{"id":114560,"date":"2010-10-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010"},"modified":"2014-06-05T19:36:50","modified_gmt":"2014-06-05T14:06:50","slug":"g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"G Sri Ramappa vs G Munivenkataramappa on 18 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
G Sri Ramappa vs G Munivenkataramappa on 18 October, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
'2\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 18\"' DAY OF OCTOBER, 2010 \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HOi\\E'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA   A-\n\nWRIT PETITION NO.15271\/.2010.(G?9\u00e9\u00a5Ci'Pe)\u00bb'   \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nG.Sri Ramappa,\nS\/0. late Gopalappa, \nAged about 58 years,  \n\nResident Of Chinna kOte.,Vi'..lag-.3,  \nRobertsonpet Hobli,   ' 'L\nS.G.K.F. Post, V \" ._ A\n\nBangarpeth Talvuk,'  _  _  - \nKolar District.       \n\n PETITIONER\n(By Sri: 'iRajia's.i\u00a7eykh\u00aba:i*\u00a7.K. ,\"  E\"  '  \n\nAND: V' E' V  A   E\n\n1. G.iV_iuniyEnkataVr;ar\ufb01aE'ppa,\n\n\"S;\/o. late Gopaiappa,\n\n ed-.. _a bout 4 S ' y--e--a rs.\n\n'. A E. Nata ya p-pa,\n\n._ \"~'S__,{o\u00a7\"!a\"_te__ GOp\"alappa,\n' _Aged_abEO'_ut 42 years.\n\n Chavruidarappa,\n\nA .-S\/oftate Gopalappa,\n\n , _A'ged about 39 years.\n\n.  A3 are resident of\n '\"'Chinna kote viiiage,\n\n\n\nS.G. Kote post,\nBangar Peth Taluk,\nKolar District.\n RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
(By Sri T.Srinivasan, Adv. for R1 to R3)<\/p>\n
4*<\/p>\n
This writ petition is filed under Articles ZED and.Z’g:2.27~._._’..
\nof the Constitution of India, praying to “q.ua’si_h. the
\nimpugned order dated 29.3.2010 _pa.ssed b’y”‘th.e7Lear’n.eds.v
\nCivil Judge (Sr.Dn.) i<.<3.F., in; M.A'.n.o;.12;\/2o'o9 ._vide
\nAnnexure —- K and restraining the respjondenfts\/defend'a.nt's:.t_'
\nfrom interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful pos.session 'anal V' ..
\nenjoyment of suit schedule pIo_p"e.rtiesit-ill the i'f.ina..l'd.i.sposal ~. "<\/p>\n
of the proceedings in o.s.No.99\/_2oo9 on__the.V-ifilevg\u00e9of Civil
\nJudge (Jr.Dn.) Bangarpet. '   9<\/p>\n
This petition comingon'\u00ab.for;_pre*-l\u00bb.i_min-a_ry hearing in 'B'
\ngroup this day, the Court m.adejtw'ne foyl.liiow'\u00bbin'gs;<\/p>\n
pat:iiona.-,z.,talismantapas me'd'i'o.s.No.99\/2009 against<\/p>\n
respondents\/dVefendan,t's\u00ab.,,:i;.7i~the Court of Civil Judge (Jr.<\/p>\n
Divn.,)., Bangar_pe~t., .5-for'. the relief of permanent injunction<\/p>\n
'V–.and-….Eohseqgyentiaill"reliefs in respect of suit schedule<\/p>\n
 -propertyf;\u00bb–.L\u00a33efen_jijants 2, 3 & 4 have filed separate written<\/p>\n
state_me’nts:”:anVd counter claims. The plaintiff has filed<\/p>\n
7-‘~.__’*~oi)jecti’o.ns “for the written statements and counter claims.<\/p>\n
  with the plaint, the plaintiff filed I.A.No.2 under<\/p>\n
_g_Oi’der 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC to grant an order of temporary<\/p>\n
‘s\/<\/p>\n
4′<\/p>\n
injunction, restraining the defendants from interfering with<\/p>\n
his possession and enjoyment of suit schedule <\/p>\n
The defendants 2, 3 & 4 filed LA Nos.5, 6 & 7 res’pe\u00abctVi-ye.ly::j_ _<\/p>\n
under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPCWseeking'”lanjorderAycfiu  <\/p>\n
temporary injunction, restraining the? <\/p>\n
interfering with the agricultural o__peraVtio_n’s cars-iecf; injithe <\/p>\n
written statement schedule propferties. trial court
\nhaving found Drima fac’ie._.xC’ase5,\ufb01 bs!lancev..fAof~convenience and
\nirreparable loss &_ hard:s\u00bbhip_ the plaintiff,
\nallowed    & 7. Aggrieved,
\nthe dereddenlt;ei[fiVi:ied  order 43 Rule 1(r) read
\nwith Section’ appellate court by judgment
\ndated  the appeal in Dart. The<\/p>\n
comnjo’i’iorder’-passed lay the trial court, on I.As 2, 5 to 7<\/p>\n
  before it, was set–aside and the parties to the<\/p>\n
‘suitf’__hav’e7b.ee\u00bbnV’directed to maintain status–quo in respect<\/p>\n
of the .-._’suit:”‘ schedule and written statement schedule<\/p>\n
uH”:”.’4.””–.,:prop_erties. Aggrieved, the plaintiff has filed this writ<\/p>\n
{<\/p>\n
2. Sri Rajashekhar.K, learned counsel appearing<\/p>\n
for the petitioner contends that, the court below <\/p>\n
unjustly, erroneously and illegally in passing  <\/p>\n
judgment, whereby it has set~asi_cl,e., the just”an’d.ec;u’ital;-lea ”<\/p>\n
order passed by the trial court. ;’~.Lea.fr”rieid c0u’nsel:Vsu’b.n\ufb01i.ts<\/p>\n
that, the petitioner was em’p_|’o-yged  <\/p>\n
of his own, out of which theggsuitvschedulhe”properties were
\npurchased and that,  l\u00e9lelafdiglngseparately from
\n23.06.1981 and’-the  properties were
\nafter his__ thelulfalnwily and in the
\ncircun1gvst_an’c’e.s’_:,” tllaie  order passed by the
\ntrial court  been interfered with, while<\/p>\n
passing thee ilmvpug.n’e,d \u00bbju”d.gn1ent.<\/p>\n
‘3. -\\<\/p>\n
  nsri T.’S’r’i’nivasan, learned counsel appearing for<\/p>\n
 on the other hand contended that, the<\/p>\n
tlrialcourtlfailed to notice the relevant aspects of the case<\/p>\n
 and h’a,s”i~misdirected itself, on account of which, the order<\/p>\n
‘1\ufb02a.ll>owing LA No.2 and rejecting I.A Nos.5 to 7 was passed.<\/p>\n
 l.?earned counsel further submits that, in view of the<\/p>\n
l<\/p>\n
\/\/\/\u00bbr””<\/p>\n
,5?\n<\/p>\n
material error and illegality committed by the trial court,<\/p>\n
an appeal was filed and that, the appellate court<\/p>\n
correct consideration of the record has p_a’sse.d.’._’__:the”<\/p>\n
impugned judgment, which in the facts and_.c.i.rc’u.msft:ances’<\/p>\n
of the case is justified and no interiierencggj;is\u00a5call,ed. <\/p>\n
4. I have perused  petition.\n<\/p>\n
5. The parties ‘are brot’hVers,’VVVbe._ing \u00abthechildren of
\nLate Gopalappa. The  ,f’jt::he–‘.__eidest son of
\nGopalappa. xivjoined BGML on
\n25.10.1978″ after the defendants,
\nbecause’ ‘T_hV\u00e9”suit property purchased
\nwas also  of some of the defendants.\n<\/p>\n
The petitioner_:’clai’.ms’*_that, he started leaving separately<\/p>\n
” V”‘v.,fro’m\u20ac’1Ei’81 and the-re”was a division of the properties. The<\/p>\n
 contended that, in the presence of<\/p>\n
pan,,chay.ath:claVrs and elders of their family, the joint family<\/p>\n
 prope’rity7~i.e., the suit schedule properties were partitioned<\/p>\n
u”V’.,,aVn,dipalupatties dated 23.05.1998 was prepared, in terms<\/p>\n
  which, separate allotment as per the schedules A to F<\/p>\n
\/,x”<\/p>\n
_, r-\n<\/p>\n
was made. According to them, another item of property<\/p>\n
situated at Thumatagere is yet to be partitioned”—agnd<\/p>\n
plaintiff without any right, title and interest in V.<\/p>\n
statement schedule properties, attempted tohi_nte:rfeire.VVl’ <\/p>\n
6. The court below, which is-..aylfso’-,a.:4.f’a’ct”‘finding<\/p>\n
court, having noticed the cas._e ofltlfile parti’es <\/p>\n
documents produced before it, haslheld the trial court
\nhas not correctly appr.ec.iate_d ;t~hle”~–._ci.rculmstances of the
\ncase and the do_cumeynts.:’_andV-.its conci:Vu.Vsi’on in granting<\/p>\n
order of  fax\/otirV.of_:the’pl”a’i’i’i’tiff was unjust and<\/p>\n
hence,,.has_o’rderAe3d\u00abfor.:rn_ainte–n.-arice of status-quo, which
\nwould inotycauysef;ai1yy’l’nam1 “or injury to either of the<\/p>\n
parties.\n<\/p>\n
.”7E’;”l:’ j”Si.nce tuhelfact finding court after reference to<\/p>\n
A”-the plrimfayvfaciie\u00abmaterials placed on record has passed an<\/p>\n
equ\u00ab\u00abi..tab___%~e’ ordier, I do not deem it appropriate to interfere<\/p>\n
with theorder, specially keeping in view the relationship<\/p>\n
if ‘rlbetwieen the parties. The triai of the suit is required to be<\/p>\n
  -.v.e\u00a7xpedited, so that the matter could be effectively decided.<\/p>\n
l\u00bb<\/p>\n
K’<\/p>\n
In the result, the writ petition stands dismissed.<\/p>\n
The pleadings being complete, the trial <\/p>\n
directed to try and dispose of the suit <\/p>\n
practicable and at any event, within a peri_o~d-\u00bbo:fj8V  <\/p>\n
from the date a copy of this judgmeratl<\/p>\n
record.\n<\/p>\n
The trial codrt_,.is direct,’ed_”‘t.o decide, the suit,
\nuninfluenced by any  and findings
\nrecorded by tvhef’c.ourt_’A’b’eio$,\u00a7,~  judgment<\/p>\n
herein.\n<\/p>\n
  parties are kept open for
\nconsideration.’ V f
\n ‘ReturnVth’e. forthwith to the trial court.<\/p>\n
  Qartiesiare directed to appear before the trial court<\/p>\n
  receive further orders.\n<\/p>\n
55].’.\n<\/p>\n
Tudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court G Sri Ramappa vs G Munivenkataramappa on 18 October, 2010 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda ‘2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 18″‘ DAY OF OCTOBER, 2010 BEFORE THE HOi\\E’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA A- WRIT PETITION NO.15271\/.2010.(G?9\u00e9\u00a5Ci’Pe)\u00bb’ BETWEEN: G.Sri Ramappa, S\/0. late Gopalappa, Aged about 58 years, Resident […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-114560","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nG Sri Ramappa vs G Munivenkataramappa on 18 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"G Sri Ramappa vs G Munivenkataramappa on 18 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-06-05T14:06:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"G Sri Ramappa vs G Munivenkataramappa on 18 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-05T14:06:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1057,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010\",\"name\":\"G Sri Ramappa vs G Munivenkataramappa on 18 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-05T14:06:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"G Sri Ramappa vs G Munivenkataramappa on 18 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"G Sri Ramappa vs G Munivenkataramappa on 18 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"G Sri Ramappa vs G Munivenkataramappa on 18 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-06-05T14:06:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"G Sri Ramappa vs G Munivenkataramappa on 18 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-05T14:06:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010"},"wordCount":1057,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010","name":"G Sri Ramappa vs G Munivenkataramappa on 18 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-05T14:06:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-sri-ramappa-vs-g-munivenkataramappa-on-18-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"G Sri Ramappa vs G Munivenkataramappa on 18 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114560","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=114560"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114560\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=114560"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=114560"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=114560"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}