{"id":11805,"date":"2008-09-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008"},"modified":"2017-08-08T01:12:12","modified_gmt":"2017-08-07T19:42:12","slug":"g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"G M Umadevi W\/O Lt B C Shivaram vs V Anand S\/O Venkataramaiah on 20 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
G M Umadevi W\/O Lt B C Shivaram vs V Anand S\/O Venkataramaiah on 20 September, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: V.Gopalagowda & K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
\ufb01etween:<\/p>\n
In THE HIGH center or KARIIATAKA AT BA!_\u00a7\u00a3’zAL\u20ac\u00a2-    .<\/p>\n
Dated: 20″‘ day of Scpt\ufb01mher    u  2<\/p>\n
Present ,  *
\nmm aoarnm m.wm1cm_ v.eem1.A _
\naoumm m.maT2\u00a7f.E._
\n\u00a7,._r_f._4 No.  <\/p>\n
1  . x <\/p>\n
WV\/1QWLz=afE B,<::s\u00a7;ivARp.\u00a7\u00a7A:vw <\/p>\n
2 B,,'s.1iL.LNo.2 M1N’0’R.. REPR. BY
\nNATURAL’ GUARDIAN MOTHER
\n4;jAF’PL.No.”1.__ ‘
\nv.’:__”~B;QTEi,_ARE R ‘vA–N’o.630,
\n Ui\u00e9swaxgs ‘A’ MAIN ROAD
\n ” ~ . am \ufb02wcix, JAYANAGAR
\n ‘BAN{}A1.g0RE~56o 082 ….APPELLAN’I’S<\/p>\n
A  (By ‘a.\u00a7;;\u00a7.sREEN1vAsA1AH–AI)V)<\/p>\n
     7v.ANAND<\/p>\n
s\/0 VANKATARAMAIAH
\nswam MAHATHMA TEMPLE ROAD
\nWHITEFIELD<\/p>\n
BANGALORE —— 560 066<\/p>\n
2 THE MANAGER
\nM] S. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD
\n# 67′] E, 13″ FLOOR, REDDY COMPLEX
\nWHITEFIELD ROAD<\/p>\n
.’    ”\n<\/p>\n
MAHADEVAPURA POST<\/p>\n
BANGALORE – 550 043  <\/p>\n
(BY SR1 O.MAI-IESH–ADV FOR R2}. jg   –<\/p>\n
–oOo–[<\/p>\n
M.I3′.A is am under Section ‘i:7i:=-3(1) o\u00a3cth\u00e9i1x&.V A\u00a2t f c<\/p>\n
against the Jucigacnt and   “1’\/’$3001<\/p>\n
passed by the MACT, BaI1g’&!<_ire_V city—   No.
\n2274\/2002. ,Z _i_~.'\u00bbc *\u00bb ~<\/p>\n
This M.F.A cominjgi cf: ff\u00a7r:iica3?ii1:\u00a7,"?I'V_'s3zci'oI'c the Court
\nthis day, upon  J delivered<\/p>\n
the foiiowinggv '  ._ .L
\n c, fact  the quantum of
\ncompeccai\ufb01c\ufb01 *~ Motor Accidents Claims<\/p>\n
Tribunal, :Baxigal6re."-  M.V.C No.4934\/2001 the<\/p>\n
  have  this appeal sec]-dug<\/p>\n
  The claimants \ufb01led claim petition under<\/p>\n
'V V'   166 of Motor Vehicles Act claim' ing<\/p>\n
  for the death of B.C.Shivara.m. The first<\/p>\n
 "claimant is the wife and sccond claimant is the minor<\/p>\n
son of deceased I–3.C.Shivaram. The accident in<\/p>\n
k<\/p>\n
question and the death of the deceased in <\/p>\n
accident are not disputed.<\/p>\n
3. It is undisputed that theVdeceased”v:ajs ‘4 ” = <\/p>\n
as Police Constable in Police   <\/p>\n
date of his death, his as  <\/p>\n
Certi\ufb01cate Ex.P-7 was  He   45
\nyears. The   the loss of
\ndependency has:’taken.A’oi11\u00a7.’:;t}ie-\ufb01iet  Rs. 3786\/ -.<\/p>\n
It is     loss of<\/p>\n
   gross salary as on the
\ndate of  ”taken into consideration and<\/p>\n
the only   can be allowed are the<\/p>\n
 ‘statutoi-‘nyi dedactioiis A such as Income Tax, Professional<\/p>\n
 \u00abpa. V 1n..s;;;te,t’cfitius, the Tribunal has proceeded to take<\/p>\n
on.1y~..  Thus, the Tribunal has committed<\/p>\n
   error whiie computing the loss of dependency.<\/p>\n
dd    It is also contended by the learned counsel for<\/p>\n
‘T  ”  claimants that the deceased was aged 45 years and<\/p>\n
he had another 13 years of service, therefore, he would<\/p>\n
b<\/p>\n
have earned one or two promotions <\/p>\n
superannuation and also higher salary  <\/p>\n
service on account of annual  K V’<\/p>\n
pay revisions. Therefore, the ineemehfoivr 1 ._<\/p>\n
computing Ioss of dependeneji”..shoiiid__ “higher ” L’<\/p>\n
than what is mentionedzirl ;– “-\u00bb<\/p>\n
5. Learned eou.n’se_1* ~fo::_   remained
\nabsent. Therefofevg of the matter.
\n6; ”  c:ef1sit1efebie”_’fo1*ee in the contentions
\nof for  The Apex Court<\/p>\n
in the (}aVVV’;w Q of Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.<\/p>\n
  .85 o:s;rem~:ea in 200314) s.c.e 162 in<\/p>\n
h’ V  thus: –\n<\/p>\n
. T._”’14. The amount of compensation<\/p>\n
— indisputably should be determined having<\/p>\n
*~ retgard to the pecuniary loss caused to the<\/p>\n
;  dependents by reason of the death of the<\/p>\n
 victim. It was necessary to consider the<\/p>\n
A earnings of the deceased at the mac of the<\/p>\n
accident. Of course, further (sic~:future)<\/p>\n
prospect is not out of bound for such<\/p>\n
consideration. But the same should be
\nfounded on some legal principle.”<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
The said decision squarely applies to this “A4<\/p>\n
Having regard to the fact that the    <\/p>\n
years of service he would have  ai:4A1e\u00a73st’V:vone or <\/p>\n
two promotions. He would heve  <\/p>\n
increments, pay revisions’
\nTherefore, in addition i.oV_i11e.<gi'o'ss:' \ufb01aemissed in
\nEx.P–7, some more   tio  to reckon
\nhis average   loss of
\ndependency;  .'ic:':oii.sideration all these
\nfactorsg Z  _tO  that the average
\nmommy' i_Iicr:)II1e… should be taken at<\/p>\n
Rs."1jD,'GQO\/-x isaniiual income should be taken<\/p>\n
 3as %ies.ii,[2o\u00a2,eoo\/–. If one–third of this is deducted<\/p>\n
  expenses, the balance works–out<\/p>\n
 _ to I7\u00a5s.8\u20ac):,\u20ac)()i"}\/–.<\/p>\n
 A. , 4_ 7;" "Having regard to the age of the deceased, the<\/p>\n
   multiplier applicable would be 13 which is<\/p>\n
T   applied by the Tribunal. In the light of this<\/p>\n
the total loss of dependency comes to Rs. 10,4(),()()O\/ .<\/p>\n
In addition to this, the claimants are alse entitled to<\/p>\n
&<\/p>\n
   Ordered by the Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n
Rs.40,000\/– under conventional heads. Thu$v,~.,V_tI\u00a7:e*<\/p>\n
claimants are entitled to a total [jef  <\/p>\n
Rs.10,80,00{)\/– as against Rs.6,57.,4_Q8\/   V<\/p>\n
the appeal deserves to be allowed”-\u00ab  ~ <\/p>\n
3. Accordingly, the
\nthe compensation to V   ‘interiast at
\n6% per annum from   payment.\n<\/p>\n
The  enhanced
\n  within eight<\/p>\n
weeks’; A’ of a copy of this
\njudgmerm   and disbursement of<\/p>\n
enhagrlced comf\u00e9evhsation shall be in the same<\/p>\n
Sdl-2″\n<\/p>\n
Iudqe<\/p>\n
Sd]-9<\/p>\n
 A  MP-bpy4108 hag’;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court G M Umadevi W\/O Lt B C Shivaram vs V Anand S\/O Venkataramaiah on 20 September, 2008 Author: V.Gopalagowda & K.N.Keshavanarayana \ufb01etween: In THE HIGH center or KARIIATAKA AT BA!_\u00a7\u00a3’zAL\u20ac\u00a2- . Dated: 20″‘ day of Scpt\ufb01mher u 2 Present , * mm aoarnm m.wm1cm_ v.eem1.A _ aoumm m.maT2\u00a7f.E._ \u00a7,._r_f._4 No. 1 . […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11805","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nG M Umadevi W\/O Lt B C Shivaram vs V Anand S\/O Venkataramaiah on 20 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"G M Umadevi W\/O Lt B C Shivaram vs V Anand S\/O Venkataramaiah on 20 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-07T19:42:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"G M Umadevi W\\\/O Lt B C Shivaram vs V Anand S\\\/O Venkataramaiah on 20 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-07T19:42:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":837,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008\",\"name\":\"G M Umadevi W\\\/O Lt B C Shivaram vs V Anand S\\\/O Venkataramaiah on 20 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-07T19:42:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"G M Umadevi W\\\/O Lt B C Shivaram vs V Anand S\\\/O Venkataramaiah on 20 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"G M Umadevi W\/O Lt B C Shivaram vs V Anand S\/O Venkataramaiah on 20 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"G M Umadevi W\/O Lt B C Shivaram vs V Anand S\/O Venkataramaiah on 20 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-07T19:42:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"G M Umadevi W\/O Lt B C Shivaram vs V Anand S\/O Venkataramaiah on 20 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-07T19:42:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008"},"wordCount":837,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008","name":"G M Umadevi W\/O Lt B C Shivaram vs V Anand S\/O Venkataramaiah on 20 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-07T19:42:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-umadevi-wo-lt-b-c-shivaram-vs-v-anand-so-venkataramaiah-on-20-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"G M Umadevi W\/O Lt B C Shivaram vs V Anand S\/O Venkataramaiah on 20 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11805","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11805"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11805\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11805"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11805"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11805"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}