{"id":117025,"date":"2010-09-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2"},"modified":"2018-04-15T15:02:12","modified_gmt":"2018-04-15T09:32:12","slug":"divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2","title":{"rendered":"Divisional Manager National … vs Kashilingam S\/O Ramaswamy on 20 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Divisional Manager National … vs Kashilingam S\/O Ramaswamy on 20 September, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: K.L.Manjunath & S.N.Satyanarayana<\/div>\n
 --_;.. 1,\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT \n\nDATED THIS THE 20TH BAY or SEPTEMBER.  u\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HON'BLE MILJUSTICE    \n\nAND\nTHE I-ION'BLE MR.JUS'l'ICE'S,N.$AT1'_ANAT\u00a7;*\u00a7C'i?A1\u00a7A  \nMISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEEEL-1:\\I0,V8312\u00ab. 2CI%06 (WC)\n\nBETWEEN :\n\nE)ivisi()I1a1Man3.ger,,_  '\nNational I11s11r21I1Q,<3\u00ab'C_c)--;_ L1Eti'1., _.    I\nDivisioxxaj (.)f\ufb01Cc,  654", _. .   ,  ' \n\nSathi Compiexi.'  'I'I{_():a;d.j,:-.. _    V_ \n\nBANGALORE E--* E\n\nNew reptdgby-.iLs.   '\nRegi0r1a1()f\ufb01Ce;- V   \nNati.0n.a_1 II1s1,1"1"3,_It'C{: CQ. 'IA(\u00bb}..,t"_;~\nRegion 2:} _ O,f\ufb01c(i~,, ' E'31_,il)h.21:r211\u00b0n \n4(1g)mp1ex,3 144, M.(3r';=Road,A.\n\n APPELLANT.\n     Swamy, Adv.)\n\n VANIH)-;-- A h * '\n\n1,, K\u00e9i-s11iii1i\u00a7;21"rn,\n' V S \/ 0 *~I"{aII1aswa,11;y,\n AA  Majp1,1swaI11y Ii)cva..r.\nAggie: Me.1j()1', # \"I \"I70\/43,\n\nas\/E\n\n\n\nDr. Raj k'e_1r11zz:r Road,\n\n}_'mk21s1'1nag21r, ._\n\nBANGALORE.  RESPONBENTS.\n\n(By Sri.Su.r(:s}1 M.Lz3.tur,   \nAdv. for 1\"-{~ 1,\n\nRcspmldexxt No.2 - N0t.i(:c\ndisp<:.nse(.i with)   \n\n*m=I=#=1=M\u00a2#=!=#*_* \n\nT1115 ap'p\u20aca,i is filed um"-,\u00a7_\u00a7tr S(:\u00a7:fi.r)r1  oi\ufb01i \n\nWor'kmcn's (3ompeI1sat.i0n   th\u00e9}  ()f(:i:erH dated\nO2.()5.2(){)6 passed in wcA,(V_1"3--2,INF(:\/{iR;_11.\/"20V06-\ufb01n the me\nof the Labour ()f\ufb01cer  _f0r Workrnt-:n's\nCompt-:.r1sat.'10n, S'ub--I)ivi:;i.Q:n--'2,_<__  Bhavan.\nBanm:'rghatta    \u00e9iw*:ar%iing compensation\nof Rs.4,o6,656=;\/ \u00a7 =p.a., from 0m2.2004\ntill the date  the appeilant herein to\n\ndeposit tht%,sa3.nt:. V' " \n\nThis app.ea1Vcof\u00a3'1i'ng~*\u00bbL' on for Orders this day,\n\n}g,L.MA_n{JUrIATH; "J..',__<ie\u00ab1i.vcrd the ronowmg:\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
” ._N{:)t.i(i\u00e9;  ‘r\u00a7t’:_-3i>0r1(1e1’1i. No.2 is dispensed with, sincte<\/p>\n
r(–:sp01″1(‘i\u00a331’1.1.”– N0’;2 is p.1a(:<td expartc bf'\u00a7f()I'\u20ac the C()In1nEssioI1ez'.<\/p>\n
  'AW'-\u00a331 consent. of both the courlsc-if, this matter has taken<\/p>\n
 13:3? f0";j }:1ea1~iI1g ami ('11Sp0S(',d c)f.<\/p>\n
-3-<\/span><\/p>\n
3. ‘.l’l1e 2-xppeklaxlt -~ lnsurz-1.r1(te Cornpany has (:l1alle,nged the
\nq1.:ar1t1.:’In of eompe1″1.s:;11ion awarded is on l1igl*1er___ side.<\/p>\n
Respondent: No.1 lodged a Claim Peti.t1’.or1 under {he ‘p’re.:Visi.c):1s<\/p>\n
of W()rkmeI1’s C()mpensatio1’1 Act, l3a3.’1g21lo1’e,_f}r1 \/'”‘\u00a3:3~<\/p>\n
2\/NFC \/CRW I I \/2005. Accordillg to e121i1’naAI1t.,’_’    dd<\/p>\n
 a driver in lorry b :ari.11g regist1’2ltio\ufb01..’_A<\/p>\n
which vehicle met with an 21c(:i(l,_e’I1:. on”1.7;}.VlV.2O’04″”w’iieI1 it”<\/p>\n
was proceeding from Su1’1.d\u00a7)o1′ t..<)""{}o3l,'"'on 1.\\\u00a7\u00e9iti.0nai"l~Ilghway
\nNo.63 near Yallapur — Arell$(:_Egha1,';" :as__\u00e9a..v1=esu1t of which, he<\/p>\n
sustained grievousuiglj-1,1ri<\u00a7:As a.f1_\u00a7?. flfficitmfe tzoboth upper limb<\/p>\n
and other 1A1<_{"viz:l,"q immediately shifted to
\nYa.lla.pu;1_* }f'C)WSVI')i'taV1  to KMC Hospital and for<\/p>\n
further t,;'e.21{:mef1t to Bowrring and Lady Curzon<\/p>\n
V.leeI.()":-'spit\u00e9i-zl.V' ncrzil-3.e w:1s"fegisi:(t'r(:(;l before the Yallapur Police in<\/p>\n
 AcC()'rdi'1'1g to him, he was aged about 45<\/p>\n
 ox'; t.h..e~ {i\u00e9irte of the actcident and that h.e was getting a<\/p>\n
" 5g1'ary of l..{:"1\u00a7oi\u00bb.5O0\/~.\n<\/p>\n
 *1*m\u00e9 appellant. — lI”lS1,1l”c.1I’l(3\u20ac Company contested the case.<\/p>\n
-a:{i’r”:ai’i.tC(‘i iss1..1z’u’1ce of policy in favour of tl’Ie owner of the<\/p>\n
 \u00a7zt:1’1i(:\u00a3<: zmcl ii denied all other 22.vermen1,s made in the pet\ufb01sion.<\/p>\n
:5:\/'<\/p>\n
-4-<\/span><\/p>\n
Based on the above pk-tz1(‘Iia:1gs, points were formulated by the<\/p>\n
C01’nm.issi(_)’r1cr_ I’3ef'()re the (lonlmissioner, the C}’c1i’.i’I1I:’.,1f1’i”.\u00bbyWfr1S<\/p>\n
got. 1’1imsel.\u00a7’ examined as I-“.W.1 and he relietl 1e11)o:1~I\u00a3’xVs,_}*~lf1,_to<\/p>\n
13-7. He also exzunined Dr.S.R2;m1a(:_t1andra_gist”-\u00a7?.V’J *.\\t}*ho_ <\/p>\n
treated him at Banga.iore tllrough IwhQ:h,j. <\/p>\n
were marked. The COEIlII’1iSStl{)4_I1\u20ac1″ “after  the<\/p>\n
e\\,\u00bb\u00a7denee let m by the parties  thetteoftelt\ufb01sjtten that as
\nper the opinion of the c1o’c:;’::’._(:5’1:’-.  50% to
\nboth the legs and, 250\/gA….tr,f..   However, the
\nCommiss1’0ner “l'(‘-i:”t:ia1 by the claimant
\nand the    that the ciailnant is
\nsu.f1_”eri:<1g ft':-_Qm  and he cannot discharge<\/p>\n
his duty as 3.t"'<:1_;rit"uerta_r14t(i.fufther came to the conclusion that<\/p>\n
the (:121i;i}a:1t~ (:ar1ri0t..even. do norma} Work and he Cannot. sit<\/p>\n
ztmad: sVt:a::;1Vci .f0"r,io;i"g time, he (:zm_:'1()t. walk, run and climb cycle.<\/p>\n
 _ V Theref<)rej i'1.1.t:1-e.i:'–0t:;\u00e91I disability of the respondent. is considered<\/p>\n
 ;1t..\u00a21_()()%,..ee:'1tifsry to the plzysical disability as assessed by<\/p>\n
 t)(5(i:t:.()r. A(:(:ordi11g1y a sum of Rs.4,06,656\/– has been<\/p>\n
 __e1u?ard<e(1 with interest. at 12% [min the date of ae(:.ide.nt til}<\/p>\n
  3;(*3\u00a3l,1iS\u00e9.i.fi().i'1. 'I"'his order is called 11:1 qt,1est1'on in this appeai.<\/p>\n
6\/,<\/p>\n
_a110w t.E1ea:i1)}3eae1.  "\n<\/p>\n
-5-<\/span><\/p>\n
5. The main (:0r1tem\u00a7.0r1 of’ the appellants counsel is thai,<\/p>\n
the C(:\u20ac()r. Therefore. he (:0nte}_’1<iVSXt.}'1z;t Dtheu <\/p>\n
Commissioner should have ass<\u00e9.\u00e9;sed.,_ \ufb01.1e {:,QInpe11saii_OI1.<\/p>\n
payabie to Ciajmant basecl cm' the   utif1e<\/p>\n
Doctor. In the circumstances. i1(: Kf'<2:c_1:1I'*"'<e'\u00a7t ffle  reduce
\nthe compensation by   A Iele further
\nconteucis that the  is on higher
\nside. The   entitled to claim
\ninterest at   i.nsti.tuti0n of petition
\ntili the daft; of 1*–'.?.%  from the date of award<\/p>\n
till the date Ofep3.}g1\ufb01Ve}:1.f.*.: 1%..(g Q'{)\u00a3'diI1g1y he request the Court to<\/p>\n
6.’ L’ =}:\u00a3’e1vi1*1vg\u00a7 ‘E’1e22;f(i=the courlsel for appellant and counsei for<\/p>\n
—  .v.;’es[)(>n.(jIe111′ _E\\T();’11.i_11e foilcnwing” point’s would emerge for our<\/p>\n
. . 1 . _ ,.r;_o’n_s’id era t.ivoAr.’::\n<\/p>\n
x xi)\u00bb  VVhether the qu2’x,11t1.1111 of (:()mper1sat.i011<\/p>\n
awardeai by the C0Imni.ssioner is on }:1ighe’r
\nside?\n<\/p>\n
ii] Wlletlleif the i’mer(:si awarded reqm’.res
\n10 be re.d1.:eed’.r’<\/p>\n
(3.,<\/p>\n
– 5 –\n<\/p>\n
7. So far as first point is concerned, it is nodoubt true that<\/p>\n
the doctor has assessed 40% permanent disability toforie of<\/p>\n
the limb and 10% to other limb in 331 <\/p>\n
considered as permanent disability to both the  <\/p>\n
on the same, the Doctor has also ogiiinedhthiat <\/p>\n
applied, for the whoie body disability 1is,s”t-o beeVat’:’;25%}”~ e<\/p>\n
But the doctor has deposed that  disability is
\ntaken into consideration,’  dfivef drive the vehicle.\n<\/p>\n
axzwwi a do _     i
\nHe has told in exa,niir1at.i.o1ji~in+(:h\u00a7.ef “abe.iiit”‘ the nature of
\ndisability causedtito    ‘Wily he cannot do his
\nduty as driver  say other riorma} duty.\n<\/p>\n
Even the stiek. for walking and therefore<\/p>\n
considering tidei’u;1c’tioii\u00e91i\u00bb*disaihiIit.y if the doctor has deposed<\/p>\n
that  is 10(3’%i…tiisahi1ity to discharge the work by the<\/p>\n
 a_.1fid.ji:f_the same is taken into consideration by the<\/p>\n
Coiniiiis-siorie\ufb01fweiido not find it necessary to interfere with<\/p>\n
 the weiia feasotied order of the Commissioner. Accordingly<\/p>\n
  Neel  heid against the appellant.\n<\/p>\n
  ‘;So far as Point No.2 is concerned, in View of the<\/p>\n
  thidgrnent of the Apex Court in the case of Oriental Insurance<\/p>\n
{L}\/..\n<\/p>\n
 C()n1mi’ssi()I_1’e’1″..\n<\/p>\n
“t]AGv<\/p>\n
-7..\n<\/p>\n
Co. Ltd, Vs. Molid. .Nz’1s:ir repcirted in SCC 2009 371.7.<\/p>\n
clainiajit, is c:nt.it,1e(l to i1’1i.cresi at tlm rate of 7.5% p.\u00a3*si’,’.”‘\u00bbtf’1’0rn<\/p>\n
the (.late ofthe petit:i(m till \u00a31110 date of award and ai:;t**t_.?1\u00a2.”0f<\/p>\n
12% p.z;1., from the (‘late of 2-i.wa.r(i till. the (1_21t.r::_A’_:t’:.f: V’ <\/p>\n
A(:c0r(1i_r’1g;1y, we answer P()im.  <\/p>\n
\nappellant. ' l V\n\n9. In the result, the    The\n<\/pre>\n
q1.1aI’1t111I1 of c()mper1satioii’*–;iwa}f(l\u00a2{i Corrzmissioner is
\ncon\ufb01rmed. liowevfg’, V_.ir1t<=::ms't:–  (lommissioner<\/p>\n
is rcducecl l1o1_r_lit':g  "t.l;\u00a2 *r\u00a7:s;_)0ii1e;ie11tWNo.l. \u00ab claimant is<\/p>\n
entitled _v 0f'._W7;'5l'\/c) p.a., from the date of
\nthe 1)c:t'iti01i't:ill=tli\u20ac:'  and at the rate of 12%
\nfrom the. date  eiwzirfi tfil'IvAt'l.1C date of payment. Ac(:ord'i;r1g1y,
\n'-'lift-\u20ac"21rissi2vt;[r 5P()i4I"It_N().2\u00ab '15:-*.i\u00a7i'\u00e9tV'l},' in favour of the appellam.
\nI  'V  (.lep0sit" is ordered to he sent to the
\n'
\nSd\ufb02-\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n
Sd\ufb01\u00a7~
\nTudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Divisional Manager National … vs Kashilingam S\/O Ramaswamy on 20 September, 2010 Author: K.L.Manjunath & S.N.Satyanarayana –_;.. 1, IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE 20TH BAY or SEPTEMBER. u PRESENT THE HON’BLE MILJUSTICE AND THE I-ION’BLE MR.JUS’l’ICE’S,N.$AT1’_ANAT\u00a7;*\u00a7C’i?A1\u00a7A MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEEEL-1:\\I0,V8312\u00ab. 2CI%06 (WC) BETWEEN : E)ivisi()I1a1Man3.ger,,_ ‘ National I11s11r21I1Q,<3\u00ab'C_c)–;_ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-117025","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nDivisional Manager National ... vs Kashilingam S\/O Ramaswamy on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Divisional Manager National ... vs Kashilingam S\/O Ramaswamy on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-15T09:32:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Divisional Manager National … vs Kashilingam S\\\/O Ramaswamy on 20 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-15T09:32:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2\"},\"wordCount\":1236,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2\",\"name\":\"Divisional Manager National ... vs Kashilingam S\\\/O Ramaswamy on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-15T09:32:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Divisional Manager National … vs Kashilingam S\\\/O Ramaswamy on 20 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Divisional Manager National ... vs Kashilingam S\/O Ramaswamy on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Divisional Manager National ... vs Kashilingam S\/O Ramaswamy on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-15T09:32:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Divisional Manager National … vs Kashilingam S\/O Ramaswamy on 20 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-15T09:32:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2"},"wordCount":1236,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2","name":"Divisional Manager National ... vs Kashilingam S\/O Ramaswamy on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-15T09:32:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-manager-national-vs-kashilingam-so-ramaswamy-on-20-september-2010-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Divisional Manager National … vs Kashilingam S\/O Ramaswamy on 20 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117025","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=117025"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117025\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=117025"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=117025"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=117025"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}