{"id":115259,"date":"2011-02-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011"},"modified":"2014-07-10T18:55:54","modified_gmt":"2014-07-10T13:25:54","slug":"sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011","title":{"rendered":"Sahadevan vs Rahna Sulthan on 2 February, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sahadevan vs Rahna Sulthan on 2 February, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nRCRev..No. 59 of 2011()\n\n\n1. SAHADEVAN,SON OF CHAMI,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. RAHNA SULTHAN, D\/O.LATE KITHAT MUHAMMED,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. SHERINA, W\/O.LATE KITHAR MUHAMMED,\n\n3. FATHIMA TASLIM,D\/O.LATE KITHAR MUHAMMED,\n\n4. SHAHUL HAMEED,S\/O. LATE KITHAR MUHAMMED,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.D.KRISHNA PRASAD\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice N.K.BALAKRISHNAN\n\n Dated :02\/02\/2011\n\n O R D E R\n    PIUS C. KURIAKOSE &amp; N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ.\n          -----------------------------------------------\n                     RCR. No. 59 of 2011\n          -----------------------------------------------\n          Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2011\n\n                           O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>Balakrishnan, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>     The tenant who has suffered order of eviction under<\/p>\n<p>Section 11(3) and 11(4)(iii) is the revision petitioner. The<\/p>\n<p>need projected by the landlady is that the petition schedule<\/p>\n<p>building is bona fide required for accommodating her<\/p>\n<p>daughter for starting a business therein. It is contended by<\/p>\n<p>the landlady that the tenant has put up a new building very<\/p>\n<p>near to the petition schedule building by name &#8216;Century<\/p>\n<p>Plaza&#8217; and he is actually conducting business in a room<\/p>\n<p>situated in that building.\n<\/p>\n<p>     2. The claim was resisted by the tenant contending that<\/p>\n<p>the need alleged is not bona fide. The ground under Section<\/p>\n<p>11(4)(iii) was also resisted by the tenant contending that he<\/p>\n<p>is not in possession of any other building as alleged by the<\/p>\n<p>landlady.\n<\/p>\n<p>RCR. 59 of 2011<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                             -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     3. The learned Rent Controller considering the oral and<\/p>\n<p>documentary evidence ordered eviction on both the<\/p>\n<p>grounds.       The Appellate Authority concurred with the<\/p>\n<p>eviction order passed by the Rent Controller.<\/p>\n<p>     4. Sri.D.Krishna Prasad, learned counsel appearing for<\/p>\n<p>the tenant submits that when the case was originally listed<\/p>\n<p>for trial the landlord sought adjournment and that was<\/p>\n<p>allowed by the trial court and thereafter the landlady and<\/p>\n<p>one witness were examined and the case was posted for<\/p>\n<p>evidence of the tenant. On that day, the tenant could not<\/p>\n<p>be present in court as he had to take his daughter, who was<\/p>\n<p>in an advanced stage of pregnancy, to a hospital at<\/p>\n<p>Coimbatore and thus sought time for giving evidence on his<\/p>\n<p>behalf.     The court granted two days time.    Though the<\/p>\n<p>tenant was under the belief that he can come back within<\/p>\n<p>two days, he could not return because his daughter had to<\/p>\n<p>be admitted in the hospital and so no evidence could be<\/p>\n<p>RCR. 59 of 2011<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                              -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>adduced on his side. Thus, according to the learned counsel,<\/p>\n<p>it was almost an ex parte order that was passed by the Rent<\/p>\n<p>Control Court.     The learned counsel further submits that<\/p>\n<p>though these grounds were canvassed in appeal,         those<\/p>\n<p>grounds were not accepted by the Appellate Authority. Thus<\/p>\n<p>the learned counsel submits that the finding entered by the<\/p>\n<p>two courts are erroneous and       unsound and as such it<\/p>\n<p>requires reconsideration.\n<\/p>\n<p>     5. The learned counsel for the landlady would<\/p>\n<p>vehemently argue that here is a tenant who is actually in<\/p>\n<p>the place of a big landlord having another new building of<\/p>\n<p>his own by name Century Plaza. It is contended that the<\/p>\n<p>building by name Century Plaza is situated very near to the<\/p>\n<p>petition schedule building and that the tenant is actually<\/p>\n<p>conducting business in one of the rooms situated in that<\/p>\n<p>building.     The learned counsel further submitted that the<\/p>\n<p>tenant is having buildings at two other places also and there<\/p>\n<p>RCR. 59 of 2011<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                             -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>also he is conducting business. The learned counsel Sri.D.<\/p>\n<p>Krishna Prasad submits that there is no evidence to show<\/p>\n<p>that those buildings belong to the tenant. But on going<\/p>\n<p>through the evidence it could be seen that the fact that the<\/p>\n<p>tenant is having other buildings was not seriously objected<\/p>\n<p>to. The Advocate Commissioner in Ext.C-1 report has given<\/p>\n<p>details regarding the other buildings held and possessed by<\/p>\n<p>the tenant.\n<\/p>\n<p>     6. Though it was vehemently argued by the learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the tenant that the tenant could not give<\/p>\n<p>evidence before the Rent Control Court as his daughter was<\/p>\n<p>hospitalised no document was produced either before the<\/p>\n<p>Rent Control Court or before the Appellate Authority to<\/p>\n<p>canvass for the position that there was justifiable reason for<\/p>\n<p>his absence and inability to adduce evidence before the trial<\/p>\n<p>court. In the absence of any such evidence it is too late in<\/p>\n<p>the day for the tenant to contend that he was actually<\/p>\n<p>RCR. 59 of 2011<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                             -5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>prevented from giving evidence before the Rent Control<\/p>\n<p>Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>     7. The learned counsel for the tenant has also argued<\/p>\n<p>that PW-2, for whose need the building is sought to be<\/p>\n<p>evicted is actually abroad with her husband and that she<\/p>\n<p>does not actually intend     to come back for starting a<\/p>\n<p>business and that the need projected is only a pretext for<\/p>\n<p>eviction. The daughter of the landlady (PW-2) has however<\/p>\n<p>chosen to mount the box to give evidence regarding the<\/p>\n<p>need that she actually intends to start business as stated in<\/p>\n<p>the petition. The evidence so given by PW-2 was accepted<\/p>\n<p>by the two authorities below. Therefore, we are not inclined<\/p>\n<p>to upset that finding. In view of what is stated above, the<\/p>\n<p>orders of eviction passed by the Rent Control Court under<\/p>\n<p>Section 11(3) and 11(4)(iii) confirmed by the Appellate<\/p>\n<p>Authority cannot be upset by this court sitting in revision.<\/p>\n<p>There is no illegality, irregularity or impropriety in the<\/p>\n<p>RCR. 59 of 2011<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               -6-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>orders passed by the two statutory authorities.<\/p>\n<p>     The result is that this revision petition is dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>     The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits<\/p>\n<p>that the tenant may be granted one year time to vacate the<\/p>\n<p>premises. The request is opposed by the learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>for the landlord. We notice that the rent now being paid by<\/p>\n<p>the tenant is only Rs.300\/- per month. However, we feel<\/p>\n<p>that the tenant can be granted time till 31-12-2011 for<\/p>\n<p>surrendering    the  premises     subject    to   the  following<\/p>\n<p>conditions:\n<\/p>\n<p>     The revision petitioner shall file an affidavit before the<\/p>\n<p>Execution Court or the Rent Control Court as the case may<\/p>\n<p>be, within three weeks from today undertaking to put the<\/p>\n<p>landlord back in possession of the petition schedule<\/p>\n<p>premises on or before 31-12-2011 and undertaking further<\/p>\n<p>through the same affidavit that the entire arrears of rent<\/p>\n<p>due as on date will be paid within one month from today<\/p>\n<p>RCR. 59 of 2011<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               -7-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>and occupation charges at the rate of Rs.2500\/- per month<\/p>\n<p>with effect from 1-2-2011 without fail on the 1st of every<\/p>\n<p>month till actual surrender is made.      We clarify that the<\/p>\n<p>revision petitioner tenant will get the benefit of time allowed<\/p>\n<p>as above only if the affidavit as directed above is filed and<\/p>\n<p>the undertakings therein are complied with.<\/p>\n<p>                         (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE)<\/p>\n<p>                         (N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE)<\/p>\n<p>ksv\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Sahadevan vs Rahna Sulthan on 2 February, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM RCRev..No. 59 of 2011() 1. SAHADEVAN,SON OF CHAMI, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. RAHNA SULTHAN, D\/O.LATE KITHAT MUHAMMED, &#8230; Respondent 2. SHERINA, W\/O.LATE KITHAR MUHAMMED, 3. FATHIMA TASLIM,D\/O.LATE KITHAR MUHAMMED, 4. SHAHUL HAMEED,S\/O. LATE KITHAR MUHAMMED, For [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-115259","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sahadevan vs Rahna Sulthan on 2 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sahadevan vs Rahna Sulthan on 2 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-02-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-07-10T13:25:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sahadevan vs Rahna Sulthan on 2 February, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-10T13:25:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1030,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011\",\"name\":\"Sahadevan vs Rahna Sulthan on 2 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-10T13:25:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sahadevan vs Rahna Sulthan on 2 February, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sahadevan vs Rahna Sulthan on 2 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sahadevan vs Rahna Sulthan on 2 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-02-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-07-10T13:25:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sahadevan vs Rahna Sulthan on 2 February, 2011","datePublished":"2011-02-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-10T13:25:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011"},"wordCount":1030,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011","name":"Sahadevan vs Rahna Sulthan on 2 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-02-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-10T13:25:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sahadevan-vs-rahna-sulthan-on-2-february-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sahadevan vs Rahna Sulthan on 2 February, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115259","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=115259"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115259\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=115259"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=115259"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=115259"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}