{"id":114562,"date":"2009-07-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009"},"modified":"2018-04-09T12:09:53","modified_gmt":"2018-04-09T06:39:53","slug":"vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil vs Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil Devaki … on 3 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil vs Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil Devaki … on 3 July, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 18681 of 2009(O)\n\n\n1. VADAKKOTH CHEMBU VALAPPIL\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. VADAKKOTH CHEMBU VALAPPIL PRABHAKARAN\n3. VADAKKOTH CHEMBU VALAPPIL SATHYAVATHI\n4. C.V.SAJI, AGED 35 YEARS,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. VADAKKOTH CHEMBU VALAPPIL DEVAKI AMMA,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. C.V.SASIDHARAN, AGED 51 YEARS,\n\n3. C.V.SURESAN, AGED 45 YEARS,\n\n4. VADAKKOTH CHEMBU VALAPPIL SAROJINI AMMA,\n\n5. C.V.GEETHA, AGED 49 YEARS,\n\n6. C.V.LATHA, AGED 44 YEARS,\n\n7. C.V.SAJITH, AGED 41 YEARS,\n\n8. VADAKKOTHU CHEMBU VALAPPIL KAMALA\n\n9. C.V.NISHA, 43 YEARS,\n\n10. C.V.BINDU, 40 YEARS,\n\n11. C.V.SUJA, AGED 35 YEARS,\n\n12. C.V.SHEEJA, AGED 36 YEARS,\n\n13. VADAKKOTH CHEMBUVALAPPIL PRABHAVATHI\n\n14. C.V.VASANTHA AMMA, AGED 53 YEARS,\n\n15. C.V.VIJAYAN, AGED 50 YEARS,\n\n16. C.V.SUBHASHINI, AGED 46 YEARS,\n\n17. C.V.PADMAJA, AGED 39 YEARS,\n\n18. VADAKKOTHU CHEMBU VALAPPIL RAVEENDRAN,\n\n19. VADAKKOTHU CHEMBU VALAPPIL RASMI,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.M.MADHU\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :03\/07\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                  S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.\n\n              ````````````````````````````````````````````````````\n                    W.P.(C) No. 18681 OF 2009 O\n              ````````````````````````````````````````````````````\n                 Dated this the 3rd day of July, 2009\n\n                            J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
              Petitioners are defendants            1, 6, 7 and 9 in\n\nOS.No.180\/06 on the file of the Sub Court, Kozhikode.                The\n\n<\/pre>\n
respondents are the plaintiffs and other defendants in the suit.<\/p>\n
Suit is one for partition. After the commencement of the trial, the<\/p>\n
plaintiff moved an application to include one item of property also<\/p>\n
in the schedule which was objected to by some of the defendants.<\/p>\n
The learned Sub Judge, after hearing both parties, allowed the<\/p>\n
amendment application.            Ext.P5 is the copy of that order.<\/p>\n
Impeaching the propriety and correctness of that order, the<\/p>\n
petitioners have approached this court and filed this writ petition<\/p>\n
invoking the supervisory jurisdiction vested with this court under<\/p>\n
Article 227 of the Constitution of India.\n<\/p>\n
       2.     Having regard to the facts and circumstances<\/p>\n
presented with reference to Ext.P5 order impugned in the writ<\/p>\n
petition, I find that notice to the respondents is not necessary and<\/p>\n
it is dispensed with.\n<\/p>\n
WPC.18681\/09
\n                                   : 2 :<\/span><\/p>\n
      3.     I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Inviting<\/p>\n
my attention to paragraph 8 of the plaint, copy of which is<\/p>\n
produced as Ext.P1, it is submitted by the counsel that the<\/p>\n
plaintiffs have deliberately left out the item subsequently sought to<\/p>\n
be included in the schedule from the purview of the suit and so<\/p>\n
much so, this was a case where the bar under the proviso to Order<\/p>\n
6 Rule 17 applied with all force showing that the amendment<\/p>\n
sought for was within the knowledge of the plaintiff even at the<\/p>\n
time of filing of the suit. Emphasising on the impact of the proviso<\/p>\n
in granting amendment, the learned counsel submitted that unless<\/p>\n
the court comes to the conclusion that in spite of due indulgence<\/p>\n
the party could not have raised the matter before the<\/p>\n
commencement of trial the proposed amendment cannot be<\/p>\n
allowed. Reliance is also placed upon the decision rendered by<\/p>\n
the apex court in Vidyabai Vs. Padmalatha [2009 (1) KLT SN 14<\/p>\n
(C.No.13) SC] to contend that Ext.P5 order is unsustainable in<\/p>\n
law. After perusing Ext.P5 order, I am unable to agree with the<\/p>\n
submissions made by the counsel. The learned Sub Judge, after<\/p>\n
appreciating the controversy raised for adjudication in the suit and<\/p>\n
WPC.18681\/09
\n                                  : 3 :<\/span><\/p>\n
taking note that the suit is one for partition exercised his discretion<\/p>\n
in favour of the plaintiff allowing the amendment sought for. True,<\/p>\n
in the plaint, it is stated that some items of properties derived by<\/p>\n
inheritance are left out from the suit.       Whether the item now<\/p>\n
sought to be included falls within those covered by the averments<\/p>\n
in paragraph 8 there is no material. Even if that be so, so long as<\/p>\n
the defendants are not having a case that the item sought to be<\/p>\n
included is not divisible and does not come within the joint<\/p>\n
ownership of the parties no fault could be found with the court for<\/p>\n
permitting the plaintiff to amend the suit to incorporate that item<\/p>\n
also for an effective adjudication of all controversies to sever the<\/p>\n
joint ownership over the properties between the parties.             In<\/p>\n
considering an amendment application the most cardinal principle<\/p>\n
is whether such amendment is necessary for the purpose of<\/p>\n
determining the real controversy between the parties. No benefit<\/p>\n
is going to come to the defendants if the property which is sought<\/p>\n
to be included by way of amendment is left out of the suit. Any<\/p>\n
sharer can file a separate suit so long as it continues under joint<\/p>\n
ownership. In Eapen Antony Vs. Joseph [2009 (2) KLT 849], this<\/p>\n
WPC.18681\/09
\n                                     : 4 :<\/span><\/p>\n
court has held that amendment can be allowed after closure of the<\/p>\n
evidence and at any stage before the judgment if it does not alter<\/p>\n
the nature of suit or cause prejudice to the opposite side. What<\/p>\n
prejudice is being caused to the defendants by the proposed<\/p>\n
amendment in including one item more in the schedule is a<\/p>\n
mystery. Delay in moving the amendment appears to be the sole<\/p>\n
reason for the objection and that objection is taken care of the<\/p>\n
learned Sub Judge by ordering the plaintiff to pay cost to the<\/p>\n
contesting defendants. The applicability of the decision Vidyabai<\/p>\n
Vs. Padmalatha [2009 (1) KLT SN 14(C.No.13) SC] relied by the<\/p>\n
learned counsel to the facts of the case cannot be analysed as the<\/p>\n
full text is not available. But, it is seen from the brief notes that the<\/p>\n
defendant had sought for amendment of his written statement in a<\/p>\n
suit for specific performance setting forth an entirely new case<\/p>\n
after the commencement of the trial. No decision can be read in<\/p>\n
isolation without reference of the facts in considering its<\/p>\n
applicability to a different case. At any rate, in my view having<\/p>\n
regard to the fact the present suit is one for partition and if an item<\/p>\n
of the property is left out it would only cause irreparable injury of<\/p>\n
WPC.18681\/09
\n                                 : 5 :<\/span><\/p>\n
the parties and perhaps steal precious time of the court also later<\/p>\n
by another suit at the instance of the one or other sharers the<\/p>\n
discretion exercised by the learned Sub Judge in allowing the<\/p>\n
amendment application has to be treated as proper, valid and<\/p>\n
correct. Writ petition is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                              Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
                            (S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE)<\/p>\n
aks<\/p>\n
                            \/\/ True Copy \/\/<\/p>\n
                                    P.A. to Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil vs Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil Devaki … on 3 July, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 18681 of 2009(O) 1. VADAKKOTH CHEMBU VALAPPIL … Petitioner 2. VADAKKOTH CHEMBU VALAPPIL PRABHAKARAN 3. VADAKKOTH CHEMBU VALAPPIL SATHYAVATHI 4. C.V.SAJI, AGED 35 YEARS, Vs 1. VADAKKOTH CHEMBU VALAPPIL DEVAKI […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-114562","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nVadakkoth Chembu Valappil vs Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil Devaki ... on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil vs Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil Devaki ... on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-09T06:39:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil vs Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil Devaki … on 3 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-09T06:39:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":865,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil vs Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil Devaki ... on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-09T06:39:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil vs Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil Devaki … on 3 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil vs Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil Devaki ... on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil vs Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil Devaki ... on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-09T06:39:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil vs Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil Devaki … on 3 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-09T06:39:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009"},"wordCount":865,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009","name":"Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil vs Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil Devaki ... on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-09T06:39:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-vs-vadakkoth-chembu-valappil-devaki-on-3-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil vs Vadakkoth Chembu Valappil Devaki … on 3 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114562","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=114562"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114562\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=114562"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=114562"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=114562"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}