{"id":113999,"date":"2011-06-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-06-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011"},"modified":"2018-01-30T05:50:01","modified_gmt":"2018-01-30T00:20:01","slug":"mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mrs Freny Rustumji W\/O Late Mr. … vs M\/S. Rustumji Developments on 3 June, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Mrs Freny Rustumji W\/O Late Mr. … vs M\/S. Rustumji Developments on 3 June, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: S.N.Satyanarayana<\/div>\n
.1-\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARN_x3\u00a3FA_E\u00a7;A 2:51'   1\"'\n\nDATED THIS THE 93% DAY <;)_'11~JUNE'2[\u00a7'1  '\n\nBLT5F_O'\u00a3;E '\n\nTHE HONBLE D\/I1i{.JUST1_(ZiE'\u00bbvS_.fJ:SATYANARAi'ANA\n\nMFA.i\\TC}. 3 680;{2V0b9%[V~{cPC)\n\nBETWEEN :\n\n1.\n\nMrs.F1*\u20aciiy_   ~--\nW\/0 1::1_te--i;M:f.R.H;Rusfu1;'r1_ji;\nAged _ab~:)ut  '\n\n1'vIr_c;ody\u00e9jV ' Ru   '  --. '\nS\/'0 late Ix\/hf.R,H_.Ru\u00a7tun'1ji,\nAged 4\u00a71bf) L1'L 3.2 yrs ., \n\n,  M1'..Xerx\u00e9s ..I}\u00a7{1\u00a7stu\u00a7.nji,\n   \u00a7'5;4--Ig 13:16 Mr.R';'H'.'Rustumji,\n' 2 _, I?\\g\u20ac.d ElbQLlt 30 yrs...\n\n _ AL: a:'_\u20ac  Rustumji Residency\n\n87,.Ri:jh"1n0nd Road,\nBangalore 560 025.\n\n  {by Sri.VAc\u00a2iitya Sondhi, Adv)\n\nM \/3 Rustumji Developments\nA regci, part\ufb01rzership firm\n\nAt Richmond Towers,\n\n12. Richmond Road\nBangalore 560 025\n\nRepby its Mzznaging Partmir\nME' N.E5LRL2sm:1':ji,\n\nKI! Appellants\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n2. lVII'.N.t'l.RLlSiU.iT1ji\n\nS\/o l\\\/lr.H.Rusturnji\n\nAged about 64 yrs,\n\nRichmond Towers__\n\n12, Richmond Road, _ _ '-  V' \n\nBangalore 560 025; it    }  ;. Respondents<\/pre>\n
(by M\/S.KOil1E1l and Bhanii’; Adv \u00a305,323 1 .V  ” ‘<\/p>\n
This apiiealgis filed\u00a7Lu\/Or’der”–43….Rule MR) of the CPC
\nagainst the:.oi<di3_1'  ,1;  l–..2009{passed in OS.No.5163\/2000
\non the file' _oi'.jt'ne  Add'l'e..C'it3r.i'Ciigril' Judge, Bangalore City,
\n(SCCH_1 3], Bang"alore,.._rej_eCting_th~e IAJGII filed under Order
\nXX}\ufb02X;VRule'i\\.\/f\u00bb _2A bf CFC; praying to take action against the
\n21" defendant. 'i'ot"*-..disohley'i'ng' the order of this Court below
\npassed on [A1 rnadefon 1592002 in the interest of justice.<\/p>\n
Thisxiaplpeal e__on;.ing…l-on for admission this day, the court
\ndelivered. the fei iowingz '<\/p>\n
\u00e9 —-  A  JUDGMENT
\n  jThenpb1ai"ntiffs in OS.No.5l63\/2000 have come up in this<\/p>\n
appeal  the one line order passed by the court below<\/p>\n
; on I2}&.Ne,\u00abi6 filed under Order 39 Rule 2A, epc.<\/p>\n
"f2,__Briei' facts leading to this appeal are as unden-<\/p>\n
V  Appellants herein who are plaintiffs in the Court below<\/p>\n
  {tied a suit in OS.No.5l83\/2000 seeking specific performance<\/p>\n
of the agreements dated 31.3.1988 entered in to between them<\/p>\n
and defendants witii rei'e:ren.ee to suit seheduie properties.<\/p>\n
Ct'?\n<\/p>\n
During the pendeney of said proceedings’,'”~–.an..A_”‘or{:ler’\u00bbQf<\/p>\n
temporary i1’1jur1ello11 was granted in’ ..f2tx_r0u1– .__.V0’f_ plaintiffs 5<\/p>\n
pursuant to an application filed_ by
\n1 and 2, ere, which is not ii’r:l:Eispule;*- li’s;= uc}k:l{\u00a3\u00e9’\ufb01l1ed by
\nappellants herein that\/” said interim
\norder defendants herein’  suit schedule
\nproperties in    Of th\u20ac COurt below.\n<\/p>\n
Hence, plain”%;l’l’l’sV   under Order 39<\/p>\n
Rule 2A.\n<\/p>\n
 is an  that an the said application an<\/p>\n
independerr:i_Vhhenqniryyrsvgllso conducted by the Court b\u20ac1OWA<\/p>\n
 p_ Thf:1″3eal’:_e:’,ppborh”:he____parties have addressed their arguments.<\/p>\n
‘$ira.,ngely,. l:h_e’*s_aid application came to be disposed of by the<\/p>\n
:3-rder’ irnpnggnezzfi, which is (me line order datecl 127. 1.2009 reads<\/p>\n
as ‘i:~–nder:’– v
\nA _ l 4′ **17leLo9 PRR. D1 and 2 ss Order on
\nV  here.\n<\/p>\n
A Parties are absent. Orders pronounced in
\nopen eeurl. lA.l6 is rejected. P\/E on merits.<\/p>\n
,1?\/it”\n<\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
we\u00bb?\n<\/p>\n
4-, The eourt below alter eonsldering_….the.”serious<\/p>\n
allegation made by the plaintiffs against d\u20acl’\u20acI’l\u20aclV:EiI1l:,Vlf::”‘~l\/lfl’l’lCll.’K  <\/p>\n
with regard to contemptuous act said to’ha\\}-=e e.;ornn:i”ttl.ed”hy the 7.<\/p>\n
clefendants against the intelfim
\nbelow, alter having 1’ee0r<ledllp:.p:l"the hxevlclenee;  said'
\napplication in lA.l6 anal. thellpa-rtievs, ought to
\nhave given jtltspposing of the said
\napplication   and whatever be
\nthe order it;  on  the ease.\n<\/p>\n
 ‘ithpugned Clearly discloses that the
\ncourt belowuhaslnolt,’l.:app_l1etl its mind. It has considered the<\/p>\n
said;-piapplieation “HIV a very Casual manner though the allegations<\/p>\n
. nlaele _ar:e –qtt’lt,e serious, which Virtually amounts to showing<\/p>\n
H  &lsl\u00a7fes}>’ee’l’V. or contempt to the order of the court which<\/p>\n
cannot”-he “g:Ier1’nit,ted.\n<\/p>\n
 6, It is submitted by the Counsel for appellants that<\/p>\n
l  V ___sluhsequent to filing of the present appeal the aforesaiel suit<\/p>\n
a,<\/p>\n
filed by then} is ellsmissed for default’ in respect of which they<\/p>\n
have filed an applieat,io1: antler Order 9 Rule 30, CFC for<\/p>\n
Q”?\n<\/p>\n
I
\n{II
\nno<\/p>\n
restoration {if the same, which is  :_. in<\/p>\n
Mlse.N’e.32:2\/2009, Be that as it may. ThQi,:ghl_:’inlth:e 4ins\u00a7t’aiii <\/p>\n
case the dismissal of the suit is p’iendi1′;\u00a7jstdnsideratten ir3__the l<\/p>\n
aforesaid miscellaneous pr0ee'<:dings,"pit'd0es snbt.e0'rne:'3in'ithes<\/p>\n
way of the court below taking  matter  to pass
\norders on the application   taking in to
\nConsideration the evidenlce on the said
\napplication    by the parties to
\nsuit. l  L V<\/p>\n
  Counsel for appellant relied<\/p>\n
upon the \u00e9e:;isi.mis-_:e:;des:\u00e9d by the Apex Court in the matter of<\/p>\n
  Pritri'aWi_lAl\\la_t,h lQai'n.,_–_ys~ State of Jharkhand and Others, (2004)<\/p>\n
~   l'yyl~:.e_rein it is observed by the Apex Court as under:<\/p>\n
  a given case, even if ultimately the
\n order is vacated or relief in the main
\n'prdgteeding is not granted to a party, the other
\nAA  cannot take that as a ground for<\/p>\n
 disobedience of any interim order passed by the<\/p>\n
court."\n<\/p>\n
.6..\n<\/p>\n
And also in the matter of K.Seshappa \u00bb–vs~ St.l?r~a.n_e.i.s’<\/p>\n
Chure, Chikkeihallaptzr, i999(5} Kar.L.J  itdi\u00e9slb<\/p>\n
observed by this Court as under:\n<\/p>\n
“Th6 l3ufP0rt of Rhle 2;A is
\nsee that the dignity  is
\nOrders given by the eourt:”are -to beioilllowedi and
\nthey are meant  followed ~-if anyhody tries
\nto take law into    to act in
\nbreach of _the_. order”i’ntentiorially’.arid’lt>urposefuylly
\nknow’ing\u00a7;:   or:c:lerl;_ ljullyl “he has to be
\n Order 39, Rule
\n2;” isto ‘be…n’laintained and if any
\nf2_ers._on   of majesty of law. definitely
\nhelhas  “severe hands. The purpose
\nof Order”39V,V  is to prevent breach of the<\/p>\n
orders oi; the_\u00a7_Z_ot:rt, and disobedience of the orders
\n Cotirt. This has got nothing to do with final
\n the case. Final decision of the Case
\nit   on a separate footing. But, when Court
\n “ordered parties to maintain status quo and
\nlldireeted the parties not to alienate the suit
\nll property in any manner, if sueh at ease is made out
\nA and established, the duty of the Court of law is to
\nsee that said breach is punished and is not
\nrepeated. So, finally what is the decision of the<\/p>\n
suit is a dilierent niatter, but Court has to consider<\/p>\n
the suit separately and the application  . A’<\/p>\n
that the defendant had comrnitted breach offthelll
\nlfljul\/1(,’iiOI1 order that has i0~be_de:%ided’ .l;’ll\u20ac:::~:<\/p>\n
basis of the evidence led in under Cvrderd    Ad<\/p>\n
2–JA applicailon. These two have in be 1;al%i.en”i<3 be <\/p>\n
two disiiinei: pr0eeedirig:\u00e9';..eb NO V :1Qub\u00a3;,""'th\u00e9
\napplication undeif__ Order  2-Ahis .n_1ad_e5 in a
\nsuit to the  that 3. .pda:i-yd"restrained has
\neomrniiiiied breach AV :1 erd-edlrv; that is a
\nseparaie   l13ae.x nothing to do
\nwith  ofilhe.  ufinally decided. In
\nsuppeifii   a'nd"View as mentioned
\nab'dVe., f:.;i"efe'r . in 'the' 'folldwing observations of
\nl{Qni.b'1e.l\\\/lrdudsitiee._C;P.'Mathur of Allahabad High
\neemii' in i.hedease   Chand Jain, supra:
\n Qpvinidcin\ufb02dhe mere fact that an order
\n_dA'v-Jas  hear the miscellaneous Cases<\/p>\n
 \u00e9ilsiiig with the main suit would not mean that<\/p>\n
  lm.iek.:ellane0us eases should be decided en<\/p>\n
dthej__haSis oi' the evidence which had been
\n"*–VA&:~ec:'erded in the main suit and by the same
\n hrder. A proceeding under Order 39, Rule 2-<\/p>\n
A. CPC initiated on the ground ef
\ndisobedience or breach of injunction order, is
\nin {he naiure of a criminal proceeding as the
\npersesen El\u00a7{\u00a31lI1Sl, whom such proceeding is<\/p>\n
iniiiiaied is liable in be detained in prisen if it<\/p>\n
is found that he had committed breach'  \u00bb Al
\nin_iunci.ion order. Since a punishrne_ntf_is
\nimposed and a person is sent
\nprinciple on which these
\ndecided are entirely pdifferent; He-rleilvlthe it
\nprinciple of criminal  "apply, l
\nplaintiff will have top_..elsl'tvablish
\nshadow of douht that}; the-.__d.Vetendants had
\nCOII}I'l1lUL,\u20ac(Ll disobedience of the
\ninjL1r1.ctii.on.._orqlelr"Te\u00a7'en_::"the had full
\nl<n'o_xxl.lVed\u00a7\u00a7e:'._V_oiT   sa_rne&–.V it  burden of
\n  "suchjv cases lies entirely<\/p>\n
 ll  pla:if\u00a7Arii;i,i"l'.*.,f:I'l'1e priiicilple on which a civil<\/p>\n
 suit -different as here decision
\n"wv;'1"E\/h\ufb01f   of pleadings is taken<\/p>\n
_ V onlijhel  of preponderance of evidence."<\/p>\n
   A.\u00a3"iieg5"giving anxious consideration to the submission<\/p>\n
   Counsel for the appellants and as W\u20acll as<\/p>\n
respondlentslland also on going through the aforesaid decisions,<\/p>\n
 xthiis–.Coulri, is of the opinion that the impugned order is required<\/p>\n
 to 'beset aside, The matter should be referred back to the court<\/p>\n
l " -below for fresh eonsideration wit,h a specific direction that the<\/p>\n
court bel<;)w if necessary should rehear the plaintiffs and<\/p>\n
-9-<\/span><\/p>\n
defericlarits aiirl after giving them S1;fl.iCi\u20acI1lif'{)}3’p<\u00a7i'l}ti3;1il;}( shall.<\/p>\n
dispose of IA l6 on merits taking irivto eon'sitieratio_n"=:1Vthe<\/p>\n
evidence which is already record-e__d ari\u00e9ie.at?ailabl'e1:iI1\u00ab.file. <\/p>\n
9. Furtlier, it is   the original suit is
\ndismissed and restoratiorivo\ufb01thlellsan*ielV.is~:4._p;ti’der consideration
\nin misoellarieous’~tir:)Cet?_dir;gs: JL1\\\\(‘3:~.,”g’,’:”v;Zf.YV1′.\u00a7i’v:lVi’i’7\u00a37ill not Come in the
\nway Of court   hearing the Parties on
\nIA. 16  it is”‘a”totally separate and distinct
\nissue   below, which directly refers to<\/p>\n
fI1EllI1t\u20acil11lIi’g~,'(:V{“j’g’;I1i”E!jy7-_ de_e’oriilm and majesty of the court.<\/p>\n
 of the foregoing, the appeal filed by appellants<\/p>\n
his  aforesaid observations and with a direction<\/p>\n
thatthe i,e1_l,lOfl in [A916 should be reheard and disposed of<\/p>\n
‘V..,within” 601- days irom 1.7.2011. The aforesaid date is fixed in<\/p>\n
 fireseorte of counsel appearing for plaintiffs, appellants<\/p>\n
hereiri and aisrfi respondents, defendants in the Court below so
\nas to prevent any delay that may arise in issue of notice to
\nparties since original suit is dismissed and the same is pending
\nCi)l”kSiC\u00a7\u20ac’.f\u20ac:l,l{)ll in the aforesaiei miseellarieous proceedings.<\/p>\n
ea\/is”;\n<\/p>\n
E<\/p>\n
-10-<\/span><\/p>\n
Both the is\/21rm:>d Counsel are directed to inforrri”–f;heif=pV3rfi\u20acs:ted <\/p>\n
mak\u20ac: I1\u20ac{‘,\u20acSS.’:1\u00a3’:y’ arrangexnants fog’ their \u00ab_a;ppeara”n_ceV ‘th ‘r01igh i <\/p>\n
c0un$\u20ac-I an 1.712011 in disposed <\/p>\n
file of V AddLCity cm: Court,  13, “Ba;:ga1\u00a2y\u00e9”*a}\u00a7d”tE; assist<\/p>\n
the Court below in dispuging g–i”‘ii1\u00e9:’seiid_ matt\u00e9r”-within 60 days<\/p>\n
from the said date.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Mrs Freny Rustumji W\/O Late Mr. … vs M\/S. Rustumji Developments on 3 June, 2011 Author: S.N.Satyanarayana .1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARN_x3\u00a3FA_E\u00a7;A 2:51′ 1″‘ DATED THIS THE 93% DAY <;)_'11~JUNE'2[\u00a7'1 ' BLT5F_O'\u00a3;E ' THE HONBLE D\/I1i{.JUST1_(ZiE'\u00bbvS_.fJ:SATYANARAi'ANA MFA.i\\TC}. 3 680;{2V0b9%[V~{cPC) BETWEEN : 1. Mrs.F1*\u20aciiy_ ~– W\/0 1::1_te–i;M:f.R.H;Rusfu1;'r1_ji; Aged _ab~:)ut ' 1'vIr_c;ody\u00e9jV […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-113999","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMrs Freny Rustumji W\/O Late Mr. ... vs M\/S. Rustumji Developments on 3 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mrs Freny Rustumji W\/O Late Mr. ... vs M\/S. Rustumji Developments on 3 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-30T00:20:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mrs Freny Rustumji W\/O Late Mr. … vs M\/S. Rustumji Developments on 3 June, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-30T00:20:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1720,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011\",\"name\":\"Mrs Freny Rustumji W\/O Late Mr. ... vs M\/S. Rustumji Developments on 3 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-30T00:20:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mrs Freny Rustumji W\/O Late Mr. … vs M\/S. Rustumji Developments on 3 June, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mrs Freny Rustumji W\/O Late Mr. ... vs M\/S. Rustumji Developments on 3 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mrs Freny Rustumji W\/O Late Mr. ... vs M\/S. Rustumji Developments on 3 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-30T00:20:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mrs Freny Rustumji W\/O Late Mr. … vs M\/S. Rustumji Developments on 3 June, 2011","datePublished":"2011-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-30T00:20:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011"},"wordCount":1720,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011","name":"Mrs Freny Rustumji W\/O Late Mr. ... vs M\/S. Rustumji Developments on 3 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-30T00:20:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-freny-rustumji-wo-late-mr-vs-ms-rustumji-developments-on-3-june-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mrs Freny Rustumji W\/O Late Mr. … vs M\/S. Rustumji Developments on 3 June, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113999","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=113999"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113999\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=113999"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=113999"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=113999"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}