{"id":116426,"date":"2010-12-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-12-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010"},"modified":"2017-03-07T00:58:33","modified_gmt":"2017-03-06T19:28:33","slug":"indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010","title":{"rendered":"Indian Institute Of Astrophysics vs Dr G.S.D Babu on 15 December, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Indian Institute Of Astrophysics vs Dr G.S.D Babu on 15 December, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: B.V.Nagarathna<\/div>\n<pre>' V' IVI\/s;'SUN\u00bbDARASwAMY\"&amp; RAMADAS)\n\n '  -   \" \n\n. S\/O.S'RI \u20ac,}.C'\u00a3-IRISTOPHER\n 'AGED ABOUT 66 YRS,\nA ' IRETD. SCIENTIST E.\n \"\u00abINDIAN INSTITUTE 01+'\n_ ASTROPHYSICS),\n \"BANGALORE.\n.. \" P'LAT.N0.01 I, GANGA BLOCK,\n'-NATIONAL GAMES VILLAGE,\n\" KORAMANGALA.\n\n39\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE ISWDAY OF DECEMBER. 2010 \nPRESENT\n\nTHE II0I\\I'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.G.SAB_HAH_I.3f '  \n\nAND\nTHE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE B'.'=\\z.I\ufb01ACAR;_gi'TH'NA V\nWRIT PETITION No.3243:b,12o10-IS-'C.A\"T).\":.:  \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nINDIAN INST':TTU3_:'E   \nASTR0PHYSIC.S,i._ 5. '\n   \n\nBANGAI;ORE_--\"r32?s0..034.-.  _ '\nREPBY ITS\"DIRECT.0.R  _   _\nNOW REPRESEN*TED--BY  \nADNIINISTRATIVE OF_'FI~f_3ER.7'  PETITIONER\n\n.\u00bb {BY SR1 PRADEEB S.SAwKAR, ADV. FOR\n\nDI~.C:..S.p.B_.AB7I._I;':\n\nBANGALORE. . . .RF.ZSPONDENT\n\n=i\u20ac=i&lt;=\u00a3==i&lt;*\n\n\u00bb\/..\n\n \n\n\n\n_ :3 _\nTHIS WRIT PETITION Is FILED PRAYING TO QUASH\nORDER DATED 6\/7\/2010 VIBE ANNEXURE3 C PASSED BY\n\nTHE CENTRAL AEMINISTRATIVE TRIBIINAL. BAT\\Io;LII;o&quot;Ij&#039;UEI\\I3TLY:\"I\u00ab-~. I-\nI:)IsIvIIss TIIE APPLECATION FILED BY THE REs--I\u00bbIojI\\ID'ENTt  \"\n\nTHIS PETITION BEING REsER*\u00bbrEE\u00a7_'AT;ID'oo9\/2009 filed by the respondent has been<\/pre>\n<p> d1&#8243;reCt.ing&#8217;Vth\u00e9tvpetitioner herein to recalculate the<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;p_eIisi_oIII3_rVy,V dbedizefrts after granting respondent five more<\/p>\n<p>years,&#8217; of Weigi&#8217;I3t_a\u00a7;\u00a7e and to pay consequential benefits to him<\/p>\n<p> .&#8217;Wj&#8217;thiI1 a v}&#8217;)A\u20acI1&#8217;i()d of three months and in the event of there<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;&#8216;oein\u00a7t&#8221;de1ay in the payment, to pay interest at the rate of 12%<\/p>\n<p>2. The respondent. had filed the app]i.&lt;:ati.orI before the<br \/>\n&#039;I&#039;rihuI&#039;Ia1 Coflt\ufb01fldiflg that he had served for a period of nine<\/p>\n<p>years in U.P.Stai,e Observatoly, Nainital and had carried<\/p>\n<p>E<br \/>\nZ;\n<\/p>\n<p>X;\n<\/p>\n<p>_3n<\/p>\n<p>research work in Astrophysics and thereafter, he joinedhthe<\/p>\n<p>services of the petitioner herein on 13\/ 2 \/ 1978 as a Revsearch<\/p>\n<p>Associate and in 2003 he retired on attaining  _<\/p>\n<p>superannuation and had coinpletedmtwentyi&#8221;five::&#8217;ygears&#8217;&#8211;Aof <\/p>\n<p>service in the institute. According  him, he lr:.a.d..lbeerilfp,aid;v, if<\/p>\n<p>the terminal benefits by ta}&lt;.ing.\u00bbiri-tog consivderatic-.itl&#039;t*yi&#039;enty<br \/>\nyears as qualifying service but   him<br \/>\nin U.P.State Observatoi*y,_._&quot;&#039;i\\ia_ii.ttta\u00a7l,A ignored. He<br \/>\nhad made severalArepresentationslto  claiming<br \/>\ngrant of weightagleljgoifg   of the Central<\/p>\n<p>Civil Services  (hereinafter, referred to as the<\/p>\n<p>&#039;Pension A&#039;R_1,iles&#039;)&#039;  negatived. Under the<\/p>\n<p>circumstances, he&#039;challenged Annexure &#039;A&#8211;12&#039; being a letter<\/p>\n<p>&#039; l.\u00b0date&#039;d 12,[g2008l&quot;isstied by the petitioner herein and<\/p>\n<p> soltighta:&quot;direc&#039;i:ion. to give five years service Weightage while<\/p>\n<p>re&#8211;ca41cu1a.tin&quot;g&#8211;_. his retiral benefits and to fix his pension as<\/p>\n<p> .  &#039;per Ru1e_3O of the Pension Rules.\n<\/p>\n<p> Though uinpteen number of opportunities were<\/p>\n<p>  git-gen by the Tribunal to the petitioner herein to file reply<\/p>\n<p> from 23\/7\/2009 to 4\/3\/2010, the petitioner herein did not<\/p>\n<p>file its reply. Ultimately, on hearing the respondent, the<br \/>\nmatter was disposed of on merits. Thereafter,<\/p>\n<p>M.A,No.l34~\/2010 was filed by the petitioner, the said<\/p>\n<p>,\u00bb-\u00b0&#8217;?.=a-\n<\/p>\n<p>_,;l_<\/p>\n<p>application was allowed and reply of the petitioner herein<\/p>\n<p>was taken on record and the matter was re~heai&#8217;d <\/p>\n<p>application of the respondent was allowed. Being _<\/p>\n<p>by the said order. this writ petition hasmbeen \u00a3il&#8211;ed*_\u00bb ..&#8217;:~.. b  V.<\/p>\n<p>4. We have heard the learned\u00bb.eotirise.l&#8221;&#8216;-folrVftheyyl<\/p>\n<p>petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. It is subrnittedy.that:the.V is not<br \/>\nentitled to  Rule 30 of the<br \/>\nPension  proviso to the said<br \/>\nRule    the Rule cannot be<br \/>\nextendedvvlltoihini.&#8217; ..V&#8217;_ll&#8217;ii.-ljzyitigfl1:;trie&#8221;&#8221;respondent does not satisfy<\/p>\n<p>the conditions&#8217; l_aidi..dovvn  Rule 30, the Tribunal while<\/p>\n<p>3 V&#8217; inisconstiiuingy the sai&#8217;d'&#8221;P{ule granted the benefit of five years<\/p>\n<p>   services which the respondent is not entitled<\/p>\n<p>to. Ti&#8217;ibtii_:al could not have directed that the services<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;a,,,..~.l&#8217;1&#8217;enderedVu&#8217;E;~y the respondent in U.P.Sta\u00a7e m\/O\ufb02lbservatory,<\/p>\n<p>   should be taken into consideration While giving<\/p>\n<p> ___&#8221;&#8221;weight&#8217;.age of five years as the same would be contrary to the<\/p>\n<p>u&#8221;,Rttle and therefore. he submitted that the order passed by<\/p>\n<p>the Tribunal may be set aside and the application of the<\/p>\n<p>respondent. may be dismissed. \/'&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p> A ..:i&#8217;t.{a}ljf()r which postgraduate research, or specialist<\/p>\n<p>_5_n.\n<\/p>\n<p>6. Having, heard the counsel for the petitioner and on<br \/>\nperusal of the inaierial on record, the question<br \/>\nfor our consideration is as to whether the<br \/>\nentitled to the benefit of weightage OfySAt?I&#8217;ViC\u20acS_-ti1&#8217;11il.\u00a7l&#8217;.,  it<br \/>\nof the Pension Rules on the p1&#8217;en1is:-ev  .l<\/p>\n<p>conditions mentioned therein.  the outset, iiiVi&#8217;sl&#8221;necessi1ryl<\/p>\n<p>to extract the said Rule?\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;SO. ,_Addiii0n&#8211;v:._to. q.iicilifi}&#8217;ingl&#8221;iservice in<br \/>\nspecial circilrnstances ii  .\n<\/p>\n<p>{1} [A Governrreritv&#8221;jrom a service<br \/>\nor   1960], shall be<br \/>\nelf{giblel_&#8217;lA  service qualifying for<br \/>\nsiiperannuaiionf,&#8211;~{biit&#8217; not for any other<br \/>\nclasslll&#8217;Q.f::_c;ctual period not exceeding<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;4;one;foiirth&#8221;of_Vthe length of his service or the actual<\/p>\n<p>&amp; &#8216;- ijeriod&#8221;by whicvhmhis age at the time of recruitment<\/p>\n<p>V  &#8216;Vexceededtweniygfive years or a period. of five<br \/>\n 2  is less, if the service or post to<br \/>\n Government servant is appointed is<\/p>\n<p>one\u00a5<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;qualification or experience in scientific,<br \/>\ntechnological or professional fields, is essential;<br \/>\nand<\/p>\n<p>{b} to which candidates of more than twenty-five<\/p>\n<p>years of age are normally recruited:\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;fr<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;&#8221;&#8216;&#8211;__V1:&#8217;1&#8217;aye the vreiquisite eligibiiity for the said benefit, which are as<\/p>\n<p>7. On a perusal of the said rule, it is seenyV_Vt.h:at<br \/>\nweightage 01&#8242; services can be extended to a  _<br \/>\nsuperannuation to an extent of actuaimper&#8217;i0d&#8211;&#8216;U17-Aseryice r1_0t &#8216;<br \/>\nexceeding 1\/4&#8243;&#8216; of the ierlgth of his  .\u00ab<br \/>\nby which his age at the tirne,ef_recrtiitiiinent<br \/>\nyears or a period of 5 years.   less. j&#8217;in&#8217;ere:&#8217;:are two<br \/>\nfurther conditions which  beibireuthe said<br \/>\nbenefit can be extended :1 I V<\/p>\n<p>a)     servant is<\/p>\n<p>  gfaduate research<br \/>\n  experience in scientific<br \/>\n ;prbies&#8217;siona1 fieids is essenttiai;<br \/>\nIs}, oiismore than 25 years of age are<br \/>\n&#8216; r&#8217;eCr&#8217;Uited inthiedsaid post.\n<\/p>\n<p> 8] vv..4:iicwevfei&#8221;, there are three other riders which a<\/p>\n<p>G0veitnmevn&#8217;t..s.eiyant would have to tide ever even in order to<\/p>\n<p>1} That the Government&#8221; servant must have a<br \/>\nqualifying service of not less than \u00a30 years at the<br \/>\ntime he quits the sewices:\n<\/p>\n<p>2] T hat the aforesaid concession is admissible only if<br \/>\nthe rccruit.n1ent rules in respect of the services of<\/p>\n<p>a,<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;2<\/p>\n<p>the post contain a speci\ufb01c provision that t1i_.e~.sa\u00abrn&#8217;e.V<\/p>\n<p>would carry t.he benefit of the ruie; and  <\/p>\n<p>3) The Government servant niusth opt belore  <\/p>\n<p>of his retirement for the&#8217;\u00bb.:we_ig;ht&#8217;,age. of&#8221;&#8216;se&#8217;r&lt;.fiei_es::;_t<\/p>\n<p>under the rules whieii..__ option once n.e&#039;xei&#039;C.i,sVed_.\u00a7 is<\/p>\n<p>final.\n<\/p>\n<p>9. In the instant  it  on 13 \/ 2 \/ 1978 as<\/p>\n<p>per Annexure   the position of<br \/>\nResearch   the respondent. Prior<br \/>\nto his retii&#8217;eii1.etn&#8217;trort&#8217;::28.\/ respondent represented<br \/>\nfor grar1t&#8217;:of  as per the prevailing rules<\/p>\n<p>including Rule 30  the._Per:i.sion Rules. He thereafter, made<\/p>\n<p>.. _ several:representations on attaining superannuation also. In<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;r_res&#8217;p&#8217;onse_ to &#8211;the. said representations Annexure A~5 was<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;A-5&#8217; is a letter dated 30\/9\/2004. The<\/p>\n<p>_ said 1e&#8217;tte1&#8243;&#8212;-V:is &#8216;c:&gt;&#8221;iti&#8221;aeted as fo11ows:~<\/p>\n<p>VV1&#8217;1..VDIAN INSTITUTE OF ASTROPHYSICS<\/p>\n<p>KORAMANGALA<br \/>\nBANGALORE~56O 034<\/p>\n<p>HA \/ AS \/ 3 I 06 \/ Pension \/ 2004-05<br \/>\nSeptember 30. 2004<\/p>\n<p>RPAD<\/p>\n<p>Dr G.S.D.Babu xi<\/p>\n<p>,2:\n<\/p>\n<p>Fiat&#8221; it 01 1, Ganga Btocic &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>National Games Village<\/p>\n<p>A 11 <\/p>\n<p>request for counting of your past service in UPSO, (presently<br \/>\nARIES.) Nainitai, provided ARIES transfers to HA the senaiice<\/p>\n<p>benefits. You might. therefore, consider initio\ufb01ng sfep&#8221;s._&#8217;_tov<br \/>\ntransfer your past service along with proportionate.pertsion&#8217; V.<br \/>\nliability from ARIES to HA. Once this is done, y_or___tr  &#8216; _<\/p>\n<p>can be taken up for consideration.\n<\/p>\n<p>Thanking you,<\/p>\n<p> ully it  <\/p>\n<p>L\u00bb b   it<br \/>\n . _ Admfnis trdtive Q\ufb02icer<\/p>\n<p>A perusal of the  le&#8217;-}_te1jV&#8211; .&#8221;make it apparent<br \/>\nthat one of the diAsqualifieat:ions&#8217;lvrnentlioned earlier letter<\/p>\n<p>dated 30\/9\/  &#8216;d-i-dj not have a Ph.D<\/p>\n<p>Degree when Ahe_&#8211;v_ioineci&#8211;.&#8217;the__ services of the Institute was<br \/>\ndeleted.  _eondiL~tor.1&#8243;fo_r&#8221;&#8216;t&#8217;ransfer of past services was<\/p>\n<p>however. insisted &#8216;ubon&#8217;-  in letter dated 15\/7\/2008<\/p>\n<p>. .l{z&#8217;%.nIie&gt;{:t1re&#8217;A&#8217;A1 12&#8242;), wlhlerein, it was stated that the request for<\/p>\n<p>ll&#8217;c_ot1.ntii1g:&#8221;eflpastservices rendered in AIRES had not been<\/p>\n<p>1z1v.,__ t&#8217;EVe1&#8217;1 in the statement of objections filed by the<\/p>\n<p>S  Tl.lp.e&#8217;Lvitioi51er herein before the Tribunal, it has been contended<\/p>\n<p>    the respondent joined the petitioner ~ Organisation as a<\/p>\n<p>:.&#8221;VPost Graduate holding a Masters Degree in Astronomy and<\/p>\n<p>he did not possess his Doctorate Degree and had received<br \/>\nPh.D Deg1*ee in 1987 during his services at the respondent.<\/p>\n<p>lnstittite and that the benefit under Rule 30 is not available.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\/ &#8216;$1!\/.:\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>13~<\/p>\n<p>Pension Rules states that the Government servant. has to be<\/p>\n<p>appointed to a post. for which post&#8211;graduate researc:1:&#8217;1&#8217;\u00ab._y\u00bb_orv<\/p>\n<p>specialist quaiification or experience in _.&#8211;\u00a7__scieriti\ufb01C\u00a7&#8221;.._._&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>technologicai or professional \ufb01elds, isessential&#8221;andj&#8217;_to&#8217;Vvrhichit <\/p>\n<p>candidates of more than tWenty&#8211;{ive;&#8217;-yearsea,.of &#8220;&#8216;ag&#8217;eV:&#8221;-sare:g<\/p>\n<p>nomiaily recruited. in the instant case,A._the respondevnt hgiadd<\/p>\n<p>experience in scientific field  _Vhad&#8221;&#8216;w_or\u00a3{edVVgin the<br \/>\nU.P.State Observatory  t1&lt;.I_ere.fore,_v.yyas entitled to be<br \/>\nappointed as a Research__Avss.oei&#039;ateV a~&#039;g\\&#039;\/,tiiet_&#039;ivlnstitute in the<\/p>\n<p>year 1978. Su2_bs&#039;efg\u00a7-}ent1y, he&quot;;obtai.ned.,a_fiDoctorate Degree<\/p>\n<p>while workingiiifthevZinstitute. Therefore, on that score, the<br \/>\npetitioners    the benefit of Rule 30 to<\/p>\n<p>the respvonderit.v., &#039;T&#039;r1e&#039;Tri&#039;bu.na} has considered these aspects<\/p>\n<p>handheld  iiii the requirements insisted by the<\/p>\n<p>to extend the benefit of Rule 30 to the<\/p>\n<p>respondent ddtdiinot come within the scope of the said rule<\/p>\n<p> that.Vthei*e is no other reason to deny the benefit of Rule<\/p>\n<p>  &quot;{\u00a7Oxtbo.&quot;the respondent. Under the circumstances, a direction<\/p>\n<p>x was issued to recaiculate the pensionaiy bene\ufb01ts by granting<\/p>\n<p> five more years of weightage and to pay the consequentiai<\/p>\n<p>benefits in terms of Rule 30 of the Pension Ruies. The said<br \/>\ndi1&quot;ecti0n is justified in View of the fact. that the respondents<br \/>\ncase cleariy falls within the scope of Rule 30. He is not<\/p>\n<p>\/.\n<\/p>\n<p>2 \/&gt;<\/p>\n<p>disqualified on account of any of the provisos of ihe saidijule<\/p>\n<p>and the riders put: by the petitioners herein are outsi\u00e9ie:&#8217;:ih&#8217;e<\/p>\n<p>scope of the said rule or dehors the said rule and :*theifef\u00e95&#8217;re,i&#8217;.&#8221;*&#8217; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>Could not have been insisted upon bgwihe pe{itiOfi&#8217;e.if~herein. <\/p>\n<p>The order of the tribunal does not ea1:i&#8217;:.fo1&#8242;;&#8217;_\u00e93;n\u00a7r TC<\/p>\n<p>14. In the 1&#8217;\u20acSL11T.,  i10A&#8221;&#8216;m_esiiV  <\/p>\n<p>petition, the same fails and isiaeicvofdingjiy; .Afjeje&#8217;e_ied.<\/p>\n<p>e n; i \u00bb 4 i  i sax:\n<\/p>\n<p>           JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/&#8217;3<br \/>\nFUDGE<\/p>\n<p>W *n1iJ.s= .,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Indian Institute Of Astrophysics vs Dr G.S.D Babu on 15 December, 2010 Author: B.V.Nagarathna &#8216; V&#8217; IVI\/s;&#8217;SUN\u00bbDARASwAMY&#8221;&amp; RAMADAS) &#8216; &#8211; &#8221; . S\/O.S&#8217;RI \u20ac,}.C&#8217;\u00a3-IRISTOPHER &#8216;AGED ABOUT 66 YRS, A &#8216; IRETD. SCIENTIST E. &#8220;\u00abINDIAN INSTITUTE 01+&#8217; _ ASTROPHYSICS), &#8220;BANGALORE. .. &#8221; P&#8217;LAT.N0.01 I, GANGA BLOCK, &#8216;-NATIONAL GAMES VILLAGE, &#8221; KORAMANGALA. 39 IN [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-116426","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Indian Institute Of Astrophysics vs Dr G.S.D Babu on 15 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Indian Institute Of Astrophysics vs Dr G.S.D Babu on 15 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-06T19:28:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Indian Institute Of Astrophysics vs Dr G.S.D Babu on 15 December, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-06T19:28:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1616,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010\",\"name\":\"Indian Institute Of Astrophysics vs Dr G.S.D Babu on 15 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-06T19:28:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Indian Institute Of Astrophysics vs Dr G.S.D Babu on 15 December, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Indian Institute Of Astrophysics vs Dr G.S.D Babu on 15 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Indian Institute Of Astrophysics vs Dr G.S.D Babu on 15 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-12-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-06T19:28:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Indian Institute Of Astrophysics vs Dr G.S.D Babu on 15 December, 2010","datePublished":"2010-12-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-06T19:28:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010"},"wordCount":1616,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010","name":"Indian Institute Of Astrophysics vs Dr G.S.D Babu on 15 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-06T19:28:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-institute-of-astrophysics-vs-dr-g-s-d-babu-on-15-december-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Indian Institute Of Astrophysics vs Dr G.S.D Babu on 15 December, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116426","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=116426"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116426\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=116426"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=116426"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=116426"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}