{"id":116748,"date":"2011-07-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-07-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011"},"modified":"2017-02-04T14:21:12","modified_gmt":"2017-02-04T08:51:12","slug":"mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Salim Baig vs Ministry Of Health And Family &#8230; on 20 July, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Salim Baig vs Ministry Of Health And Family &#8230; on 20 July, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                        In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                      at\n                                                New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                             File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001194\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a020,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a020,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Salim\u00a0Baig\n           S\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Abdul\u00a0Halim\u00a0Baig\n           R\/o\u00a0Kasba\u00a0Bhojpur\n           Moradabad\n           Uttar\u00a0Pradesh\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\n\n           Respondents\n\n\n\n           Central\u00a0Council\u00a0of\u00a0Indian\u00a0Medicine\n           61\u00ad65\u00a0Institutional\u00a0Area\n           Janakpuri\n           New\u00a0Delhi\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Sube\u00a0Singh,\u00a0PIO\n\n\n\n\n                         Information\u00a0Commissioner             :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                            at\n                                                    New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                         File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001194\n\n\n\n                                                         ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.19.10.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0CCIM\u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       five\u00a0points\u00a0including\u00a0the\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0Institutions\u00a0teaching\u00a0Unani\u00a0medicine,\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0rules\u00a0with\u00a0respect\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       admissions\u00a0to\u00a0Unani\u00a0hospitals\u00a0based\u00a0on\u00a0Pre\u00adTibb\u00a0etc.\u00a0\u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.11.1.11\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0reiterating\u00a0his\u00a0request\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0information.\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Sube\u00a0Singh,\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a028.1.11\u00a0(He\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0sent\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0wrong\u00a0address\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       and\u00a0hence\u00a0there\u00a0was\u00a0a\u00a0delay\u00a0in\u00a0furnishing\u00a0information)\u00a0.\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.16.4.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>2.     During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0as\u00a0received\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Unani\u00a0Education\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       section\u00a0was\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Commission,\u00a0noted\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0on\u00a0record\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       after \u00a0 hearing \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondent \u00a0 \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 deemed \u00a0 PIO \u00a0 like \u00a0 in \u00a0 other \u00a0 earlier \u00a0 cases \u00a0 has \u00a0 not \u00a0 been\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       cooperating\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0complete\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0stipulated\u00a0period\u00a0\u00a0under\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       RTI\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0so\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0can\u00a0be\u00a0forwarded\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0which\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0violation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0law\u00a0.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       instant\u00a0case,\u00a0he\u00a0\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0o\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0required\u00a0information\u00a0point\u00a0wise\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0so\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       can\u00a0be\u00a0supplied\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0by\u00a020.8.11\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0submit\u00a0a\u00a0compliance\u00a0report\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Commission\u00a0by\u00a027.8.11..\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.     Shri \u00a0 Sube \u00a0 Singh, \u00a0 Respondent \u00a0 PIO\u00a0 submitted\u00a0 during\u00a0 the\u00a0 hearing\u00a0 \u00a0 that\u00a0 he\u00a0 is \u00a0 not\u00a0 getting\u00a0 enough\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       cooperation\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0 \u00a0staff\u00a0which\u00a0often\u00a0 \u00a0results\u00a0 \u00a0in\u00a0delayed\u00a0responses\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0He\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       stated\u00a0that\u00a0this\u00a0non\u00adcooperation\u00a0has\u00a0resulted\u00a0\u00a0in\u00a0imposition\u00a0of\u00a0penalty\u00a0on\u00a0him\u00a0more\u00a0than\u00a0once\u00a0.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       this\u00a0connection\u00a0,\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0undersigned,\u00a0\u00a0while\u00a0noting\u00a0the\u00a0fact\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0had\u00a0never\u00a0brought\u00a0this\u00a0issue\u00a0to\u00a0<br \/>\n          the\u00a0attention\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0\u00a0during\u00a0earlier\u00a0hearings\u00a0\u00a0decided\u00a0to\u00a0invite\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Chairman,\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Vaidya\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         Raghunandan\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0to\u00a0her\u00a0chamber\u00a0\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0Shri\u00a0Sube\u00a0Singh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0on\u00a0a\u00a0mutually\u00a0convenient\u00a0date\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         and\u00a0time,\u00a0preferably\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a010th\u00a0 of\u00a0August,\u00a02011\u00a0so\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0issue\u00a0can\u00a0be\u00a0sorted\u00a0out\u00a0. \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         Vaidya \u00a0Raghunandan \u00a0Sharma \u00a0 \u00a0may\u00a0kindly\u00a0make\u00a0it\u00a0convenient\u00a0to\u00a0fix\u00a0a\u00a0date\u00a0and\u00a0time\u00a0 \u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         attend\u00a0the\u00a0meeting.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                             \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                     Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Shri\u00a0Salim\u00a0Baig<br \/>\n         S\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Abdul\u00a0Halim\u00a0Baig<br \/>\n         R\/o\u00a0Kasba\u00a0Bhojpur<br \/>\n         Moradabad<br \/>\n         Uttar\u00a0Pradesh<\/p>\n<p>2.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n         Central\u00a0Council\u00a0of\u00a0Indian\u00a0Medicine<br \/>\n         61\u00ad65\u00a0Institutional\u00a0Area<br \/>\n         Janakpuri<br \/>\n         New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p>3.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n         Central\u00a0Council\u00a0of\u00a0Indian\u00a0Medicine<br \/>\n         61\u00ad65\u00a0Institutional\u00a0Area<br \/>\n         Janakpuri<br \/>\n         New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p>4.       Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC<\/p>\n<p>5.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Vaidya\u00a0Raghunandan\u00a0Sharma<br \/>\n            Chairman<br \/>\n            Central\u00a0Council\u00a0of\u00a0Indian\u00a0Medicine<br \/>\n           61\u00ad65\u00a0Institutional\u00a0Area<br \/>\n          Janakpuri<br \/>\n          New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p>Note: \u00a0 In \u00a0 case, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission&#8217;s \u00a0 above \u00a0 directives \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 complied \u00a0 with \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents, \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nAppellant\/Appellant\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct,\u00a0giving\u00a0(1)\u00a0<br \/>\ncopy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication,\u00a0(2)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0PIO&#8217;s\u00a0reply,\u00a0(3)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0(4)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(5)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0considers\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\ncomplaint.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\/Appellant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Salim Baig vs Ministry Of Health And Family &#8230; on 20 July, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001194 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a020,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a020,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Salim\u00a0Baig S\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Abdul\u00a0Halim\u00a0Baig R\/o\u00a0Kasba\u00a0Bhojpur Moradabad Uttar\u00a0Pradesh The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing Respondents Central\u00a0Council\u00a0of\u00a0Indian\u00a0Medicine 61\u00ad65\u00a0Institutional\u00a0Area Janakpuri New\u00a0Delhi Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Sube\u00a0Singh,\u00a0PIO Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001194 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.19.10.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0CCIM\u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0 five\u00a0points\u00a0including\u00a0the\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0Institutions\u00a0teaching\u00a0Unani\u00a0medicine,\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0rules\u00a0with\u00a0respect\u00a0to\u00a0 admissions\u00a0to\u00a0Unani\u00a0hospitals\u00a0based\u00a0on\u00a0Pre\u00adTibb\u00a0etc.\u00a0\u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0 an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.11.1.11\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0reiterating\u00a0his\u00a0request\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0information.\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0 Sube\u00a0Singh,\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a028.1.11\u00a0(He\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0sent\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0wrong\u00a0address\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-116748","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Salim Baig vs Ministry Of Health And Family ... on 20 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Salim Baig vs Ministry Of Health And Family ... on 20 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-04T08:51:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Salim Baig vs Ministry Of Health And Family &#8230; on 20 July, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-04T08:51:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011\"},\"wordCount\":547,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Salim Baig vs Ministry Of Health And Family ... on 20 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-04T08:51:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Salim Baig vs Ministry Of Health And Family &#8230; on 20 July, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Salim Baig vs Ministry Of Health And Family ... on 20 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Salim Baig vs Ministry Of Health And Family ... on 20 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-04T08:51:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Salim Baig vs Ministry Of Health And Family &#8230; on 20 July, 2011","datePublished":"2011-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-04T08:51:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011"},"wordCount":547,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011","name":"Mr.Salim Baig vs Ministry Of Health And Family ... on 20 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-04T08:51:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-salim-baig-vs-ministry-of-health-and-family-on-20-july-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Salim Baig vs Ministry Of Health And Family &#8230; on 20 July, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116748","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=116748"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116748\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=116748"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=116748"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=116748"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}