{"id":117900,"date":"2010-10-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010"},"modified":"2018-01-25T21:47:43","modified_gmt":"2018-01-25T16:17:43","slug":"state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"State Of Karnataka vs Panjada S Chinnappa on 5 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State Of Karnataka vs Panjada S Chinnappa on 5 October, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.Sreedhar Rao B.V.Pinto<\/div>\n<pre>I\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATEE} THIS THE 0521: DAY OF' ocroem 2015.\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE .'\u00a3~iON'BLE MR JUSTICE ;.\u00ab:~sR.3Et:\u00a7I'\u00a71}5x '11&gt;\"T:'-\u00e9m'   \n\nANE) M .  \nTHE HONTSLE MR;;fU$lCE'BgV\".}?IN'i'Cr :\"\"~ww \n\nCRIMINAL APPEAL oi? \n\nBETWEEN :\n\nSTATE op,' ;:ARNA':\u00a7A;\u00a7A\u00a7j',.:: , ~  5\nBY THE SUQJNSPECPOR Q9, ' \npoucs,' MAI3~!-HERE-.RUR1\u00a7L_  A\n\nr&gt;0L1c1&gt;:,s*\u00a3fAf:f:o1~':.'   ..\n\n(E51 Si\u00e9ilH.;'S.Q\ufb01\ufb01N\u00a7\u00a7R;\u00a7MOL\u00a5I\u00a7, SPP).\n\n1.<\/pre>\n<p> , ._1F5PLNJADAV&#8217;S.w\u20acf:}\u00a7IINDJAPPA,\n<\/p>\n<p>-.,_@ ANnA;AH, S\/&#8217;USUBBAIAH,<\/p>\n<p>  AGED 46\u00abYEARS,<\/p>\n<p> _ &#8216;AGi2;V{:ULTUg1s&#8217;r,<br \/>\n._  ._MAaENAn*v1LLAGE,<br \/>\nA  mpgxgax TALUK.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; V  2. KALERAMMANA THAMMAEAH,<\/p>\n<p>..  s\/0- MANDANNA,<br \/>\n&#8221; . &#8220;AGED &#8220;22 YEARS,<br \/>\n&#8216; FJEADENAD VILLAGE,<br \/>\nMADIKERI TALUK.  RESPONEENTS.\n<\/p>\n<p>(BY SRI.SHAN&#8217;I&#8217;HARADDY S MULIMANI, ADV)<\/p>\n<p>v.\n<\/p>\n<p>\/f<\/p>\n<p>&#8230; APPELLANT.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><br \/>\nproduced M03. 1 to 11. The defence of the accused was one<br \/>\nof total denial and they had examined. DWS. I to 3 and got<br \/>\nmarked Ex\ufb02-1 to 913. However, after heaxing the<\/p>\n<p>prosecution and the defence, the learned Sessions.[&#8216;\u00a7\u00a72;;dge<\/p>\n<p>has held that the prosecution. has not  <\/p>\n<p>beyond zeasonable doubt and acquitted both   <\/p>\n<p>the o\ufb01ences for which they stood charged. &#8221; <\/p>\n<p>\nThe State is in appeal. V<\/p>\n<p>5. PW-1 is the     the&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>deceased. He has givers,&#8217; corapiaiiiieiz 14.i.96.  that<br \/>\non 13.1.96 at about  A-1 came near<\/p>\n<p>their house hQI;1in.g    g&#8217; embhakam. It is<\/p>\n<p>stated in the -&#8216;threatened him if<br \/>\nPrabhakar is no&#8217;t aes:\u00a7\u00e9j1a!\u00a71e&#8211;  ad} of them. On that<br \/>\nnextvday, i.e.;oi1 14.   a.m., when his father was<\/p>\n<p>goieg   * Manda] Wadhan by name<\/p>\n<p> Nages\ufb01;   also accompanied him, when<\/p>\n<p>TV  reachegl me  ca\ufb01ed &#8216;Eiebaxe bane&#8217; in Madhe<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   in front of them holding a gun. At that<\/p>\n<p>V 4\ufb01:.-\ufb01e, :TShubhB1{8I&#8217; was going fvom the iand side. On<\/p>\n<p>   father of the eompIaman&#8217; t, A-1 asked him to<\/p>\n<p> son. He ftirther stated that if he does not show his<\/p>\n<p>v-.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<p>6. PW-2 is Monnappa. He is a distant relative 9f the<\/p>\n<p>deceased who has siwcd E:-:.P~2 inquest ..<\/p>\n<p>conducted on the dead body of the deceased&#8217;  ~<\/p>\n<p>PW-3 Chondamma is the wife of &#8221; &#8221; V<\/p>\n<p>She has stated that immediately an 11t\u00a7arie;1g\u00ab&#8217;ee\u00bb1;&#8217;11e <\/p>\n<p>gun shot, she went to the seeI&#8221;xe_V of   ;;zt,\\\u00a7th;at  ;<\/p>\n<p>time, her husband had fallen  xygit\ufb01   on the<br \/>\nlower part of the  _ Sine   \u00e9hubhakar<br \/>\ninformed her that_ A~1 %1;.as;&#8217;e:ee_  ea her husband.<br \/>\nThereafter,  tee  to the hospital.<\/p>\n<p>7.   &#8220;&#8216;aei1,ef\u00a71ef\u00bbeye witness who has<br \/>\nalso   9\u00a3e\u00a7&#8217;ence at about 6.30 a.m.,<br \/>\nA-1 has  s}.;:\u00bb.oi; e  by means of gun MO~1.<\/p>\n<p>Immediatel\ufb02  -3 reached the spot , so also<\/p>\n<p>  **** &#8220;He has further stated that he is a<\/p>\n<p>   :E }{.~&#8221;P-3 mahazar under which empty cartridge<\/p>\n<p>z.iJ3:i&#8221;&#8216;i$rac1e &#8216;V&#8217;\u00a3\u00a7\u00a7e.fe seizeti by the police. He has identi\ufb01eti the<\/p>\n<p> weapoteeeineed by Av} and the articles M032 to 5.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; *  VT   It is in his evidence that when the accused tried in<\/p>\n<p>  at the deceased he came in fmnt of the deceased and<\/p>\n<p>u Wfequested A-1 not to shoot at the deceased. However,<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">7<\/span><br \/>\nwhen he came away from the front side of the <\/p>\n<p>A-1 shot at the deceased Ganapathy.<\/p>\n<p>9. PW&#8211;5 Kuttappa has also   &#8216;Of _ <\/p>\n<p>occurrence immediately after ttxe \u00a71cide1;t&#8217;1  <\/p>\n<p>informed by PW~4 Shubhaltzar  AK-\u00abI   <\/p>\n<p>gun shot at (Franapathy. Thefeafiser, he.;s\u00a7ssi\u00a7\u00a7tmk&#8217;v: &#8216;Htiiem in &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>ii\ufb01ing the injumd to the (.&#8217;!&#8217;]f&#8217;iVV&#8217;i&#8221;t  found<br \/>\nthe injured has succunztbed <\/p>\n<p>10.   the scene of<br \/>\noffence   He has also stated<br \/>\nthat   \ufb01red gun shot<br \/>\nand aelge\u00e9   Thema\ufb01er the deceased was<br \/>\nshifted mg  At  4&#8242; V<\/p>\n<p>..  11;   has also reached the scene of o\ufb01imce<\/p>\n<p>.A after the incident. He has stated that the<\/p>\n<p> inj&#8217;i1;ec{&#8220;&#8216;s\u00a7}4\u00a7:e__ \u00e9gp\u00e9alaug and told that A&#8212;1 Chinnappa am.-1<\/p>\n<p> shzitt &#8216;v&#8221;1;11eteai&#8217;!:er, the in\ufb01ured Ganapathy was shifted<\/p>\n<p>   toveltdadikexi hospital.\n<\/p>\n<p>tt    PW&#8211;~8, PW&#8211;9 and PW-10 have turned hostile and they<\/p>\n<p>M    ttave not supported the case of the prosecution.<\/p>\n<p>12. PW-11 is the photographer who has wken the<\/p>\n<p>photos of the deadbody of Ganapathy. PW-12 Dr.<\/p>\n<p>7*<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">9<\/span><br \/>\nthe voluntary statement, A-1 led PW-17 and pachayathdars<br \/>\nto Marienadu and in the pmscncc of panchayathdars he<\/p>\n<p>has seized the: gun as shown by Avl as per the mahazar<\/p>\n<p>Ex. P~4. Thereafter, gun was subjected to <\/p>\n<p>the experts and after the arrest of A\u00bb2 and sub;s$\u00a7:5&amp;111.*:,z:i:t1_i&#8217;,i?;&#8217;i\u00e9.i;i:&#8217;i <\/p>\n<p>completion of invcstigatiozi and alsp &#8220;\u00a3331.  <\/p>\n<p>experfs mport, he handed over  <\/p>\n<p>his successor. P&#8217;W&#8211; 18    Asst. * L&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Director, FSL, Bangalqrc. xHex:A&#8217;I1as&#8221;&#8211;~\u00a7tat&lt;:\u00a3ti&quot;  on the<\/p>\n<p>request of the police, &#039;hbs  gun and has<\/p>\n<p>stated that th\u00a2_&#039;pr_.csen.\u00e9\u00e9&quot;of:&quot;:  bf&#039; smokeless gun<\/p>\n<p>powder residuzigwas  of SBBL (Single<br \/>\nBarrel Bullet    $30. It) and it bears the<br \/>\nsigns of diggiiaxgc, hilt&#039;  bpiiiioiii is possible regarding the<\/p>\n<p>actiiial   He has. further stated that he<\/p>\n<p>zihas  V b\u00e9ixfi\ufb01dges from the laboratory and<\/p>\n<p>[V *v.&#039;:_&#039;$AA\u00a5.&#039;itvIf&#039;V(.5;&quot;3SSf1}1A1&#039;}*&#039;\u00ab_&#039; tesfE:ecI_vn1fh\u00e9 SBBL gun and has observed that the<\/p>\n<p> is; in&#039; Working condition. He has further given<\/p>\n<p> iev:ae\u00a7\u00a2g imi\u00e9ic the court that he has examincti the articles<\/p>\n<p> of; worn by the deceased and also the Led pellets of<\/p>\n<p> cartridge and opined that the said pellet could<\/p>\n<p>h\u00e9ive been \ufb01red by smooth bore \ufb01n: arm like M04. It is<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">10<\/span><\/p>\n<p>further stated that the scorching, biackening and <\/p>\n<p>arotmd on the Event side of the swcatm: in <\/p>\n<p>and the diameter of dispersicm of pellets o:1&#8217;_\u00a7iia$.  K  <\/p>\n<p>of the sweater approximately _j  * \u00ab<\/p>\n<p>the gun. However, he has stated f4haAt &#8216;i_t is  <\/p>\n<p>furn.1&#8217;sh as towhcthcr the  Vyge  has V<\/p>\n<p>been \ufb01red through th\u00a2\u00bb..V_$33L&#8221;&#8216;gu;1 Sag-1. &#8216;Se  issued<br \/>\ncezti\ufb01cate and has   \ufb01ne court during<br \/>\nhis    &#8221;  ._  <\/p>\n<p>15.     ::3_1:as_  that she has<br \/>\nconducttzdv   the dead body of<br \/>\n :o13.   \ufb01gs stattxi that 40 small size<\/p>\n<p>circle hol\u00e9s\u00e9 Wcr\u00e9&#8217;  511 the skm&#8217; of the deceased and<\/p>\n<p> _ she }takenV&#8221;out\ufb01:;I1o&amp;I:w\u00ab3 than 40 pellets from the deadbody<\/p>\n<p> (1}f\u00abt.&#8217;1:V1c:  from the various parts of the stomach viz.,<\/p>\n<p>  the skin, 5 pciicts from lower part of<\/p>\n<p>ab&amp;om,e:\u00a7.; zrpeuets from right thigh. 5 pellets Emm left thigh<\/p>\n<p>  auxin a1$&lt;&#039;)\u00a2 pellets from other parts of the stomach and 12<\/p>\n<p>   in around the small intestine. She has further<\/p>\n<p>   that MO-1 gun could cause the said injuries and<\/p>\n<p>the death is due to gun shat.\n<\/p>\n<p>5-\u00bb.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">15<\/span><br \/>\ndeceased and themfcme, we hoid such an act has been done<br \/>\nby Ad by sudden pmvocation. Therefore, the o\ufb01ence<br \/>\nConitmitted by Accused No.1 courses Within Sec.304&#8211;i <\/p>\n<p>However, on the re-ap\u00a7mciation of evidence on <\/p>\n<p>do not \ufb01nd any material against A4 for  .<\/p>\n<p>either for the offence under the    &#8221; &#8216;V <\/p>\n<p>the Arms Act.The:vefo1e, his  <\/p>\n<p>interference. _ .\n<\/p>\n<p>In the result, the fo11owing:c:&#8217;der;\\&#8211; _<\/p>\n<p>22. The appeal&#8217;   1;; Ttdtewnoxder of<br \/>\nacquittal passed_agaias_t..    jvvitil is convicted<\/p>\n<p>for    IPC and sentenced to<br \/>\nu11dergc&#8217;ii_gcrousV.Vi.i:t\u00a7)1+ie}cz1:i:rsei1t for 5 years and to pay a \ufb01ne<\/p>\n<p>of  dhefaiiltftlndergo simpie imprisonment for<\/p>\n<p>. \u00ab.  5  He is  convicted for the o\ufb01ence under Sec<\/p>\n<p>   = Anus Act and sentenced to under to<\/p>\n<p>1ig94&#8217;rVcu$.iIi1j\u00a7_rieonment for one year. 330th sentences to run<\/p>\n<p> concm\ufb01en\ufb02y. The period of sentence undergone by A-1 as<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;id  triai prisoner is gven set off lmdr:-.1&#8242; Sec.428 Cr.P.C.<\/p>\n<p> directed to smmnder before the Trial Court to serve the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;balance sentence and on his failure, the Trial Court is<\/p>\n<p>directed to execute the sentence imposed on accused No. 1.<\/p>\n<p>(.&#8221;)$g<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">16<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The appeal against A-2 is dismissed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court State Of Karnataka vs Panjada S Chinnappa on 5 October, 2010 Author: K.Sreedhar Rao B.V.Pinto I IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATEE} THIS THE 0521: DAY OF&#8217; ocroem 2015. PRESENT THE .&#8217;\u00a3~iON&#8217;BLE MR JUSTICE ;.\u00ab:~sR.3Et:\u00a7I&#8217;\u00a71}5x &#8217;11&gt;&#8221;T:&#8217;-\u00e9m&#8217; ANE) M . THE HONTSLE MR;;fU$lCE&#8217;BgV&#8221;.}?IN&#8217;i&#8217;Cr :&#8221;&#8221;~ww CRIMINAL APPEAL oi? BETWEEN : STATE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-117900","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State Of Karnataka vs Panjada S Chinnappa on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of Karnataka vs Panjada S Chinnappa on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-25T16:17:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of Karnataka vs Panjada S Chinnappa on 5 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-25T16:17:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1197,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010\",\"name\":\"State Of Karnataka vs Panjada S Chinnappa on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-25T16:17:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of Karnataka vs Panjada S Chinnappa on 5 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of Karnataka vs Panjada S Chinnappa on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of Karnataka vs Panjada S Chinnappa on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-25T16:17:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of Karnataka vs Panjada S Chinnappa on 5 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-25T16:17:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010"},"wordCount":1197,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010","name":"State Of Karnataka vs Panjada S Chinnappa on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-25T16:17:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-panjada-s-chinnappa-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of Karnataka vs Panjada S Chinnappa on 5 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117900","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=117900"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117900\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=117900"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=117900"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=117900"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}