{"id":118190,"date":"2006-12-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-12-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006"},"modified":"2018-02-04T00:09:02","modified_gmt":"2018-02-03T18:39:02","slug":"k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006","title":{"rendered":"K.P.Krishnankutty vs The Joint Registrar Of &#8230; on 15 December, 2006"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">K.P.Krishnankutty vs The Joint Registrar Of &#8230; on 15 December, 2006<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C) No. 33288 of 2006(K)\n\n\n1. K.P.KRISHNANKUTTY,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. K.P.GANGADHARAN,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE NEDIYANGA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.C.JAMES\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice J.M.JAMES\n\n Dated :15\/12\/2006\n\n O R D E R\n                           J.M.JAMES, J.\n\n                             -------------------\n\n                        W.P.(C). 33288\/2006\n\n                            --------------------\n\n            Dated this  the 15th day of December, 2006\n\n\n                             JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>              The   writ   petitioners   are   the   employees   of   the<\/p>\n<p>second respondent, bank.   There were allegations of mis-<\/p>\n<p>appropriation and mis-conduct, during their service.  They<\/p>\n<p>were   proceeded   against,   as   per   the   service   rules.     The<\/p>\n<p>allegations   made   against   them   were   found   to   be   proved.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore,   the   punishment,     as   prescribed   under   the<\/p>\n<p>Kerala       Co-operative Societies Rules, 1969, in short &#8216;the<\/p>\n<p>Rules&#8217;, had been imposed.  However, a vigilance  case had<\/p>\n<p>been registered   against  three  persons,  including   the  writ<\/p>\n<p>petitioners   herein.     The   Vigilance   and   Anti   corruption<\/p>\n<p>Bureau   had   continued   with   the   investigation.               On<\/p>\n<p>collection of the materials,   F.I.R   had been lodged under<\/p>\n<p>Sections   13(2)   and   13(1)(c)   of   the   Prevention   of<\/p>\n<p>Corruption   Act,   1984,   and   also   under   Sections   109,   465,<\/p>\n<p>467, 468, 471, 477A, 201 and 120B of IPC.<\/p>\n<p>      2.      On   receiving   the   information   from   Vigilance<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).33288\/2006<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>and   Anti   Corruption   Bureau,   the   first   respondent,     the<\/p>\n<p>Joint   Registrar   of   Co-operative   Societies,   through   his<\/p>\n<p>communication   dated   28.11.2006,   had   addressed   the<\/p>\n<p>second   respondent   to   place   the   writ   petitioners   under<\/p>\n<p>suspension,  as their continuance in service would affect<\/p>\n<p>the further investigation of the criminal case.<\/p>\n<p>      3.     Basing   on   the   communication   of   the   first<\/p>\n<p>respondent,  the second respondent issued a show cause<\/p>\n<p>notice   to   the   writ   petitioners,   directing   them   to   show<\/p>\n<p>cause   why   they   should   not   be   suspended   from   service.<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly,   both   the   writ   petitioners   had   filed   their<\/p>\n<p>replies.     The   same   are   thus   under   consideration   of   the<\/p>\n<p>second   respondent.     While   so,   the   petitioners   came   up<\/p>\n<p>before   this   Court,   praying   that,   as   a   domestic   enquiry<\/p>\n<p>had   already   been   completed   and   penalties   imposed,<\/p>\n<p>according   to   the   Rules,     there   should   not   be   a   further<\/p>\n<p>suspension,  which would affect their very existence and<\/p>\n<p>their family members also would be put into difficulties.<\/p>\n<p>      4.     The   learned   counsel   for   the   writ   petitioners<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).33288\/2006<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>submitted, relying on  <a href=\"\/doc\/138105614\/\">Muhammed Kutty  v.  Secretary<\/a><\/p>\n<p>to Government (2002  (1)  KLT  880), to emphasis the<\/p>\n<p>point   that   the   Joint   Registrar   has   got   no   authority   to<\/p>\n<p>direct   the   second   respondent,   bank,   to   suspend   their<\/p>\n<p>employees.     The   counsel   also   relied   on    <a href=\"\/doc\/1017538\/\">Gopinathan<\/p>\n<p>Nair  v.  Registrar of Co-operative Societies<\/a>   (1978<\/p>\n<p>KLT  392) to argue that,  discretion has to be exercised<\/p>\n<p>by   an   authority   invested   with     such   discretion   and   law<\/p>\n<p>has to be exercised uninfluenced by the directions of any<\/p>\n<p>extraneous authority.   The counsel, therefore, submitted<\/p>\n<p>that   the   first   respondent   had   got   no   authority   to   direct<\/p>\n<p>the second respondent to suspend the writ petitioners.<\/p>\n<p>      5.     The learned Government Pleader, on the other<\/p>\n<p>hand,   submits   relying   on  <a href=\"\/doc\/58259\/\">State   of   Rajasthan     v.<\/p>\n<p>B.K.Meena   and   Others<\/a>     (1996    (6)     SCC       417)   to<\/p>\n<p>argue   that     &#8220;disciplinary   proceedings   are   meant   not<\/p>\n<p>really to punish the guilty, but to keep the administrative<\/p>\n<p>machinery unsullied by getting rid of bad elements&#8221;.  On<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).33288\/2006<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the other hand,  criminal proceedings are initiated to see<\/p>\n<p>whether   the   accused   had   committed   any   offence   as<\/p>\n<p>alleged   against   them.     The   Government   Pleader   also<\/p>\n<p>placed   reliance  on    <a href=\"\/doc\/1686371\/\">Depot   Manager,   A.P.   State   Road<\/p>\n<p>Transport   Corporation     v.     Mohd.   Yousuf     Miya<\/a><\/p>\n<p>(1997   (2)     SCC     699)  to   reiterate   the   point   that   the<\/p>\n<p>purpose of departmental enquiry and of  prosecution are<\/p>\n<p>too   different   and   distinct   aspects.          The   criminal<\/p>\n<p>prosecution is lodged for an offence, for the violation of a<\/p>\n<p>duty,   which   the   offender   owes   to   the   society.<\/p>\n<p>Departmental   enquiry   is   to   maintain   discipline   in   the<\/p>\n<p>service   and   efficiency   of   public   service.     Both   the<\/p>\n<p>proceedings are distinct and different.<\/p>\n<p>      6.     The   above   legal   principles   clearly   show   that<\/p>\n<p>there   can   be   criminal   proceedings   as   well   as<\/p>\n<p>departmental enquiries.  In the case at hand,  the plea of<\/p>\n<p>the writ   petitioners is that the allegations made against<\/p>\n<p>them   had   been   found   proved   and,   therefore,   the<\/p>\n<p>punishments,   as   prescribed   under   the   Rules,   had   been<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).33288\/2006<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                      5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>impose on them.   Hence, the suspension at the instance<\/p>\n<p>of the first respondent, need not be again imposed.<\/p>\n<p>       7.     As   discussed   above,     the   show   cause   notice<\/p>\n<p>had   been   issued   and   the   replies   furnished   by   both   the<\/p>\n<p>writ petitioners.  The final decision  has to come from the<\/p>\n<p>second respondent, the Co-operative bank.<\/p>\n<p>       8.     In   the   above   legal   and   factual   situation,   the<\/p>\n<p>second   respondent   shall   take   an   independent   decision,<\/p>\n<p>uninfluenced by the directions of the first respondent to<\/p>\n<p>suspend them.  On the suspension of the writ petitioners,<\/p>\n<p>this Court, at this stage, need not interfere with the show<\/p>\n<p>cause   notice   issued   by   the   second   respondent   or   the<\/p>\n<p>replies   furnished   by   the   writ   petitioners.     It   is   for   the<\/p>\n<p>disciplinary   authority,   the   managing   committee   of   the<\/p>\n<p>second respondent, to take appropriate decision, in view<\/p>\n<p>of the legal principles discussed above.  Therefore, I  find<\/p>\n<p>no further orders are necessary to be given through this<\/p>\n<p>writ petition.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       9.     However,   I   make   it     clear   that   the   writ<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).33288\/2006<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>petitioners   will   be   free   to   redress   their   grievance,     if<\/p>\n<p>their  interests are adversely affected,   in the  order that<\/p>\n<p>may be  passed by the second respondent.<\/p>\n<p>             The writ petition is closed  as above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                               J.M.JAMES<\/p>\n<p>                                               JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>mrcs<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court K.P.Krishnankutty vs The Joint Registrar Of &#8230; on 15 December, 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C) No. 33288 of 2006(K) 1. K.P.KRISHNANKUTTY, &#8230; Petitioner 2. K.P.GANGADHARAN, Vs 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE &#8230; Respondent 2. THE NEDIYANGA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK For Petitioner :SRI.V.C.JAMES For Respondent : No [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-118190","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>K.P.Krishnankutty vs The Joint Registrar Of ... on 15 December, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K.P.Krishnankutty vs The Joint Registrar Of ... on 15 December, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2006-12-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-02-03T18:39:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K.P.Krishnankutty vs The Joint Registrar Of &#8230; on 15 December, 2006\",\"datePublished\":\"2006-12-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-03T18:39:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006\"},\"wordCount\":799,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006\",\"name\":\"K.P.Krishnankutty vs The Joint Registrar Of ... on 15 December, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2006-12-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-03T18:39:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K.P.Krishnankutty vs The Joint Registrar Of &#8230; on 15 December, 2006\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K.P.Krishnankutty vs The Joint Registrar Of ... on 15 December, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K.P.Krishnankutty vs The Joint Registrar Of ... on 15 December, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2006-12-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-02-03T18:39:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K.P.Krishnankutty vs The Joint Registrar Of &#8230; on 15 December, 2006","datePublished":"2006-12-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-03T18:39:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006"},"wordCount":799,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006","name":"K.P.Krishnankutty vs The Joint Registrar Of ... on 15 December, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2006-12-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-03T18:39:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-krishnankutty-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-15-december-2006#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K.P.Krishnankutty vs The Joint Registrar Of &#8230; on 15 December, 2006"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118190","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=118190"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118190\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=118190"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=118190"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=118190"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}