{"id":118275,"date":"2010-02-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010"},"modified":"2016-05-20T05:39:43","modified_gmt":"2016-05-20T00:09:43","slug":"shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Shri K.C.Jain vs Western Railway, Mumbai on 4 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shri K.C.Jain vs Western Railway, Mumbai on 4 February, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                 Central Information Commission\n                                                                 CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000024\n                                                                  Dated February 4, 2010\n\nName of the Applicant                      :   Shri K.C.Jain\n\nName of the Public Authority               :   Western Railway, Mumbai\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p>1.    The Applicant filed an RTI application dt.28.12.08 with the CPIO, Divisional Office,<br \/>\n      Western Railway, Mumbai stating that in response to an RTI application dt.17.9.08,<br \/>\n      the PIO vide his reply dt.17.10.08 had informed him that the case of Shri Sumer<br \/>\n      Singh, Retd. Mail Guard, BCT for grant of stagnation increment which was due from<br \/>\n      1.3.2000 would    be communicated with the approval of competent authority in due<br \/>\n      course of time but nothing was mentioned regarding consequent revision of pension<br \/>\n      and its arrears and so also for grant of interest on delayed settlement dues.      More<br \/>\n      than 2 months hava passed and nothing further has been heard. He requested for the<br \/>\n      latest development with respect to the    case. Shri B.Ramachandran, PIO replied on<br \/>\n      6.2.09 enclosing the note dt.3.2.09 from Ms.Suchitra Bhandary, APIO-BCT stating that<br \/>\n      the stagnation increment has been granted to Shri Sumer Singh on 20.11.08 and his<br \/>\n      service sheet was sent to the settlement section on 25.11.08 for revision of pension<br \/>\n      and arrears of settlement dues as per rules. Not satisfied with the reply, the Applicant<br \/>\n      then wrote to the PIO on 28.5.09 stating that six months have passed since 25.11.08<br \/>\n      and nothing has been heard about whether the pension has been revised or not. He<br \/>\n      also invited the attention of the PIO to his earlier RTI application dt.17.9.08 wherein<br \/>\n      he had asked for the reasons     together with file notings for denying the interest @<br \/>\n      12% for delayed payment of his settlement dues in spite of clear instructions of<br \/>\n      Railway Board contained in the letter dt.13.6.1997 and requested the PIO to advise<br \/>\n      the latest development in respect of the           case for grant of interest. Shri<br \/>\n      B.Ramachandran, PIO replied on 25.6.09 enclosing the note dt.23.6.09 from<br \/>\n      APO(Bills) stating that information can be given only after obtaining third party&#8217;s<br \/>\n      consent. Not satisfied with the reply, the Applicant filed an appeal dt.21.7.09 with the<br \/>\n      Appellate Authority reiterating his request for the information. Shri A.K.Jha, Appellate<br \/>\n      Authority replied on 28.8.09 informing the Applicant that the settlement dues have<br \/>\n      been revised and giving a list of dues settled . He also added that the Applicant in his<br \/>\n      letter dt.28.5.09 had not shown whether the consent of Shri Sumer Singh was taken<br \/>\n      or not and hence the case has been treated as third party information.       He further<br \/>\n      added that settlement dues were not delayed on administration grounds as the same<br \/>\n      were pending due to vigilance case, hence interest is not admissible as per extent rule.<br \/>\n      Being aggrieved with the reply, applicant filed a second appeal dt.11.11.09 before CIC.\n<\/p>\n<p> 2.    The Bench of Mrs. Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner, scheduled the hearing<br \/>\n      for February 4, 2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.    Shri Nandkumar, APO(Bills), Shri Sridhar, Shri J.S.Panwar, APO and Ms.Kulkarni, Sr.<br \/>\n      Clerk represented the Public Authority.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.    The Appellant was heard through audio conferencing.\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>5.    The Appellant submitted that after a period of 30 days, the PIO, instead of answering<br \/>\n      all the questions has only submitted a note to him and that no information has been<br \/>\n      provided against points 2 and 3 related to granting interest on delayed payment. He<br \/>\n      also pointed out that as per Railway Board&#8217;s instructions contained in their letter no.<br \/>\n      F(E)III\/97\/PNI\/6 dated 13.6.97, the payment of interest at 12% on delayed payment<br \/>\n      of settlement of dues on account of pending disciplinary action is admissible . He<br \/>\n      contended that the Appellate Authority has failed to provide the rules under which the<br \/>\n      interest is not payable.   Shri Nandkumar submitted that the Appellant had asked for<br \/>\n      stagnation increment and arrears for the period from the date of stagnation increment<br \/>\n      to the date of retirement and also for the interest because of late payment of gratuity.<br \/>\n      He added that a vigilance case was pending against Shri Sumer Singh and the case<br \/>\n      was over only in 2008. Shri Sumer Singh was exonerated and after that all payments<br \/>\n      due to the Appellant were made. As for the Railway Board letter mentioned by the<br \/>\n      Appellant, Shri Nandkumar stated that the circular was not clear and hence he had to<br \/>\n      put up the same to the Competent Authority for further clarification.               The<br \/>\n      Commission, however, is of the opinion that there is absolutely no ambiguity<br \/>\n      in respect of the contents of the Railway Board&#8217;s letter and that the Railway<br \/>\n      Authorities have deliberately delayed the matter and strongly recommends<br \/>\n      that appropriate action be taken with regard to payment of interest on<br \/>\n      delayed payment to the Appellant, under intimation to the Commission . In<br \/>\n      this connection, the Respondent also informed the Commission that he had put up a<br \/>\n      note to the competent authority for his approval for payment of interest and is<br \/>\n      awaiting his decision. With regard to point 2 about the file notings, the Respondent<br \/>\n      added that the file notings were provided vide letter dt.17.10.08.      The Respondent<br \/>\n      then invited the Appellant to inspect the relevant files and the Appellant agreed to do<br \/>\n      so between 9 and 13 February . The Commission accordingly directs the PIO to allow<br \/>\n      inspection of Mr. Sumer Singhs&#8217;s file by the Appellant, after obtaining a written or oral<br \/>\n      submission from Mr. Sumer Singh as per provisions of Section 11(1) of the RTI Act<br \/>\n      and provide authenticated documents to the Appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p> 6.     The appeal is accordingly disposed of.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                        (Annapurna Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                Information Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated true copy:\n<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.     Shri K.C.Jain<br \/>\n       Sr. Citizen &amp; Social Activist<br \/>\n       26\/284, New Govind Nagar<br \/>\n       Ramganj<br \/>\n       Ajmer 305 001<\/p>\n<p>2.     The PIO<br \/>\n       Western Railway<br \/>\n       Divisional Railway Manager&#8217;s Office<br \/>\n       Personnel Department<br \/>\n       Mumbai Central<br \/>\n       Mumbai 400 008<\/p>\n<p>3.     The Appellate Authority<br \/>\n       Western Railway<br \/>\n       Divisional Railway Manager&#8217;s Office<br \/>\n       Personnel Department<br \/>\n       Mumbai Central<br \/>\n       Mumbai 400 008<\/p>\n<p>4.     Officer incharge, NIC<\/p>\n<p>5.     Press E Group, CIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Shri K.C.Jain vs Western Railway, Mumbai on 4 February, 2010 Central Information Commission CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000024 Dated February 4, 2010 Name of the Applicant : Shri K.C.Jain Name of the Public Authority : Western Railway, Mumbai Background 1. The Applicant filed an RTI application dt.28.12.08 with the CPIO, Divisional Office, Western Railway, Mumbai stating [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-118275","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shri K.C.Jain vs Western Railway, Mumbai on 4 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri K.C.Jain vs Western Railway, Mumbai on 4 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-20T00:09:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri K.C.Jain vs Western Railway, Mumbai on 4 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-20T00:09:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":932,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Shri K.C.Jain vs Western Railway, Mumbai on 4 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-20T00:09:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri K.C.Jain vs Western Railway, Mumbai on 4 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri K.C.Jain vs Western Railway, Mumbai on 4 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri K.C.Jain vs Western Railway, Mumbai on 4 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-20T00:09:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri K.C.Jain vs Western Railway, Mumbai on 4 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-20T00:09:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010"},"wordCount":932,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010","name":"Shri K.C.Jain vs Western Railway, Mumbai on 4 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-20T00:09:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-k-c-jain-vs-western-railway-mumbai-on-4-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri K.C.Jain vs Western Railway, Mumbai on 4 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118275","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=118275"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118275\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=118275"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=118275"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=118275"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}