{"id":112666,"date":"2009-10-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009"},"modified":"2017-02-16T18:56:40","modified_gmt":"2017-02-16T13:26:40","slug":"ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"Ms. Manisha Dahiya vs University Of Delhi on 30 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ms. Manisha Dahiya vs University Of Delhi on 30 October, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>                       CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                        Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market,\n                          Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067.\n                                  Tel: +91-11-26161796\n\n                                                            Decision No.CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002231\/5296\n                                                                  Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002231\n\nAppellant                                    :       Ms. Manisha Dahiya,\n                                                     D\/o Shri Ranbir Singh Dahiya\n                                                     R\/o Flat No. 9, Type-C\n                                                     Police Station Ashok Vihar,\n                                                     Delhi-110052\n\nRespondent                                   :       Mr. Jay Chanda\n                                                     Public Information officer\n                                                     University of Delhi,\n                                                     Main Campus, Delhi-110 007\n\nRTI application filed on                     :       03\/02\/2009\nPIO replied                                  :       23\/02\/2009\nFirst Appeal filed on                        :       22\/03\/2009\nFirst Appellate Authority order              :       15\/09\/2009\nSecond Appeal Received on                    :       02\/09\/2009\n\nInformation sought:\nAppellant sought following information regarding her candidature for Ph.D in Physics as OBC\ncandidate:\n   1.      Whether the candidate belonging to OBC category declared by the Govt. of NCT Delhi and\n           having OBC certificate issued by the SDM concerned of GNCT of Delhi, is eligible for\n           getting admission in Delhi University or not.\n   2.      Copy of result vide which candidates were declared qualified (category wise i.e\n           General\/OBC) for PHD in Physics may be supplied.\n   3.      Copies of marks sheet of candidates who have been declared qualified of PHD in Physics\n           i.e General &amp; OBC may be supplied.\n   4.      Is it correct that Appellant has applied for PHD in Physics as OBC candidate?\n   5.      Is it correct that Appellant's application for PHD in Physics as OBC candidate was\n           accepted by the Physics department of Delhi University?\n   6.      Is it correct that Appellant was called for interview of PHD in Physics\n   7.      Is it correct that Appellant was declared as qualified candidate for Phd in Physics as OBC\n           candidate at Sl. No. 3?\n   8.      Is it correct that after declaring Appellant as qualified candidate as OBC for Phd in Physics,\n           the official of Physics department of Delhi University ahs asked Appellant to deposit the\n           Pay Certificate of Appellant's father to determine whether Appellant's case falls under\n           creamy layer as OBC candidate?\n   9.      Is it correct that as per directions of officials of Physics department of Delhi University,\n           Appellant deposited the Pay Certificate of Appellant's father?\n\n   Appellant asked following questions regarding her candidature:\n   i.    If Appellant was not eligible as OBC candidate then why her Application as OBC candidate\n         was accepted?\n    ii.     Appellant was not eligible then why she was called for interview?\n   iii.    Reasons for declaration of Appellant as qualified candidate as OBC for Phd in Physics\n   iv.     Reasons for asking the Appellant to dep9osit the Pay Certificate of Appellant's father, if\n           she was not eligible for Phd. In Physics as OBC candidate.\n   v.      Reasons for not considering the Appellant as General candidate if she is not eligible as\n           OBC.\n   vi.     Reasons for asking the Appellant's guide to submit experience certificate.\n   vii.    Whether any new rule\/law has been framed between the period from declaring result of\n           qualified candidates for Phd. In Physics and issuing letter No PD-1289 dated07\/11\/2008 or\n           not.\n   viii.   If yes a copy of the same might be supplied to the Appellant.\n\n   Appellant asked for reasons for not canceling the candidature of Appellant as initial stage if OBC\n   certificate issued by the concerned SDM was not acceptable in University of Delhi.\n       Copy of OBC certificates submitted by the candidates who had been declared qualified for Phd\n   in Physics as OBC candidate.\n       Is it correct that in view of above facts Appellant was deprived of from Fundamental right\n   given by the Constitution of India apply as General candidate for Phd in Physics with no fault on\n   part of Appellant.\n\nPIO's Reply:\nRespondent mentioned that most of the questions about the status of such Ph.D admissions may be\nobtained from the Head, Deptt. of Physics. Policies pertaining to OBC in the University regarding\nadmissions the same are available under Public domain in M\/HRD website www.goidirectory.nic.in.\nThe University has adopted the above guidelines and issued instructions to all Head of the departments\nrelating to admissions in the University from the academic year 2008-09 onwards.\n\nGrounds for First Appeal:\nPIO did not provide point wise information.\n\nOrder of the First Appellate Authority:\nFAA stated that the information sought by the appellant was not provided by the PIO point wise. He\nmentioned the same might be provided to the Appellant by 15\/05\/2009.\n\nGrounds for Second Appeal:\nAppellant's father requested to direct the PIO to furnish the point wise reply as requested vide RTI\nApplication.\n\nRelevant Facts<\/pre>\n<p> emerging during Hearing:\n<\/p>\n<p>The following were present:\n<\/p>\n<p>Appellant: Absent<br \/>\nRespondent: Mr. M.A.Sikandar, APIO on behalf of PIO Mr. Jay Chanda;<br \/>\nMany of the queries so the Appellant do not seek information as defined under Section 2(f) of the RTI<br \/>\nAct. However, some of the queries such as &#8220;Copy of result vide which candidates were declared<br \/>\nqualified (category wise i.e General\/OBC) for PHD in Physics may be supplied&#8221; were certainly<br \/>\nseeking information as defined under RTI Act. The FAA had ordered the information to be given by<br \/>\nhis order of 15\/05\/2009. The Respondent states that the deemed PIO Prof.D.S. Kulshrestha gave the<br \/>\ninformation on 26\/10\/2009 which was sent to the Appellant on 27\/10\/2009. The Respondent was asked<br \/>\nto explain the reason for the information not been sent to the Appellant by 15\/05\/2009 as ordered by<br \/>\nthe FAA. The Respondent is not able to give any explanation for this delay.<br \/>\n Decision:\n<\/p>\n<p>The appeal is allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>The information has been provided.\n<\/p>\n<p>The issue before the Commission is of not supplying the complete, required information by the<br \/>\nPIO within 30 days as required by the law.\n<\/p>\n<p>From the facts before the Commission it is apparent that the deemed PIO Prof.D.S. Kulshrestha is<br \/>\nguilty of not furnishing information within the time specified under sub-section (1) of Section 7 by not<br \/>\nreplying within 30 days, as per the requirement of the RTI Act. He has further refused to obey the<br \/>\norders of his superior officer, which raises a reasonable doubt that the denial of information may also<br \/>\nbe malafide. The First Appellate Authority has clearly ordered the information to be given.\n<\/p>\n<p>It appears that the deemed PIO&#8217;s actions attract the penal provisions of Section 20 (1). A showcause<br \/>\nnotice is being issued to him, and he is directed give his reasons to the Commission to show cause why<br \/>\npenalty should not be levied on him.\n<\/p>\n<p>He will present himself before the Commission at the above address on 11 December 2009 at<br \/>\n10.30am alongwith his written submissions showing cause why penalty should not be imposed on him<br \/>\nas mandated under Section 20 (1).\n<\/p>\n<p>This decision is announced in open chamber.\n<\/p>\n<p>Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.<br \/>\nAny information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                               Shailesh Gandhi<br \/>\n                                                                                     Information Commissioner<br \/>\n                                                                                               30 October 2009<br \/>\n(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)Rnj\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Ms. Manisha Dahiya vs University Of Delhi on 30 October, 2009 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market, Old JNU Campus, New Delhi &#8211; 110067. Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No.CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002231\/5296 Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002231 Appellant : Ms. Manisha Dahiya, D\/o Shri Ranbir Singh Dahiya R\/o Flat No. 9, Type-C Police Station Ashok [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-112666","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ms. Manisha Dahiya vs University Of Delhi on 30 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ms. Manisha Dahiya vs University Of Delhi on 30 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-16T13:26:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ms. Manisha Dahiya vs University Of Delhi on 30 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-16T13:26:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":417,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009\",\"name\":\"Ms. Manisha Dahiya vs University Of Delhi on 30 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-16T13:26:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ms. Manisha Dahiya vs University Of Delhi on 30 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ms. Manisha Dahiya vs University Of Delhi on 30 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ms. Manisha Dahiya vs University Of Delhi on 30 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-16T13:26:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ms. Manisha Dahiya vs University Of Delhi on 30 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-16T13:26:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009"},"wordCount":417,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009","name":"Ms. Manisha Dahiya vs University Of Delhi on 30 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-16T13:26:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-manisha-dahiya-vs-university-of-delhi-on-30-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ms. Manisha Dahiya vs University Of Delhi on 30 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112666","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=112666"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112666\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=112666"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=112666"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=112666"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}