{"id":113406,"date":"2011-11-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-11-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011"},"modified":"2015-08-16T22:01:00","modified_gmt":"2015-08-16T16:31:00","slug":"sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011","title":{"rendered":"Sukhdev Singh vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 15 November, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sukhdev Singh vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 15 November, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>C.W.P.No.17705 of 2011                                                       -1-\n\n     IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH\n\n\n                                                       C.W.P.No.17705 of 2011\n                                                       Date of Decision:-15.11.2011\n\nSukhdev Singh                                                          ...Petitioner\n                                         Versus\n\nState of Punjab &amp; Ors.                                                 ...Respondents\n\nCORAM:        HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR\n\nPresent:-     Mr.S.S.Bains, Advocate for the petitioner.\n\nMehinder Singh Sullar, J. (Oral)\n<\/pre>\n<p>              Having completed all the codal formalities as envisaged under the<\/p>\n<p>provisions of The Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 and the Rules framed<\/p>\n<p>thereunder (hereinafter to be referred as &#8220;the Act and the relevant Rules&#8221;), the<\/p>\n<p>District Collector (respondent No.3) appointed Harpal Singh son of Gian Singh<\/p>\n<p>(respondent No.4) as Lambardar of village Bhajoli, Tehsil Kharar, District Mohali,<\/p>\n<p>by means of impugned order dated 31.8.2010 (Annexure P1).<\/p>\n<p>2.            Aggrieved by the order (Annexure P1), petitioner Sukhdev Singh and<\/p>\n<p>Jaswant Singh son of Ram Singh filed their respective appeals, which were<\/p>\n<p>dismissed as well, by the Divisional Commissioner, Patiala Division (respondent<\/p>\n<p>No.2), by way of impugned order dated 20.4.2011 (Annexure P2).<\/p>\n<p>3.            The petitioner still did not feel satisfied and preferred the instant writ<\/p>\n<p>petition, challenging the impugned orders (Annexures P1 &amp; P2), invoking the<\/p>\n<p>provisions of Articles 226\/227 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n<p>4.             After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, going through<\/p>\n<p>the record with his valuable help and after deep consideration over the entire<\/p>\n<p>matter, to my mind, there is no merit in the present writ petition.<\/p>\n<p>5.            Ex facie, the argument of learned counsel that since the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>was more suitable candidate, so, the authorities below committed a mistake in<\/p>\n<p>appointing respondent No.4 as Lambardar, lacks merit.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"> C.W.P.No.17705 of 2011                                                                  -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>6.                What cannot possibly be disputed here is that the Lambardar is a<\/p>\n<p>village officer as defined under section 3(11) of the Act and is a link between the<\/p>\n<p>Government functionaries and the village peasants. It is age old institution and is<\/p>\n<p>an integral &amp; significant part of revenue system. The Collector is the appointing<\/p>\n<p>authority of the Lambardar. The appointment of Lambardar is administrative<\/p>\n<p>function and is prerogative of the District Collector, being In-charge of the<\/p>\n<p>Administration. He is in an advantageous position to examine the merits and<\/p>\n<p>demerits of the candidates. Therefore, it would always be in the interest of justice<\/p>\n<p>&amp; administration and it is the duty of the Collector to appoint such person in the<\/p>\n<p>office of Lambardar, who is otherwise eligible and competent to carry out the<\/p>\n<p>duties efficiently.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.                As is evident from the record that, Harpal Singh (respondent No.4) is<\/p>\n<p>a graduate and better qualified than the other two candidates. He has passed Urdu<\/p>\n<p>examination from Language Department, Punjab. He is commanding good<\/p>\n<p>reputation in the village. The Naib Tehsildar and Sub Divisional Officer (C) have<\/p>\n<p>recommended his name for the appointment of Lambardar. On the contrary, a<\/p>\n<p>criminal case was registered against petitioner Sukhdev Singh, on accusation of<\/p>\n<p>having committed the offences punishable under section 148, 323, 324, 326 and<\/p>\n<p>506 read with section 149 IPC, which was pending in the Court of JMIC, Kharar.<\/p>\n<p>After considering the respective merits and demerits of the candidates, the District<\/p>\n<p>Collector appointed respondent No.4 as Lambardar, vide impugned order<\/p>\n<p>(Annexure P1), which, in substance, is as under:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>            &#8220;After going through deeply the record in detail, after hearing all the three<br \/>\n     candidates and arguments of their counsels, I have come to the conclusion that out of the<br \/>\n     three candidates Harpal Singh s\/o Gian Singh is more suitable and meritorious and<br \/>\n     candidate because:-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            This candidate is better qualified than other two candidates. Contrary to this<br \/>\n     candidate Jaswant Singh is 7th class pass. Whereas no proof has been placed on record that<br \/>\n     candidate Sukhdev Singh is literate. Therefore, this highly qualified candidate if appointed<br \/>\n     as Lambardar would be for the benefit of common villagers. Other than this it has come to<br \/>\n     our notice that this candidate Harpal Singh has also passed Urdu examination from<br \/>\n     Language Department, Punjab which is a good qualification of this candidate. Knowledge<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> C.W.P.No.17705 of 2011                                                                 -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     of Urdu is an essential for doing, Revenue Department Work. This qualification has taken<br \/>\n     this candidate ahead of other two candidates. Number of respectable persons from the<br \/>\n     Village have also recommended his candidature for appointment as Lambardar. From this<br \/>\n     it becomes clear that this candidate has got good reputation in the Village. Naib Tehsildar<br \/>\n     Cum Assistant Collector Grade I Kharar and Sub Divisional Magistrate Cum Assistant<br \/>\n     Collector Grade II Kharar have separately recommended that this candidate be appointed<br \/>\n     as Lambardar.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             Keeping in view aforesaid facts and agreeing with the report with report<br \/>\n     dt.17.05.2010 of Sub Divisional Magistrate Cum Assistant Collector Grade I Kharar, I<br \/>\n     hereby appoint Harpal Singh s\/o Gian Singh as new Lambardar on the post which has<br \/>\n     become vacant on account of death of Ram Singh Lambardar Vill. Bhajoli, Tehsil Kharar<br \/>\n     District S.A.S.Nagar. After expiry of period for filing the appeal, Sanad Lambardari be<br \/>\n     issued to this candidate. File be consigned to record.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>8.                It is now well settled proposition of law that choice of the Collector<\/p>\n<p>in the matter of appointment of village Lambardar should not normally be<\/p>\n<p>interfered with, unless the Collector has taken a perverse view and has not<\/p>\n<p>exercised his choice judiciously. In the instant case, the Collector has rightly<\/p>\n<p>weighed the respective pros and cons of the candidates and appointed Harpal<\/p>\n<p>Singh (respondent No.4) as Lambardar.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.                Not only that, the choice of the District Collector was further upheld<\/p>\n<p>by the Divisional Commissioner, through the medium of impugned order<\/p>\n<p>(Annexure P2).\n<\/p>\n<p>10.               At the same time, the learned counsel for the petitioner did not point<\/p>\n<p>out any legal violation and material, much less cogent, to contend as to how and in<\/p>\n<p>what manner, the impugned orders (Annexures P1 &amp; P2) are illegal and would<\/p>\n<p>invite any interference in this relevant behalf.\n<\/p>\n<p>11.               Meaning thereby, the authorities below have recorded the cogent<\/p>\n<p>grounds in this relevant connection. Such orders, containing valid reasons, cannot<\/p>\n<p>possibly be interfered with by this Court, while exercising the limited jurisdiction<\/p>\n<p>of this Court under Articles 226\/227 of the Constitution of India, unless and until,<\/p>\n<p>the same are illegal and perverse. Since no such patent illegality or legal infirmity<\/p>\n<p>has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner, so, the impugned<\/p>\n<p>orders (Annexures P1 &amp; P2) deserve to be and are hereby maintained, in the<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> C.W.P.No.17705 of 2011                                                     -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>obtaining circumstances of the case.\n<\/p>\n<p>12.           No other legal point, worth consideration, has either been urged or<\/p>\n<p>pressed by the counsel for the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>13.           In the light of aforementioned reasons, as there is no merit, therefore,<\/p>\n<p>the instant writ petition is hereby dismissed as such.<\/p>\n<pre>\n\n\n\n                                                              (Mehinder Singh Sullar)\n15.11.2011                                                            Judge\nAS\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Sukhdev Singh vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 15 November, 2011 C.W.P.No.17705 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.17705 of 2011 Date of Decision:-15.11.2011 Sukhdev Singh &#8230;Petitioner Versus State of Punjab &amp; Ors. &#8230;Respondents CORAM: HON&#8217;BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present:- Mr.S.S.Bains, Advocate for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-113406","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sukhdev Singh vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 15 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sukhdev Singh vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 15 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-11-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-16T16:31:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sukhdev Singh vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 15 November, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-16T16:31:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1058,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011\",\"name\":\"Sukhdev Singh vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 15 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-16T16:31:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sukhdev Singh vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 15 November, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sukhdev Singh vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 15 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sukhdev Singh vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 15 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-11-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-16T16:31:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sukhdev Singh vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 15 November, 2011","datePublished":"2011-11-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-16T16:31:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011"},"wordCount":1058,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011","name":"Sukhdev Singh vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 15 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-11-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-16T16:31:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sukhdev-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-15-november-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sukhdev Singh vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 15 November, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113406","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=113406"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113406\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=113406"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=113406"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=113406"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}