{"id":117262,"date":"1954-05-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1954-05-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954"},"modified":"2015-10-13T12:35:41","modified_gmt":"2015-10-13T07:05:41","slug":"jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954","title":{"rendered":"Jagat Bandhu Ganguly vs State on 12 May, 1954"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Calcutta High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Jagat Bandhu Ganguly vs State on 12 May, 1954<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: AIR 1955 Cal 109, 1955 CriLJ 370, 58 CWN 913<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Guha<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: Guha<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p> Guha, J. <\/p>\n<p> 1. This is an application under Section 439, Criminal P. C. at the instance of Jagat Bandhu Ganguly who has been committed by a Magistrate of Alipore to the Court of Session for taking his trial under Section 408\/109, I. P. C. Kanai Lal Mitra who was co-accused with him has also been committed to the Court of Session to take his trial under Sections 408, 467 and 477A, I. P. C. The present petitioner before this Court is Jagat Bandhu Ganguly alone and the prayer made on his behalf is that the order of commitment in so far as he is concerned should be quashed.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. In order to appreciate the grounds upon which the prayer for quashing of commitment is based it is necessary to refer to a few facts. Jagat Bandhu Ganguly was previously put upon his trial before the same Magistrate under Section 136, Calcutta Port Act (Bengal Act III of 1890). That case ended in an order of acquittal under Section 258, Criminal P. C. on 31-10-53. It was alleged in that trial that the present petitioner had dishonestly accepted for himself gratification in the shape of certain raw materials namely M. S. Rods from a firm of contractors named N. Banduri &amp; Brothers as a reward for showing favour to the said firm in the exercise of his official function. In acquitting the present petitioner in that case the learned Magistrate made certain observations which, it is contended now on behalf of the petitioner, stand in the way of the trial of the petitioner on a charge under Section 408\/109, I. P. C.\n<\/p>\n<p>It has been contended that the learned Magistrate while acquitting the petitioner found in clear terms that it has neither been proved that the accused, namely the present petitioner,<\/p>\n<p>showed any favour to Prafulla Banduri in the matter of securing the order for the firm of Prafulla Banduri or in the matter of fixing the wastage rate or in issuing sub-quota certificate or issuing excess raw materials from the Stores as alleged by the prosecution, nor was it proved that the accused, namely the present petitioner, accepted any iron rod as illegal gratification for the favour shown to Prafulla Banduri as alleged. It is argued on behalf of the petitioner that in the face of these findings of the learned Magistrate a fresh trial of the petitioner under Section 408\/ 109, I. P. C. is not permissible.\n<\/p>\n<p>In this connection reliance has been placed upon a recent Bench decision of this Court in the case of &#8212; &#8216;Manikchand Agarwalla v. The State&#8217;,  (A). I happened to be a member of that Bench and in that case the principles laid down by the Judicial Committee in the case of &#8212; &#8216;Samba Sivam v. Public Prosecutor, Federation of Malaya&#8217;, 54 Cal WN 695 (PC) (B) have been followed. It is argued on behalf of the petitioner that in view of what was held in &#8216;Manikchand Agarwalla&#8217;s case (A)&#8217; the present commitment order directing the petitioner to stand his trial in the Court of Session under Section 408\/109, I. P. C. is bad.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.  In &#8216;Samba Sivam&#8217;s case  (B)&#8217; it was held that the verdict   of acquittal   on  the   munition charge was   admissible   in  the   trial  under   the fire  arms  charge  though  it  was not  conclusive. The facts were   somewhat  different   in   &#8216;Manikchand Agarwalla&#8217;s case  (A)&#8217; where it was pointed out   by the learned   Chief Justice   that the previous order of acquittal was in the particular circumstances   of   that case   all   but   conclusive. Each case   has, therefore,   to be decided   on its own facts. So far as the present case is concerned,  the  previous  acquittal  order  was  passed  by the   same   Magistrate    after   the     commitment order had  been  made.     Again,  certain  observations made by the learned Magistrate in his order of acquittal   on the   charges Under Section   136,   Calcutta Port Act, have to be borne in mind. The following passage of the judgment is pertinent:\n<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;I have perused the evidence, both oral and documentary, and I must at the very outset remark that I shall confine my observations to the charges under Section 136 of Act III of 1890 solely because the accused -is under orders of trial before the Sessions Court in connection with alleged delivery of excess raw materials from the Port Commissioners&#8217; Stores. Regarding this part of the story I find that I need not come to any conclusion, and hence I refrain from doing so.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Now, so far as the present trial Is concerned, the allegation of delivery of excess raw materials is the very basis of the present commitment proceedings and as regards this allegation the learned  Magistrate  expressly refrain  from  coming  to any conclusion In his previous judgment. It may be that in view of the order of acquittal it will not be open to the prosecution to take any step to challenge it in the impending Sessions trial, but that does not necessarily mean that the prosecution  cannot   be  permitted   to  establish   the charge of criminal breach of trust or abetment thereof by other evidence. If and when the prosecution   seeks at   the Sessions   trial to adduce evidence which is not   permissible   according to law, it will be for the accused to raise objection at the appropriate time to the reception of such evidence   and the   trial   Judge   will decide   then how much   of the   evidence is   admissible, but there  is   no  reason   why  the  order  of   commitment of the petitioner under Section 408\/109, I. P. C. should be quashed.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.  In the circumstances, therefore, this application for quashing the commitment proceedings must fail. The Rule is discharged accordingly.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Calcutta High Court Jagat Bandhu Ganguly vs State on 12 May, 1954 Equivalent citations: AIR 1955 Cal 109, 1955 CriLJ 370, 58 CWN 913 Author: Guha Bench: Guha ORDER Guha, J. 1. This is an application under Section 439, Criminal P. C. at the instance of Jagat Bandhu Ganguly who has been committed by a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[22,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-117262","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-calcutta-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Jagat Bandhu Ganguly vs State on 12 May, 1954 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jagat Bandhu Ganguly vs State on 12 May, 1954 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1954-05-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-13T07:05:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Jagat Bandhu Ganguly vs State on 12 May, 1954\",\"datePublished\":\"1954-05-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-13T07:05:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954\"},\"wordCount\":955,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Calcutta High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954\",\"name\":\"Jagat Bandhu Ganguly vs State on 12 May, 1954 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1954-05-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-13T07:05:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jagat Bandhu Ganguly vs State on 12 May, 1954\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jagat Bandhu Ganguly vs State on 12 May, 1954 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jagat Bandhu Ganguly vs State on 12 May, 1954 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1954-05-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-13T07:05:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Jagat Bandhu Ganguly vs State on 12 May, 1954","datePublished":"1954-05-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-13T07:05:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954"},"wordCount":955,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Calcutta High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954","name":"Jagat Bandhu Ganguly vs State on 12 May, 1954 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1954-05-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-13T07:05:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagat-bandhu-ganguly-vs-state-on-12-may-1954#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jagat Bandhu Ganguly vs State on 12 May, 1954"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117262","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=117262"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117262\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=117262"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=117262"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=117262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}