{"id":114227,"date":"2008-03-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008"},"modified":"2016-11-07T23:55:34","modified_gmt":"2016-11-07T18:25:34","slug":"shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Shri Seetaram S\/O Sagun Charan vs Abdulsalam S\/O Husainsab Mujawar on 28 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Shri Seetaram S\/O Sagun Charan vs Abdulsalam S\/O Husainsab Mujawar on 28 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Ajit J Gunjal<\/div>\n
I I \n\nT 31' *\"'-'*-j'Hii\n\n% % IN THEHIGH comm' 0F'KARNATAKA AT  V  j\nT DATED\" 'I'I-HS THE 23'\u00bb: DAY.?O_I-\"'MAR(_31\u00e9I'    T  & \n\nI-I\n1.:\n\n'r\n7 I' \\J'Iu\\\n-_\n\nan-.m.  '\n\n1'}\n-THE   -\n. .R.P.   \n\n A     \n\n%     T  \n\n    *  \n<\/pre>\n
.Bclgaum_ -%-L590 %er:2;jk%     % …P13:’rrIfIoNER<\/p>\n
{By [A\u00ab1v=%;\n<\/p>\n
: ff’%f*;a\u00a7ah”}-1:3′,u”wa:~,<\/p>\n
_   ‘A\u00a7’mi’j%a.bDutLi62f’years.\n<\/p>\n
I    _
\n% %  ; .  = % ._’R,IQ_eE.0QfI’.
\n‘ ‘ ” ‘V V   Oluhr-Road;\n<\/p>\n
H” I?    7 _. u.n_.1.a_I’__.I.,\\.n.=u..r us<\/p>\n
  (Bys\ufb02.Smt_.HeAdv;jfm,’
\n”  ‘  for’fi’G,lR)  . ‘<\/p>\n
‘I’:m\u00a7unr1
\n9′ L1<\/p>\n
 the property in question, which is an old house. A<\/p>\n
This H.R.R.P. is med under Section 115 n dd-ode
\nCode of Civil Procedure against me o1derb”d,’ated
\nQ6.08.2(l”.’)? ea-..s.% in I-IRRP He. 61,1290-5 en;”‘t}..?1.’e..’_f&k’ of<\/p>\n
the 11 Addl. District Judge, Belgaum, rcjec\ufb01zlg tneialaetde
\nRevision petition and    ‘* .
\n10.08.2005 passed in HRC No.11’\/2003* on t;.l1e”i?:1eVof.t’.l1e’; T <\/p>\n
IV Add]. civn Judge (Jr.Dn.) Be1g\u00a7auin,’ee..a1lourif2g…_ti3;ee<\/p>\n
I-mall-J<\/p>\n
mtitien \ufb01led under See\ufb01.enTV2?{2}{2?}  9}   <\/p>\n
1999.\n<\/p>\n
This H.R.R.P. coming  this day,
\nthe Court made the foliowingz   ___  ” ”<\/p>\n
This.-reiiieie.n;’–_V1$ dude  115 of the Code of
\nCivil  -ter.ai:t….  He is questioning the
\nmderpassecz  -_II_.Ir_lge 9.8  3.5 the<\/p>\n
Revisionei”-Comet.-._ Aiioth’ the Courts  c0n”‘c’:’un’c:I'””1t’1y’<\/p>\n
   ._t.heu “Ia:.ee!k)rd requires the premises for his<\/p>\n
h’      occupation.\n<\/p>\n
 2;:  the course of this order, the parties<\/p>\n
U W H    referred to as ‘landord’ and ‘tenant’.<\/p>\n
3. The landlord claims that he is absolute owner of<\/p>\n
\/-<"\n<\/p>\n
–.r<\/p>\n
” CICDLULI I1 l(ci:l-“all-r-I-I-I-III-I Ill-I-l\\l\u00bb<\/p>\n
‘ .- ‘ _. -.- – m<\/p>\n
According to the landlord, the tenant has <\/p>\n
occupying the premises as a tenant on a   ~ V.<\/p>\n
Rs.100\/- and the rents are paid up to  <\/p>\n
_A_ccor\u00a2:.i1ng :9 tn: 1a;;s1w, there  <\/p>\n
.._…a ….1 a………..it 1…t…………. 1…….4’ rm… 1-…n.;_’A s<\/p>\n
Hsului 111 \ufb01uu LCIH:-ll cc.u.t.uI.:1.u.<. us. u:11u.:yu.I'u \ufb01f\ufb01\ufb01"<\/p>\n
further state that the   of
\nmeats. The landlord    more
\nthan 50 trucks end  is running a<\/p>\n
n…..\n<\/p>\n
4-up-pa-vu —.—– ——_<\/p>\n
not have st\ufb01tnhic  j  fifii’ V’stom1g”””* the nis.tena1*”‘s
\nrelating to  \ufb02eet of vehicles. Hence, he<\/p>\n
requirestthe   for using the same as<\/p>\n
_ godogvrx to   and also damaged spare<\/p>\n
-or his<\/p>\n
‘ ‘I. let?! In?’ I ‘&J\\!JuI M559 antics VII’-I’-D 0 ‘ -r’ on –<\/p>\n
 occupation. Another <\/p>\n
 c which  by the landlord is that he does not have<\/p>\n
t H H K  suttable aoeommoda\ufb02on in the City at Belgaum. He
\n  t  makes a speci\ufb01c averxnent that the tenant has<\/p>\n
n \u00abnah-Inn!-Ia’! no-u-I (“nu-ninanrvinl (“J-nnnlnur nI’ hid
\n\\-\u00a2J\\fiu-I \\W\\I.’lD-‘I\\\ufb01ll ‘Z JJJI’<\/p>\n
E<\/p>\n
own and the same is in his possession. Hence, the<\/p>\n
(.3.\n<\/p>\n
‘I
\nI
\n1<\/span><\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
1 n<\/p>\n
eviction petiizion under Section ‘.’2″r'(2jm ti. ij) <\/p>\n
Karnataka Rent Act, 1999.<\/p>\n
4. ‘i”‘nc tenant entered -:  ‘*
\nobjections denying the avermenfis of Ht?’<\/p>\n
submits that he has been inV_e.’:eu1:Vr”s\ufb01en of  *<\/p>\n
since last 60 years  *  rents
\nregalarl”. He is not    u’a’.vJ. aw.-mite
\nthat the Ianagom   in the City
\nof     he does not
\nhave   submitted that
\nhe does not  complex as contended by<\/p>\n
………. ..1.- 4.1…- …a…__4…….._……
\nI. U15 “II.\n<\/p>\n
(‘4’<\/p>\n
 –  _ of  insdnesofto denial.<\/p>\n
. 2 “u:  ri..;;,’~:__\u00a7.. 4.1…. ..,…….,…. ml.’ 4…._.:…I 4.1…. n……n………:
\n‘- ‘ ‘K10.’ ‘  L115 bullluc U1 lnl.-I’ll, I-Ix mllul\ufb02u<\/p>\n
 ms Power of mm-ncy holder as P.W.I and has<\/p>\n
 on Ex.P1 to Ex.Pl0. The tenant has
\n  ‘exazximed himself as R.W.1 and Ex.R1 to Ex.R3 are<\/p>\n
d’   The !e.a_r11er._l ‘1:-L4 Judge h.gvi._n.g regsIxd_ to fix<\/p>\n
I_A ____.A.\n<\/p>\n
J. S__ ‘_._- J.\n<\/p>\n
I. III [J U].\n<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
1.–\n<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
SF<\/p>\n
1..__ _ – 1..\n<\/p>\n
(33 L C ID<\/p>\n
‘ ” D’lV\\DlI!”|’Im<\/p>\n
conclusion that the landlord has established <\/p>\n
requires the premises for his use and A’ <\/p>\n
up\n<\/p>\n
-r
\nT
\nI<\/p>\n
‘I’\\ I|’oI’I’-Iam fha<\/p>\n
hm-aunt as \ufb01t’!  <\/p>\n
ILL]. I-ul.l\\.nL I.-I135: In-Int’-I ld|d.IAIiI.|A \u00abIlsa. $53.’  V. _ I-FIIIIOI-l’$VD%’v’qIlUF<\/p>\n
accommodation. ‘This order W61: ,1 f<\/p>\n
tenant before the Revisional  ‘who on    it<\/p>\n
the evidence has con\ufb01rmed  ‘of:the <\/p>\n
 Judge.\n<\/p>\n
6.   appearing<\/p>\n
1:\u00bb: the  requirement or the<\/p>\n
-:\n<\/p>\n
‘:1
\nI
\nII
\nII
\nt
\n%
\nI<\/p>\n
    the impugned orders.\n<\/p>\n
c. 1}; ‘ .– h g _.L….._…_. :4. 1.. .n.- 1.- _._a,.:…_..| .n….a. 4.1.3-<\/p>\n
“-.8.  me IJTSI l\ufb01suul , 1 1 we 1 u 1:u uusu. uua<\/p>\n
 at n\u00e9mi\u00e9ion under Section 115 of the Code of Civil
\n  Indeed the powers, which can be exercised<\/p>\n
   this Court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil<\/p>\n
Q ‘
\nI \u00abl\\lI)\\-OI’!-I-I ‘ BI-II-r Q.-I-Iaauuaun aonuagnauuuquanuiuu<\/p>\n
.5-\n<\/p>\n
out that the impugned orders su\ufb02br from  <\/p>\n
without jurisdiction interference is not    of  ” <\/p>\n
9. The landlord during t.he  of  ‘ ‘    a
\nstated that he requires the   <\/p>\n
and occupation inasmuch astbeV_said  * V L’<\/p>\n
to we statien mad :–.=.nd,.-cu.-=-. ‘=-..ez–.v\\’-,m.~’–!e’1..:p_–…. ef pm\ufb01fably as<\/p>\n
godown to store the   it is not
\nin dispute    of vehicles,
\nwhich  and for such
\nperiodiev    are essential and to<\/p>\n
4…… 4-  …’ …….-.’ .-.’.-.’..”…9-.. 1-. ‘<\/p>\n
suum the ‘*”-nu”‘-‘see. It has<\/p>\n
var’ ‘ ngtguan}-\u00abII:-r|:_n_u: I-‘-uQ__
\n I.-ES’:  I-I-M: 1119<\/p>\n
also co_1’neV’i1:..I1ls,  that’ apart from the <\/p>\n
” ‘~  he nethave any other suitable premises
\n   Indeed it is to be noticed that the<\/p>\n
    to be considered, havi_n_g regrd to the<\/p>\n
 “.j*;~.__”presumption, which is t be i\ufb02\ufb01 in \ufb01’v’o1ir of the
\ni it      regarding his requirement. It is to be noticed
\n  h   the tenant has not let in any evidence, which can<\/p>\n
   rebut the said presumption. Hence, the \ufb01ndings ,,<\/p>\n
4-?’<\/p>\n
______–_____________\ufb02’\ufb02\ufb02wdh\ufb02h$\ufb02<\/p>\n
  Jae tm said \ufb01ndings on the basis of wide-n”<\/p>\n
.7.\n<\/p>\n
recorded by the Courts below on the questio,n–._of<\/p>\n
requirement cannot be faulted.<\/p>\n
10. In so far as the \ufb01nding V’  “cw .
\nhaving alternate premises,    .<\/p>\n
Act is concerned, the   :fou:1e*’ion <\/p>\n
ecimission of the ten.;a_t;t  at  Bm
\n11 Wever, ex’ianation i” the tenant
\non contest.   and his
\nbrother is    recorded by the
\nlearned,  by the learned<\/p>\n
4;i’1._  the findings neeomded, I am of<\/p>\n
BIN:\n<\/p>\n
 ‘~i’s.uiteti. “i”‘ne1e is no merit in this <\/p>\n
  stands -rejected.\n<\/p>\n
it       Sanjay  ‘, ieamed counsei
\n    for the tenant submits that the tenant is an<\/p>\n
 Ex-servicemen and has been residing in the premises 4,}<\/p>\n
\/4<\/p>\n
(IL<\/p>\n
 last 66 yes1s””‘. He see”*’**<\/p>\n
vacant possession.\n<\/p>\n
13. Smtjiemaiekha, learned ‘ifff\ufb02 ll ” ~
\nthe landlord submits that having    <\/p>\n
the tenant has an alternate eat  <\/p>\n
months time may be\n<\/p>\n
14. Having regardHt_o-‘ ‘_  <\/p>\n
and also the t}3.ct:tl’1at the  1.1nIT’Ex-Serviceman,<\/p>\n
Necdiessodmk  mam: grant of ‘time is<\/p>\n
subject to  tcte  the usual undertakings Wlt.h1n’<\/p>\n
tour tveelts,  following conditions:<\/p>\n
  the  shall not induct any\n<\/p>\n
 —  into the petition schedule<\/p>\n
‘pfeniises.\n<\/p>\n
Ll
\nE
\n3<\/span>
\n“S
\n8<\/span>
\n’13
\n\u00ab*2
\nB
\n(M
\n\u00a7<\/p>\n
3. That he shall not drive the landlord to
\n\ufb01le Execution petition. \ufb02
\n\/–d<\/p>\n
n I I
\ncxtczzgion of time.\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Shri Seetaram S\/O Sagun Charan vs Abdulsalam S\/O Husainsab Mujawar on 28 March, 2008 Author: Ajit J Gunjal I I T 31′ *”‘-‘*-j’Hii % % IN THEHIGH comm’ 0F’KARNATAKA AT V j T DATED” ‘I’I-HS THE 23’\u00bb: DAY.?O_I-“‘MAR(_31\u00e9I’ T & I-I 1.: ‘r 7 I’ \\J’Iu\\ -_ an-.m. ‘ 1’} -THE – […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-114227","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nShri Seetaram S\/O Sagun Charan vs Abdulsalam S\/O Husainsab Mujawar on 28 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Seetaram S\/O Sagun Charan vs Abdulsalam S\/O Husainsab Mujawar on 28 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-07T18:25:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Seetaram S\\\/O Sagun Charan vs Abdulsalam S\\\/O Husainsab Mujawar on 28 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-07T18:25:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1172,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Shri Seetaram S\\\/O Sagun Charan vs Abdulsalam S\\\/O Husainsab Mujawar on 28 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-07T18:25:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Seetaram S\\\/O Sagun Charan vs Abdulsalam S\\\/O Husainsab Mujawar on 28 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Seetaram S\/O Sagun Charan vs Abdulsalam S\/O Husainsab Mujawar on 28 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Seetaram S\/O Sagun Charan vs Abdulsalam S\/O Husainsab Mujawar on 28 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-07T18:25:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Seetaram S\/O Sagun Charan vs Abdulsalam S\/O Husainsab Mujawar on 28 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-07T18:25:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008"},"wordCount":1172,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008","name":"Shri Seetaram S\/O Sagun Charan vs Abdulsalam S\/O Husainsab Mujawar on 28 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-07T18:25:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-seetaram-so-sagun-charan-vs-abdulsalam-so-husainsab-mujawar-on-28-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Seetaram S\/O Sagun Charan vs Abdulsalam S\/O Husainsab Mujawar on 28 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114227","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=114227"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114227\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=114227"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=114227"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=114227"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}