{"id":114911,"date":"2006-02-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-02-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006"},"modified":"2016-11-17T09:17:53","modified_gmt":"2016-11-17T03:47:53","slug":"saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006","title":{"rendered":"Saurin T. Parikh, Proprietor Of &#8230; vs Stock Exchange And Anr. on 27 February, 2006"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Bombay High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Saurin T. Parikh, Proprietor Of &#8230; vs Stock Exchange And Anr. on 27 February, 2006<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: 2006 (2) BomCR 736, 2006 132 CompCas 910 Bom, 2006 (3) MhLj 480, 2006 70 SCL 31 Bom<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: H Gokhale<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: H Gokhale, A S Oka<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p>H.L. Gokhale, J.<\/p>\n<p>1. Heard Mr.Divan in support of this  Petition. Mr.Mody appears for the Bombay Stock  Exchange, which is respondent No.1 as well as  Investor Protection Fund, which is respondent  No.2. The Petition seeks an order to set aside  the order dated 25th May 2005 passed by the 1st  respondent and seeks an order directing the Stock  Exchange to give further opportunity to the  petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. The facts leading to this Petition are as  follows:-\n<\/p>\n<p> The petitioner is claiming the amounts on account  of one Kantilal Mangaldas Securities (P)  Ltd. becoming a defaulter. The petitioner  obtained an Award before the Arbitrators of the  Stock Exchange wherein this defaulter conceded the  claim. The petitioner&#8217;s case is that therefore  the petitioner is entitled to the amounts held due  and they be released from the Investor Protection  Fund. The Stock Exchange declined to accept this  request by its letter dated 22nd February 2005 on  the ground that the client code mentioned on the  contract notes issued by the default member was  not matching with the trade files of the Exchange.  An Appeal was preferred and it came to be rejected  by the impugned order dated 25th May 2005. The  order states that the written submissions made by  the petitioner were considered and the Committee  has upheld the decision.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Mr.Divan, learned Counsel appearing for  the petitioner, submits that in view of the  guidelines framed by SEBI, the amount had to be  released from the Investor Protection Fund. He  further submits that SEBI has issued a circular  dated 28th October 2004 under the power available  under Section 11(1) of the Securities and Exchange  Board of India Act, 1992 and a mechanism is  created under these guildelines. A claim is permitted  to be filed under these guidelines and  since the claim was filed, the Stock Exchange had  to honour the Award given by the Arbitrators.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. Mr.Mody, learned Counsel appearing for the  Stock Exchange, on the other hand, pointed out  that the claims are to be entertained in  accordance with the bye-laws, rules or regulations  of the Stock Exchange. That is provided under  Clause 7 of the SEBI Regulations itself. He has  drawn our attention to the rules of the Trust  governing this Investor Protection Fund. Under  Rule 7(E) of these Rules, it is provided that the  Trustees shall have an absolute discretion as  regards the mode and method of assessing the  nature of claims and under Rule 8 it is  specifically provided that the fund shall be under  no legal obligation to collect the debts of a  default member and\/or to make payments from the  fund. That apart in para-3 of the  affidavit-in-reply, it has been specifically  stated that in the case of default of Kantilal  Mangaldas Securities Private Limited with whom the  petitioner was affiliated as a sub-broker, it was  noticed that the claims of almost Rs.2 Crores were  lodged with the said Trust and most of the claims  lodged were by or through sub-brokers such as the petitioner  and the claims were fully conceded and  accepted by the said defendant broker.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. Mr.Mody has pointed out that the release  of the fund from the Investor Protection Fund was  discretionary and it was essentially meant for a  benefit of the small investors. In the instant  case, his submission is that the claim was  essentially collusive and, therefore, on facts also  the SEBI was entitled to reject it.\n<\/p>\n<p>6. We quite see the force in the submission  of Mr.Mody. That apart, if the petitioner wants  to execute the Award given by the Arbitrators, the  remedy under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,  1996 is available to the petitioner. We do not  consider the SEBI guidelines as creating a  mandatory requirement for the Investor Protection  Fund. We have taken a similar view in one of the  earlier matters which came before this Court in Writ Petition No.2649 of 2004 in the case of  Ms.Pragna Desai vs. The National Stock Exchange  of India Ltd. by order dated 12th January 2006.\n<\/p>\n<p>7. Petition is dismissed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court Saurin T. Parikh, Proprietor Of &#8230; vs Stock Exchange And Anr. on 27 February, 2006 Equivalent citations: 2006 (2) BomCR 736, 2006 132 CompCas 910 Bom, 2006 (3) MhLj 480, 2006 70 SCL 31 Bom Author: H Gokhale Bench: H Gokhale, A S Oka ORDER H.L. Gokhale, J. 1. Heard Mr.Divan in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-114911","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Saurin T. Parikh, Proprietor Of ... vs Stock Exchange And Anr. on 27 February, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Saurin T. Parikh, Proprietor Of ... vs Stock Exchange And Anr. on 27 February, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2006-02-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-17T03:47:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Saurin T. Parikh, Proprietor Of &#8230; vs Stock Exchange And Anr. on 27 February, 2006\",\"datePublished\":\"2006-02-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-17T03:47:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006\"},\"wordCount\":706,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006\",\"name\":\"Saurin T. Parikh, Proprietor Of ... vs Stock Exchange And Anr. on 27 February, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2006-02-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-17T03:47:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Saurin T. Parikh, Proprietor Of &#8230; vs Stock Exchange And Anr. on 27 February, 2006\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Saurin T. Parikh, Proprietor Of ... vs Stock Exchange And Anr. on 27 February, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Saurin T. Parikh, Proprietor Of ... vs Stock Exchange And Anr. on 27 February, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2006-02-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-17T03:47:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Saurin T. Parikh, Proprietor Of &#8230; vs Stock Exchange And Anr. on 27 February, 2006","datePublished":"2006-02-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-17T03:47:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006"},"wordCount":706,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006","name":"Saurin T. Parikh, Proprietor Of ... vs Stock Exchange And Anr. on 27 February, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2006-02-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-17T03:47:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saurin-t-parikh-proprietor-of-vs-stock-exchange-and-anr-on-27-february-2006#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Saurin T. Parikh, Proprietor Of &#8230; vs Stock Exchange And Anr. on 27 February, 2006"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114911","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=114911"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114911\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=114911"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=114911"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=114911"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}