{"id":114258,"date":"2010-10-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010"},"modified":"2017-02-05T00:02:38","modified_gmt":"2017-02-04T18:32:38","slug":"gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Gayatridevi K W\/O N K Subrmanya vs The High Court Of Karnataka on 27 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Gayatridevi K W\/O N K Subrmanya vs The High Court Of Karnataka on 27 October, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: J.S.Khehar(Cj) And A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2010\nPRESENT i\"d'\u00b0\n\nTI-IE HONBLE MR.J.S.KHEHAR, CHIEF   \n\nAND \nTHE HONBLE MR.JtJ$TI(5E_  9' \nWRIT PETITION   \nBETWEEN:    9'\n\nSII1t.GayatrideVi K.\n\nJudgment Writer   - \nAged about 4+O4}A\"3.\u00ab'irs  2:   \n   \u00bb\nLabour C0'L11't'i:__V;\".  \n\nMangaioire;-97:, 9:3:   ...Petitioner\n\n . A it  (By.   .AdVo(:ate)\n\nAND; _\n\n V'  ,1 .   Court\"'0f'Karnataka\n\n' = By Registrar (Vigilance)\n\n2.' Ts\u00a7finci;$.fa1'i}..--i5'istrict &amp;\nSessiions Judge\nAnd\u00bb. Diiscipiinary Authority\n\n2  V. 99 'Hsssan. ...Responden1:s\n\n(By Sri B.Veerappa. AGA)\n\nThis Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and\n\nV 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash vide\n\nAnneXure--F dated 19.6.1998 issued by R2 and\n\n\n\n\"\"\"~r*\"\"i\u20ac'Mz'9v\n\nAnnexure-H passed by the R1 dated 28.1.2004 and to\ndirect the respondents to grant all consequential<\/pre>\n<p>monetary benefit flowing from the quashing of the above<br \/>\norders including the award of costs. <\/p>\n<p>T his Writ Petition coming on for final <\/p>\n<p>day, Chief Justice passed the following order;:._    <\/p>\n<p>J.S.KHEI-IAR. C.-J. (Oral):\n<\/p>\n<p>The petitioner is Va._V_\u00b0&#8217;Stenographer,_  &#8216;was-V<\/p>\n<p>employed in the Sessions Qiv-isi&#8217;on,&#8217;-~.Hassan.,.During the<br \/>\ncourse of her  dated<br \/>\n25.11.1996  statement of<br \/>\nimputatiorils   charge&#8211;sheet is<br \/>\nbeing   it  6<\/p>\n<p>1 .9 9 1 +\u20acrhei._. A-:1ci.1.Munsiff and J.M.F.C (11<br \/>\n Court}.&#8217;\u00b0I-&#8216;lastsan, in his [).O.Letter No.2\/96<br \/>\n&#8220;Dated 16\/ 11\/1996 has reported that at<br \/>\nab&#8217;ou_t 10.50 A.M. you entered into chamber<br \/>\n\u00aband asked the Presiding Officer why you<br \/>\n have ordered for issue of memo in respect of<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;  &#8221; attending in framing of charges and<br \/>\n1&#8242; .&#8221;\u00a7&#8211;p1&#8217;eas in C.C. 1586\/93, 1154\/95 and 4541\/94<br \/>\n~ on 14\/ 11\/1996 and you further spoken that<br \/>\n&#8216;&#8221;the Add1.Munisff. Hassan, acting at the<br \/>\ninstigation of District Judge&#8221; and that you<br \/>\nknow what to do and how to give reply to the<br \/>\nmemo. This amounts to serious misconduct<\/p>\n<p>on the part of Srnt.K.Gayathri Devi,<\/p>\n<p>Stenographer.\n<\/p>\n<p>You are in the habitual in insuiting the<br \/>\nPresiding Officer whenever Work entrusted to<\/p>\n<p>you and when the same is not attending in<br \/>\nthe stipulated period, for instance your four<br \/>\nincrements have been with&#8211;ho1d with<br \/>\ncumulative effect in DE. 1\/96.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>2. T he petitioner submitted a reply to the <\/p>\n<p>charge&#8211;sheet on 21.12.1996. After the   <\/p>\n<p>the departmental enquiry, the&#8221;ddidscipiinaryhi&#8221;authority<\/p>\n<p>in\ufb02icted the punishment of stoppage of <\/p>\n<p>with cumulative effect on thejpetitioner;&#8221;yide&#8217;\u00b0\u00bban&#8221; order<br \/>\ndated It1e.i998.&#8217;rhe\u00ab;xaru\u00a7\ufb01\u00a2r \ufb01re\ufb01ured an: appeal<br \/>\nagainst the order passed  authority<\/p>\n<p>which was  1\u20aciy&#8217;th&#8217;e.:&#8217;a&#8211;ppe.1.}:ate authority on<\/p>\n<p>28lJ26\ufb02@*Q$&#8217;w y _<br \/>\n  the orders dated 19.6.1998<\/p>\n<p>and 28.112-Q04, VVth_&#8217;edpeti:t=ioner approached this Court by<\/p>\n<p> =   presentwrit&#8217; petition.\n<\/p>\n<p> _V  ~TIp&#8217;he&#8221;-..fi_rst contention advanced by the iearned<\/p>\n<p>uddcountsei&#8217;   petitioner was, that the entire enquiry\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;V proe&#8217;eeding&#8221;sv stand vitiated on account of the fact, that<br \/>\n dd\ufb01dufring  the course of the Departmentai Enquiry<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  conducted against the petitioner. the petitioner was not<\/p>\n<p>permitted to lead any evidence in her defence. Referring<br \/>\nto the rules of natural justice as also the mandate of<\/p>\n<p>provisions of Article 311(2) of the Constitution India,<\/p>\n<p>it is submitted by the learned counsel for<br \/>\nthat the enquiry conducted &#8220;against_7&#8217;th&#8217;e:&#8217;.&#8217;;petiti&#8217;onerll&#8221;<br \/>\ncannot be said to be reasonabie1&#8217;_&#8217;_&#8217;as&#8217;l shed&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>deemed to have been affordlevdia reasona1:;l&#8217;ev_o&#8217;p;portdnity&#8221;Vit<\/p>\n<p>to defend herself, and as &#8220;_the~\u00bb..sarne&#8221;ioliaioie to be<br \/>\nset aside. &#8216;4 V A<\/p>\n<p>5. We;  iirst contention<br \/>\nadvanced  the petitioner on<br \/>\nthe issltiel  l  an opportunity of<\/p>\n<p>leading&#8217;-ei\/idence&#8221;&#8216;iii._llher&#8221;defence. In the statement of<\/p>\n<p>irnputations, thepcategoric stance of the respondents as<\/p>\n<p>:.&#8221;=__!Vi&#8217;depic&#8217;te:dl..in:&#8217;paragraph&#8211;8 is that the petitioner having<br \/>\n sufficient opportunity, did not adduce any<br \/>\n evidence&#8217;; .V&#8217;l;hat apart, we have perused the appeal<br \/>\n by the petitioner against the punishment<br \/>\n    dated 19.6.1998. Although, the aforesaid appeal<\/p>\n<p> was exhaustive wherein the petitioner had raised all<\/p>\n<p>legal objections which were open to her, it was no where<\/p>\n<p>her contention that the enquiry officer had not<br \/>\npermitted her to lead evidence in her defence. it is<\/p>\n<p>therefore, not possible for us to accept the*~._i&#8217;irst<\/p>\n<p>contention advanced by the learned coun\u00e9\u00e9el  .<\/p>\n<p>petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>6. The second contention advanced <\/p>\n<p>counsel for the petitionerll.v\\&#8217;fa.s, that <\/p>\n<p>inflicted upon the petitionerhighly.disproplbrtionate<br \/>\nto the charges levelled  her. it was<br \/>\nsought to   presumed for<br \/>\nthe sake  ltlheipipetitioner was guilty of<br \/>\nthe   was extremely harsh<\/p>\n<p>for  to inflict the major penalty<\/p>\n<p>of stoppage of increments with cumulative effect on<\/p>\n<p>. her,<\/p>\n<p>   apparent from the statement of<\/p>\n<p>impiltaitiolis which have been extracted hereinabove,<\/p>\n<p>it that the charge levelled against the petitioner is of<br \/>\n internperate behaviour. The statement of imputation<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;Valso discloses, that another departmental enquiry on<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;_&#8230;&#8211;o<\/p>\n<p>U <\/p>\n<p>account of similar behaviour of the petitioner was<br \/>\npending against her. In a separate order passed by us<\/p>\n<p>today, while disposing of Writ Petition No.2()22v~\/ll\/:&#8217;iZ_:\u00bb0&#8217;l*1._V(),<\/p>\n<p>accepting the plea advanced at the hands<br \/>\ncounsel for the petitioner, a1tho_u.gh__thefpunishment  K&#8221;<br \/>\nstoppage of four increments with cumulativie <\/p>\n<p>been in\ufb02icted upon the petitioner, ordered  V<\/p>\n<p>to be reduced to sto.ppage&#8212;&#8212;VVof.tvao i.ncreme1}1ts with<br \/>\ncumulative effect.    of\ufb01t\u00e9milar Q<br \/>\nbehaviour at   petitioner. Having<br \/>\nexamined  mtoltialiiy of the facts and<br \/>\ncircurnstaiicesh\ufb01   the statement of<br \/>\nimputat.ions  the petitioner, we are of the<\/p>\n<p>viewpthat the&#8217;puVnish_ment inflicted upon the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>5[jthe,.\\&#8212;r.:di&#8217;sciplin&#8217;ary&#8221;authority cannot be termed as<\/p>\n<p>  to the charges levelled and proved<\/p>\n<p> ..  8;&#8221;-&#8216;Thus viewed, we \ufb01nd no merit even in the<\/p>\n<p>  second contention advanced by the learned counsel for<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;the petitioner.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Gayatridevi K W\/O N K Subrmanya vs The High Court Of Karnataka on 27 October, 2010 Author: J.S.Khehar(Cj) And A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2010 PRESENT i&#8221;d&#8217;\u00b0 TI-IE HONBLE MR.J.S.KHEHAR, CHIEF AND THE HONBLE MR.JtJ$TI(5E_ 9&#8242; WRIT PETITION BETWEEN: 9&#8242; SII1t.GayatrideVi [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-114258","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Gayatridevi K W\/O N K Subrmanya vs The High Court Of Karnataka on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gayatridevi K W\/O N K Subrmanya vs The High Court Of Karnataka on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-04T18:32:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Gayatridevi K W\\\/O N K Subrmanya vs The High Court Of Karnataka on 27 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-04T18:32:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":812,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Gayatridevi K W\\\/O N K Subrmanya vs The High Court Of Karnataka on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-04T18:32:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gayatridevi K W\\\/O N K Subrmanya vs The High Court Of Karnataka on 27 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gayatridevi K W\/O N K Subrmanya vs The High Court Of Karnataka on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gayatridevi K W\/O N K Subrmanya vs The High Court Of Karnataka on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-04T18:32:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Gayatridevi K W\/O N K Subrmanya vs The High Court Of Karnataka on 27 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-04T18:32:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010"},"wordCount":812,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010","name":"Gayatridevi K W\/O N K Subrmanya vs The High Court Of Karnataka on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-04T18:32:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gayatridevi-k-wo-n-k-subrmanya-vs-the-high-court-of-karnataka-on-27-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gayatridevi K W\/O N K Subrmanya vs The High Court Of Karnataka on 27 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114258","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=114258"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114258\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=114258"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=114258"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=114258"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}