{"id":115991,"date":"2009-02-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009"},"modified":"2017-09-02T20:38:34","modified_gmt":"2017-09-02T15:08:34","slug":"church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Church Of Immaculate Conception &#8230; vs Mrs Margaret Rose Lobo on 17 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Church Of Immaculate Conception &#8230; vs Mrs Margaret Rose Lobo on 17 February, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n<pre>\"1\n\n1191 THE HIGH COURT OF KARKATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 1'77\" DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2009\n\nBEFORE\nTHE H0!\\'\u00a3'BLE 1\\m..:I:s*r1cE 3.3. PATIL  \u00bb'   V'\n\nwan' PETITEON No. 18233 I goo\u00e9 \u00a3GM+{i\u00a7\u00bbc3:VATVV.: '   .\n\nBETWEEN:\n\n{inure}: of Immaculate C0I1&lt;:\u00abs:pt:i0n\n\nCaf Urva Mangaiore,  -\n\nA Religiaus and Charitable\n\nIxxstitution &#039;by its Parish Priest, _ _\n\nAdxxxinis\ufb02ator Rev. Fr. Andrew Lcs\ufb01iak  &quot;_\n\nAged about 60 ytizars, &#039; ~ 5 . . &quot; 2. V &#039;\n\nS.\/0 David Lewis,\n\nR\/at. Urva Church, V     VV -&#039;   .. \n\nMangalore.  &#039;   &#039; &#039; - _  ~  PETITIONER\n\n(By s:1.B,V?. 1:{:is1:\u00a7::;, \nArm:  &#039; V &#039;\n\nMrs&quot; Margaret\u00e9\ufb01o\u00e9az&#039;: V \nAdu1t,_{ V \n\n&quot; 1.1319 Ms. gggs\u00e9tph ma, -------- ~ &quot;\ngR{at._&#039;2j1\/23&quot;}&#039;,_&#039;La._dj.y Hill,\n\nChiiimbi,  AV *\n\n    RESPONDENT\n\n&#039;*&quot;k&quot;3\u00a2&#039;\n\n A  Pctiiion is f\ufb02ed under Articles 226 5:. 227 of the\n\n  C\u00e9g\ufb01s\ufb01m\ufb01on of India praying 1:0 quash the Order dated\n&quot; T1?i--.1&#039;1...2{)06, ya.-ssse\u00e9 on LA. no.4, \ufb01le\u00e9 under Order SIV Rule {5}\n&#039;~1&#039;--]W S\u20acC. 15} Sf CFC, 1938 in 0.8. N0.198[&#039;.7l0{}4 on &#039;\u00a3116: filti Of H\n\n  A\u00e9di. Civil Judge (Sr. Dm.) Mangalore in A1:m@x11:re--A.\n\n This Patitien amazing an for Preliminary fiearting &#039;B&#039; Group,\nthis day&#039;, the Court made \u00e9zhe followingw\n\n\n\n\/-\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>3.. iiha\ufb02enge in this wrii petition is to the Grder date\u00e9<br \/>\n14.11.2006 passed by the court below dismissing IA .I1(}7;&#8221;.&#8217;% :f1}t3(?1<\/p>\n<p>by tha pc\ufb01tiener httrein.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. Petitioner is the plaintiff before the ma}  I\u00a5. 1f1a.\u00a7; 536$ _  <\/p>\n<p>fh\ufb01 suit O.S.No.198\/2004 seeking a  <\/p>\n<p>to deliver vacant possession of thf: B si:i1e&#8217;a:11:1\u20ac: p1fe;:1jiscs wi\u00a3i1.iI:&#8217;&#8211;. <\/p>\n<p>the time to be \ufb01xed by the cou\ufb01 &#8216;;22z.1:Vii~.f0r (.&gt;\ufb01:\u00a2f&#8217;r\ufb01i}ief\u00a7\u00a71.:ig1\u00e91\ufb01din.g VV<\/p>\n<p>mcsm: pm\ufb01ts.\n<\/p>\n<p>3, Defeiida\ufb01it&#8217;   gtatemcnt contending that<br \/>\nthe  is&#8217;1&#8217;aca*{v&#8217;vi;.&#8217;i\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7&gt;:.,\u00a71i)\u00a7\u20ac\u00a712\u00a7{t: \u00e9wner 0f the plaint A schedule<\/p>\n<p>yxnpsrgz and&#8221; t1j3.\u00e9t_13:t\u00a7 i\u00e9a cagfswner of the same. The defendant<\/p>\n<p>4__1\u00a71as ~;19I1tt2n1*1&#8217;\u20acE&#8211;r:\ufb01(:1v_th:;2t the asseriicns made by &#8216;(&#8220;116 plaini\u00e9if<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;&#8211;.::g_m\u00e9j   p\u00e9rmgtted the dcfczndant to occupy the pzajm B<\/p>\n<p>sCLj&#8217;\u00a71e&lt;ii\u00a7.1::  a licensee was false and that the glaiat B<\/p>\n<p>V \ufb01zcfned\u00e9iie  was not in her occupation by virtue of the<\/p>\n<p>H &quot;  agfeeggantvv\u00e9\ufb01zxtered ixzto between the piainti\ufb01&#039; and the d\u00e9tftmdant.<\/p>\n<p> oh these pletadirzgs, the trig} Court has fmme\u00e9 SEIVEIEI<\/p>\n<p>T  g\u00e9i\ufb01llege<\/p>\n<p>;\u00ab;\\<\/p>\n<p>4. The gri\u20acVa.11c&#8217;:::=: 0f the pcititioner is that some of th6; i:.~34\u00a7u\u00a7:s<\/p>\n<p>framad were quite unnecessaxy and did not <\/p>\n<p>considemtion at all} in the suit. &#8216;F}:3Lexefo1fe:*,,&#8212;-\u00bb..h1:1}f:.VV    <\/p>\n<p>applicatien ta 110.4 seeking to recast H16   &#8220;e::me:._z&#8217;1Vc\u00abl.\u00a2tA-i.t(1.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>that the issue as to whether t.{1e.;.21,_-a_:3&#8217;11t3&#8217;\ufb01V&#8217;._i\u00e9&#8217; &#8220;the a1&#8221;;&#8217;\u00a71t311\u00a7.t1\u00e9 otgrzier  L.<\/p>\n<p>at the piairlt A scheduie pmp:ertyjV&#8217;Vt&#8217;v;?T\u00a7Vt1et1;cr  Vtumves<br \/>\nthat the defendant is in  of   schedule<br \/>\nproperty as a Iiceaseeg .:Vv\u00a71\u00a7&#8217;t3VCS that it has<br \/>\niaw\ufb01\ufb02iy t$I:tninated&#8221;&#8216;t:;t1:ie    the defendant in<br \/>\n{aspect of B    totally tmnecessaxy.\n<\/p>\n<p>The  recasting tht: issue by<br \/>\nframiag zhv\u00e9tfg\ufb01osemig  E: &#8221;  V<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;W&#8217;_}_2e\u00a7hef&#8221;~.th\u00e9 piigxirtiijif the aewnear ef the plain: B<br \/>\nfmizhgdzzle  _<\/p>\n<p>.3133  the Cotlrt below to delete issue nos. 1, 2 8:.<\/p>\n<p>t V&#8217;   3 as.&#8217;  above. The court beiow has mjectad this<\/p>\n<p>% T 2. _ &#8216; a\u00e9gzplicatiant} &#8216; <\/p>\n<p>  x _\u00ae&#8217;unse1 appearing for ths petition\ufb01r taldng me through<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;  impugned order, giaint and written statement submits that<\/p>\n<p>  the (302111 below has acted without apglyiug its mind. t0 the<\/p>\n<p>grfievatzca made by the plaintj\ufb01&#8217;&#8211;petitioI1er harczin.<\/p>\n<p>\/l\ufb01y.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>6. Having heard the Iearmtd (\ufb01ounsel for the pe\ufb01tiener anal<br \/>\non careful consideration of the matmiajs 03:1 mcord, I find much<br \/>\nfame in that centsntion urged by the learned Counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>7, The re\u00a7\u00a7.ef sought 1111 the plaint is for d\u00a3;}._i_.x%E:1iy  <\/p>\n<p>possession eff schedule B premises.\n<\/p>\n<p>prope\ufb02y which is described in  is  <\/p>\n<p>matter of the suit. Possession s&lt;}t:gh&#039;tf0r by   only V<\/p>\n<p>in resgect of B schtdulc vp:*\u00a7:mis\u00a2Vs&quot;&#039;w\u00a7f:ic 1i&quot;;i._$  bf AV&#039; schedule<\/p>\n<p>property. Though the  the plain&#039;: that A<br \/>\nsch\u20ac:d113\u20ac:1.\u00a3Vp;*op:\u00a7\u00e9A:*i;=;%._&#8211;v :;:A:\ufb01!}&#039;StT.7~\u00a71,:V?;7i&quot;\u00a7\u00a2.&#039;:f.&#039;1_&#039;\u00a77.f)1iK2&#039;I1eE:*d by the piaintri\ufb02&#039;, in the<\/p>\n<p>Eight of the&quot;::;_:1i.e-.f :1~1a\u00a3%i\u00a7 which is Only with reference to<\/p>\n<p>B scheduls  \u00a7x}\u00a3a.3 i.1nnecessa1y for the court below to<\/p>\n<p>  f\u00a7&quot;\u00a39JI&#039;1\u20ac &quot;E&#039;1,;.1 isssuigto iii\u00e9x\u00e9ffieczt as to Whether the piainti\ufb01&quot; provcci<\/p>\n<p>fhaf&#039;   *i}ie.:v%\u00a7.Wner of A schedule property. This issue<\/p>\n<p>  1equL&quot;.\u20ac\u00a7$ tovb\u00e9i L&#039;1&#039;:*-gc\ufb01ast. In the light of the aontmversy raises} with<\/p>\n<p>:..\u00ab.._&#039;rt:.gard to&quot;  B schsduif: property, the oniy proper issue that is<\/p>\n<p>   to bf&#039;: framed is, &quot;wh\ufb01thar the piaiutiff pmves that he is<\/p>\n<p>  \u00a70Wn\u20ac:r of B schaduie pmp\ufb02rty and anfitled for Vacant<\/p>\n<p>  kpossessien of the 53333.6-:?&quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>%.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>8. In so far as the other two issues are cex).&lt;:e:z*ned&#8211;&quot;wfi1i&lt;:i1<\/p>\n<p>relate to the burden on the plain\ufb01ff to prove as to <\/p>\n<p>ziefendant is in pcermissive possassion of B sch&lt;=:d11&#039;i\u00a5=::..&quot;p:0p:\u00e9I&#039;x1\u00a7;7  <\/p>\n<p>a licensee 311:1 whether the plaintiff ];rrt5iIed.t;1;2;t    V&#039;<\/p>\n<p>terrainated the license gmnte\u00e9 to the  <\/p>\n<p>schstdule pmyerty, as the }3]ainiiif_:\u00e9i:3_A;aveiied 1:; that&quot; V<\/p>\n<p>the defendant was in permigsive :g:a*3\u00a7*\u00a7\u00a3%;::*:$i(2:; as&#039;  and that<br \/>\nit has terminated the lice\ufb01s\u00e9i\u00e9 Jjlotzice, the court<br \/>\nbelow has per$u;ad.\u00a7t1v__itse\u00a7fV&#039;t\u00e9:3   Thezmfore, it<br \/>\ncannot bs  _be1o\u20ac5:&#039;v&quot;11f\u00a7V\u00a7\ufb01&quot;V;:mmitte\ufb01 apparent<br \/>\niiiegality&#8221;  warr311!: interference in<\/p>\n<p>exercise ziif wzzii ., &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>9. &#8220;I&#8217;}:1&lt;}ugh &#039;tb$ Vie3;1}:ze\u20aci_ Cc-{lass} for the petitiomzr contends by<\/p>\n<p>&#039;V  tg9.:{)r{\u00a7.er )\u00e9\u00a5V.&quot;&#039;{7\\&quot;&#039;\ufb02}eS 1 65 2 of CFC that when 3 material<\/p>\n<p> Law is 3_ff1I&#039;Il1\u20acd by (me panty and denied by<\/p>\n<p>1:he&#039;&lt;:t},fi\u20ac:r s;k1;\u20ac}:A:;_i_.:%,}:be taken; as a basis for \ufb01zamimg the issues an\u00e9<\/p>\n<p> &#039;such  facts alleged and denied must have bearing on<\/p>\n<p>   ta) Sue or with regard to the right: fjf defence, I do not<\/p>\n<p>  in the instant caste that tha C{)&#039;\u00a31I&#039;1Z beiow has in any manner<\/p>\n<p> &#039;w\u20accv3&#039;mmii\u00a3ed any illegality in \ufb02aming th\ufb01 issues pertaiuing to the<\/p>\n<p>termina\ufb01mz of license cf the dszfttnciani, as the basis of the claim<\/p>\n<p>of \u00a3316: plaintiff is that the \ufb01efendant was inducted as licensee<\/p>\n<p>V<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Church Of Immaculate Conception &#8230; vs Mrs Margaret Rose Lobo on 17 February, 2009 Author: B.S.Patil &#8220;1 1191 THE HIGH COURT OF KARKATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 1&#8217;77&#8221; DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2009 BEFORE THE H0!\\&#8217;\u00a3&#8217;BLE 1\\m..:I:s*r1cE 3.3. PATIL \u00bb&#8217; V&#8217; wan&#8217; PETITEON No. 18233 I goo\u00e9 \u00a3GM+{i\u00a7\u00bbc3:VATVV.: &#8216; . BETWEEN: {inure}: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-115991","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Church Of Immaculate Conception ... vs Mrs Margaret Rose Lobo on 17 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Church Of Immaculate Conception ... vs Mrs Margaret Rose Lobo on 17 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-02T15:08:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Church Of Immaculate Conception &#8230; vs Mrs Margaret Rose Lobo on 17 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-02T15:08:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":907,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Church Of Immaculate Conception ... vs Mrs Margaret Rose Lobo on 17 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-02T15:08:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Church Of Immaculate Conception &#8230; vs Mrs Margaret Rose Lobo on 17 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Church Of Immaculate Conception ... vs Mrs Margaret Rose Lobo on 17 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Church Of Immaculate Conception ... vs Mrs Margaret Rose Lobo on 17 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-02T15:08:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Church Of Immaculate Conception &#8230; vs Mrs Margaret Rose Lobo on 17 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-02T15:08:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009"},"wordCount":907,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009","name":"Church Of Immaculate Conception ... vs Mrs Margaret Rose Lobo on 17 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-02T15:08:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/church-of-immaculate-conception-vs-mrs-margaret-rose-lobo-on-17-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Church Of Immaculate Conception &#8230; vs Mrs Margaret Rose Lobo on 17 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115991","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=115991"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115991\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=115991"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=115991"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=115991"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}