{"id":115477,"date":"2004-03-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2004-03-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004"},"modified":"2017-03-23T00:24:27","modified_gmt":"2017-03-22T18:54:27","slug":"kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004","title":{"rendered":"Kanna Pillai (Deceased) vs Oyamalli @ Mallika Ammal on 24 March, 2004"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madras High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Kanna Pillai (Deceased) vs Oyamalli @ Mallika Ammal on 24 March, 2004<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS\n\nDATED: 24\/03\/2004\n\nCORAM\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M. CHOCKALINGAM\n\nSECOND APPEAL NO.506 OF 1993\n\n1. Kanna Pillai (deceased)\n2. Sakunthala\n3. Parasuraman\n4. Kumari\n5. Valli\n   (Appellants 2 to 5 brought\n    on record as LRs of the\n    deceased sole appellant vide\n    as per order of Court\n    dt.10.4.02 made in CMP.3910\/02)             .. Appellants\n\n-Vs-\n\n1. Oyamalli @ Mallika Ammal\n2. Sri Raman\n3. Thirumal\n4. Veerappan (died)\n5. Venkatesan\n6. Rajam\n7. Minor Ve.Hemalatha\n   rep. by her mother Rajam\n    6th respondent\n   (Respondents 6 and 7 are brought\n    on record as LRs of deceased\n    4th respondent and the 6th\n    respondent guardian vide\n    CMP Nos.3957 &amp; 3958\/94\n    dt.27.7.2000)                                               .. Respondents\n\n        This second appeal is preferred under Section 100 of CPC  against  the\njudgment  and  decree  passed  in  AS  No.4 of 1990 on the file of the learned\nSubordinate Judge, Vilupuram dated 2.2.1993 confirming the judgment and decree\nof the learned Additional District Munsif, Villupuram  made  in  OS  No.415\/87\ndated 5.9.1989.\n\n:JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>        What is challenged herein is the judgment of the  learned  Subordinate<br \/>\nJudge,  Villupuram  made in AS No.4 of 1990, wherein the judgment of the trial<br \/>\ncourt in a suit for declaration and for consequential permanent injunction was<br \/>\naffirmed.\n<\/p>\n<p>        2.  The plaintiff sought the relief in respect of  a  piece  of  land,<br \/>\nmeasuring  1-1\/2  cents  along with a tamarind tree shown as B schedule to the<br \/>\nplaint, a part of 6 cents situated in  S.No.622\/3  which  is  described  as  A<br \/>\nschedule.   According  to  the  plaintiff,  the  property  measuring  6  cents<br \/>\noriginally belonged to  his  father  one  Govindasamy  Pillai  and  his  three<br \/>\nbrothers, and  thus,  each  was entitled to 1-1\/2 cents.  Originally patta was<br \/>\ngranted.  The old patta number is 319 and the new patta number is  780.    The<br \/>\ndefendants have  no  right  or interest over the suit property.  While so, the<br \/>\ndefendants were adumbrating that out of 6 cents in S.No.622\/3, the husband  of<br \/>\nthe  first defendant and the father of the defendants 2 to 5 one Thiruvenkatam<br \/>\nwas entitled to 4 cents and the rest 2 cents was belonged to the plaintiff and<br \/>\ntheir pankalis.  When the plaintiff made an attempt to take the fruits in  the<br \/>\ntamarind  tree,  it was being objected to by the defendants, and there arose a<br \/>\nnecessity for the plaintiff to file the suit.\n<\/p>\n<p>        3.  The suit was resisted by the  defendants-inter-alia  stating  that<br \/>\nthe  claim  made  by  the plaintiff was false and the suit A schedule property<br \/>\nmeasuring 6 cents never belonged to the plaintiff&#8217;s  family;  that  neither  B<br \/>\nschedule  nor A schedule has been in possession of the plaintiff or his family<br \/>\nmembers, but the property has also been in the possession  of  the  defendants<br \/>\nand prior to them with Thiruvenkadam, the husband of the first defendant; that<br \/>\nthe property actually lies within patta No.320 and not 319 as contended by the<br \/>\nplaintiff;  that the defendants have been paying kist; that originally, a suit<br \/>\nwas filed in OS No.562 of 1980 and an appeal was preferred  in  AS  No.148  of<br \/>\n1982,  wherein  it  has been found that the plaintiff was not entitled to, but<br \/>\nthe same was suppressed in the suit, and hence, the suit was to be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>        4.  The trial court  framed  necessary  issues,  tried  the  suit  and<br \/>\ndismissed the  same.    Aggrieved,  the plaintiff took it on appeal, which was<br \/>\nalso met the same fate.  Hence, this second appeal, at  the  instance  of  the<br \/>\nplaintiff, aggrieved over the judgment of courts below.\n<\/p>\n<p>        5.   At  the  time of admission, the following substantial question of<br \/>\nlaw was formulated by this Court for consideration:\n<\/p>\n<p>        &#8220;Whether the dismissal of the suit  in  its  entirety  even  though  a<br \/>\nfinding  is  given  in favour of the appellant in respect of two cents of suit<br \/>\nland is sustainable?&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>        6.  Heard  the  learned  counsel  for  the  appellants  and  also  the<br \/>\nrespondents on those contentions.\n<\/p>\n<p>        7.   From  the  very  reading of the plaint, it could be seen that the<br \/>\nplaintiff has sought the relief of declaration in respect of 1-1\/2  cents  out<br \/>\nof  6  cents  situated in S.No.622\/3 and also a tamarind tree situated in that<br \/>\n1-1\/2 cents.  The said 1-1\/2 cents and  the  tamarind  tree  are  shown  in  B<br \/>\nschedule and  the  total  extent  of  6  cents  was  shown in A schedule.  The<br \/>\nspecific case of the plaintiff was that  the  entire  extent  of  6  cents  is<br \/>\noriginally  belonged  to  his  father  one  Govindasamy  Pillai  and his three<br \/>\nbrothers, and thus, all the four branches were entitled to 6  cents  and  each<br \/>\nwas entitled  to  1-1\/2  cents.    It remains to be stated that nowhere in the<br \/>\nplaint, any partition or separate possession and enjoyment of the property has<br \/>\nbeen pleaded, but the plaintiff averred in the plaint that the entire property<br \/>\nwas in possession of the plaintiff and he has been paying kist for  the  same.<br \/>\nIt  is  true that it is not a suit for partition, but the plaintiff has sought<br \/>\nfor declaration in respect of 1-1\/2 cents and a tamarind tree  therein,  which<br \/>\nis shown  in  B schedule.  Needless to say that the plaintiff comes forward to<br \/>\nstate that there are other co-sharers, and hence, declaration as sought for by<br \/>\nthe plaintiff in the absence of others cannot be granted at all.   As  pointed<br \/>\nout  above,  it is not the case of the plaintiff that the property was divided<br \/>\nand the plaintiff was in possession and enjoyment of the same.  The defendants<br \/>\nhave come forward to state that out  of  6  cents,  the  first  defendant  was<br \/>\nentitled to 4 cents and the rest belonged to the family of the plaintiff.  The<br \/>\nadding  circumstance  is  that both the courts below have pointed out that the<br \/>\nplaintif has failed to prove  the  fact,  by  seeking  an  appointment  of  an<br \/>\nAdvocate  Commissioner, that there is a tam arind tree in B schedule property.<br \/>\nThe Court is able to see legal impediment, though not mentioned  by  both  the<br \/>\ncourts  below,  that  such a declaration in respect of a part of the property,<br \/>\nnamely, 1-1\/2 cents  and  a  tamarind  tree,  in  the  absence  of  the  other<br \/>\ncosharers,  whom according to the plaintiff were also entitled to the property<br \/>\nof 6 cents, cannot be granted,  and  thus,  it  suffers  with  non  adding  of<br \/>\nnecessary party to the suit.  Apart from that, under the stated circumstances,<br \/>\nthis  Court  is  of  the  opinion  that  the merit of the rival submissions in<br \/>\nrespect of their cases need not be now gone into and what would be  better  is<br \/>\nto make a dismissal of the appeal by giving liberty to the plaintiff to file a<br \/>\nfresh  suit, adding all the necessary parties and seeking for necessary relief<br \/>\nas required in law.  It  was  a  suit  filed  by  the  plaintiff  seeking  for<br \/>\ndeclaration in  respect  of  1-1\/2  cents  and a tamarind tree.  But, both the<br \/>\ncourts below, in the absence of all the necessary parties, have gone  into  an<br \/>\nextent  of  adjudicating  the  right  of  the defendants stating that they are<br \/>\nentitled to 4 cents out of total extent of 6 cents, which finding has  got  to<br \/>\nbe  necessarily set aside for the simple reason that in the absence of all the<br \/>\nnecessary parties, such adjudication cannot also be done.  Hence, that finding<br \/>\nis set aside.  Exercising liberty, if the plaintiff has  filed  a  fresh  suit<br \/>\nadding  all  the  necessary  parties,  the defendants are at liberty to adduce<br \/>\nevidence necessary.\n<\/p>\n<p>        8.  In the result,  this  second  appeal  is  dismissed,  leaving  the<br \/>\nparties to bear their costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>Index :  Yes<br \/>\nInternet :  Yes<\/p>\n<p>vvk<\/p>\n<p>To<\/p>\n<p>1.  The Subordinate Judge, Villupuram\n<\/p>\n<p>2.  The Additional District Munsif, Villupuram\n<\/p>\n<p>3.  The Record Keeper, VR Section,<br \/>\nHigh Court, Madras<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court Kanna Pillai (Deceased) vs Oyamalli @ Mallika Ammal on 24 March, 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24\/03\/2004 CORAM THE HON&#8217;BLE MR.JUSTICE M. CHOCKALINGAM SECOND APPEAL NO.506 OF 1993 1. Kanna Pillai (deceased) 2. Sakunthala 3. Parasuraman 4. Kumari 5. Valli (Appellants 2 to 5 brought on record [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-115477","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Kanna Pillai (Deceased) vs Oyamalli @ Mallika Ammal on 24 March, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kanna Pillai (Deceased) vs Oyamalli @ Mallika Ammal on 24 March, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2004-03-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-22T18:54:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kanna Pillai (Deceased) vs Oyamalli @ Mallika Ammal on 24 March, 2004\",\"datePublished\":\"2004-03-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-22T18:54:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004\"},\"wordCount\":1096,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004\",\"name\":\"Kanna Pillai (Deceased) vs Oyamalli @ Mallika Ammal on 24 March, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2004-03-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-22T18:54:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kanna Pillai (Deceased) vs Oyamalli @ Mallika Ammal on 24 March, 2004\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kanna Pillai (Deceased) vs Oyamalli @ Mallika Ammal on 24 March, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kanna Pillai (Deceased) vs Oyamalli @ Mallika Ammal on 24 March, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2004-03-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-22T18:54:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kanna Pillai (Deceased) vs Oyamalli @ Mallika Ammal on 24 March, 2004","datePublished":"2004-03-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-22T18:54:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004"},"wordCount":1096,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004","name":"Kanna Pillai (Deceased) vs Oyamalli @ Mallika Ammal on 24 March, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2004-03-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-22T18:54:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanna-pillai-deceased-vs-oyamalli-mallika-ammal-on-24-march-2004#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kanna Pillai (Deceased) vs Oyamalli @ Mallika Ammal on 24 March, 2004"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115477","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=115477"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115477\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=115477"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=115477"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=115477"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}