{"id":114908,"date":"2008-06-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008"},"modified":"2016-03-05T08:19:33","modified_gmt":"2016-03-05T02:49:33","slug":"t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"T C Nethraj S\/O T S Chennaveeraiah vs The State Of Karnataka By The … on 30 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
T C Nethraj S\/O T S Chennaveeraiah vs The State Of Karnataka By The … on 30 June, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n
~   =  _AK0Z)AGI_\u00a2\u00a3 _c;:sTRsc'r  MMMMM I \u00ab\n  (BY MURTHY. SPF')\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 301\" DAY OF JUNE 2008\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONBLE MRJUSTICE K.N.KEsHAvANAaA'YAaA;pILST[ _If  \nCRIMINAL REVISION PETITION  If} T I\n\nBE [mE\u00a7I_\\I:\n\nT c: NETHRAJ\nsro T s CHENNAVEERAIAH\nAGED ABOUT 43 YEARS\nmo: AGRICULTURIST I\nRIO JAMBOOR VILLAGE I \nSOMWARPET TALUK    E I  \nKODAGU DISTRICT     I  \n\n     g I _   \u00a7..T.I=ETuTtoNER\n(BY SRI. H s     I \nSRI.K.A.CHANDRA$H_EKAR,'ADV.),    \n\nANQ : \n\nTHE sTATEI:oF  \nBY THE Pouczeorf SOFJ_IEWARPET\nPOLI\u00e9;.':E STATION,\n\n RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
* . I “”I’TI?IIS.I–V’;3|-TIIIIIINAL REVISION PETITION es FILED u:s.397
\nRJW4T._401yCR..P.C BY THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT was<\/p>\n
I HON’?-.LEA.V COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE
\n  CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED 1.2.2001
\n,.’..F’AS$AED BY THE C.J.M., M.%IKERI, IN C.C.NO.83i1998 Ahw<\/p>\n
 T I’ .CQN_FIRMED BY THE DISTRICT 8: SESSION JUDGE, KODAGU,<\/p>\n
—  MADIKERI. IN CRL.A.N0.15I2001 BY HIS JUDGMENT AND<\/p>\n
   .T\u00b0R\u00b05’I’I9\u00a7T5IEII&IIs$%Z\u00b0R%vIs:oN PETITION comm ow FOR<\/p>\n
I  ‘HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOINING:<\/p>\n
ODR<\/p>\n
This Revision Peti\ufb01on is filed under Sections 397 <\/p>\n
Cr.F’.C by the accused in cc No.83l1998 ques\ufb01oningihe  _<\/p>\n
and correctness of the judgment of conviction.   i <\/p>\n
passed by the CJM, Madikeri, convidirig <\/p>\n
the offences punishable under sections and,’.E}O:6j’ <\/p>\n
sentencing him to undergo simp|e””irnf3rison.rneni
\nand to pay a \ufb01ne of Rs.2,\u00a3.’.$O[&-_  pau\ufb01vne, ‘to undergo
\nsimple imprisonment for     ‘judgernent dated
\n28.3.2006 passeci–::l;y_ me=;i ileerneeeuenieiner*  Sessions Judge.<\/p>\n
Madikeri,”iin’ one  ‘disrnissing the said appeal and
\naf\ufb01rmind”eil1e<'judg:nient.:of  and sentence passed by the<\/p>\n
learned MaV\u00a7istrete.VVV'  A _
\nV' _; 2'. The  Police \ufb01led charge sheet against the<\/p>\n
  eeenees punishable under Sections 326 and 506<\/p>\n
 -epic,inteeeiee%%elieging that on 2.4.1998 at Jernboor village. when the<\/p>\n
corn’pieineiniel?W.1-P.N.Mohen was supplying water to his<\/p>\n
  V”vegeta5le_.i\u00a7erden, the accused cerne there in a Tractor and asked<\/p>\n
  T:”‘ine.,coinplainant to allow him to take his Tractor on the pa\ufb02iway te<\/p>\n
‘ V’  Haitihole to load sand. At that time, the complainant replied<\/p>\n
 mat the accused cannot take his Tractor on his pathway as there is<\/p>\n
a stay order from the High Court and the case is pending before the<\/p>\n
\ufb01e<\/p>\n
i  <\/p>\n
High Court. At that time, me accused being enraged by the<\/p>\n
statement of the complainant, got down from the Tractor, rernoved<\/p>\n
the gate across the pathway and took out an iron rod  <\/p>\n
Tractor and assaulted the complainant on his left foot;”‘le\ufb01   K H ” <\/p>\n
also on the left cheek causing grievou.ehu’rt <\/p>\n
the complainant with dire consequences: * . __lrrirnAediatelyi,Athe  .,<\/p>\n
complainant was taken to the local ‘-hcepital.and ‘twat-3 Q’<\/p>\n
taken to the District Hoepitel.   e We ‘in me District
\nHospital showed fracture ol’4″‘_e_  T hereafter. PW.1
\nlodged a compiaintihefore   based on which<\/p>\n
are Police   Afteivgvinyee\ufb01gation, charge sheet
\ncame      l”\n<\/p>\n
5 -3.   of-surnmons, the accused appeared before<\/p>\n
 ,.r_gieV”:olearhed “Magistrete”‘and pleaded not guilty for the charges<\/p>\n
 o.’__le’ve”_ile—.1  for the offences punishable under Sections 326<\/p>\n
ahd Soe 19\u00a2.’ he claimed to be tried.\n<\/p>\n
”    4. During trial, the prosecution examined the complainant as<\/p>\n
l   an eyewihwess-Rudrappa as PW.2. seizure mahazar witness<\/p>\n
was PWs.3 and 4, the brother of the complainant who was also<\/p>\n
stated to be an eyewitness as PW5. two Police Omcers as PWs.6<\/p>\n
and 7 and the Doctor who treated the compiainant as PW.8,…__’ihe<\/p>\n
prosecution also got marked l’:’.xs.P.1 to P.5 and M.0.1. ;  i<\/p>\n
5. During examination under _-Section ;3.’l3′”‘ i” it<\/p>\n
accused denied all incriminating circurrestenees a\u00a7:peering’eQainsi_:<\/p>\n
him in the evidence of  The the  *<\/p>\n
accused is one of total denial.\n<\/p>\n
6. After hearing  the oral and
\ndocumentary   l.eerned  by his judgment
\nunder  hes proved the guilt of the
\naccused   Sections.326 and 506
\nIPC beyond  In that view of the matter. the<\/p>\n
iearned.  the accused to undergo simple<\/p>\n
 V’  –.impirisorlment..for thre”e”mon\ufb02ns and also to pay fine of Rs.5,0GOI-.<\/p>\n
   by the said judgment of oonviction and sentence,<\/p>\n
 appeal before the learned Sessions Judge,<\/p>\n
 Madikeriin vCrlA.No.i5i2w1. The learned Session Judge alter<\/p>\n
A Q” hearing both sides, by his judgment under revision dismissed the<\/p>\n
AV’    saidiappeal and upheld the judgement of the learned Magistrate.<\/p>\n
&<\/p>\n
?. Questioning the legality and correctness of these<\/p>\n
judgments, the accused has presented \ufb01nis Revision Petitian.<\/p>\n
interalie on the ground that the judgments of the Couns~.belo’uE4 <\/p>\n
erroneous and contrary to the evidence on record,__ ‘as tltef\ufb02otrrts _ <\/p>\n
below have not properly appreciated themevidence  <\/p>\n
prosecution in its proper perspective a\ufb01ndithat ai\u00e9pcaums <\/p>\n
have failed to note that the lngredientsiof sectsqns.  of ‘ A<\/p>\n
PC have not been estai)!iashed\u00e9.ra’nd.p\/ghe iudgrnents of the
\nCourts below suffer from  are liable to be set<\/p>\n
aside.\n<\/p>\n
 l have ‘iieardiithe-learned counsel for the petitioner as weli<\/p>\n
as the learned  the State.\n<\/p>\n
he learnedicouvnsel for the petitioner contended that the<\/p>\n
 .__ei:idence”\u00ab..gn~ mead ciearly indicates that there was some civil<\/p>\n
dispute in  of the pathway and order of injunction granted<\/p>\n
‘<._by  had been vacated. Therefore. the complainant had<\/p>\n
A 5. to obstruct any of the public including the accused to pass<\/p>\n
'  through the said pathway. Under these circumstances. learned<\/p>\n
 counsel submitted that even if the incident alleged is presumed to<\/p>\n
have taken place, it must have taken place in a heat of passion<\/p>\n
without there being any intention on are part of the accused. He<\/p>\n
\u20ac263\/\/rt-\n<\/p>\n
fur\ufb01uer submitted that in the absence of X-ray film, the Courts. helow<\/p>\n
ought not to have held diet the complainant has suffered <\/p>\n
oniy on the basis of the evidence of PW.8 who hasuinoti. ‘<\/p>\n
seen the X-ray \ufb01lm before issuing the cere?ticete._” iitigeergte, i_:h_ere._V ‘A V’<\/p>\n
is no material on record placed by the :’pros’ecu’hon*<\/p>\n
F’W.1 had suffered fracture awaiting the ‘offence  <\/p>\n
325 IPC. He further coniended fior__any” ‘reasen, ihis Court
\ncomes to the conclusionihet   the Courts below
\nconvicting the accusw for…the   under Section
\n326 iF’C is to  iii}-.hai:_ei);ent; sentence ordered, having
\nregard to  the higher side and a
\nlenient   reliance on the iudgment
\nof the Supreme  of Neil: Sing}; vs. State of
\nPunjab _reported in ,49iscici-1;L:J 2061.<\/p>\n
V  “ihe’~..other hand, learned Pubiic Prosecutor for the<\/p>\n
Stet.e”‘soudht’iito5’suppo1t the reasoning of the Courts below and<\/p>\n
‘,_contendedjthat there are no grounds to interfere with the judgment<\/p>\n
‘V V’ of\ufb01’1e..sCoiirts below. He further contended that having regard to<\/p>\n
*  theiinehzre es weii as the gravity of the offences for which the<\/p>\n
T ” “accused has been found guilt. the sentence of imprisonment for<\/p>\n
U three months itself is on me lower side, therefore, there are no<\/p>\n
grounds to interfere even with the order of sentence passed by the<\/p>\n
gag\/,,-\n<\/p>\n
Coors beiow. With these contentions. he sought for dismissai of<\/p>\n
the Revision Petition.\n<\/p>\n
11. in the light of the above facts. the poimsmy    u so <\/p>\n
consideration are; _ i ? _ T\u00bb A
\n*1) Whether the come beioweere justified in ekheadfmg
\nthe accused-revision petitioner of”eie”of\u00a7encesV <\/p>\n
punishable undersectiens   <\/p>\n
ii) Whether the senteneef oreered\ufb01abyy learned<\/p>\n
    i it
\n12\u00a2\u00bb-,,in”order_ the prosecution placed strong<\/p>\n
reliance on the ‘evidenoe  the complainant who has been<\/p>\n
  V_P1N’.i’end.._his brother P.N.Ponnappa examined as<\/p>\n
 .  indemndent eyewieiess has been examined as<\/p>\n
 to the evidence of PWs. 1 and 5. on<\/p>\n
the duete. otthedd incident at about 8.00 AM. the complainant was<\/p>\n
it “‘V.:-eetering the vegetabie plants by the side of his house. At that<\/p>\n
  accused came there in his Tractor and tried to pass<\/p>\n
T  through me pathway by the side of the garden land of the<\/p>\n
d it complainant. At that time, the complainant proeeeted and told the<\/p>\n
accused that there is a stay order issued by the High Court in
\nreepectof\ufb011esaidpa”thway.eseuohnoonecanpessttwoughthe<\/p>\n
said pathway. F’W.1 has further mted. inspllle of the same. the
\naccused tried to take his Tractor thmugh the pathway and <\/p>\n
protested again, the accused with a rod found in<\/p>\n
assaulted him (PW.1) on his left leg and left \ufb021igil,__}is..::s   M’ <\/p>\n
fell down, immediately, be was shifted ts’   <\/p>\n
5. In the cross-\u00abexamination ofTPW.1k;’it   <\/p>\n
civil suit is filed by his mum: PVlI.5.l:’\u00a7c\u00a7insth me Gaul l _  the ‘ %<\/p>\n
Court of Civil Judge, sr.on.__ancl   is \ufb01ll-pemilng. It is
\nfunher elicited from l=vv.1 ih\u00e9 issued by the
\nCivil Judge. Sr. has  .:o.m at Madiketi.\n<\/p>\n
Court Ame; said’ ‘lzflspuia.-‘ lt is further elicited from PW.1
\nthat in me  glvil  \ufb01led an af\ufb01davit stating that
\nthe J  5 sumac road. PW.5-Ponnappa has<\/p>\n
.  ewtlencw “””  of P’W.1. with regard to the incident’ of<\/p>\n
     ed. In the cross~examination of PW.5 it is<\/p>\n
elicited tj:asf_fll:aAV.has \ufb01led suit in 05 No.1a’me94 agairm one<\/p>\n
  -Ggargesli  the file of me clvll Judge (Sr.Dn.). ll is further elicited<\/p>\n
‘    that me said suitwas filed since Ganah the defendant in<\/p>\n
‘    \ufb01aid suit was kansporting sand through that pathway. He has
\n admlmw that in the said civil suit. the mused has time: an af\ufb01davit<\/p>\n
stating that the pathway is a public road. He ms ple\ufb01 his
\nignorance to rim suggestion mat the accused has a lissnselpemlit<\/p>\n
:1
\nfacts. Under these circumsterrces. in die light of evidence of PW.2.
\nthere is no dimculty in accepting evidence of F’Ws. 1 and 5  the<\/p>\n
accused came near the scene of occurrence in the Tractor’erjd<\/p>\n
the presenw of me accused at the place of  <\/p>\n
Learned counsel for the accused has not crose4e*xarii’ined::  ” ‘V it<\/p>\n
Therefore. there is no difficulty in   <\/p>\n
widi regard to the presence   <\/p>\n
with regard to the actuai incident’Vi’io\u00a2t_V’Vvatr-tsreuitl  accused on
\nPW.1 . the oral testimony    :5.\n<\/p>\n
the same. There are no   B031 the
\nCourts below praczgtgierelianceeri thefevse\u00e9ncelor PWs.1.2 and 5<\/p>\n
have   -that the prosecution has proved
\nthe inciderrtot   accused on F’W.1 beyond alt
\nreaeenabte doubt… do not see any error committed by the Coum<\/p>\n
  tltewsaid \ufb01nding. There are no reason: for<\/p>\n
 :.tte:r\u00a7r:nege eaid \ufb01nding.\n<\/p>\n
14.__A’3′:’-‘rem the facts of the case. the imident of assault<\/p>\n
A 4’    to have miter: place in a heat of passion. As no\ufb01ced
\n.   though there was no order of injunction in raped of the
\n said pathway and the injunction came to have been granted bythe<\/p>\n
Civil Court had been vacated. the complainant appears to have
\npreventedtheacousedfrorn prooeedingorittrepathwaytoream<\/p>\n
Hattihoie for loading sand. This must have enraged the accused.
\nTherefore, under \ufb02wese circumstances, it is reasonable to<\/p>\n
the incident has occurred in a hat of passion.    _<\/p>\n
offenca proved attracts the provisions of    i <\/p>\n
However, white imposing sentence.\n<\/p>\n
the other attendant circumstances in the   d<\/p>\n
the case, it is ciear that the  did   an
\nintention of committing      go near
\nHattihoie fo: loading sand.    by the
\ncomplainant on     of assault. vital
\npart of me  assauit was on the left<\/p>\n
foot  the 4″‘ Metatarsal base. The
\ncircumstaneaealso  accused was not armed with<\/p>\n
weapon no accozdingto  prosecution witnesses, he took out the<\/p>\n
i it “:odiioI:najAin’i*ae  The incident has occurred on 2.4.1993.<\/p>\n
  eiapsed from the date of the incident.\n<\/p>\n
 these circumstances. the question is as to<\/p>\n
whetha:  this length of time. the accused shouid be sent to Jail.<\/p>\n
V’ ~TAhe”Hon’t>Ie Supreme Court in Naib Singhis case referred to supra,<\/p>\n
‘  aiftet aitering the offence for which the accused therein had been<\/p>\n
” “convicted to one under Sutton 326 has sentermd the accused<\/p>\n
therein to undergo imprisonment till the raising of the Court and to<\/p>\n
pay a \ufb01ne of Rs.5,000l-. The Hon’ble Supreme Court while
\nimposing sentence, in para-‘?, has observed em they were inclined<\/p>\n
to take a lenient View having regard to the fact that the <\/p>\n
therein was a Teacher in a school and the    <\/p>\n
prosecution showed that \ufb01lm incident  place  <\/p>\n
the moment. The Supreme   of   ~.\n<\/p>\n
incident had occurred about lame basin pruned; \u00abea. c<\/p>\n
Lordships observed that did,not iiginkfagiessrabee resend the
\nappellant back to Jail. in   their Lordships
\nreduced sentengej\u00e9g. fieaone year awarded
\nby the High o\u00a2en\u00ab.2olls~e.irm;;nsenrnen\u00a7 an   of the Court.<\/p>\n
16.’ Ash’   facts and circumstancw of he<\/p>\n
case. hand aisohrdicavies that this is not a tit mse to send the<\/p>\n
VZ’pee&onerlite_%:Jaii having regard to the fact that the incident has<\/p>\n
 ago. The evidence on record shows that me<\/p>\n
acc’used.._has.lAected in the heat of moment as he was obw-acted on<\/p>\n
dround from proceeding through the pathway to reach<\/p>\n
A    for loading sand. in View of the above discussion, I am of<\/p>\n
    considered View that the observation of the Horfbie Supreme<\/p>\n
 Court in die aforesaid decision would squarely apply to the case<\/p>\n
and even this is a \ufb01t case vmere the accused should be sentenced
\nto undergo imprisonment till the raising of the Court and also to pay<\/p>\n
gig<\/p>\n
fine of Rs.5,000l-. Bom the Courts below have completely
\noverlooked this aspect of the matter whiie imposing sentence\u00bb in<\/p>\n
my considered view, this is an illegality commmed <\/p>\n
below vimich rmuirw to be corrected by this Court   <\/p>\n
the revisional power under Section Mr ‘reed\u00abwii#i ores”<\/p>\n
Cr.P.C.\n<\/p>\n
17. Accordingly. Crimir;raI..xF\u00a7ei;ision  in
\npart. The iudgment of coniiieiien  learned Magistrate
\nconvicting the acctjseo for under $ections
\n326 and   Judge affirming the
\njudgment  However. in modi\ufb01cation of
\nthe sentence  iearned Magistrate the accused-
\n is  to’ unriergo imprisonment till the raising of<\/p>\n
i :ne\u00abicc$u:?2iijsana~ia;iso t\u00a7%\u00a7sy \ufb01ne of Rs.5,ooo:-, and in defauit to pay<\/p>\n
    simpie imprisonment for \ufb01wree months.\n<\/p>\n
‘  out was fine amount, a sum of Rs.3,000I- sheik be paid to<\/p>\n
 V-..P\\N.1–i=”‘.i\\:iA.i’.nohan, as compensation. The bail and surety bonds of
\n” 5 oeii\ufb01oner stand dissolved. The accused-petitioner is directed to<\/p>\n
V’   argzpear before the Iearnm Mmimate on 4.8.2068. Upon such<\/p>\n
ii appearance, learned Magistrate shall implement the order of this<\/p>\n
Court. If \ufb01re pe\ufb01tioner faiis to appear before the learned Magiwate
\non \ufb02wat day. are iwrned Magistrate shalt take elm to sewre he<\/p>\n
see<\/p>\n
presence of the accused for im  of the otder of mis “”—-._<\/p>\n
Court.\n<\/p>\n
Of\ufb01ce is directed to send the records af\ufb01we Cwam-‘4.})’ei\u00a7i\u00a7::  3<\/p>\n
forthwith with a copy of this order.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court T C Nethraj S\/O T S Chennaveeraiah vs The State Of Karnataka By The … on 30 June, 2008 Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana ~ = _AK0Z)AGI_\u00a2\u00a3 _c;:sTRsc’r MMMMM I \u00ab (BY MURTHY. SPF’) IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 301″ DAY OF JUNE 2008 BEFORE THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE K.N.KEsHAvANAaA’YAaA;pILST[ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-114908","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nT C Nethraj S\/O T S Chennaveeraiah vs The State Of Karnataka By The ... on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"T C Nethraj S\/O T S Chennaveeraiah vs The State Of Karnataka By The ... on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-05T02:49:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"T C Nethraj S\/O T S Chennaveeraiah vs The State Of Karnataka By The … on 30 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-05T02:49:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":2331,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008\",\"name\":\"T C Nethraj S\/O T S Chennaveeraiah vs The State Of Karnataka By The ... on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-05T02:49:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"T C Nethraj S\/O T S Chennaveeraiah vs The State Of Karnataka By The … on 30 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"T C Nethraj S\/O T S Chennaveeraiah vs The State Of Karnataka By The ... on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"T C Nethraj S\/O T S Chennaveeraiah vs The State Of Karnataka By The ... on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-05T02:49:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"T C Nethraj S\/O T S Chennaveeraiah vs The State Of Karnataka By The … on 30 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-05T02:49:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008"},"wordCount":2331,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008","name":"T C Nethraj S\/O T S Chennaveeraiah vs The State Of Karnataka By The ... on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-05T02:49:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-nethraj-so-t-s-chennaveeraiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-30-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"T C Nethraj S\/O T S Chennaveeraiah vs The State Of Karnataka By The … on 30 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114908","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=114908"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114908\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=114908"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=114908"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=114908"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}