{"id":114333,"date":"2011-05-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011"},"modified":"2018-07-10T05:42:42","modified_gmt":"2018-07-10T00:12:42","slug":"mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Ramphool Meena vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Ramphool Meena vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011<\/div>\n
                    In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                             \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0at\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0                    \u00a0\n           New\u00a0Delhi\n                                                                  File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000877\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a027,\u00a02011\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a027,\u00a02011\u00a0\n\n\nParties:\n\n\nAppellant\n\n\nMr.\u00a0Ramphool\u00a0Meena\nS\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Bhauri\u00a0Ram\u00a0\nNear\u00a0TV\u00a0tower,\u00a0Mukam\u00a0Post,\nBassi,\u00a0Distt\u00a0:\u00a0Jaipur\n\nRepresented\u00a0by\u00a0:\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.\n\nRespondent\n\n\n1.         The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer,\n\n           North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway,\n\n           Headquarter\u00a0office,\n\n           Hasanpura\u00a0Road,\n\n           Jaipur\n\n\n\n\n2.         The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\n\n           North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway,\n\n           Headquarter\u00a0office,\n\n           Hasanpura\u00a0Road,\n\n           Jaipur\n\n\n\n\nRepresented\u00a0by\u00a0:\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Subhash\u00a0Rawat,\u00a0PIO\n                    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Ajay\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0OS\/C\/NWR\/JP\n                    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Tej\u00a0Singh,\u00a0N\/Clerk\n                         \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0M\u00a0K\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0APIO\n\n\n\n\n                        Present\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0\n\n\nInformation\u00a0Commissioner                        :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n\n_______________________________________________________________\n\n                                                                 Decision\u00a0Notice\n\n\nAs\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n\n\n\n\n                        In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n\n                                                            at\n\n                        \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                                       File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000877\n\n                                                            ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Background:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0request\u00a0dt.21.10.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway\u00a0requesting\u00a0for\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0
\n            of \u00a0 a \u00a0 duty \u00a0 pass \u00a0 which \u00a0 had \u00a0 been \u00a0 issued\u00a0 to \u00a0 him\u00a0 by\u00a0 the\u00a0 Superintending\u00a0 Engineer\u00a0 (Construction),\u00a0 North\u00a0<\/p>\n
            Western\u00a0Railway\u00a0for\u00a0use\u00a0from\u00a0Jodhpur\u00a0to\u00a0Samdadi\u00a0Jn.\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0period\u00a0\u00a05.3.99\u00a0to\u00a014.3.99.\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0requested\u00a0<\/p>\n
            for\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0a\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.18.3.99\u00a0by\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0public\u00a0authority\u00a0had\u00a0authorized\u00a0him\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0an\u00a0<\/p>\n
            informal\u00a0Union\u00a0meeting.\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0also\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0what\u00a0action\u00a0was\u00a0taken\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0notices\u00a0sent\u00a0by\u00a0<\/p>\n
            his\u00a0Adv.\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Ganesh\u00a0Meena\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0public\u00a0authority.\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a08.11.10\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0<\/p>\n
            requested\u00a0in\u00a0points\u00a0nos.\u00a01\u00a0and\u00a02\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0very\u00a0old\u00a0record\u00a0and\u00a0hence,\u00a0not\u00a0available\u00a0for\u00a0reference.\u00a0As\u00a0for\u00a0\u00a0point\u00a0<\/p>\n
            no.3,\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0gave\u00a0detailed\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0provided\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0required\u00a0document.\u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0<\/p>\n
            with \u00a0 the \u00a0 information, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 filed \u00a0 a \u00a0 first \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 dt \u00a0 22.11.10 \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority. \u00a0 The\u00a0<\/p>\n
            Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a029.1210,\u00a0upholding\u00a0the\u00a0PIO’s\u00a0decision.\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0this\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
            Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.4.3.11,\u00a0reiterating\u00a0his\u00a0request\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0information.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Decision\u00a0\n<\/p>\n
       2. During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0in\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0another\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0(which\u00a0was\u00a0
\n          registered\u00a0with\u00a0them\u00a0against\u00a0no.4126),\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0has\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0informed\u00a0that\u00a0on\u00a0checking\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
          counterfoils\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0passbooks,\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0nowhere\u00a0has\u00a0it\u00a0been\u00a0recorded\u00a0that\u00a0a\u00a0duty\u00a0pass\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
          specified\u00a0time\u00a0period\u00a0(from\u00a05.3.99\u00a0to\u00a014.3.99)\u00a0was\u00a0issued\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0This\u00a0information\u00a0<\/p>\n
          was\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0on\u00a020.10.10\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Nodal\u00a0Officer,\u00a0North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway.\u00a0Hence\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0clear\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
          matter\u00a0pertaining\u00a0to\u00a0information\u00a0requested\u00a0against\u00a0item\u00a0no.1\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0settled.<\/p>\n
      3. As\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0in\u00a0point\u00a0no.2,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0such\u00a0letter\u00a0was\u00a0issued\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0
\n          Appellant\u00a0on\u00a018.3.99.\u00a0However,\u00a0a\u00a0letter\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0matter\u00a0was\u00a0indeed\u00a0issued\u00a0on\u00a08.3.99\u00a0giving\u00a0a\u00a0list\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
          staff\u00a0who\u00a0could\u00a0attend\u00a0the\u00a0Union\u00a0\u00a0meeting.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0\u00a0pointed\u00a0out\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant’s\u00a0name\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0included\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n
          that \u00a0 list. \u00a0 The \u00a0 Respondent \u00a0 produced \u00a0 the \u00a0 original \u00a0 letter \u00a0 before \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission. \u00a0 It \u00a0 was \u00a0 noted \u00a0 by \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n
          Commission\u00a0that\u00a0one\u00a0name\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0scratched\u00a0out\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0list.\u00a0However,\u00a0close\u00a0examination\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0<\/p>\n
          revealed\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0scratched\u00a0name\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0that\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0are\u00a0hereby\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
          provide\u00a0an\u00a0attested\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0letter\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      4. With\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0point\u00a0no.3,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0has\u00a0already\u00a0inspected\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0
\n          records\u00a0pertaining\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0case\u00a0at\u00a0least\u00a0three\u00a0times\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0has\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
          relevant \u00a0 documents. \u00a0 Since \u00a0 \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 has \u00a0 already \u00a0 inspected \u00a0 all \u00a0 the \u00a0 relevant \u00a0 documents \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n
          Commission\u00a0holds\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0no\u00a0further\u00a0information\u00a0available\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0which\u00a0can\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n
          authorized\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0disclosed.\u00a0The\u00a0\u00a0matter\u00a0concerning\u00a0\u00a0point\u00a0no.3\u00a0therefore\u00a0\u00a0is\u00a0\u00a0considered\u00a0as\u00a0settled.<\/p>\n
      5. It\u00a0is\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0 \u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0have\u00a0already\u00a0replied\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Advocate’s\u00a0letters,\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0which\u00a0were\u00a0
\n          produced\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission.\u00a0Copies\u00a0of\u00a0these\u00a0letter\/s\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0furnished\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0At\u00a0this\u00a0stage\u00a0<\/p>\n
          the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0pointed\u00a0out\u00a0that\u00a0when\u00a0contacted\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority,\u00a0Advocate\u00a0Shri\u00a0Ganesh\u00a0Meena\u00a0<\/p>\n
          had\u00a0denied\u00a0having\u00a0written\u00a0some\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0letters\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0has\u00a0claimed\u00a0to\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0written\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
          Advocate.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      6. The\u00a0Commission\u00a0holds\u00a0that\u00a0adequate\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0provided.\u00a0Information\u00a0as\u00a0already\u00a0decided\u00a0by\u00a0
\n          the\u00a0Commission\u00a0in\u00a0paras\u00a0hereinabove\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0furnished\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0by\u00a025\u00a0June,\u00a02011.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a07.   The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0accordingly\u00a0disposed\u00a0of.<\/p>\n
\n\n\n                                                                                                                  (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)\n                                                                                                         Information\u00a0Commissioner\n\n\n\n\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0\n \u00a0\u00a0(G.Subramanian)                    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Deputy\u00a0\n   Registrar\n\nCc:\n\n1.\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Ramphool\u00a0Meena\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0S\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Bhauri\u00a0Ram\u00a0\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Near\u00a0TV\u00a0tower,\u00a0Mukam\u00a0Post,\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Bassi,\u00a0Distt\u00a0:\u00a0Jaipur\n\n2.\u00a0The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer,\n\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway,\n\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Headquarter\u00a0office,\n\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Hasanpura\u00a0Road,\n\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Jaipur\n\n\n\n\n3.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\n\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway,\n\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Headquarter\u00a0office,\n\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Hasanpura\u00a0Road,\n\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Jaipur\n\n4.\u00a0Officer\u00a0in\u00a0Charge,\u00a0NIC\u00a0\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Ramphool Meena vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0at\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000877 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a027,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a027,\u00a02011\u00a0 Parties: Appellant Mr.\u00a0Ramphool\u00a0Meena S\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Bhauri\u00a0Ram\u00a0 Near\u00a0TV\u00a0tower,\u00a0Mukam\u00a0Post, Bassi,\u00a0Distt\u00a0:\u00a0Jaipur Represented\u00a0by\u00a0:\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0hearing. Respondent 1. The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer, North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway, Headquarter\u00a0office, Hasanpura\u00a0Road, Jaipur 2. The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority, North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway, Headquarter\u00a0office, Hasanpura\u00a0Road, Jaipur Represented\u00a0by\u00a0:\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Subhash\u00a0Rawat,\u00a0PIO \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Ajay\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0OS\/C\/NWR\/JP \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Tej\u00a0Singh,\u00a0N\/Clerk \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0M\u00a0K\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0APIO Present\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0 Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit _______________________________________________________________ Decision\u00a0Notice As\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000877 ORDER […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-114333","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Ramphool Meena vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Ramphool Meena vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-10T00:12:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Ramphool Meena vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-10T00:12:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011\"},\"wordCount\":598,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Ramphool Meena vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-10T00:12:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Ramphool Meena vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Ramphool Meena vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Ramphool Meena vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-10T00:12:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Ramphool Meena vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011","datePublished":"2011-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-10T00:12:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011"},"wordCount":598,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011","name":"Mr.Ramphool Meena vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-10T00:12:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ramphool-meena-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-27-may-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Ramphool Meena vs Ministry Of Railways on 27 May, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114333","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=114333"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114333\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=114333"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=114333"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=114333"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}