>\n
as he has secured 4″‘ rank in the merit list.<\/p>\n
the originals at the time of   <\/p>\n
admission made by me, 1″ respeedeet the
\nrespondent to the    petitioner’ is
\nbefore this Court.   m it i F ii<\/p>\n
 i’ 3.  {loensel fer the respective parts” s.<\/p>\n
   i’s\u00ab.the.suhznissien of the learned Counsel for the<\/p>\n
.  as per the regulaticms of respondent No.1-<\/p>\n
  on the date of counseling on 2.7.08 in the morning<\/p>\n
ieglmae petitioner has produced all the crigiaal certificates and<\/p>\n
in ” \u00ab rsinee the 2″‘ respondent has failed to produce the erim als,<\/p>\n
petitioner being the next candidate in the merit list, he shtmid
\nhave been given admission by the 1″ respondent. Though, in the<\/p>\n
cmmseling held he was made to pay the admission fees, he was<\/p>\n
kept in the weieeg list eed to the contrary the <\/p>\n
had been admitted te the said course which eme<\/p>\n
rules.\n<\/p>\n
5. Per—contra, me   eeee 1″\n<\/p>\n
respondent has eubeened js   vested with
\nthe authority and since the 32?’  has produced the<\/p>\n
eustodiaxe.  et\ufb01fixive Kakinada University<\/p>\n
reeheeiegp\u00e9eeiieeeedyeneeeigieeaeem:-e 2*” respondent, altheugh<\/p>\n
  edmission, his admission could have<\/p>\n
  in event if the 2″” respondent hm not<\/p>\n
% %%   the ‘eegsee: testimonials on the appointed we to be<\/p>\n
$<\/p>\n
   to produce the certi\ufb01cates and since he has<\/p>\n
 pegdeeea all the certi\ufb01cates well within the speci\ufb01ed date he<\/p>\n
 ‘A  preferred as against \ufb02ee pe\ufb01tioner, as sach, them is no<\/p>\n
V ‘ ‘ illegality in admitting the 2″” respondent who is meritorious end<\/p>\n
thediscretionexercisedtaopmdueethcmmeatalmerdateis<\/p>\n
nei\ufb01zer arbitrary not illegal. Accordingly, in stepped pf his<\/p>\n
Xv<\/p>\n
. W -*6″ ‘<\/p>\n
argument, the learned Counsel fat the 1″ <\/p>\n
upon the ruling reported in (2005)9 Sllpmme <\/p>\n
in the case of Dolly Chhnnda Vs..Cha_j’nna\u00a7i”.’fe\u00a7   l L <\/p>\n
* =6; In  llghtlof ”  V
\nwhether “any megasigy in lid  the 2′”
\nrespondent to  at a later date
\nand in admit\ufb01llg1′ who has producad
\nall the   of cm-mscl-ing itself’?\n<\/p>\n
   upon by the 1′ respondent<\/p>\n
refcn\ufb01to ejbszaxi\ufb02tinlejll Court in paragnph 7 of the ma<\/p>\n
ji\ufb01gtncnt  tlzxat, ‘wary infractitm of the rule relating to<\/p>\n
 ~  proof need not necessarily result in rejection of<\/p>\n
H ”    In the insmmt case, theugh there is a delay in<\/p>\n
 the original cemmsass by the 2″‘ respondent, but<\/p>\n
   was a reason for the delay and \ufb01at the 2″” respondent has<\/p>\n
 produced an endorsement from the University with whom he<\/p>\n
had deposited the originals and in order to give him a chance<\/p>\n
since he was a merited candidate and  the<\/p>\n
interview well on time, the discretion was  .1″<\/p>\n
respondent-Institution to give \u00a7_1in3__soma” “25”<\/p>\n
produce the testimonials ”  ‘A<\/p>\n
certi\ufb01cates well within fl;’n%$:_: ‘;\u00a2.\u00a7i’fA5.”e\u20ac:1__
\nsigma he was 39  was
\naccepted and he   oeursc.. in
\nthe ratio Ia\ufb01d    new that submission
\n ofcandidntme. Hm, the
\ndimian in giving<\/p>\n
sox\ufb01\u00e9’  “the 2″‘ respondent to produce the<\/p>\n
  to be  Gt’ illegal. In the<\/p>\n
  there is no merit in the contention of the<\/p>\n
 3. Accordingly, petition is dim:-issed.<\/p>\n
sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
Bkp. ‘Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Dr Bharatraj N Banavalikar vs National Institute Of Mental … on 6 August, 2008 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh V I \u00bbAge:.Mmjar, Cfc National Imt\ufb02xtc of Mental F”TTT,P;B.N’o.29oo, Hosu: road, IN THE HIGH COURT 0:? KARNATAKAAT BANGALORE f DATED THIS THE 06″‘ DAY OF Q * THE H()N’BLE MRJIJSTI(fEA\ufb01!fLU\u00a7A!;;iI;G.iI\u00a7M’E\u00a7H WRIT PET1T1oNTTS6.1o10oT mi % BETWEEN: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-112075","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nDr Bharatraj N Banavalikar vs National Institute Of Mental ... on 6 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dr Bharatraj N Banavalikar vs National Institute Of Mental ... on 6 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-01T08:12:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dr Bharatraj N Banavalikar vs National Institute Of Mental … on 6 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-01T08:12:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":651,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008\",\"name\":\"Dr Bharatraj N Banavalikar vs National Institute Of Mental ... on 6 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-01T08:12:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dr Bharatraj N Banavalikar vs National Institute Of Mental … on 6 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dr Bharatraj N Banavalikar vs National Institute Of Mental ... on 6 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dr Bharatraj N Banavalikar vs National Institute Of Mental ... on 6 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-01T08:12:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dr Bharatraj N Banavalikar vs National Institute Of Mental … on 6 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-01T08:12:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008"},"wordCount":651,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008","name":"Dr Bharatraj N Banavalikar vs National Institute Of Mental ... on 6 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-01T08:12:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-bharatraj-n-banavalikar-vs-national-institute-of-mental-on-6-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dr Bharatraj N Banavalikar vs National Institute Of Mental … on 6 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112075","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=112075"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112075\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=112075"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=112075"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=112075"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}