{"id":114455,"date":"2009-03-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009"},"modified":"2015-05-31T04:53:47","modified_gmt":"2015-05-30T23:23:47","slug":"p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"P Thippaiah vs Jeevarathnam on 16 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
P Thippaiah vs Jeevarathnam on 16 March, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH comm op' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 15TH BAY OF MARCSH. I?   ~\nBEFORE V '  V % 4'\n\nTHE i-IOPFBLE MR. JUSTICE ASFIQK B.\" .HIIacH;:gE\u00a7\u00a7:%%%V :2 i\n\n'R.F.A.No.1386l25i'\u00a5{  \nBETWEEN:   \" %\n\nPTHiPPAiA1~1  \nS\/O LATE POPPAIAH   \nAGEDABoU'M9YEA:2s,_--_   _,    =\nR\/O Nc>.1[64,J B1.oCK,i    _  ' \nom SARWAR LANE  .      '\nSESHADWPURAM,  _ \nBANGALORE-56QMQ20'=._\" \" _ _ '\n  if M  % APPELLANT\n'r.(BY__$RiV V\"1'IVSHE\u00a5ANA3?H,'ADVOCATE)\nAND  _ _   \nJEEVARATHNAM \nS\/O LATE POPPAIAH _\nAGED. ABOUT446 YEARS, \" _\nRESi'D\u00a7N'3 XN\" A 'P.T:+.\ufb02BoU1' 42 YEARS\n\n\u00abA a ,      ' V %  ?1.i1\u00a7)' 4%sR1'%ViNo%:9\n\nij  'S\/0 f;.A'\u00a5'E JEEVARATHNAM\nT  ABOUT 21 YEARS\n\n ~ . a  ' ~ \u00e9sks VIJAY\n\nS] O LATE JEEVARATHNAM\nAGED ABOUT 18 YEARS\n\n\n\n1(d) SR1 V\u00a7C'i'OR\nS\/O LATE JEEVARATHNAM\nMINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS   \nNATURAL GUARDIAN AND MCYFHER I\nSMT. DEENAMMA\n\n1(3) Ms. FLORENCE =\nDXO LATE JEEVARATHDEAM\n\nMINOR REPRESENTED BY HER \nNATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER\" \nSMT. DEENAMMA V   E\n\nALLARE R\/A No.1\/64. _ .\n'A' BLOCK, om sanwap LANR':\"' - \nsmsmmetpuaam\ufb01.   j \nBANGALORE\u00ab56Q\u20ac}20;--'\" _  _ _ \n(AMEND1333 AS PlfJR'i..(3RDE1?.S.D'F;_18.4;'06] \n\nA. ....       RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
‘ (BYSRI P B’ awe’, ADV’.’)=CA’I”E)<\/p>\n
– THIS RFA IS FEEL}-Ui\u00bb\u00bbCf’C AGAiNS’I’ THE JUDGMENT
\nAN!) DEGREE DATE!) \u00a327.9.”.200-E. PASSED IN 0.8. NO. 15358\/2001 ON
\n‘THE FILE OF THE XXVI}! EDIEL. “CIVIL JUDGE, MAYOHALL UNIT,
\nBANGALORE (GCCH-29). PARTLY EEECREEING THE SUIT F’\u00a7LI3D BY THE
\nRESRONDENT’~’\u00a7~IER’EIN BY ‘E)IR_E(‘lT’ING THE APPELLANT I-IEI'<'E\u00a5N TO
\nDEL2VEI\u20ac–AVACAN'I5"?O\u00a53SESSION OF' 8 SCHEDULE PROPERTY TO THE
\nf?ESPC}NDEf\u20acT_V HEREMM 'WITHIN 3 MONTHS FROM THE BATE OF<\/p>\n
ORDER.'  V<\/p>\n
 This    on \ufb01n' hea:tm' g this day, Court dciivercd<\/p>\n
the foI1_owing.-"—  A<\/p>\n
s <\/p>\n
 is dimcted ag&st the judgacnt, order and<\/p>\n
  by the Court cf XXVIII Add}. City Civil Judge, Mayo<\/p>\n
 um, Bangalore in O.S.No.15358\/2001.<\/p>\n
REM<\/p>\n
validity of the sale deed and the gift deed. Based     _<\/p>\n
pleadings, the Trial Court fraxned the fo\ufb02owing issuer f,   .<\/p>\n
i)<\/p>\n
ii)\n<\/p>\n
iii)<\/p>\n
iv)<\/p>\n
absolute owner of schedule\ufb01   A .<\/p>\n
\nWhether the plaintiff      <\/p>\n
Whether the plainti\ufb01’    of
\nplaintiff and defendant e2r:e\u00a2u_ted_ a Gif\u00a3..de*ed on
\n29.9.2000 in favoutj ‘ef this <\/p>\n
Whether the defendant  is the lessee
\nunder the Bzsargalmre’ Lieu:  in respect of<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
the _  <\/p>\n
Whether d::fai1dan:e’ee;3rdvas  i:1V?).at’ he is in lawful
\nposseeei\u00e9irr bf’ eehetiuleptupcr\ufb01es?<\/p>\n
Wliether   en\ufb01\ufb02ed for damages?\n<\/p>\n
Whether the  ‘entitled for pessession and
\nmeene profits? A ”\n<\/p>\n
 “or verder?\n<\/p>\n
    4;  get himself examined as max and<\/p>\n
 as P’W~2 marking Exuf’. 1 to 13.9. The<\/p>\n
‘A ‘.   examined as DW-1 merldng docummlts
\nF roe. 15. On considering the pleadings, era} and
\n  evidence placed 011. its record, the Trial Court<\/p>\n
.’ar1e’wered the cententieus issues in favour of the respondent<\/p>\n
93%<\/p>\n
 parties namely the appellant,<\/p>\n
 as is evident \ufb01mm the appellant<\/p>\n
   charges, either by way of licence fee or as<\/p>\n
 .. ,  i   Ito point of time, the respondent and Rajamma<\/p>\n
  ‘  the appellant paying the monthly charges. On the<\/p>\n
and decreed the suit directing the appellant to de\ufb01v\u00a7””veee:t\u20ac   H
\npossession of ‘B’ schedule property to the respende-me: Z  ”
\nmenths and the separate enquiry in  it <\/p>\n
profits.\n<\/p>\n
5. Aggrieved by the afezreeaid\u00e9ej-uei\ufb01gtzrlerat,  -appeal is<\/p>\n
preferred.\n<\/p>\n
6. Sri  thei   ”  for the
\nappellant submits   VS\u00bbInt.Ra_jamma was
\nnot entitled   favour. It is only
\nthe appellant,  of the Corpemtion and
\nwho was in   ‘eehedule properties who was<\/p>\n
entitleti   ofttthe sale deed. This position was<\/p>\n
3811<\/span><\/p>\n
appellant joining the services of the Corporation, the  ” <\/p>\n
‘A’ property stood re-allotted tn the appellant is    3 V’   l <\/p>\n
7. Sri -P.B.Raju, the lmmecl couns\u00e9l fc\u00e9f ti’*1e:7f.<\/p>\n
wsuld pray for the dismissal of  <\/p>\n
8. 1 have browsed   \u00a7::g.l1=>.t1  the
\nsale deed in respect of ‘A’  is the g:ii’\u20ac:
\nd\ufb01\ufb01d 636011166 333′   “sf respondent.\n<\/p>\n
Ex.P.5 is the    t9 the e\ufb01hct\nthat the    the name of the\n<\/pre>\n
respondent  the legal notice, issued on
\nbehalf of the  hteply tllcreto, respectively. I<\/p>\n
am ‘nstllm. \u00a30 \ufb01ve my acceptance to the submission<\/p>\n
glrged  because the validity of the<\/p>\n
   deed cannot be assailed in collateral<\/p>\n
  –. ;11″‘ “1gs.__  ‘ g chosen not ts challenge the sale deed<\/p>\n
   deed, the appellant cannot resist the<\/p>\n
  ~  with any rate of success. The appellant has<\/p>\n
 jiot \ufb01led any suit for mandatoxy injunctisn seeking<\/p>\n
I93!-I<\/p>\n
direction to the Corporation to execute the sale  <\/p>\n
favour. Based on the statement, Ex.D.13    <\/p>\n
deductions \ufb01’om the salary of the %a;ppe11ant  \ufb01ne <\/p>\n
endorsement at Ex.IZ).14 issued by the   <\/p>\n
month the house rent a\ufb02owance Rs; I2_3EI”‘~
\ndeducted frem his salary, it cz\ufb01mgot
\nof the schedule ‘A’ preperty” $ from
\nSmt.Rajamma to her;  \ufb01ppe\ufb02ant has
\nnot examined any   particularly the
\nsignatories to    <\/p>\n
9. The  appellant is on the lines<\/p>\n
cf t1;c.respQ!i\u00a7i\u00e9nf   deed by paying money to his<\/p>\n
mot}1e1j..’  Q1″ suggestion is put to_ the respondent<\/p>\n
  The case 01′ the respondent is fully<\/p>\n
\ufb01xpi\ufb01orted   the mother of both the panic’ S hrzmin.<\/p>\n
   =  sets: incunsistency in the stand of the<\/p>\n
 In one placa he claims to he a licensee and in<\/p>\n
 place, he claims to be the lesser under the<\/p>\n
RBH<\/p>\n
Corperation. None at’ the exhibits placed on the record of <\/p>\n
Court are remotely indicative of the re-allo1:I1:1enl::”   <\/p>\n
schedule ‘A’ property to the appellant.    A<\/p>\n
11. Thus, I dun not \ufb01nd aI1y_m.eI’it iitthis   V.<\/p>\n
Trial Court cannot be held to be at   suit
\ndirecting the appellant to  poseeseion of
\nthe schedule ‘B’ property to  cextaitl
\naspects of the matte?    It is not in
\ndispute that the   are brothers.\n<\/p>\n
They have    roof fer aver three
\ndecades.   are being used for
\nresidential ll  zeppellant is not a well placed<\/p>\n
perser1;he_’ is only a, Po a In the sezvxces of the<\/p>\n
  these aspects into prawatic<\/p>\n
eonsicleratidiz, Kcleem it necessary and just to grant some<\/p>\n
 vacg\ufb01hg. the schedule ‘B’ property by the appellant.<\/p>\n
\/}  view, the ends cf justice would be met by<\/p>\n
\ufb01\ufb01lt<\/p>\n
my gantring time to the appellant to vacate the ‘ill’ *  ” <\/p>\n
prowrty up to 16.09.2010.\n<\/p>\n
12. The facts and circumstaiic\ufb01s ofVi;l1\u00e9.”caVsc:~ vi<\/p>\n
granting of one more relief tfa the  i ii
\nfactual matrix of this case is’  At’i:1.\u00a2:: Cantirlued to
\npay the amaunts for aimtit  of licence
\nfee or rental c:i1arg’\u00a2s.\u00a7~.:   should not be
\nfastened with       V ioigcupation charges
\nagain. At thisiijuncutinii\u00e9,\u00bb  the learned counsel for
\nthe respondent    the next portion of tha
\nerdqirgoulci.   aside that part of the Trial<\/p>\n
 \u00bbji1dgm@i1\u20aci  directs enquiry into mesnc pm\ufb01ts,<\/p>\n
  ii that the msponcient would net claim<\/p>\n
 qxicsne  The Coilrt places on record its<\/p>\n
   a\u00a71i@rE_’a1{iG:1\u00ab-of tile fair stand taken by Sri P.B.Raju,<\/p>\n
 ’11’  In the result, the judgncnt under appeal is<\/p>\n
 upheld. Its directiun to the appellant to hand<\/p>\n
ov\u00e9r tha possession of the ‘B’ schedule property is upheld but
\n3.3% T<\/p>\n
H<\/p>\n
by giving time to vacate it upto 16.09.2010. The   <\/p>\n
of Sri P.B.Raju that the respondent Sl’\u00a7\u00a353.\ufb01 ilat   <\/p>\n
profit is placed on record.\n<\/p>\n
No order as to casts.\n<\/p>\n
bvr<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court P Thippaiah vs Jeevarathnam on 16 March, 2009 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri IN THE HIGH comm op’ KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 15TH BAY OF MARCSH. I? ~ BEFORE V ‘ V % 4’ THE i-IOPFBLE MR. JUSTICE ASFIQK B.” .HIIacH;:gE\u00a7\u00a7:%%%V :2 i ‘R.F.A.No.1386l25i’\u00a5{ BETWEEN: ” % PTHiPPAiA1~1 S\/O LATE POPPAIAH AGEDABoU’M9YEA:2s,_–_ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-114455","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nP Thippaiah vs Jeevarathnam on 16 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P Thippaiah vs Jeevarathnam on 16 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-30T23:23:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"P Thippaiah vs Jeevarathnam on 16 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-30T23:23:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":997,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009\",\"name\":\"P Thippaiah vs Jeevarathnam on 16 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-30T23:23:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P Thippaiah vs Jeevarathnam on 16 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P Thippaiah vs Jeevarathnam on 16 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P Thippaiah vs Jeevarathnam on 16 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-30T23:23:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"P Thippaiah vs Jeevarathnam on 16 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-30T23:23:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009"},"wordCount":997,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009","name":"P Thippaiah vs Jeevarathnam on 16 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-30T23:23:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-thippaiah-vs-jeevarathnam-on-16-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P Thippaiah vs Jeevarathnam on 16 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114455","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=114455"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114455\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=114455"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=114455"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=114455"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}