{"id":114848,"date":"2009-01-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009"},"modified":"2019-01-30T04:56:25","modified_gmt":"2019-01-29T23:26:25","slug":"mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Mahadevappa Hanumanthappa … vs Thippanna Yellappa … on 27 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Mahadevappa Hanumanthappa … vs Thippanna Yellappa … on 27 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n
RSA 461 I 2008\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT E}!-IARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUA1\u00a7gf':2:\u00a3\u00a7o9'MTv:'~  % \"\n\nBEFORE  _ _ _\nTHE HON'BLE MR.J1ISTI(\u00a7E',__I*\u00a7;-$:PA1'fLv_'  ~ * V' 1.\nR.8.A.xo.46:\u00a3'ZV' A  \n\n \n\nBETWEEN :\n\nMahadevappa Hanumanthappa  v\n\nS\/0 Hanumanth\ufb02PF*9&x$0m$nnav3r,  .  \nAged about 56 yrsiitfs\ufb01 \" X    \u00bb\nGCC:  h '\nR\/odogayallgpmug,'--- -.:_;:V__ _  '  '\nTaluk as Disn~ic'tT.I3,naxw:;d. _ \nPin-~580 011. %     \"V ..APPELLANT\n\n(By Sri s.R.Hegdc,  _  J\n\n     ..... \n<\/pre>\n
1.. 2   Sakmppannavar,<\/p>\n
‘ S] Q _Yc\ufb02a.t}p\u00a7” S\u00e9ylq\ufb01ppannavar,
\nAged ‘about 45 years,
\n003: \u00bb.Ag1’cf.1I\u00a3u}:rist,<\/p>\n
 V — R{oJbga\u00a7*a13apura,
\n..   Taluk as Qistrict Dharwad,
\n  en.\n<\/p>\n
   Hanumanthappa Goudar,<\/p>\n
 ‘S\/cf\u00bb Hanumanthappa Goudar,
\n.. “Aged about 48 years,
\n“Occ: Agriculturist,<\/p>\n
 ” ” Rio Thadisaha Koppa,<\/p>\n
Tahik & District Dharwati,
\nPin \u00ab-580 OIL ..RESPONDEN’I’S<\/p>\n
R88 461 I 2008<\/p>\n
(By Sri D.M.Bandi, Adv. 85
\nSri D.B.Ka11a11agoudar, Adv. for R-2)<\/p>\n
This Regular Second Appeal is  “milder  1{)G=of
\nCPC against the judgment and  T giateed -20.  A
\npassed in R.A.Ne-.15\/2000 on the \ufb01le oVf;t11e_IICivi1 Jucige”
\n85 CJM, Dhaxwad, dismissing the–4_appeia21Veiz1d eui3;;’ii’mVa’:ag_V\u00a7the <\/p>\n
judgtnent and decree dated.._v}”‘~()8.12″.129S39_  in
\n().S.No.6(}6\/1989 on the \ufb01le of the.._Pr1_. Civil Jtzcige {Jr.I)n.),
\nDhaxwad.\n<\/p>\n
This AFPCBI is ‘g  eene    this day 31\u00a2
\nCourt deiivered the fo}loWing_:”–”   1V   ..\n<\/p>\n
01. This   the concurmnt<\/p>\n
\ufb01ndings     <\/p>\n
D2.   u  defendant before the tan’ 1<\/p>\n
Court. ;’I’h::_ suit ayes’  ey one Yeliawa wife of Somagapa<\/p>\n
 V.   that she was the absolute<\/p>\n
o\u00a7m\u00e9r.;\u00a7\u00a3* :1;;eeee%.Vs1gi:.e;4.ag:~heduse pmpcmtes and for consequential<\/p>\n
—   reiief bf restraining the de\ufb01endant \ufb01om obstructing<\/p>\n
..  possese\ufb01n and in the altema\ufb01ve for the relief of<\/p>\n
  as also for mesne profits. The 2″ defendant<\/p>\n
  respondent herein was the purchaser of can of the<\/p>\n
A A   ‘  X , get schetiulae properties.<\/p>\n
RSA461\/2008<\/p>\n
03. The I” defendant (appellant) contended <\/p>\n
statement that the plainti\ufb01” was his grandnH1ethe1′;’    <\/p>\n
father expired when he was a chiki,:’the1efo;’e, he  <\/p>\n
up by the plainti\ufb01l Defendant  <\/p>\n
had relinquished her right in;   j’:31titV>4’Veehedu1e’VV<\/p>\n
property in his \ufb01avoup   the “pm1$erty has
\ncontinued to be in his   owner of the
\nsame. He aiso _em;ten\u00a2.:ie6”    substantiai
\namount he     \u00a31093;-:eV_  and started\n<\/p>\n
04. In A’ h’ ._ er  pleadings, the tna1′ Couxt<\/p>\n
framed 11CC\u20ac’V’.’\u00a7Sa’I’_Y’ isst_1ee~-,.1’hein\u00a31ding the issue as to whether the<\/p>\n
 u  hef’eese as the owner of the suit schedule<\/p>\n
to whether the defendant could prove that<\/p>\n
   her ngh’ t in the suit properties in<\/p>\n
 –v1’aavou1′:”o..1’V’t\u00a3’1e.V4c’tefend,a11t. Both the part1e’ s adduced end’ ence<\/p>\n
u x V’  ‘ 0;: heonskieration of the evidence both oral and<\/p>\n
Adoeeexehtaxy, the trial Court recorded a \ufb01nding that the<\/p>\n
Vt  was abie to establish that she was the owner of the<\/p>\n
  “suit scheduke properties and that the defendant had got<\/p>\n
changed his name in the reeoxd of rights by obtaining her<\/p>\n
\ufb01e<\/p>\n
RSA 461\/’\u00a3008<\/p>\n
signatum in the blank papers. The trial’ Court also feihi\u00e9that<\/p>\n
the defendant fa1]ed’ to establish his case that   <\/p>\n
waived her ugh’ t in the suit pmperties\u00e9  M   Vt<\/p>\n
defendant by Iehnquishmg the sallle\ufb01g   <\/p>\n
found  be in possession of the evi’1itV pmj)e1t1es,  * V L’<\/p>\n
found that the plaintiff was entitle_(VV1iA’ ~f_rVVposseesio_1M1  the suit<\/p>\n
properties.\n<\/p>\n
05. Aggrieved    by the trial
\nCourt, the  a regular appeal before
\nthe  Based on the
\ncontentieizss  Appellate Court framed<\/p>\n
the necessaV\u00a3y\u00ab._\u00a2 “c~e;i:1sicieration. The lower Appellate<\/p>\n
,   x(?O?l1C1i’1TL’\u00a31VV_’Wfi’t}J the \ufb01ndings zmoxded by the txial<\/p>\n
  held that the appellant before it failed to<\/p>\n
  recorded by the trial Court suffered<\/p>\n
V V irons,   It is neeessaxy to notice here that d111’m’ g<\/p>\n
., , ..  I\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01d\u00e9hey of the appeal, the appellant herein \ufb01led an<\/p>\n
  seeking amendment of the written statement. He<\/p>\n
  to contend that the suit properties were absolutely<\/p>\n
   by Somappa, the husband cf the plaintiff’ Yellavva and<\/p>\n
that after the death of Somapll’-1. the plainti\ufb02’ Yeilavva<\/p>\n
tr<\/p>\n
RSA 462\/2008<\/p>\n
akmgwith her three daughexs Ycllavva,
\nSavakka jointly succeeded to the Saki pmpertics  V’
\nand therefore since the suit pmpcrt\ufb01es’ wcm” K V’
\npropcl\ufb01cs the plaintiff being the son     ._<\/p>\n
Somappa was cntitbd to    This * L’<\/p>\n
application came to be  \ufb02tljlt:  Court
\nholding that the app1ica\ufb01;51\u00a7;T -if tantamount to
\npermitting the  \u00e9ixzxxissions made
\nby him in     out that the
\nWritten     dit\u00e9if\u00e9ldant-appc\ufb02ant herein
\non 20.02-.._198QA   two occasions on 21.09.1998<\/p>\n
and 27.02′{i\u00bb.’3\u00a7*9  statements W618 filed. The<\/p>\n
V lower\u00bb    pointed out in its order dated
\n 1′ vamcndment sought for that aithough
\n  was filed in thc year 2000, the amcndmrznt<\/p>\n
  was  a lapse of nscarly six years during the year<\/p>\n
  ‘I’i2\u00a2\u00a7r:forc the same could not be entcrtaincd.<\/p>\n
,.    Counsel appearing for the appellant strenuously
\nT ‘ ‘d’oi1tends that the lower Appellate Court seriously erred in law<\/p>\n
3  in not entertaining the application for amendment to the<\/p>\n
written statement as atmght for by the appellant herein. He<\/p>\n
RSA 461\/2008<\/p>\n
contends that the rejection of the application fbr <\/p>\n
in the facts and circumstances of this ‘.
\namounts to a substantial question wlg\ufb01ch  ‘A ”<\/p>\n
into in this second appeal.\n<\/p>\n
0?. Learned Counml -{gr  V;espbndE2\ufb01it”’1*efi1tcs ” V<\/p>\n
these contentious and urg__cs lgst <$n'thc  and
\nhaving contested the cast    dcfcades when the
\nmatter was at   after a lapse
\nof nearly six   V fi1ing"'iof the appeal, the<\/p>\n
amendment   were contraxy to<\/p>\n
the admission _\ufb01#a\u00a7"'a:\ufb01temp{ed which has been rightly<\/p>\n
negatived   Court. He submits that this<\/p>\n
cannot  Siibsfantial question of law to entitle the<\/p>\n
 topm a m    ad appeal<\/p>\n
08:." '– ;'.he learned Counsel for the parties and on
\n v\u00a2:;Va:=ei'11I".44i;r\u00a73.ii\u00a7,\u00a5i.t$1\u00a7'#11;io;:z of the materials on record including the
\n  .15.11.20o7 passed by the lower Appellate Court
\n  j the amendment sought for, I do not \ufb01nd any
\n  question of iaw flailing for consideration by this<\/p>\n
RSA 461\/2008<\/p>\n
09. As rightly pointed out by the lower  <\/p>\n
amendment sought for, if ailcrwed, will result tee’  V’ <\/p>\n
resiiing from the speci\ufb01c stand takerfbye    <\/p>\n
had become the absolute orw11erof   <\/p>\n
relinquishment deed. It was ._1f.he   ft_he”–,V\u00e9efeedant’V’<\/p>\n
that the properties in question  ‘jeint 1;an1ily~1}3roperties
\nwherein the plainti\ufb01’ Ye\ufb02svea   three daughters
\nhad equal share. ‘Cmvuthe   rhe. speci\ufb01c case
\nof the defentianir.    owner of the
\n deed and waived
\nher   of the defendant Thus,
\nthe   Appellate Court holding that<\/p>\n
the amgendmenat  i\u00e9e permitted is just and proper. At<\/p>\n
 en}? Vxvste’  the amendment sought for in the<\/p>\n
   ”   result in a substantial question of law to<\/p>\n
    appeal.\n<\/p>\n
M ‘A   ” was  the other findings recorded on other aspects,<\/p>\n
;7i\ufb01c\u00a7:”b\u00e9th the courts have concunently held that the plaimie<\/p>\n
Vj }jas”estabHshed her case regarding her ownership over the suit<\/p>\n
  schedule properties and that the defendant ram to establish<\/p>\n
his case regarding the relinquishment since these \ufb01ndings are<\/p>\n
%\/<\/p>\n
R86. 461 \/2908<\/p>\n
recorded after appreciating the oral and documentary <\/p>\n
this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under  _<\/p>\n
cannot upset the said concurrent \ufb01ndings.   ‘ <\/p>\n
being devoid of merits is Iiablc to  ‘ <\/p>\n
the same is dismissed. Parties tr:   hosts;  V<\/p>\n
“K   j      ;  fu&g*@<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Mahadevappa Hanumanthappa … vs Thippanna Yellappa … on 27 January, 2009 Author: B.S.Patil RSA 461 I 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT E}!-IARWAD DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUA1\u00a7gf’:2:\u00a3\u00a7o9’MTv:’~ % ” BEFORE _ _ _ THE HON’BLE MR.J1ISTI(\u00a7E’,__I*\u00a7;-$:PA1’fLv_’ ~ * V’ 1. R.8.A.xo.46:\u00a3’ZV’ A BETWEEN : Mahadevappa […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-114848","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMahadevappa Hanumanthappa ... vs Thippanna Yellappa ... on 27 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mahadevappa Hanumanthappa ... vs Thippanna Yellappa ... on 27 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-29T23:26:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mahadevappa Hanumanthappa … vs Thippanna Yellappa … on 27 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-29T23:26:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1149,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Mahadevappa Hanumanthappa ... vs Thippanna Yellappa ... on 27 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-29T23:26:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mahadevappa Hanumanthappa … vs Thippanna Yellappa … on 27 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mahadevappa Hanumanthappa ... vs Thippanna Yellappa ... on 27 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mahadevappa Hanumanthappa ... vs Thippanna Yellappa ... on 27 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-29T23:26:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mahadevappa Hanumanthappa … vs Thippanna Yellappa … on 27 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-29T23:26:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009"},"wordCount":1149,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009","name":"Mahadevappa Hanumanthappa ... vs Thippanna Yellappa ... on 27 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-29T23:26:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahadevappa-hanumanthappa-vs-thippanna-yellappa-on-27-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mahadevappa Hanumanthappa … vs Thippanna Yellappa … on 27 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114848","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=114848"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114848\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=114848"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=114848"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=114848"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}