{"id":115850,"date":"2010-08-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010"},"modified":"2017-01-23T15:32:16","modified_gmt":"2017-01-23T10:02:16","slug":"the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"The President vs The State Of Kerala Represented By &#8230; on 11 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The President vs The State Of Kerala Represented By &#8230; on 11 August, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 24245 of 2010(E)\n\n\n1. THE PRESIDENT,PARENT TEACHER'S\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. THE TEACHER IN CHARGE,  -DO-\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY\n\n3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,\n\n4. THE DISTRICT EDUCTIONAL OFFICER,\n\n5. THE HEADMASTER,GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR\n\n Dated :11\/08\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                           C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.\n                    --------------------------------------------\n                       W.P.(C). NO. 24245 OF 2010\n                    --------------------------------------------\n\n                   Dated this the 11th day of August, 2010\n\n                                 JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>      The first petitioner is the President of the Parent Teachers&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Association of Government High School, Chullikkode in Malappuram<\/p>\n<p>District and the second petitioner is the Teacher-in-charge of the said<\/p>\n<p>school.   This Writ Petition has been filed mainly with the following<\/p>\n<p>prayers:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>             i)   call for the records relating to Exhibits P-8 and<\/p>\n<p>             quash the original of the same to the extent it grant<\/p>\n<p>             Higher secondary courses in High School, Muthuvallur<\/p>\n<p>             in preference to Government High School, Chullikode.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             ii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ<\/p>\n<p>             order or direction commanding the 1st and 2nd<\/p>\n<p>             respondents to grant Higher Secondary Courses to<\/p>\n<p>             Government High School, Chullikode.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>       2.    A scanning of the contentions in the Writ Petition would<\/p>\n<p>reveal that the grievance of the petitioners is against the granting of Higher<\/p>\n<p>Secondary Course in Government High School, Muthuvallur.<\/p>\n<p>        3.   At the very outset, it is to be noted that both the schools are<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C) NO.24245\/2010                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Government schools situated in the very same panchayath viz.,<\/p>\n<p>Muthuvallur Grama Panchayath.            The learned Government pleader<\/p>\n<p>submitted that petitioners&#8217; school cannot claim the status of a Government<\/p>\n<p>High School since the high school section of the said school is being run<\/p>\n<p>only on the basis of Exts.P4 and P5 interim orders of this Court. In that<\/p>\n<p>context, it is relevant to refer to certain aspects discernible from the Writ<\/p>\n<p>Petition itself. Earlier, as per Ext.P1 G.O dated 27.11.2007, Government<\/p>\n<p>have sanctioned one high school in Muthuvallur and decided to upgrade<\/p>\n<p>G.M.U.P School Chullikkode as high school. As per Ext.P2 G.O dated<\/p>\n<p>21.1.2008, Ext.P1 order was revoked by the Government. Thereupon, the<\/p>\n<p>first petitioner herein preferred an appeal against Ext.P2 G.O before the<\/p>\n<p>Government. Aggrieved by the delay in the matter of disposal of the said<\/p>\n<p>appeal, the first petitioner moved W.P.(C).No.13707\/2008 before this<\/p>\n<p>Court. The said Writ Petition was disposed of with a direction to consider<\/p>\n<p>the appeal preferred by the petitioner therein. After such consideration,<\/p>\n<p>the Government have issued Ext.P3 order. Ext.P3 in so far as it is relevant<\/p>\n<p>reads thus:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>              a) Government order G.O(MS) 2002\/07\/G.EDn. Dated<\/p>\n<p>              27.11.2007 to the effect that GMUP School Chullikodu<\/p>\n<p>              is upgraded as a High School is cancelled.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C) NO.24245\/2010                   3<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             b) Students admitted to class 8 in GMUP school,<\/p>\n<p>             Chullikkodu during 2007-2008 shall be issued TC and<\/p>\n<p>             directed to be admitted in the schools of their choice to<\/p>\n<p>             the standards to which they are entitled to be admitted.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>    4.       The said order was challenged by the first petitioner herein as<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No.16660\/2008. It is still pending before this Court. Ext.P4 is<\/p>\n<p>the interim order passed by this Court in the said Writ Petition. Later, the<\/p>\n<p>matter was referred to a Division Bench of this Court and Ext.P5 is the<\/p>\n<p>order passed by the Division Bench in the said Writ petition. Ext.P5 order<\/p>\n<p>reads as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>             &#8220;We make it clear that the interim order dated<\/p>\n<p>             4.6.2008 passed by this Court will confine only to the<\/p>\n<p>             Government High School, Chullikode. Therefore, it<\/p>\n<p>             will be open to the Government to take appropriate<\/p>\n<p>             action in respect of other schools.    There will be a<\/p>\n<p>             direction to the third respondent Deputy Director of<\/p>\n<p>             Education, Malappuram to see that the required<\/p>\n<p>             teaching staff are deputed in the Government High<\/p>\n<p>             School, Chullikode, within ten days from today.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The above mentioned undisputed facts would reveal that G.M.U.P School<\/p>\n<p>Chullikode is presently working as a Government High School,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C) NO.24245\/2010                 4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Chullikode based only on Exts.P4 and P5 interim orders passed by this<\/p>\n<p>Court in W.P.(C).No.16660\/2008. In other words, the very status of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners&#8217; school depends upon the outcome of W.P.(C).No.16660\/2008.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, it is based on the aforesaid factual situation that the learned<\/p>\n<p>Government Pleader submitted that the petitioners&#8217; school could not<\/p>\n<p>strictly be regarded as a High School. It is the further submission of the<\/p>\n<p>learned Government Pleader that no posts have been sanctioned in the said<\/p>\n<p>school and it is honouring the interim orders passed by this Court that the<\/p>\n<p>teachers are being sent to the said school by way of working arrangement.<\/p>\n<p>In the case of Government High School, Muthuvallur, as the very caption<\/p>\n<p>denotes, it is a High Schoool. The avowed policy of the Government, as is<\/p>\n<p>obvious from Ext.P6 G.O dated 3.6.2010 is to start Higher Secondary<\/p>\n<p>Course only in high schools that too, only in those Grama Panchayaths<\/p>\n<p>wherein there is no Higher Secondary Schools.           G.M.U.P School,<\/p>\n<p>Chullikode, which is presently running the high school section on the<\/p>\n<p>strength of Exts.P4 and P5 interim orders of this Court and Government<\/p>\n<p>High School, Muthuvallur are situated in the very same panchayat ie.,<\/p>\n<p>Muthuvallur Panchayat.      That apart, the learned Government Pleader<\/p>\n<p>pointed out that there is no specific averment in the Writ Petition that<\/p>\n<p>pursuant to Ext.P7 notification, the second petitioner had submitted an<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C) NO.24245\/2010                 5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>application and based on that application no comparative assessment was<\/p>\n<p>made and then the fifth respondent school was preferred in the matter of<\/p>\n<p>sanctioning of Higher Secondary course. The learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner submitted that the fact that the second petitioner has submitted<\/p>\n<p>an application for sanction of the Higher Secondary Course can be inferred<\/p>\n<p>from the averments in the Writ Petition. It is also submitted that it is a fact<\/p>\n<p>that in response to Ext.P7 application, the second petitioner has submitted<\/p>\n<p>an application for sanctioning of a Higher Secondary Course in the said<\/p>\n<p>school. That apart, it is submitted that the comparative facilities and<\/p>\n<p>features of both the schools have been specifically explained in the Writ<\/p>\n<p>Petition. Be that as it may, the question is whether the action on the part<\/p>\n<p>of the first respondent in including Government High School, Muthuvallur<\/p>\n<p>in Ext.P8 select list can be said to be arbitrary and illegal warranting<\/p>\n<p>interference by this Court. The facts expatiated earlier would reveal that<\/p>\n<p>the status of the school represented by the petitioners as High School is, in<\/p>\n<p>troth, depends upon the verdict in W.P.(C).NO.16660\/2008 which now<\/p>\n<p>pending before this Court. In other words, whether the said school can<\/p>\n<p>retain the status of a High School depends upon the outcome of W.P.(C).<\/p>\n<p>NO.16660\/2008.       As noticed hereinbefore, the said school as also<\/p>\n<p>Government High School, Muthuvallur are situated in the very same<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C) NO.24245\/2010                 6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Panchayat and the avowed policy of the Government is to start higher<\/p>\n<p>secondary school in a panchayat where there is no higher secondary school<\/p>\n<p>at all. The learned Government Pleader submitted that there is no Higher<\/p>\n<p>Secondary School in the Muthuvallur Panchayat. In view of the facts thus<\/p>\n<p>obtained in this case, the mere assertion that High School, Chullikkode<\/p>\n<p>viz., G.M.U.P.School, Chullikkode whose upgradation as High School was<\/p>\n<p>cancelled by the Government, but functioning as High School based on<\/p>\n<p>Exts.P4 and P5, is having more features and facilities than Government<\/p>\n<p>High School, Muthuvallur, even if taken as correct, cannot be a reason to<\/p>\n<p>interfere with the action on the part of the Government in choosing in<\/p>\n<p>between the said two Government Schools and granting higher secondary<\/p>\n<p>course to Government High School, Muthuvallur. When the choice was<\/p>\n<p>between two Government schools and Government have chosen one of<\/p>\n<p>them for granting higher secondary course, I am of the view that there is<\/p>\n<p>no scope for attributing arbitrariness, malafides or favouritism. In fact, a<\/p>\n<p>scanning of grounds 1 to 3 raised in this Writ Petition would reveal that<\/p>\n<p>the petitioners did not have any such contention as well. In the light of the<\/p>\n<p>aforementioned admitted facts, the action on the part of the Government in<\/p>\n<p>choosing Government High School, Muthuvallur does not call for any<\/p>\n<p>judicial review. In short, as on today, the G.M.U.P School, Chullikode<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C) NO.24245\/2010                   7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>cannot claim the status of a Government High School.             It can only<\/p>\n<p>continue to run the high school section in the light of Exts.P4 and P5<\/p>\n<p>interim orders.   When Government took such a decision in respect of two<\/p>\n<p>Government Schools and decided to start Higher secondary course in<\/p>\n<p>Government High School, Muthuvallur the Parent Teacher&#8217;s Association<\/p>\n<p>of the other School and the teacher-in-charge of that school cannot legally<\/p>\n<p>sustain their challenge based on grounds 1 to 3 in view of the peculiar<\/p>\n<p>circumstances as explained above. That apart, the learned Government<\/p>\n<p>Pleader submitted that admissions to Higher Secondary Course have<\/p>\n<p>already started in Government High School, Muthuvallur. For all these<\/p>\n<p>reasons, I am not inclined to accept the contentions of the petitioners that<\/p>\n<p>Government High School Muthuvallur was given undue preference and<\/p>\n<p>that its inclusion in Ext.P8 is illegal warranting interference by this Court.<\/p>\n<p>There is no merit in the Writ Petition and accordingly, it is dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>                                   (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE)<\/p>\n<p>spc<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C) NO.24245\/2010    8<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                            C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                            W.P.(C). NO. \/2010<\/p>\n<p>                            JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>                              June, 2010<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C) NO.24245\/2010    9<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court The President vs The State Of Kerala Represented By &#8230; on 11 August, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 24245 of 2010(E) 1. THE PRESIDENT,PARENT TEACHER&#8217;S &#8230; Petitioner 2. THE TEACHER IN CHARGE, -DO- Vs 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS &#8230; Respondent 2. THE DIRECTOR [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-115850","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The President vs The State Of Kerala Represented By ... on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The President vs The State Of Kerala Represented By ... on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-23T10:02:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The President vs The State Of Kerala Represented By &#8230; on 11 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-23T10:02:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1524,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010\",\"name\":\"The President vs The State Of Kerala Represented By ... on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-23T10:02:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The President vs The State Of Kerala Represented By &#8230; on 11 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The President vs The State Of Kerala Represented By ... on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The President vs The State Of Kerala Represented By ... on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-23T10:02:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The President vs The State Of Kerala Represented By &#8230; on 11 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-23T10:02:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010"},"wordCount":1524,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010","name":"The President vs The State Of Kerala Represented By ... on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-23T10:02:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-president-vs-the-state-of-kerala-represented-by-on-11-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The President vs The State Of Kerala Represented By &#8230; on 11 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115850","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=115850"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115850\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=115850"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=115850"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=115850"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}