{"id":115215,"date":"2009-10-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009"},"modified":"2016-02-19T05:01:20","modified_gmt":"2016-02-18T23:31:20","slug":"kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"Kudremukh Employees&#8217; Union &#8230; vs The Union Of India on 13 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Kudremukh Employees&#8217; Union &#8230; vs The Union Of India on 13 October, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ram Mohan Reddy<\/div>\n<pre>-E..\n\nIN THE HIGE COURT 0F'   A \n\nmrmn THIS THE 13:12 Daft)?  _(:)Cj'I' C)B' ER; 7 \n\nBEFGRE       %\nTHE 1~:o1~rBLE mR.msTI\u00a2E:._mm  \u00a7jEDnY\nWRIT PETITI0:'i I{o. :33 \u00e9);_\u00a3;-' 2n;jt38 gsjkx\u00e9m)\n\nBEFWEEN\n\nKUDREMUKH \" EM \u00a5?.\u00a3.;\u00a7jf)Y\u00a7r1}i2_\u00a73' --V:}N's\"c&gt;~:sr {R\u00a5\u00a73('}D. _)\n(A TRADE UR1939_.z1*E{3-\u00a7\u00bbsfrz'3i\u00a72F,1;:~~:;;N};:ER THE\ni'NE[}\u00a31NjTRAIf)i\u00a53_ 'U\u00a7s';i;Q:~:3._A{__.* 3' A \nHAVING ms? \u00a3Z3+F\u00a3}'\u00a5C}\u00a77;4 A?  .\n:\u00ab;SRsvrI=Bu:;:..::;zNx:;T';. ..Lm~z'-1:' Hausa\nH\u00a7}'_.L R(;}'AD_,. MAN'GALO}'\u20acIE*\u00a7 ..5::r'3 30:\n:3 K 1:&gt;:s'z'1~e;(:?, RE-13.3? \u00a7'TS\nASSISTANT 'GENERAL 'SEEERETARY.\n\n5' \" F.  .. '  P{3\"I'1'I'\u00a7{)Ni\u00a53R\n\n \u20ac;;\u00a5\"f%x\u00a7_:j'g:}::3;3ARA&lt;3 \u00a355 051,;\n\n1 A  *1*:~\u00a7;-\u00a2:~E; r\u00a7:&#039;1*:;N cw iixzijm\nmp. BY &#039;1&#039;Hf3; SECRI\u00a7&quot;E&quot;ARY TO\nGC-rvERNMENT\n\n &quot; *-.._MINEE5&quot;i&quot;&#039;R\u00a5 ms S&#039;i&quot;&#039;EE&#039;:\u00a3,-\n ?.;i{}Y\u20ac){\u00a7 BHAVAN\n\n&quot;WW DELHI --- 11:1: 01:.\n\n  KUQKEMUKH n~:&lt;;3r~2 ems: company\n\nLEMITED, HAV\u00a3NG \u00a7TS i~\u00a7I3LPs{) OFVICEJ\nAT 1! BLGCK, KORAMANGALA\nBANGALORE \u00abM 34 f L\n\n$2,} \\\n\n\n\n-2-\n\n\u00a5?\u20acE\u00a7P.BY ITS CBAIRMAN -~ CUM\nMANEGING DEREUFOR.\n\n(BY SR} U&#039;f*\u20ac&#039;f~\u00a3\u00a3 KRISHNAN M, ADV F(JZ)I\u00ab? Ri}._ \n\n \u00a7\u00a7\u00a7&#039;s3.P0?\u00a7:3;E:rz&#039;rS , V&#039; V \n\n(BY SR}. K I{AS&#039;I&quot;UR\u00a5, Sr. COUNSEL;:.AE\u00a7V&#039;A3?3&#039;{)F&lt;&#039;.R2    \n\nFOR KASTURI A\/S)\n\n&#039;m1s PE\u00a7&#039;I&#039;i&#039;E&#039;\u00a3{)I*J mm) t;:--\u00ab5f\u00a7;:ER AI%~&#039;;&#039;_:cL.:i:.= 2&#039;:.:6 \u00e9z. 227\n\n09&quot; THE {3()FsES&#039;}&#039;I&#039;f&#039;U&#039;I&#039;i()N 09* 1N&#039;:3:A--.,PRAY&#039;:m:; $0.? QUASH\nTHE ADV&#039;ER&#039;TISEMEN&#039;:&#039;:&quot;\u00a7?UBL\u00a3S\u00a5iE.{j\u00bb 1\u00a7;.3*rHE NEW INMAN\nEXPRESS&quot; i)A&#039;i&#039;E{) 24.:wj3 1as&#039;sL\u00a7&#039;1is:L)&quot;~-\u00a332!  KUDREMUKH\nERON ORE COMPANY \u00a3,IMi_TE:D--,V1vJ:~1_x;;,*i-E,'r'1?;f;\u00ab:\u00a7:s:' .<i>1_1:\u00a7G ft}&gt;1\u00a5z\"i$'(;i2\"'PRL.m::ARING (3.\n(mos?) Tags 135$, .-'1;*;;g4.g:.&lt;_i:m\u00a7&#039;1&#039;-- M5913: THE FGLLOWING:\n\n y%f%n\u00a7r\u00a2n_:2:_13.\n&#039;1&quot;h\u00a7\u20ac: Urxion claiming to espouse\n\nthe {gauge if-\u00bb \u00a5;}&quot;:\u20ac  ezizployaes of U33 2110&#039; responcierm\n\niron Ore ijiompazzy, aggieved by the\n\nAi:t\u20aciV!E?5{&#039;iiS\u20ac,%ff;(%\u00a7,I1fV:&#039;\u00a7EJVi;ibIiSI&#039;lffd in the New Indian Express dt.\n\n _ 24.3&#039;;&#039;--\u00a330{}:8 iinnexurew\ufb02 and the Jab Speciiiea\ufb01azl\n\n . f%io\u00a3;;\ufb01Caii9:n dated nil, A;1m=:xure~C, has p2&quot;es&amp;:1t.ed thia\n\n  \n\n2&#039;?\n\n\u00a7 ,\nag\n\n*2\n\n\n\n-3-\n\n2. Ac(:o1*(;iir1.g to the petitioner the Apex c0\u00a7.11?t\u00a7:&#039; iifi\ufb01s\n\n(i{3CiSi()I1 on 30. i(}.i\u00a3IO{)2 ordered the trloe\ufb01\u00e9rei *\n\nmining operations in the K11{iI&#039;\u20acI}]lL\u00a7{h&#039; ire\ufb02 (&#039;3i&#039;::..&#039;Ivc3c3i;:1.1;\u00a7;arIj\u00a2%V V\n\nw.(:.f.1.1.:2(&#039;)()6, as a Conseqmenix: &quot;&#039;red&#039;z1&lt;f\u00a7\u20ac.. rim&quot;\n\npower&#039;, the Company iI0a&#039;t::VdV_a \u00a76l:.;I1ta1*y: &#039;z&quot;&#039;r::&quot;ti&#039;:&#039;t*:1:\u00a71:&#039;:n$:&quot;\n\nS(2h\u20ac&#039;I\ufb02@, Wlnence sevexfa\ufb01 e1I1p\u00a3eS2\u00e9feS&quot;  opted\nfbr voluntary re\u00a3iren1e i\u00a7L:V;5e;.:%{&#039;}.t;;:;\u00a3\u00a7\u00a71?;\u00a7--(?on1pan5,&#039;, it\nis stated, mazif:  WV Vt&quot;V;o&quot;:Ei&#039;1e appropriate\nGovemunergt&#039;    ciose down the\n\nestab\u00a3i:shIneI\ufb01j &quot;a*1\u00e9&#039;&lt;:0&#039;-._fer11&#039;1i\ufb01at.e the services of 7 32\n\nwoI&#039;kInt=:r1f.$H;;g;1(3j\u00a7;e\u00e9s&#039; ozgfi\ufb01fs 1&#039;*r3I_is.\n\n&#039;A    VAI:-.i\u00e9&#039;--~--t1*1e a\ufb01legatiorx of the petitioner that wh\u20ac:I1\n\nLii1\u00e9 coz\ufb01p \u00e9i:i3y&#039;;Ei\u00e9 .about to be closed&#039;, the Chairman and\n\n-- Man\u00e9zgfrzg fiirector issued an advertisement invi\ufb01ng\n\n .:L\u00bba\u00a7)pi\u00e9s;:3t:i\u00a7):1_s fez&#039; recrx\ufb01txnent to certain tsp posts\n\n-   higher salary and emaizmzents and as the said\n\n&quot; .\u00a7if3&#039;\u00a7.cer is iiiiely to retire an 3{}.~&lt;$.2(){)8, w.iI&#039;:h. undue haste\n\nis trying to make: a.ppoi1&#039;1tHm;r1&#039;t:s to the said posts, of\n\nM\n\n &#039;\\\n\n\n\n-4-\n\npersons of his choice. It is the further ai\u00a3ega;:iQi3.VVijI;L:4 V.\n\npetitioner that appoinulwnts, if made, wo1iid oC_cansi011..T_ \n\nadditional burden 0:1 the  \n\nleading to the W()I&#039;k;II1\u20acZ1  _em1\u00a7lQ\u00a7.}\u00e9es \n\nWages out of the reserve fund . &quot;=\n4. The petitioii ._op;\u00a7OS\u00a3$&lt;j;  s\ufb01\u00e91t\u00e9n1\u20acnt cf\n0bjE:{:ti()I}.S d\u00a3. 29V.5.20{)\u00a75V_(fii&#039;.:I}f:V i;i_n\u00e9&quot;&#039;:&#039;\u00e9S},5Q;1{ient-conlpany\n\nirxter aiia, at  S_&lt;i\u00e9n3\u00a7i:ig f\u00a7r;c~&quot;aiiegatioz1s of the\n\npetitj_on:;-I&quot;Tvsg1:9A1{ii. &#039;  th\u00a2&#039;~--.\u00a2\u00a2mpmi}; despite the ;m;i.ni.ng\naCtiVity&quot;&quot;.&#039;h3:%i1&quot;1g:  hconfinues to function by\n\nprodL1cing: =.  peilets aricl pig iron.\n\n v  1:0 \u00a5Ii\u00e9&quot;r@i:-..por1den1: instead of procuring iron\n\n &#039;g):n4 'if,S'~ \u00a7}:x,i:0.t:s which have since D6611 Closed, the\n\n .  p_r\u00a73k:ures them fmm others Zike NMDC\n\n .,(N'atioz:~.aui'[. Minera}. I\ufb01evelopmem: Corporation) etc. in\n\n  ' 'a_.:i(:iL;iHi':i_0:1, it is stated that 31} empiajiees are pai\ufb01 full\n\n  35.1313; inckzding parka, mining allowance eventllough\n\n the cempany is 110': mvolved in mailing activity and that\n\nM\n.45 5&amp;1\n E\n\n\n\n-5-\n\nthe e:xper1&lt;ti\u00a7mre to an extent of Rs.5{) crores per&#039;\n\n{mm out of the profits of the company and  \n\nReserve Fund. At paragraph &#039;2&#039;  V\n\nadvertisements inviting applicatfi&#039;0;&#039;\u00a7s_V for  &quot;  ~_\n\nGenera; Mamager\/Acid]. Ge\ufb01e:\u00a7\u00a7j3v~%Maiiager%%g::o:\u00a3;:\ufb01&#039;\u00e9r\u00a2ia;); &#039;&#039;\n\nGeneral Manager\/Adei\u00a7.__ {,}\u20ac&#039;?;i&quot;1&#039;{\u00a7&#039;\u00a7&#039;I&#039;i:ZQ&#039;:4Nl&#039;2)\u00a51ag\u20acI &quot;(\u00a7)\u00e9f&#039;SO{lI}\u20acl)\nand Canxparly Secretaxfv &#039;\ufb01at in securing\nsuitable ca:}.dit:1g\u00a3&#039;_i:es   &#039;b\u00e9i\u00e9ig pubiic sector\n\nunderta&#039;k\u00a7:ig V.  &#039;--\u00e9lid\ufb01er\ufb01sement in leading\n\n3:1ewspapers.1 A&#039; far) ..V;\u00a7aragf;qfq1;\\ 9, it is stated that ihc&#039;:\nCompaxlji v.h.?3.s Sevtiriaj \u20ac${;)_\u00e9\u00e9;::isi&lt;)n programs and projects\n\nWhict\ufb01\ufb01 &#039;i31cIude:&quot;~s1_ g&#039;l\u00a3)bail tender and therefore, there is a\n\n;f1ec_cwssif3; &#039;::3 have the services of the pemons capable of\n\n%i;:tai\ufb01;1\u00abir1&#039;gTi;eV__:Ef;&#039;iiit0 fha pests advertised.\n\n3- Having hazard the laax\ufb01ed 00111236} far the\n\n   and peruse\ufb01. the pieadings, the questicm for\n\n   d\u00e9cisiozz making is, whether the pvetit:i&lt;}11sr&#039;s have locus\u00bb\n\n stancii is questieitt maiters reiating to creation or\n\n9 R5\n\n*\u00ab__\n\n\n\n-6-\n\naiaoiition of posts, f0rma1:ioI1 and s;t:&#039;1:ct;11z&#039;in&#039;g-,j or\n\nrestrucmring of cadres prescribing the sour:;.c:__&#039;c:r :\n\nof recmlitmem, notiiicatiorz, criteria of sc5&#039;i&#039;3{:t;ik:)I1,n the _ &quot;\n\n\u20acV3111atiOI1, etc. in the responde\ufb02t. ni31&#039;:ag:3H1&#039;eI&quot;;_f. 2   &#039;V\n\n6. St\ufb01iice it to st:i:ti~-tha{&quot;- in -vsimilar * %&#039;\n\ncircmnstances, the 0I}servat_i()fis.__&lt;.:f_\u00bbthe&#039; Apex in\n\nUnion of In\u00e9ia --v-  i&quot;&#039;I&#039;1fftl1}:4:&#039;\u00bb.circtlmstances,\n\nis apyositez\n\n&quot;3&#039;&quot;\u00a3&#039;A~.--&#039;Tv   \ufb02W}&#039;fh--&#039;i\u00a3h4is aspect of the\ncase, -.we \u00a7r:\u20ac:::&#039;;sids:\u00a7*&#039;*i\u00a7i&quot;n.e::(\u00a7:ssa1&quot;y to reiterate the\nsettIc:&lt;;i 1\u20ac:g&#039;a}..  matiters relating to\n\u00a2r\u20acaTj,ofi :\u00a7i1&lt;:&#039;iwab(3&#039;!itiE\u00a7.11 of posts, forxna\ufb01ori and\n\n._ii\u00e9\ufb01rg#364:.1r%:&quot;:;g\/&#039;rs;-3\u00a3&quot;;*:*V:1ct1;ri11g af cadres,\n\n --\u00bb _;j;1&#039;e\u00a7t:1:&#039;iE3:ii&#039;12c;_ the s0z1r{:e\/mode of I&#039;{iCI&#039;&quot;L1itII1CI}ii\n&quot;~T&#039;._&amp;i&#039;17ci4T&quot;&quot;_~gL{\u00a7ii\u00a7i(:ati0ns, criteria of $eiec:t.i0I:1,\n\nA &#039;---.4\u00a2va,\u00a5.u3.\ufb01a&#039;3f; of service racords of the employees\n\nV fa}; _ 1-Within the exciusive dornajn of the\nAA  &quot;\u00e9i:I;:1p\u00a3oyer, Wiflat steps shauid ha iaken for\n iiiaprovirig efficiency of the admini.strai:i0n is\naise the preserve cf the \u20ac:&#039;:II1p\u00a7{}_&#039;\u00a7?\u20acI&quot;. The power\n\nof judicial raview can be exercised in such\n\n111a.I;&quot;:ers carniy if it is shown that the action of\n\n\n\nthe empioyer is (:&lt;:nf1fra1*y to any co:1stit.11fio1}a\u00a7\u00a3_&quot;&quot;\u00bbT\nor statutory pmvision or is pateiltky  \nor is vitiated due to rnala \ufb01des. &#039;1&#039;he:. :&#039;(:(31;zTff1:&#039;L-&quot;&#039; 3\n\ncannot sit in appeal ever th\u00a7:..ju_dg1n\u00e9\ufb01t&quot;   \n\nemployer and ordain that a:apa1fti\u00e9}j1l\ufb01r_  A  .&#039;\n\nfilled by direst I&#039;\u20acCI&#039;1iitII34E&#039;\u00abE_}t Qrprdmotiori.  by  A.\ntransfer. The court has V-roie  \nthe Ii1(f&#039;:U\u00a31(}Ci\u00a3)i(i}$&quot;  &#039;of  &#039;()1--- ...,.3K\u00a3-1y:i1&quot;1g\ncomparative evaI{1.=r;iic:I)i~_L   .f:&quot;1e,\u00bbI\u00b0it of the\ncandidates. V The &#039;&quot;_\u00ae1J,rt.v&#039;V__Vcz\u00a7;1\ufb01Q\u00a7&#039;.&#039;.i\u00e9\u00a7:;,1$gge:st the\nIiraamtzer \u00a7I;I~fWh\ufb01_(:3h\u00a7  shoul\u00e9\nstrL:ct1\u00a7111&quot;c&quot;  __cadres for the\n\u00a7)1E._:I&#039;}Z)()&#039;S&#039;\u20ac&#039;.&#039;,&#039;1 A&#039;   e\ufb01iciency of\n\nE1dI\u00a51iI1iSt}&#039;Eifi(\u00a7}&#039;?;&quot;. _ ?&#039; ~ ., __ \n\n5?; _ H\u00e9vifig&#039; &#039;r\u00e9g\u00e9fd to the well settled position sf\n\n \u00a311 &quot;&#039; i;&#039;r2\u00e9&quot; fgicts and circ1m1s:ances; supra, it is not\n\ni::~pe1: for. i:h e ;.i\u00a7ctitioner--Unio;1 espousing the cause of its\n\nmcmbexjs  employees of the izmi respondent, to<\/pre>\n<p>h  , \u20ac:L=*=1i.I;1 as \u00a31 right, to question the \ufb01lling up of vacancies<\/p>\n<p>_&#8217;  6:9 &#8220;iiie creation of vacancies 93:&#8217; posts in the 2&amp;5<\/p>\n<p> V&#8217; &#8216;1&#8217;\u00b0\u00e9sp0ndcmt\u00bb()rganisation ihr e\ufb01iective management 0:&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>the: comparly.\n<\/p>\n<p>3 \u00abE?\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-8-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The absence: of relevant material  2<\/p>\n<p>subst.antj.a1 iegal evidence of the action beiI1g&#8221;&#8221;&lt;:%{)njt;_1*2iij3\u00a7 t(3  &quot; <\/p>\n<p>C(}I1S&#039;Cit{1ti(}I1a.i or statutory provti\u00e9iozi  &quot;vj.tia\u00a3ie\u00a7i&#039;- d.L_1\u20ac 11O 7<\/p>\n<p>L#.4<\/p>\n<p>mala\ufb01des or A:*bitraI&#039;i1&quot;1ess,  writ .; 3etitivd:i&quot;is&quot; <\/p>\n<p>without. nwrit and is, accordiiigljfrejected.&#039; <\/p>\n<p>\u00a311.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Kudremukh Employees&#8217; Union &#8230; vs The Union Of India on 13 October, 2009 Author: Ram Mohan Reddy -E.. IN THE HIGE COURT 0F&#8217; A mrmn THIS THE 13:12 Daft)? _(:)Cj&#8217;I&#8217; C)B&#8217; ER; 7 BEFGRE % THE 1~:o1~rBLE mR.msTI\u00a2E:._mm \u00a7jEDnY WRIT PETITI0:&#8217;i I{o. :33 \u00e9);_\u00a3;-&#8216; 2n;jt38 gsjkx\u00e9m) BEFWEEN KUDREMUKH &#8221; EM \u00a5?.\u00a3.;\u00a7jf)Y\u00a7r1}i2_\u00a73&#8217; &#8211;V:}N&#8217;s&#8221;c&gt;~:sr [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-115215","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Kudremukh Employees&#039; Union ... vs The Union Of India on 13 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kudremukh Employees&#039; Union ... vs The Union Of India on 13 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-18T23:31:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kudremukh Employees&#8217; Union &#8230; vs The Union Of India on 13 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-18T23:31:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":122,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009\",\"name\":\"Kudremukh Employees' Union ... vs The Union Of India on 13 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-18T23:31:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kudremukh Employees&#8217; Union &#8230; vs The Union Of India on 13 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kudremukh Employees' Union ... vs The Union Of India on 13 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kudremukh Employees' Union ... vs The Union Of India on 13 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-18T23:31:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kudremukh Employees&#8217; Union &#8230; vs The Union Of India on 13 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-18T23:31:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009"},"wordCount":122,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009","name":"Kudremukh Employees' Union ... vs The Union Of India on 13 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-18T23:31:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kudremukh-employees-union-vs-the-union-of-india-on-13-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kudremukh Employees&#8217; Union &#8230; vs The Union Of India on 13 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115215","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=115215"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115215\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=115215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=115215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=115215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}