{"id":11669,"date":"2010-06-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-06-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010"},"modified":"2015-04-11T09:39:24","modified_gmt":"2015-04-11T04:09:24","slug":"ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010","title":{"rendered":"Ammini vs Harigovindan on 15 June, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Ammini vs Harigovindan on 15 June, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nAS.No. 328 of 2001()\n\n\n\n1. AMMINI\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. HARIGOVINDAN\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.G.PARAMESWARA PANICKER (SR.)\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.E.R.VENKATESWARAN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN\n\n Dated :15\/06\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                  M.N. KRISHNAN, J.\n              = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n                 A.S. NO. 328 OF 2001\n              = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n          Dated this the 15th day of June, 2010.\n\n                    J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
   This   appeal    is    preferred         against  the<\/p>\n
judgment and decree passed by the Subordinate<\/p>\n
Judge, Ottapalam in O.S.174\/94.              The suit is<\/p>\n
one for specific performance of a contract<\/p>\n
with  damages.       It     is    the     case   of  the<\/p>\n
plaintiff that the defendant and plaintiff<\/p>\n
had entered into an agreement under Ext.A1<\/p>\n
whereby the defendant has agreed to sell the<\/p>\n
property to the plaintiff for a consideration<\/p>\n
of  Rs.5,000\/-   per      cent      and     towards  the<\/p>\n
purchase  price     had       paid     an     amount  of<\/p>\n
Rs.2,000\/-.  It is also stated that as usual<\/p>\n
the seller has to satisfy the buyer regarding<\/p>\n
his title etc. and to register the document.<\/p>\n
A.S. 328 OF 2001
\n                          -2-<\/span><\/p>\n
It is contended by the plaintiff that the<\/p>\n
property       was measured   and there  was  an<\/p>\n
agreement between the parties that on 27.4.94<\/p>\n
the document can be registered.       But to the<\/p>\n
utter dismay of the plaintiff the defendant<\/p>\n
had demolished the stone construction around<\/p>\n
the well and thereby had caused damages of<\/p>\n
Rs.15,000\/-.        It  is   submitted that  the<\/p>\n
plaintiff is always ready and willing to<\/p>\n
perform his part of his contract and hence<\/p>\n
the suit.\n<\/p>\n
      2. On the other hand the defendant would<\/p>\n
contend       it  is true    that there  was an<\/p>\n
agreement       to sell and   the  defendant was<\/p>\n
always ready and willing to perform his part<\/p>\n
of his contract provided the plaintiff was<\/p>\n
prepared to pay the amount for the actual<\/p>\n
A.S. 328 OF 2001
\n                           -3-<\/span><\/p>\n
extent available as agreed to between the<\/p>\n
parties.        The plaintiff did not respond to<\/p>\n
the same and therefore he is not prepared to<\/p>\n
perform his part of his contract.<\/p>\n
      3. On     a  consideration   of  the  entire<\/p>\n
materials the court below granted a decree<\/p>\n
for realisation of the amount and damages but<\/p>\n
refused       to  grant  a   decree  for  specific<\/p>\n
performance of the contract.        It is against<\/p>\n
that decision the plaintiff has come up in<\/p>\n
appeal with a prayer to grant a decree for<\/p>\n
specific performance.\n<\/p>\n
      4. Under S.20 of the Specific Relief Act<\/p>\n
the      jurisdiction       to   decree   specific<\/p>\n
performance is discretionary and the Court is<\/p>\n
not bound to grant such relief merely because<\/p>\n
it is lawful to do so.           There is also a<\/p>\n
A.S. 328 OF 2001
\n                           -4-<\/span><\/p>\n
caution that the discretion of the Court is<\/p>\n
not to be exercised arbitrarily but should be<\/p>\n
on sound and reasonable judicial principles.<\/p>\n
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the decision<\/p>\n
reported in Bal Krishna v. Bhagwan Das<\/a> 2008<\/p>\n
(12) SCC page 145 in paragraph 14 has laid<\/p>\n
down the principles to be followed.<\/p>\n
          “It is also settled by various<\/p>\n
          decisions of this Court that by<\/p>\n
          virtue of S.20 of the Act, the<\/p>\n
          relief for specific performance<\/p>\n
          lies in the discretion of the<\/p>\n
          Court and the Court is not bound<\/p>\n
          to    grant  such   relief merely<\/p>\n
          because it is lawful to do so.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
          The exercise of the discretion<\/p>\n
          to    order specific   performance<\/p>\n
          would    require  the   Court  to<\/p>\n
          satisfy     itself     that   the<\/p>\n
          circumstances are such that it<\/p>\n
A.S. 328 OF 2001
\n                           -5-<\/span><\/p>\n
          is equitable to grant decree for<\/p>\n
          specific    performance  of   the<\/p>\n
          contract.    While exercising the<\/p>\n
          discretion, the Court would take<\/p>\n
          into       consideration      the<\/p>\n
          circumstances of the case, the<\/p>\n
          conduct   of   the  parties,  and<\/p>\n
          their respective interests under<\/p>\n
          the    contract.     No  specific<\/p>\n
          performance    of   a   contract,<\/p>\n
          though it is not vitiated by<\/p>\n
          fraud or mis-representation, can<\/p>\n
          be granted if it would give an<\/p>\n
          unfair     advantage    to    the<\/p>\n
          plaintiff     and    where    the<\/p>\n
          performance    of   the  contract<\/p>\n
          would involve some hardship on<\/p>\n
          the defendant, which he did not<\/p>\n
          foresee.”\n<\/p>\n
      5. The intention of the parties and the<\/p>\n
conduct        of the   parties   are  absolutely<\/p>\n
A.S. 328 OF 2001
\n                           -6-<\/span><\/p>\n
relevant in deciding the question whether a<\/p>\n
discretionary relief has to be exercised in<\/p>\n
favour of the plaintiff.       A reading of Ext.A1<\/p>\n
agreement would convincingly establish that<\/p>\n
the parties have entered into an agreement<\/p>\n
whereby       it  is  decided   to   purchase  the<\/p>\n
property available at the rate of Rs.5,000\/-<\/p>\n
per cent and it is towards the same an<\/p>\n
advance amount of Rs.2,000\/- is paid.        It is<\/p>\n
also stated in the agreement that if the<\/p>\n
defendant is committing the breach of the<\/p>\n
contract the plaintiff is entitled to get<\/p>\n
refund      of   the  advance  amount   paid  plus<\/p>\n
another       Rs.2,000\/-  as   damages.     Really<\/p>\n
speaking there is no terms in the agreement<\/p>\n
regarding the enforceability of the contract.<\/p>\n
But     S.20(4)    of  the   Specific  Relief  Act<\/p>\n
A.S. 328 OF 2001
\n                          -7-<\/span><\/p>\n
specifically states that just because there<\/p>\n
is no such clause specific performance need<\/p>\n
not be declined.        So the main criteria is<\/p>\n
regarding the other aspects mentioned.      The<\/p>\n
non-inclusion of a clause may be of some<\/p>\n
relevance in determining the intention of the<\/p>\n
parties. The plaintiff has never been put<\/p>\n
into possession of the property.      According<\/p>\n
to the plaintiff the parties went to measure<\/p>\n
the property and found the extent and it was<\/p>\n
decided       on 27.4.94  to  have the document<\/p>\n
registered.        But   according to  him  the<\/p>\n
defendant immediately had committed breach by<\/p>\n
demolishing the stone construction around the<\/p>\n
well and had also lowered the land.       So he<\/p>\n
had sent a lawyer notice for the same also<\/p>\n
with the prayer for specific performance of<\/p>\n
A.S. 328 OF 2001
\n                          -8-<\/span><\/p>\n
the contract. The defendant had denied the<\/p>\n
demolition of the wall as well as the other<\/p>\n
allegations and had categorically stated in<\/p>\n
the reply notice that if the plaintiff is<\/p>\n
prepared       to give the   value of  the land<\/p>\n
available he has no objection in executing<\/p>\n
the document.      This reply was sent on 2.5.94<\/p>\n
and it is produced by the plaintiff     himself.<\/p>\n
But we do not know for the reasons best known<\/p>\n
to the plaintiff, instead of getting ready<\/p>\n
for the execution of the document on payment<\/p>\n
of balance consideration he institutes a suit<\/p>\n
for specific performance on 30.5.94 with a<\/p>\n
prayer for damages.      So it has to be stated<\/p>\n
that the plaintiff was not totally ready and<\/p>\n
willing to perform his part of his contract<\/p>\n
but he wanted some thing more in the form of<\/p>\n
A.S. 328 OF 2001
\n                          -9-<\/span><\/p>\n
damages.        It has been spoken to by the<\/p>\n
defendant that the intention to sell the<\/p>\n
property was to raise funds to treat his son<\/p>\n
who was seriously ailing and that child died<\/p>\n
on 6.7.94(proved by Ext.B1) and thereafter<\/p>\n
the     necessity   had  vanished to  sell  the<\/p>\n
property.       When a property is sought to be<\/p>\n
sold for a specific purpose and there was an<\/p>\n
explicit declaration to the effect that the<\/p>\n
defendant       was  prepared  to  execute  the<\/p>\n
document       in favour  of  the plaintiff  as<\/p>\n
stipulated      in  the  agreement it  was  the<\/p>\n
imperative duty of the plaintiff to comply<\/p>\n
with the same and not to rush to the Court<\/p>\n
for specific performance of the contract.<\/p>\n
Since the document was not executed, the<\/p>\n
balance consideration was not paid and the<\/p>\n
A.S. 328 OF 2001
\n                           -10-<\/span><\/p>\n
purpose for which the property was agreed to<\/p>\n
be sold vanished on the death of the son on<\/p>\n
6.7.94.        So it has to be stated that the<\/p>\n
plaintiff       by  his  conduct   wanted  to have<\/p>\n
unfair advantage and had by his conduct put<\/p>\n
the defendant into hardship and his further<\/p>\n
conduct that he was no more serious about<\/p>\n
getting       the  document   executed  within the<\/p>\n
stipulated time etc.            will show that the<\/p>\n
judicial discretion cannot be used in favour<\/p>\n
of the plaintiff for granting a decree for<\/p>\n
specific performance.          The trial court has<\/p>\n
considered those aspects and had refused to<\/p>\n
grant a decree for specific performance but<\/p>\n
has ordered refund of the advance amount with<\/p>\n
damages of Rs.2,000\/- as per the statement in<\/p>\n
Ext.A1.       Therefore I do not find any merit in<\/p>\n
A.S. 328 OF 2001
\n                        -11-<\/span><\/p>\n
this     appeal   and therefore   the   same  is<\/p>\n
dismissed but under the circumstances without<\/p>\n
any order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                         M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n
ul\/-\n<\/p>\n
A.S. 328 OF 2001
\n                    -12-<\/span><\/p>\n
                         M.N. KRISHNAN, J.\n<\/p>\n
                        = = = = = = = = = =
\n                        A.S. No. 328 OF 2001
\n                      = = = = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
                          J U D G M E N T<\/p>\n
                          15th June, 2010.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Ammini vs Harigovindan on 15 June, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM AS.No. 328 of 2001() 1. AMMINI … Petitioner Vs 1. HARIGOVINDAN … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.P.G.PARAMESWARA PANICKER (SR.) For Respondent :SRI.E.R.VENKATESWARAN The Hon’ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN Dated :15\/06\/2010 O R D E R M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11669","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAmmini vs Harigovindan on 15 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ammini vs Harigovindan on 15 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-06-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-04-11T04:09:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ammini vs Harigovindan on 15 June, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-11T04:09:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1308,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010\",\"name\":\"Ammini vs Harigovindan on 15 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-11T04:09:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ammini vs Harigovindan on 15 June, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ammini vs Harigovindan on 15 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ammini vs Harigovindan on 15 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-06-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-04-11T04:09:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ammini vs Harigovindan on 15 June, 2010","datePublished":"2010-06-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-11T04:09:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010"},"wordCount":1308,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010","name":"Ammini vs Harigovindan on 15 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-06-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-11T04:09:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ammini-vs-harigovindan-on-15-june-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ammini vs Harigovindan on 15 June, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11669","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11669"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11669\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11669"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11669"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11669"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}