{"id":113397,"date":"2010-01-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010"},"modified":"2016-01-12T06:06:21","modified_gmt":"2016-01-12T00:36:21","slug":"subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"Subba Naika @ Subbayya Naika vs Sarojini on 6 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Subba Naika @ Subbayya Naika vs Sarojini on 6 January, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nRSA.No. 1053 of 2009()\n\n\n1. SUBBA NAIKA @ SUBBAYYA NAIKA, AGED\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. SAROJINI, AGED 59 YEARS,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. K.T.KRISHNAPPA, AGED 30 YEARS,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.MADHU\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :06\/01\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                            THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.\n                           --------------------------------------\n                             R.S.A.No.1053 of 2009\n                           --------------------------------------\n                     Dated this the 6th day of January, 2010.\n\n                                     JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
        Respondents\/plaintiffs claimed that plaint A schedule, 1.58 acres was<\/p>\n
acquired by Battya Naika as per order in L.A.No.39 of 1967 and on his death, it<\/p>\n
devolved on the respondents. Appellant\/defendant has some property adjoining<\/p>\n
to plaint A schedule on its southern side. Alleging that appellant is attempting to<\/p>\n
trespass, respondents sued for decree for prohibitory injunction.               Appellant<\/p>\n
denied that plaint A schedule was acquired by Battya Naika and on his death it<\/p>\n
devolved on the respondents. According to the appellant, a portion of plaint A<\/p>\n
schedule is in the possession of Krishna Naika. Battya Naika has borrowed<\/p>\n
Rs.30,000\/- from the said Krishna Naika and as security a portion of plaint A<\/p>\n
schedule was given into the possession of Krishna Naika. Original document of<\/p>\n
title was given to the said Krishna Naika. Appellant is in possession of the<\/p>\n
property scheduled as ‘X’ in the written statement since the last 40 years. He<\/p>\n
claimed to have title by adverse possession and              law of limitation. Trial court<\/p>\n
found against the claim of appellant, held that respondents are in possession of<\/p>\n
the suit property and granted decree. That was confirmed by the first appellate<\/p>\n
court and hence this Second Appeal urging by way of substantial question of law<\/p>\n
whether the courts below were justified in accepting and acting upon Ext.C1 and<\/p>\n
whether in the absence of any evidence courts below were justified in granting<\/p>\n
relief in favour of the respondents particularly as there is no definite boundary<\/p>\n
RSA No.1053\/2009<\/p>\n
                                            2<\/span><\/p>\n
between plaint A schedule and property belonging to the appellant.            It is<\/p>\n
contended by learned counsel that in the above circumstances courts below<\/p>\n
were not justified in granting relief in favour of the respondents.<\/p>\n
       2.       Respondents have produced           patta dated 25.5.1972 issued in<\/p>\n
L.A.No.39 of 1969      in favour of Battya Naika in respect of the 1.58 acres and<\/p>\n
marked Ext.A1. Ext.A2 is the receipt dated 29.9.2005 for payment of revenue for<\/p>\n
the said property by the respondents. Respondent No.2 has given evidence as<\/p>\n
PW1 and stated about their possession of the suit property. Respondents have<\/p>\n
claimed that there was mud wall on the eastern portion of the suit property.<\/p>\n
Exts.C1 and C2 are the report and plan submitted by the                   advocate<\/p>\n
commissioner. Courts below found that boundary described in Exts.C1 and C2<\/p>\n
tallied with the description of plaint A schedule property in Ext.A1. Appellant<\/p>\n
when examined as DW1 stated that Battya Naika has executed a power of<\/p>\n
attorney in favour of Krishna Naika and that himself is in possession of the<\/p>\n
property. He however did not pay tax for any portion of plaint A schedule.<\/p>\n
According to him, Krishna Naika has filed O.S.No.194 of 2006 against the legal<\/p>\n
representatives of Battya Naika in respect of the alleged loan transaction of the<\/p>\n
year 1996.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
       3.     The question for consideration        is whether respondents are in<\/p>\n
possession of the suit property. Appellant has no claim that he is in possession<\/p>\n
of any portion of suit property. Being a suit for injunction appellant cannot plead<\/p>\n
RSA No.1053\/2009<\/p>\n
                                         3<\/span><\/p>\n
jus tertii, a plea that neither the respondents nor himself is in possession of the<\/p>\n
property, but a third person is in possession.    This being a suit for injunction<\/p>\n
what is required to be considered is only whether respondents are in possession<\/p>\n
of the suit property. That possession is proved by Exts.A1 and A2 and the<\/p>\n
descriptions in Exts.C1 and C2. Advocate commissioner has reported that there<\/p>\n
is no boundary within plaint A schedule property. Hence possibility of any<\/p>\n
portion of the schedule property being in the possession of another person<\/p>\n
does not arise. At any rate, it is not necessary in this case to dwelve into the<\/p>\n
question whether Krishna Naika may have any claim against the respondents<\/p>\n
or on any portion of the suit property. That is a matter which can be agitated in<\/p>\n
appropriate proceedings between them. Courts below found that respondents<\/p>\n
are in possession and granted injunction against the appellant. That is a finding<\/p>\n
of fact based on evidence on record and required no interference.               No<\/p>\n
substantial question of law as urged in the memorandum of appeal do arise for<\/p>\n
consideration.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
       The Second Appeal is dismissed in limine.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                               THOMAS P.JOSEPH,
\n                                                       Judge.\n<\/p>\n
cks<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Subba Naika @ Subbayya Naika vs Sarojini on 6 January, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM RSA.No. 1053 of 2009() 1. SUBBA NAIKA @ SUBBAYYA NAIKA, AGED … Petitioner Vs 1. SAROJINI, AGED 59 YEARS, … Respondent 2. K.T.KRISHNAPPA, AGED 30 YEARS, For Petitioner :SRI.T.MADHU For Respondent : No […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-113397","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSubba Naika @ Subbayya Naika vs Sarojini on 6 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Subba Naika @ Subbayya Naika vs Sarojini on 6 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-12T00:36:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Subba Naika @ Subbayya Naika vs Sarojini on 6 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-12T00:36:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":720,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010\",\"name\":\"Subba Naika @ Subbayya Naika vs Sarojini on 6 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-12T00:36:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Subba Naika @ Subbayya Naika vs Sarojini on 6 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Subba Naika @ Subbayya Naika vs Sarojini on 6 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Subba Naika @ Subbayya Naika vs Sarojini on 6 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-12T00:36:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Subba Naika @ Subbayya Naika vs Sarojini on 6 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-12T00:36:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010"},"wordCount":720,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010","name":"Subba Naika @ Subbayya Naika vs Sarojini on 6 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-12T00:36:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subba-naika-subbayya-naika-vs-sarojini-on-6-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Subba Naika @ Subbayya Naika vs Sarojini on 6 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113397","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=113397"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113397\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=113397"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=113397"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=113397"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}