{"id":115873,"date":"2009-02-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009"},"modified":"2016-03-04T19:48:57","modified_gmt":"2016-03-04T14:18:57","slug":"gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Gowramma vs Kemparamaiah on 16 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Gowramma vs Kemparamaiah on 16 February, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE \n\nQATEI) THIS THE 16'\"! DAY cm FEBRUARY, 2os:>9,..-_  : ~ \n\nBEFORE\n\nR.F.A.No.938[g{)05 \n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHQKZ13;\"'HI:~;\u00a7:1'1IGE:2\u00a71'v    \n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1\n\nSm'. GOWRAMMA\n\nI3\/0 KEMPARAMAIAH\n\nW\/O VENKATESH,\n\nAGED ABOUT 46 YEARS  H \nR\/A GADIVENKATAPPA GALLI' V. ;\nMUSLIM M0HALLA;\"T;MAGzi..D1: -~~\nBANGALORE    \n\nSNYI'. .}AYAMM\ufb01, \"'' 1;. s  V _ -\nB10 KEMPARAM,A_1AHI'A\u00a7V '  \"\nw\/0 cH1r;KABYRA?m'V%\n\nAGE!) 40 YEARS, R\/A.'F:IO.v14?.3 \n\n1473 CRoSs;..KALYANArIAGAR '\n\n'1'. DASARAHALLI, BANG  LORE--57\n5' \" L.  .. '\" '  APPELLANTS\n\n   (B*'\u00a3fS1\u00a7i\u00ab_B GHIQNANDA, ADVOGATE)\nAND ' V. \"    \n\nKEN!.i5\u00a3\u00a7'E2A.W\u00a7.E'{%}\u00a7 \n\n S\/O L;aTEV1ss.#;\u00a7I;;'EEvAPPA\n\n 4 AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS\n\n   %t\u00a7Eze;p.aRAJ\n SIG\u00bb KEEEAPARAMAIAH\n\u00ab.  ABOUT 42 YEARS\n\nVENKATESH\n\n \n\n\n\n 2  the respondent No.1, The respondent<\/pre>\n
 and   0f the respondent No. 1. The appellants
\n  \ufb02q.152\u00bb3.}2(304 for partition and separate possession of<\/p>\n
VV   each in the suit scheduie property. The matter<\/p>\n
  in the compromise between the appellants and the<\/p>\n
S] O KEMPARAMAJAH
\nEKGED ABOUT 36 YEARS<\/p>\n
ALL ARE R\/A NDQSQS, 573 MAIN ROAD
\nKENGERI SATELLITE: TOWN
\nBANGALORE ~ 560 060<\/p>\n
mzs Rm IS FILED U\/S 96′ 01:’  AGAIESF  ‘<\/p>\n
JUDGMENT AND DEGREE m*.9.3.o5 PASSED KN G.S.F\u00a7{};1E333\/04
\non THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL aunc’m;’*(sR. pm, BANGALORE
\nRURAL DISTRICF, BMJGALORE, 1:>xsMIssm:<;.THE CQMPRGMISE
\nPETITION FILED U\/O 23 RULE 31.05 B'! THE PARFIES AND
\nALSO REJECTING THE PIAINT —FIf.El3_ U;,'0 'ya, I~:zJLx2; 11(a) AND
\n{_d)(')FCPC.\n<\/p>\n
THIS R.F.A co1\u00a7,q1.m._ 03″ .;\u00a7m,4’IsS;zf\u00a7\u00a7sI THIS DAY,
\ncoum’ DELWERED Tm’. 1\u00a7iGLL.\u00a2wia\u00a7G:\n<\/p>\n
This afmpef\u00e9al i\ufb01:  ag\u00e9i\ufb01st  judgement and order,
\ndt.O9.03.2005   1::y  Judge (Sr,Dn,,), Bangalore<\/p>\n
Rural Districgk sangmg iac).s;N{s;’1523; 2004,<\/p>\n
 ‘1″}:_1._{=:  b1ie.f are that the appellant N-35,1<\/p>\n
HE}!<\/p>\n
resgaondents. A joist czomptmmise peti\ufb01on was \ufb01led under <\/p>\n
xxm Rule 3 Code 01’  pmceeum, dividing the suit ;3.:.es’\u00a2e:g:;:;* * <\/p>\n
properties into 5 shares and ailotting schedule   itfr; Z<\/p>\n
appellants I and 2 respectively.\n<\/p>\n
3. The parties propose; but me .Cc:2-;;1*t  T. <\/p>\n
the parties to the suit pmeeedixlgs   a’t   i1eg c\u00a7tiated
\nsettiezsent, the Trial Court   \ufb01se\ufb01\ufb01on
\nand furthezr rejected the plsixxt   Rule 11 (a)
\nand (d) of the  1:35   reasoning is
\nthat admittedly whess   prior to the
\ncommeneement:V’VVeif   yin Sectien 6 of the
\nHindu Stlccessie\ufb02  : the suit in terms of the
\ncompromise ‘i1v%’_()’v’1l]dV’ $3137″  lama as the appellants were
\nmaxjzfied   1_SA3′?’9a }Oe’;.g——pri0r to the eominglinto fsme of the<\/p>\n
Ks1z1a.iskL;.VA\u00a711aeIsgi_:i12e1:t;’ -.The Trial Ceurt has taken the considexed<\/p>\n
 that  vesxmot seek pal\ufb01tion as cx)–pa:rceners. As<\/p>\n
 apgjeilants ..l1sve.Vi}o cause of acijsn, the Trial Court has held<\/p>\n
 t1:sfeiV4i;i:1:a:e’Vsi1it ‘itself is not msjntainabie, In a suit, which is otherwise<\/p>\n
2   msix\ufb01siilsbie, the question of entertaining the oompmmise<\/p>\n
V.   not arim at all. The ‘i’rial C\u00a7o1.u’t has also observed<\/p>\n
IQSH.\n<\/p>\n
that the first respondent alongwith his sons can give min;<\/p>\n
property t0 the plaintiffs by way of gift. by payijig the , V.<\/p>\n
stamp duty towards its registration.<\/p>\n
4. Aggricvcd by the afarcsaid older,     _ <\/p>\n
51. Sri Chidananda, the Il’,%EiI’I]\u20acf(i ‘V_(:'{:?-l,.1.I}S\u20ac:”1A’f(ZtV’I’  M<\/p>\n
submits that the Trial Court ought  haw\u00e9e.  the
\njudgement, order and decree \ufb01l\ufb02\u00e9\ufb01f\ufb02  to him,
\nthere. was no legal impediment f9;v– fI:r:  Q16 mcox\ufb01 and<\/p>\n
give its stamp of apprgfal  u <\/p>\n
6, Sri c1;sagn_\u00a7n:\u00a7;a   1′ notice the Hindu
\nSuccession ._ (Abt 39\/ 2005) by virtue of
\nwhich the daughtz\ufb01fi\ufb01   date of their marriage, arc
\ngivclg  4:-.quaI ”  cc\u00e9\u00e9pamcncrs property, as $116: scans<\/p>\n
havE\u00a7~._     stnbmissioztm, he: has also relied on a<\/p>\n
::.._;j;,1dg1nc ::i*i;._rJrf __ti1is4 the case of \ufb01ugal& V. Grundappa<\/p>\n
35;.-.i\ufb01’:\u00a7eaa’_a:tli ma aaherg; Arepotted in 11.11 2007 MR 4790, wherein<\/p>\n
   the Central Act No,39\/2005 and the<\/p>\n
 -,a=,}\u00a7endm::x;t 1990 is resolved by holding that the:<\/p>\n
  pit):\u00a7?ijsiz:=11s3:\u00a70f the former will prevail over the latter.<\/p>\n
832$<\/p>\n
3?: The Trial Judge cannot be held to be at fault for .<<\/p>\n
the order in question. However in View of the subsequef\ufb01;   V'<\/p>\n
in the law and its ixltczrprctation by this C..\u20acaIiI'!_._    <\/p>\n
appeal bccemes Imsustaillablc. The  :f <\/p>\n
progressive legislation intended to cn'$\u00a71;i1::..Vtha.t"'1hcrg
\nmom disciilnjziation on the grmgxld of gg:f\u00a7At3cr;VVTo .\u00a211*33.1;je_\u00e9;cn:icr
\njtlsticct and gender equality, the    bzmught. it is<\/p>\n
pm\ufb01tablc to refer to fhC.'.It}CVa\ufb01'i"\u00bbi:I{)Tti\ufb01I}S_ V reported
\njudgment, which are    V. ' ' '
\n"42 'I'h11,s2,**v'n  emf .ge;\u00a3tled proposition,<\/p>\n
of Iirgzzr  Caurt and also by
\nthis i::':;u'-rgin f].l'.\u00a7\u20ac:;:.A:V.\u00a3\u00a7,\ufb013'?'\u00e9',':\u00a5:.1."1',v?}*'l;II'DTletZ\u00a5 cases; I am. of<\/p>\n
the l)"\u00a3.81L? "Z.h\u00a31'\u00a3 ;\u00a7t;\ufb01;i$–i\u00a7\u00a7n. of Sedion 5-Afd) of the<\/p>\n
_ _ I\ufb02jzfkataka  Act, 1990 is repugnant to<\/p>\n
  \u00ab  _'i;h:\u00a2.2  of\u00e9(105 rmd as the Cen1ra.fAc1 is
\n  "pf time, it will prevail over the State<\/p>\n
" . Exit i(V)'ii:';1;t:i:.  the provisicon of Section 6-A(d) of<\/p>\n
yihe   is reapugnam' or to the Cen1n1IAct in<\/p>\n
A 30 " fg\ufb01f as position of mmvied  is<\/p>\n
. _ V Enemyenzeci In ather words; cm a result of
\n 'bsiibstihxtien {sf Section. 6 of the Pn'n,cipIe Act by<\/p>\n
 may of the C3en2raIAmertd1nentAd of 200.5, the<\/p>\n
State Act, which is ea\ufb02ier int pcrint emf time, cxmrzat<\/p>\n
have any e\ufb01edw Supremacy of the parliament;<\/p>\n
HE}!<\/p>\n
therefore renders Seciion 6~A[d) of the Kamzziaka
\nAmendmentdcta I990, voici<\/p>\n
491 In view of the aforesaid pasiiien of law, in softy' as <\/p>\n
the pending matters are oomremeotl be it suit er    V
\nappeal, the daange ejfec\ufb01ed by the Centml A\u00a7;i\u00a5of    A<\/p>\n
2005 wiil have to be  note of and  \u00ab A
\nrespect of the pending pr0oeedi%iVgs,,b"2P'.e  <\/p>\n
Amendment Act of 2005  , "\n<\/p>\n
“UL af 9′ 9.2005 wifi have to Q;-gapfieci; -‘.’. V’ V<\/p>\n
3. Thus, in the wake of mg radicfali i1:n..thu::,.1_\u00a7:gi,%\u00a7}a\ufb01on
\nand the unmistakable    the Central
\nAmendment Act vis~\u00e9–vi’s;– the  Act, the
\njudgement and    Set aside and
\naqzcoxtlingly it is     to graat the
\ndecree based (3%;   in this appeal. The
\nrespondents are    unzmpmscntcd. The
\npossibility of \ufb01i\ufb01   the suit achcdulc pmpertics<\/p>\n
to    ‘the:  333:3 cannet be ruled out. It<\/p>\n
. is  ‘  the respondent and the third’ pa;t’t1e’ :3, if<\/p>\n
 am   heard in the matter before passing any<\/p>\n
 1{;:;\u00e91’\u00a2;’..g:;..%:ne joi:i.\u00a2__\u20ac\u00e9ompmmisc petition, The matter is remanded to<\/p>\n
V’  with a ciizecttion to dispose of the joint compmmisc<\/p>\n
\ufb01g)-I<\/p>\n
petition taking into accxtmnt the I~\u00a5i11du S1:cee:sSion  A’
\nAct, 2005, Act No.39] 2005 and the judgment of   T’
\nSugalahai (supra) after putting the mspond\ufb01ntsiifngiv   _
\naifording them an oppommity of heari3}g_in the.    – ‘  <\/p>\n
9. Appeal is allowed in the abovzgffj\u00e9rms. “Na:\u20ac>r;z1c1*v \u00a7a$ to<\/p>\n
costs.\n<\/p>\n
10. Oi\ufb01ce is direcsad to  mg {he M31 Czzmrt<\/p>\n
forthwith .\n<\/p>\n
bi?!’<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Gowramma vs Kemparamaiah on 16 February, 2009 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE QATEI) THIS THE 16′”! DAY cm FEBRUARY, 2os:>9,..-_ : ~ BEFORE R.F.A.No.938[g{)05 THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHQKZ13;”‘HI:~;\u00a7:1’1IGE:2\u00a71’v BETWEEN: 1 Sm’. GOWRAMMA I3\/0 KEMPARAMAIAH W\/O VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS H R\/A GADIVENKATAPPA GALLI’ V. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-115873","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nGowramma vs Kemparamaiah on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gowramma vs Kemparamaiah on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-04T14:18:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Gowramma vs Kemparamaiah on 16 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-04T14:18:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1042,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Gowramma vs Kemparamaiah on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-04T14:18:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gowramma vs Kemparamaiah on 16 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gowramma vs Kemparamaiah on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gowramma vs Kemparamaiah on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-04T14:18:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Gowramma vs Kemparamaiah on 16 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-04T14:18:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009"},"wordCount":1042,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009","name":"Gowramma vs Kemparamaiah on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-04T14:18:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gowramma-vs-kemparamaiah-on-16-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gowramma vs Kemparamaiah on 16 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115873","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=115873"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115873\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=115873"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=115873"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=115873"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}