{"id":116338,"date":"2008-06-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008"},"modified":"2018-12-23T09:49:22","modified_gmt":"2018-12-23T04:19:22","slug":"mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Mahesha S\/O Rajanna vs State Represented By Rural Police on 30 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Mahesha S\/O Rajanna vs State Represented By Rural Police on 30 June, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n
V (3! gwazz p.r,}'\n\nIN '3'!-IE HIE-I CGWELT OF KARNATAKFL AT BANGELORE\n\nDamn\u00bb THIS wan 36\" may or JUNE 2003\n\nBEFORE\n\nTim 2101?' 31:3 MR. JUSTICE K N \n\nCRIMINAL REVISIO pmrxrxon no.17e1L2\u00e9c\u00a7 7; _\n\nBE'1'.'HEEN :\n\nnn\ufb01ssnm\n\n510 naanuua\n\nAGE: so YEARS\n\necu: cconxz \u00abmax\n\nRfQ'HAIH\ufb02mE VILLAGE ,  \n\nswamps TALUK Ann DISTRCTm\"a_ _ ~ _M ,\n.'\u00a2 \u00ab' '*g.,V9E?ITIO\ufb02ER\n\nany sax nnunpaa 9 \u00a7AniaQn&$,,\u00a7r?{;2\n\nsmnmn .% % -%\"a%%*.'\nnspansnnrmn $2 mung: FOLICE, snxnoaa\n\n. . . RESPONDET1'\n\n ;'t3Y.sa;<\u00a7x\u00a7aumLuUnmay M.G. 5293\n\n" *rHis7\u00a2\ufb01:EInAL nmvxszuu pzwzwxqn IS FILEB\nvia 39? a \u00a301 CR.P.C 33 run Anwocnmn FOR THE\n\n,_',2E?ITION;n.9nAIING THAT THIS HDN'BLE 600%? um!\n%f Bs,Em3A$ED TO SET ASIDE THE onnxa DT. 1?~9--c5\n41.\u00a7hss3n 3? ram 9.9., FTC-II, SHIMGGA, IN\n'.uaL.A.No.31\/01 comrxnnaus THE ennsn DT.19-5~91\n\n.;_ 'F\ufb015SE\ufb01 BY was JHFC~II covmr, snmnen, IN cc\nTufxmm.47e4\/97.\n\n'rhia revision petition is craming on\n\nhearing this day. the Caurt made the\nfollawing:\n\n'?\n\n\n\n0 R D E R\n\nThcsugh this revision petition ia li'\u00a7't\u00a7d\n\nfor \ufb02innl hearing today, even at 4  \nthere is no representation on  \npotitiarmr. Therefore,      \n\nlearn-ad public pxoaocutgr a\ufb01y iheard'.-".i. .i\u00a7'eicu$7\u00e9\u00e9'i \n\nthe lower Court records. \n\n2. This rmrinian   under\nSec. 39'? RIW; 4021.  the accused\nin c.c:. my;   of aura - :1\nsnimegei;  "  'A legality and\nco1:rec&.\u00a7'\u00a7::sV  af convictian and\n\naantegzge fiezxgaedv--- jtsyi\ufb01tha laazrnad Magistrate,\n\n co;1v'i'iE:t.i31q'i--   "" "&<:r:uaad for the offenses\n\n Ssatioras 4:38 and 354 11%: and\n\n to undergo simple impriaomaent\n\n n'a__j::anth and 3 months reapectively. apart\n   fine. He has also: questioned than\n  and correctneaa of the Judgment\n\n ~ \u00e9\u00e9lfdated. 1'?.9.2GD.5 passed by the Fast Track Court\n\n- II Shimcga in C.r1.App-eal No.31\/2001\n\n%%\u00a7'%\u00a3\"'3\"'\u00a7 iaif\ufb01li-I W\ufb01\ufb01lkf\ufb01ix\ufb01\ufb02 40 !.}4fl\u20ac)_\"} \u00a7~\u00e9i?}\u00a7\u00a7-~! 'VKVSWNMVW \u00ab-If': I3\u00e9\ufb02r\"3\"\\ unau \"i-I\\i\\~\u00abIl\\~J2o.Iu\\-In an i\\Inl\\1\\-nu ........n\n\n\n\ndismissing the said. appaaz. and upholding the\nJudgement of aomriction arxd atentenca passed. by\n\nthe learned Magistrate ..\n\n3. Tbs brief facta of the case am; \n\n11.1.1997 at about 2.30 a.m. at *Ha1$\u00a71\u00a7\u00a7 *\n\nvillage cf ahimoga talukV.:'\"whgn\n\nMnheslrmazci and hm: g1:a11i:1V  \n\nSakkuhai were a1eepin{g~.,__ \"in Hm; '.11V<:1:z&'~1\u00a7f' Ehe\naczcuamd by ramming thnAV11-1*.1Eug:11"*~-:31: tii'G--..t3!i:3atchBd\n\ndoor of has: house :tI:Le'Es:aased inta\n\nthan   up, dragged\nhe: sat f \u00bb\u00a7:heV  an intention to\nasutraga gm:   eriminal \ufb01erce\n wi1e11x\"#h\u00a2 crind taut laudly, PW.2\n\n  - {?:I:i_;'.'ojoa and 1191.4 Jayarama, who\n\n:i \/'warn  the naighhcrha-od came running\n\n\"-1\ufb01j:\u00a7\u00ab.___h-ax reis\ufb01iie. On seeing them, the accused\n\n hand and ran away from th\ufb02 place.\n\n the mm. lodged. a. ccmplaint cm\n\n'ff2a;3.1997, based on which the police\n\n'rcgitstared the case against the accused and\n\n\"V\n\n\n\nsentenced him to undergo imprisonment as\nneticxad above. Being aggrieved by the aid\n\nJudgement at cotwiction, the accused fi1ar;i\\\u00a2n\n\nappeal hefere the Sensation Judge  \ncu. Appeal No.31\/2003.. The p1:a$.i.'i:h*.4_t:ha\ufb02.';aA:i}cia\u00e9a'V\n\nJudgamant dated 17 . 9 . 206$: dismi 2\u00bb,-one   \"said\nappeal by uphoiiding V..V.,i,\u00bb_;fud9\"\u00a7ttiea'ia.t of\nccnvictian and santons\ufb01g  learned\nHagiatrate.   Brainy   by these\nJudgargi\u00e9iit 5 ;. ~ .17  iii     Vihae: pres canted thi :3\n\ntwin i\u00bb$nVV'pati    i \n\n   urged in this revision\n\n   there is inordinate delay of\n\n2 days in lodging the cotwlaint and\n\n \":i\u00a7\u00a7.'ay in-self shows that it van a false\n  but, the courts below have not\ni '   pcinaido zed this aspect in it 5 pzope:\n\n peragaacztivo and that findings at tha courts\n\nhelm: are illegal and has xzelsulted in\n\n%\/\n\n\n\nmiscarriage of.' justice. as such thny are\n\nliable 12:: has set: aside.\n\n5. In the facta mad circmnatanqc\u00e9c-..::  V'\n\ncase, the paint: that  a{3:'i:-s\u00a7\u00ab._ \n\nconsideration is :\n\n1.<\/pre>\n
 Whether the courts 1sa;\u00a2wuTj’2a\u00a7’2\u00a7\u00a7”‘
\njustitiaa in  holdV;\u00a7_g\u00e9~.._t’hc uamma
\nguilty for t;AffEe1:;.cia’e\u00a3._’L’vyuwgishabla
\nU19 4:13 and any<\/p>\n
6. Even hsf\u00e9ge iuhg  it was<\/p>\n
anguac\u00a7VV’6i5;”‘aff”\u00bb!\u00a7i1a A\u00e9gckiussad that the delay
\nin filing’.  show that cowlaiut<\/p>\n
fi1.ot,;i__   Ai2s “\u00b0 a false tzaraplaint and<\/p>\n
 V”‘vths;v.;c’\u00a3=:>xuaA. t:h’c ‘ii*hble case of the prosecution<\/p>\n
 as such the accused is entitle<\/p>\n
 at acquittal. This argument has<\/p>\n
“‘~.-\u00ab.._’__”-.b\u00e9en “3\u00a7}:iou5ly considered by both the Courts<\/p>\n
   Both the ccmrta have noticed that in<\/p>\n
 complaint itself, certain amount of<\/p>\n
 explaxmtion hem been off erred by the<\/p>\n
complainant, an to why the cxczruplarint came to<\/p>\n
%\/<\/p>\n
evidenao at 1393.1, she has stated the raasan as
\nto why she cauld not fila the cornp1\u00a2;’i;1t<\/p>\n
icamediata 1y.\n<\/p>\n
3. In a. case of.’ this  <\/p>\n
otfansaa against the woman, <\/p>\n
urmarriad girla,
\nat reluctance an  paL’i\u00e9i:’A.L.1_;’11a  *<r'i'::i:"i\u00a7ma as
\nalto their parents   incident
\nto the  involva
\nthe futux-i: V    parents in such
\ncircumataix\u00e9aa\u00e9i   time to think;
\ncalmly,   it may attach<\/p>\n
a stigma}  the girl, which my<\/p>\n
  than way of her marital<\/p>\n
 ..::'::["x–\u00a7;arafore, in a case of this<\/p>\n
  nat\ufb01xgf} qn\u00a7:a:  ':1-jaxmot craps-ct the victim or the<\/p>\n
–.%_T&T’_;’:..,\u00a7-:1.one raiiativas of the victim to immediately<\/p>\n
 3:\u00a2 than police statien and lodge a<\/p>\n
‘  In caatena Gf decisions, the Apex<\/p>\n
‘V””A\u00bb.._ {i’ourt has held that in a. casa involving<\/p>\n
affense against the wemen, delay in filing that<\/p>\n
5\/<\/p>\n
1!}<\/p>\n
an one hand and the accused an the other hand.<\/p>\n
Therefcareg there is no reason for reje\u00a2t-inc<\/p>\n
I\\.l”\u00a7.i I\ufb02F*9. Euif\ufb01\ufb02<\/p>\n
the testimony of PEIL1. Trm avidenxxe <\/p>\n
is <:orrob1:a!:ed by the mridence af  .  M<\/p>\n
The evidence of 951.2 ta 4 ::”.”\u00e9\u00a7a<".i'\u00abtgtz-.qot1i\u00a7'i*:__\u00a7!sf?aL :<\/p>\n
whole corxoboxatos the _ avi&a_1:\u00a7.'c:\u00a7  <\/p>\n
material particulars.   4
\nare residing in    E*'\u00a7:a'.1 is
\nnut: aerioualy   V5},-*V."i_:':'_*..-1I3e<i. duxing
\nthe areas    to 4 have
\ncanai st en'%:1.3f_." V     evidence that
\nattar  PW}. at the odd
\nhour.   hvauaes and saw the<\/p>\n
accuser;  fffrom out of hm: house<\/p>\n
  g-eei\ufb01q "" 'them, the accused leaving<\/p>\n
 running away from the place.<\/p>\n
  'I*r1a:'1:4g  ig."'L:\u00e9gh:so1uta1y, nothing in the cross<\/p>\n
~.K,\/..:':v'-'\u00ab._'\u00a73K\u00a71'EiIX\u00a7ti:~0B to doubt their testimony. It in<\/p>\n
  j\ufb01ttggaatad to any of these witmsses that<\/p>\n
 was any kind of ill will between them<\/p>\n
 tha accused. P'iI.2 to 4 have no nicer to<\/p>\n
gnzind against the accused. Thmrezfmre, there<\/p>\n
\u00a7\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Mahesha S\/O Rajanna vs State Represented By Rural Police on 30 June, 2008 Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana V (3! gwazz p.r,}’ IN ‘3’!-IE HIE-I CGWELT OF KARNATAKFL AT BANGELORE Damn\u00bb THIS wan 36″ may or JUNE 2003 BEFORE Tim 2101?’ 31:3 MR. JUSTICE K N CRIMINAL REVISIO pmrxrxon no.17e1L2\u00e9c\u00a7 7; _ BE’1′.’HEEN : nn\ufb01ssnm […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-116338","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMahesha S\/O Rajanna vs State Represented By Rural Police on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mahesha S\/O Rajanna vs State Represented By Rural Police on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-23T04:19:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mahesha S\/O Rajanna vs State Represented By Rural Police on 30 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-23T04:19:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":475,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Mahesha S\/O Rajanna vs State Represented By Rural Police on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-23T04:19:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mahesha S\/O Rajanna vs State Represented By Rural Police on 30 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mahesha S\/O Rajanna vs State Represented By Rural Police on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mahesha S\/O Rajanna vs State Represented By Rural Police on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-23T04:19:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mahesha S\/O Rajanna vs State Represented By Rural Police on 30 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-23T04:19:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008"},"wordCount":475,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008","name":"Mahesha S\/O Rajanna vs State Represented By Rural Police on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-23T04:19:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mahesha-so-rajanna-vs-state-represented-by-rural-police-on-30-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mahesha S\/O Rajanna vs State Represented By Rural Police on 30 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116338","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=116338"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116338\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=116338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=116338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=116338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}