{"id":118472,"date":"2009-01-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2"},"modified":"2017-02-27T03:30:26","modified_gmt":"2017-02-26T22:00:26","slug":"state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2","title":{"rendered":"State By Basaveshwara Nagar … vs Raju on 29 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
State By Basaveshwara Nagar … vs Raju on 29 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: S.R.Bannurmath & Gowda<\/div>\n
<\/pre>\n
EN ‘YHE %-%\u00a7G%”% CQUR’? Q? KARNATAK\u00a7. A?\n<\/p>\n
DATES THIS THE 29?” my GP JANuAm%,;’_:::’as.\u00a72;f _ 7  _<\/p>\n
?F{ESENT    % A<\/p>\n
“ms !\u00bb\u00e9G?\u00e9”3LE MR. 3z.;sTIcEl.\u00a7.R; ?z@~.r~:\u00a7a\u00a7\u00a7i\u00a7;:~#%\u00e9;*\u00a7’z4;:\u00bb–}:_’%_VA&’v, ‘
\nAm? \u00abA  A  r
\nTHE HUMBLE MR. 3USTICE \u00a7{;v!;\u00a7i1v;’JEN\u00a7}G{\u00a7V\u00a7\u00a7’L$\\ #$QW\ufb01A<\/p>\n
CRE%V\u00a3E%\\i&L \ufb01ii?:F”i\u00a5Ai.-‘_V\u00a7\u00a53\u00a7.;A 1512;\/’E095 czv\u00e9
\nCRIMINALAE’PEi3sigI*i’s\u00a7’G.__82V;’3{2’;i705
\n2:2 C:*E.A.\u00a7’\u00e9e.iS12’i’2;GG\u00a7E’AVV’H  Q:\n<\/p>\n
azmmggm; w j,.%#:   ~~  _{%\u00bb_W.\n<\/p>\n
S”i’}\u00e9{?E*’8’\u00e9'”%.\u00a32S;%’*.lES\u00a7i~i’%”\u00a3AR\u00a7;”\u00a7’\u00e9AQA%~?<'" '
\n$93155 srmozss,     M J
\n\u00a7\ufb01s%'~\u00e9GA!'\u00e9__Q\u00a7'\u20ac;E   <\/p>\n
 Q   …r3.??E%..\u00a7..A?'\u00e9'?\n<\/p>\n
gm’ ::9;;._ 5.5;’ i\u00e9g\u00e9gvz\u00e9\u00e9’, SE9)’<\/p>\n
   S;’.\u00a7 z\u00e9imisi \u20ac{NA?PA
\n‘ Am: AB{;.\u00bb!.ET “ms<\/p>\n
Ni”) 23; Q\u00a7T?”\u00a5~\u00a7;’%1’b\u00e9, 3% C3055
\nM&’?\u00b0\u00ab\u00a7}U ?.’–\u00a7A’z?’!<\u00a7X\u20ac\u20acAG&R, \u00a7A?*\u00e9 GALO RE.
\n..   RES?GF'~EDE?'~iT<\/p>\n
  f{3%*'sg:'MA SAX ?\u00a5iAKAS?%, A\u00a7v,,}<\/p>\n
'  "WES CRLA IS FREQ LENDER SECTIQM 3?? CR.?.,C' 83'<\/p>\n
   3?? $69 "EHE S?ATE PRAYEQG THAT TEES \u00a7"%8?~\u00e9*\u00a7\u00a7.E QQSQ?<\/p>\n
MAY SE P\u00a7.,E&SE$ T8 EF\u00e9%*#'\u00a7NCE TWE SENFENCE INPQSED 3'?
\nTHE 95., 5&3? "\u00a7"R'\ufb01xCi< C{}UR"\u00a7"~E}(, \ufb01'\u00e9_.\u20ac}RE  \/<\/p>\n
s.c.:s:@.39?g93, wyrm 25.4.95 -\u00bb C0?\u00bb\u00a3VZ{,t3?1_}};.e:9_*\u00a7:" :*\ufb01\u00a74\u00a5'E'<\/p>\n
RES?SNE}E\u00a5'4"F\/ACCUSED mg 'mg QFFENCE 9;z.;,%4:;;3:3..:{':;';\u00a5'L:='~M:
\nANS SENTENCING HIM m UNDERGO M. FOR.\u00bbYE.\u00e9.RS*~.AP$Q 93$ \u00bb<\/p>\n
IS ALSG ssmemcw T8 PAY A F1s~;:\u00e90:=*\u00ab RS ,36'3–G:,f'?–.\u00a7(.\u00a7.';,' f{G\u00ab<\/p>\n
EPCK<\/p>\n
in g:g.M:o.s23g200\u00a7<\/p>\n
 "  .agN:;ALa:%RE;'%–\n<\/p>\n
SEHNEEN:\n<\/p>\n
K RAJU<\/p>\n
S\/G KQISHMAPPA – _ .\n<\/p>\n
AG\u00a7 – 26 ‘ms   —\n<\/p>\n
at 25; 9*” MAIN; 33? mass 3:\n<\/p>\n
M\ufb01s\u00a7\u00a3}U\u00a7&A”fHA{\u20ac;%Ql\u00a7R  . ‘
\n3A\u00a3~\u00e9sALGRE;.’  <\/p>\n
,..\u00a7?PEi&&NT<\/p>\n
{av 32;; A :*s\u00bb:;iV’;3:*2),\u00bb:.,a<\u00a7;s\u00a7:; 5
\nANS: % A' 4'  <\/p>\n
s"rAT1;E–<::F s<A%E;~aATA;&  H
\nav 3.*\u00a5SA\u00a5ES\ufb01WARAB$.!\u00a7SARA PGLECE<\/p>\n
",RESPC&DEN?\n<\/p>\n
fa?-T;s’fr;’;:.’3:3,}\u00a7_a\u00e9;%q*:i~z, 3??)<\/p>\n
“m’\u00a7sV t\u00a7;_.A 153 mm usssaaa sscmw 3?4(2:; cam. 52′<\/p>\n
” jms; Ammttm\ufb01 mg mg APPEL\u00a3\ufb01J\\%”\u00a7” AGAENST mg EEJDGMEN’?
\n ” \u20ac}AT\u20ac_E C\u00a7_\u00ab 25q4$e\u00a7 mggsm 5:! mg 93., 53.3? ‘{‘RACK COE}R”%”-E}{,
\n 3*;05\u00a7R?\u00a7 am’, :9; \u00a7,m~a@.39?;\u00a73 M \u20acQ\u00a7\\\u00e9’%i’7\u00a7\u20acT\u00a7%%@ “\u00a5’H\u00a7
\n Ap\u00e9gamm”\/Accusga FGR “ma QFFENCE P;’\u20ac.}\u00a3S.3\u00a7? Q? :9: Asaaa
\n j\u00a7Ess:”:”\u00a7;~$:\u00ab:1:~:@ me: Y9 UNDERGQ RE. ma 4 YEARS we HE is<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
weaeme s.};. sea 6 MGNTHS man: we :\u20ac\u00a7FFE\ufb01\u00a3CE 1′;:,%:\u00a7V;’s.;\u00e9’;*:3*?.}::;\u00e9_<\/p>\n
ALSQ SENTEMCEB Ta PAY A F1!\\iE or: RS.3@G0,\/~– :.::;;.\u00bb”ro
\nmzagasa 3.1. F’GR6MGNTHS.\n<\/p>\n
These appeais coming an fer hearimf;\u00a7 ‘*<\/p>\n
BANSURMATH, 3., de\ufb01vered t%1efc>l\u00a7_Qys:\u00bbE_r3g:  ‘<\/p>\n
3&DGMENT A<\/p>\n
36mg aggr\u00e9eved by th’\u00e9._j’:;:.\u00a7j’gm\u00e9n\u00a7_af_V\u00a2’:\u00a7;v:\u00a7\u20ac2\u00ab\u00a7.\u00a7:tv\u00a7-on”land * L’<\/p>\n
sentence \u00e9ated 25.4.2905%%%\u00a7.:\u00a7jf%.1s;;.sx:{\u00a7;3\u00a7t?T;’%2Q%33, the
\naccused has \ufb01iad Cr?.A.”\u00a7*\u00e9=;\u00a7’*823f2E-{\u00a7\u00a73\u00a73″”~\u00e9’;_2\u00a7iV’aggrieved by the<\/p>\n
inadequacy cf*–__sen:\u00e9?1?<:s;;: v".t}\u00a7e V'.Sfa\u00e9e has \ufb02ied<\/p>\n
CV5.A.Nca;1'5.3#2;{\u00e9G{3Ef.w'. Asm "'E:%m facts, appreciation of
\neviderafzve anja  "bath tha cases are common<\/p>\n
and $\u00a7ng!ef"j4L\u00a3.V\u00e9\u00a7g.r{;VV'er}\u20acAQf" \u00e9\u00e9\u00e9irned Sessivsns Ridge is required<\/p>\n
  ta \u00a7;\u00e9'\u00ab:.rg\u00a7jon\u00a7\u00a7d\u00e9f\u00e9*d,._b.Qi:%"z the matters are taken up together<\/p>\n
–c\u00a2n.sEde_’ra iic:_n and are be\u00e9gzg dispose\u00e9 of by mm<\/p>\n
ciemmon }i;\u00a75’__\u00a7f”:’E\u00e9\ufb01t.\n<\/p>\n
,2;. t.’\u00a7”%;e reiatiensh\u00e9g} between the accuses: anti the<\/p>\n
” %\u00a3.\u00e9Vt:z\u00e9’7a\u00ab$ses irscluding the injured, is not very much En<\/p>\n
V’   cl\u00e9jsaute. The \u00e9ajwad witness PW’.2 \u00bb Raveen\u00e9ran and his<\/p>\n
 wife PW.1 ~ Smt.\u00a7.a\u00a7\u00a7tha have a daughter Pwm —<\/p>\n
5\/”\n<\/p>\n
injuries. Th\u00e9s incident was nct\u00e9ced net oniy by t_heV_ \u00a7’e’\u00a7_rm\u00a7%y<\/p>\n
members, but alse mdeperzdent neighbours.\n<\/p>\n
after the iriciderat, it E3 stated thgt, ‘a1cca:s\u00e9\u00a3i\u00a7vit\u00a7’:. ‘ci*2\u00a7”‘<\/p>\n
weapen. ‘Ehereafter, the injuredv”?W.;2viia\u00e9\u00bbSh’\u00a3f\u00a7\u20ac\u00a73 ‘\u00e9\u00e9’i\u00a7~%’i.\u00e9\u00a7iy<\/p>\n
tc Shanbhag Nursing \u00a5'”|0\u00a5’\u00ab;’1 E?”‘-.__.3E”3\ufb01”A’tI{$TeB\u00a5%\u00a7?” \u00a5”i\u00e9il.WM;8HY<'\u00a7 '<\/p>\n
hospita} as the rzature__ of Enju_f_\u00a7'jA-2%;a:;_\u00bb_vver.y  PW.13
\nDr\ufb01radeep Nayak adf\ufb01igfad,"\u00abVex:3:f$i"r'x–e\u00a7:'% i$nd gave traatmerzt
\nta PW.2. In the'.:31v'ear2~g\u00bb:'E*:%i;\u00e9 pcz\ufb01ca stat\u00e9ora
\nat abaut .;L.Ef3}:3:$:5;i\u00e9g\ufb01r:.: .a';}:j:  \u00e9szci\u00e9ent to the<\/p>\n
}u :'isdict;E E:: e1 VVst%%at;e:::%;e7:z\u20ac–%”of 9w.1 treating it as a first<\/p>\n
  \u00a7nfg\u00a7i?%fn\u00a7_fEe;j, r\u00e9g\u00a7’:ste\u00a3s\u00ab'{he case in Crime N$.852 of 2902 far<\/p>\n
 ‘ ‘\u00a7\u00a7’;!\u00a7\u20ac\u00a2’vGi\u00a7’\u00a7’\u00bbE\u00e9{\u20acC\u20ac:jf’vi;i::??\u00a3\u00a7;\u20acT Sectiora 30? IPC against the accusezd and<\/p>\n
\u00a7r:s}\u00e9StigVa\u00a3%V~\u00e9’;rV.’\u00a7S  taken up. The mandatory procedares iike<\/p>\n
 ho\u00a3\u00e9\u00a7Eag5″A\u00a7;;;.?c\ufb01t mahazar and preparation of rough sketch is<\/p>\n
 \ufb01a7r:”s:i;:.:c:{\u00e9d in the presence cf independent mahazar<\/p>\n
wtnesses. Search for the accused is set \u00a7:2, s\u00e9atements sf<\/p>\n
mfhe witnesses mciuding the neighbours and perscns whs<\/p>\n
can threw \ufb01ght on the incident, are recarded, The accuses<\/p>\n
6,\/>'”\n<\/p>\n
is etrestee en 1?.3.2.2G02 and after Eriterregtette;:.;._’__;:eis\u00a2_:Vhe<\/p>\n
vetenteered ta show the piece where he.t_h’eje.Vvh:\u00e9Tieen <\/p>\n
weapors, independent mahazar t\u00a7}itne}sses”\u00abare_’_e7rittet\u00a7  Vtti-‘tsttze accused dei\ufb01ed the
\nchatgiee”  _  jt\u00a7.e”Vtr\u00a7ed, he ts tried En<\/p>\n
e.c.Ne..3%9.?\/zae\u00e9; t    <\/p>\n
 ‘ziulrz eta-e_t:t’o eietabi\u00e9eh the guitt at the accused. the<\/p>\n
 ;e.rt%’se\u00a2:\u00b0ttti.e.\u00a7f”te%Eed upen the evi\u00e9ence cf 14 witnesses and<\/p>\n
get__ \u00a7\u00a7’x\u00e9.?1 ta P13. and Meal ta 4. Tetai deniai<\/p>\n
epf5eer$:’tef”‘ be the defence strategy and ne era? er<\/p>\n
 :JIec;ttme’:\u00a7tary evidence is got marked or exhib\ufb01ed by the<\/p>\n
*3ecesed.\n<\/p>\n
\u20ac42′<\/p>\n
5. After considering the riva% contentions, asVVaVir \u00e9a\u00a7\u00a5y<\/p>\n
noted, the Triai Court found the accused <\/p>\n
charge and by the impugned erder, conv%r_:3:e–:i, _j!jsEnifbrAt\ufb01\u00e9  <\/p>\n
offence under Sesztian 307 IPC. \ufb01a?ter..h?\u00a73%in\u00a7 \u00a3h*\u00e9’a~r:c\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7adi’<\/p>\n
regarding sentence, the ‘\u00a5’riaV\u00a3T’\u20acZ\u00a7:urt”%’2\u00a7s’ $ente’i\u00a7\u00a7e\u00a7.h%r_\u00a7::  t’c <\/p>\n
undergo R3. for 4 years a’f\u00a7’c%._V a%s5o  a ; \ufb01ne sf
\nRs.3,\u20ac)G\u00a3)\/-, in defau\u00a7t,’ ;l.:_<'_.*Lj.=,2nc.EV\u00e9\u00e9rg\u00a7$ '$..,_I.:fer_6 m;oA21V\u00a7:hs. It is
\nthis judgment o\u20acV_cnv\u00a7g:_ig}_: i\u00a7;”~<:.'fi\u00e9$3VEE_\u00e9\u00a3'iged before us<\/p>\n
by the accusa\ufb01 '_f.#af\u00e9E~.in\u00a71_a\u00a7g':fE\u00e9%}\u00e9V\u00e9"vbyjfhe inadequacy of<\/p>\n
the sevn't"er3:;e;;j;'tiik\u00e9fi-:"5t'at:e ha\u00e9"'ps* eferred the companion<\/p>\n
appeai {Chi .4}_f?au.'i'\u00a3\u00a7\u00a7V.'.:3;".;-;'3:2;'.2C\u20ac3S)V._.'uhder Section 377 Cr.P.C.<\/p>\n
 6. _Qut of “wit \ufb01e\u00a7ses examined, PW.3., the wife of<\/p>\n
‘wig theEompia\u00a5nant and eye witness to the<\/p>\n
I%%\u00a7:\u00a7e:T::ent1.V’:’*k1\u00ab\u00a7w.j’2-\u00a7sthe injured v\u00e9ctim of assauit. Pm\/.4, the<\/p>\n
yeAu’nge{_v’bri:$~%:har af PW.1, an independent eye witnes$,<\/p>\n
a\u00e9d 6 Nagesh and Krishnamurthy the neighbeurs,<\/p>\n
T._”afe-Q\u00e9xamined apart from \u00e9aughter 9!’ PWs.1 and 2<\/p>\n
%  ..Sr\u00a711t,Rekha and also the wife of the accuseai is axamine\u00e9 as<\/p>\n
V Wmo a3 as eye witness. PW.3 Radhakrishna, PW.”\/’<\/p>\n
\u00a34\/’<\/p>\n
16}<\/p>\n
or commit the offence. it is often said that, reot\u00e9ve is
\nekways iecked up in the mine of accused end it can be
\nherdiy ereved by direct evidence. The Court has te.V_\u00a7e_ti2.er
\nthe motive aspect from the circumstances  _
\ntime ef the accident or the his1.:e.ry’__’behied”<\/p>\n
asseuit. As we have aweedy noted, w\u00a3j1eee’theere’~i\u00a7’ ee\u00e9eeniiej<\/p>\n
of injured witneee ceupied wii:_h~..eye eet\ufb01ess acc:;%uenme= his –. ‘<\/p>\n
wife, daughter, brother-in-ie_e\u00e9”-..:ae.g\u00a7 eise.[_:V’End_ependent<\/p>\n
eaghbours, in our Vvie.’w,rr:je:\u00a5ve.’j;}’ar\u00a3 even if eet<\/p>\n
estabtisti\u00e9iz-e…\u00a7\u00a7:\u00a7i\u00a3  tasge :5e%eeca%se at’ the defence amt<\/p>\n
fzzrthez\ufb02\ufb02 For this aspect is kept aside, we<\/p>\n
have te coVe%::en’traV\u00a3e ere t’f;~*e acceptaei\ufb01ty of the eye w\ufb01ness<\/p>\n
*=,.,_eccej\u00a33nt\u00bb_.,e::d $1′ \u00a7\u20ac”\u00a7s~–~—-eet preved, then the entire eeideece<\/p>\n
  heef tee E:e_”%:ei~e:a*\u00a7;einst the prosecution aed in favour of the<\/p>\n
eece’sed,\u00e9.’.E’\u00a7$;_e%i etherwiee it is an admitted fact Ehat the<\/p>\n
7.__re\u00a3ati’eeeh;%e between eccused and his wife PW.1O and her<\/p>\n
A ‘~iLffeV:%f2Li\u00e9”;=. members are strained and as such there exists i\ufb01<\/p>\n
,,   {,\u00a7;3t?V\u20ac*  ‘<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
we came: draw suc\ufb01 inferences. What as; the dcv;\u00a3e_::%’T.\u00a7\u00a7as<\/p>\n
admitted Er: the cross~exam\u00a7nat\u00a7n is that, tii\u00e9”\u00e9\u00ab’z\u00a7j–::}f\u00a7*:_.v\u00a7_s\u00ab_<\/p>\n
possiisie by coming mto ccantact with 3 shag?\u00bb$\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01g\u00e9’\u00e9::abje:\u00bb\u00a7\u20ac.*~V. <\/p>\n
1: is to be rsoste\u00e9 that \u00a7t is an:-gatn ;z%\u00bb,;%;io%::;%e*::%c%a%;%ggmgg<\/p>\n
and answer. This takes t%2a<:a;s3e of't%1}_\u00e9"accu[s\u00e9dVA~r\u00e9:g_.f1:Eg\u00e9\u00e9i\u00e9i". "L.<\/p>\n
This answer of dcctor does ':v?\u00a7tsi:; 'es\u00a7ab\u00a7\u00a7s\u00a7% $h\u00e9t \ufb01ne Erijury
\nconcernad was net o:'9i.\u00a7'e;\u00abs:lc\u00a3.'_:ho}:'.A5\u00e9.__g:%i;assaci by" 1-(Haifa M04.
\nAbsciutew, there Es r: <J.:'I._ \u00e9f=.\u00ab m:s,%%}’;msa\u00a7%be Kept in mm that the
\ndocterks’\u00e9\u00bb\u00a7_\u00a7der\u00a7\u00e9\u00e9V”tL$Va’: _\u00a7:\u00a7:.\u00a7” ;j_\u00a71j.ury was nearly faia\u00e9, nearer<\/p>\n
to the h\u00e9la~5:i,”v\u00a7\u00a7:af.E Ac.;_*”g’a\u00ab\u00a7\u00e9, m\ufb01ica\ufb01es we S\u20ac3″\u00a7G\u00e93S\u00a7’%8SS. if<\/p>\n
 :*ez3{L_\u00a7i3′:.r  waA\u00e9”%’n\u00a7.as.:xe\u00a7 %n we facmrg\u00e9’, \ufb01e wea\u00e9d’ mt fzazsa<\/p>\n
 ‘ ‘s;~.%af’\u00a7$e5d”v.vi_e ::’a:\u00a7f\u00e9’c\u00ab<3ct this case fer tine sake cf regis\u00e9er\u00e9ag 3<\/p>\n
\u00a7a;sfi'&"a\u00a7;aiE%\u00e9'$ifV.\u00a5:\u00a7\u20ace accuse\u00e9. Tm fiat thing, he weaid have<\/p>\n
 da\ufb01\u00e9 ..is: ?;ov\u00a7\u00e9 is the hcs\ufb01ta\u00e9 and is fat: tms is what was<\/p>\n
V' $\u00a3\u00a2;:':9@A after the assaas\u00e9t. $\u00a7mu\u00a7tanes:.ss\u00a5y, w\u00e9theut \u00a7<;'}$\u00a7?'i\u00a7<\/p>\n
 \u00a7':::a:\u00e9A%\u00a7 time, PW,,1 has gene is the jurisd\u00e9ctic\u00e9\ufb01af pcz\u00e9\u00e9ae<\/p>\n
w\u00a7tat'i$:2 and \ufb01adged Ewe? first infarmat\u00e9on. Emmediaiwy,<\/p>\n
aftar taking ta Maiiya hespita\u00e9, PW33 \ufb01stici\ufb01g the fact Efzat<\/p>\n
6\/"V<\/p>\n
ms is a medics Eega\u00e9 case, has made entry in the reg\u00e9ster<\/p>\n
by 18.2% p.m., wherein ever: w\u00a7z\u00e9%e meratien\u00e9ng \u00a7"E84,\u00a7}v\u00a7':'.-*"%~_jt\u00a7'Lj'{.':..?_' \u00a7.",,<\/p>\n
name :3? the accuse\u00e9 as an assa\ufb01ant with \u00a7<_::3'Ef$*~\u00ab':';s:-..j:a_;'5Essf;;<\/p>\n
ment\u00e9eneci Of coarse, this \u00e9nfarmat\u00e9o\ufb01 _\u00a73**\u00bbf:\u00a3j;j'~n\u00a7s'%i:e\u20acEA   <\/p>\n
9394.4 and P't1%s'.4 deariy a\u00e9rmts th%S.A1aspeL:f:; '4'–.?;} t.\u00a71'e\u00e9a\ufb01g\u00e9wf\u00e9cg.'<\/p>\n
3? any feuradaticn, much .\u00a7\u00bb\u00e9$s, pfcg\u00e9singat?2\u00a3\u00a7,\u00a7as\u00a7: \u00e9f'<\/p>\n
acczideniai injury, that mo, at V\u00e9 "'ai'\u00a7iz\u00a3_Vp\u00a7a\u20ac\u00e9~%\u00a7u%<e':rz\u00e9\u00e9ring the
\nheart, in mgr view, theA-..i_\u00a7\u00a7=eQ:"\u00a7' ?Qf"W3'F\u00a7 \ufb01g 'me 'accused
\nby acciderzta\u00e9 \u00e9ngitgry ca;fi:n.\u00a7t'–.b\u00e9v._Va;:c\u00e9i;:\u00a7\u00e9t:\u00a7i.'v\u00e9sgstecia\u00e9\u00e9y when<\/p>\n
were e}'V{7e"'7asT.{%\u00a3,an3,}':f9:g"s  e\u00a7!_'\u00e9"%;\u00a5.?Et:'\u00a7esses $3 the \u00e9ac\u00e9\u00e9ent.
\nExceat  \u00b0:i%3\u00a7s.. sug\u00a7e\u00a7t\u00a7\u00a7i2\u00ab,._ '\u00a7:%'a\u00a7*'e E5 a\u00e9saiatew as mataria\u00e9<\/p>\n
aasaiiia\ufb01\u00e9e t\u00a2L-""acV:':&pff.:'V-_t\u00e9\u00a7\u00e9::_:ti:a:$e ef the acwae\u00e9. Sn tize ot\ufb01eg'<\/p>\n
 a_s,{ide%\u00b0\u00a73cev**~\u00abs~;' Pws\ufb01, 2, 4, ars\ufb01 10 {ha ra\u00e9afzed<\/p>\n
_'w%%'.\u00e9\u00a5e3s'es{'%\u00a7'$._ v*\u00a2g\u00a7iE as twe \u00e9ndepen\u00e9ent 633$ witaesses,<\/p>\n
%'?.;e=\u00a7g_:'\u00a7:'}\u00a7bGl.i_AEf\u00a7' ?V\u00a7\u00a5"\u00bb..\u20ac::S.5 and 6 cieariy give the deta\ufb01e\u00e9 history 0%<\/p>\n
fjlrhe 335.1-j&:'iL\u00a3'1\u00a7tVb'}\/th\u00e9 accused.<\/p>\n
   Even after tbareugh scrutiay ef thaw ev\u00e9\u00e9ez\u00e9ceg<\/p>\n
wssa\u00e9\u00e9 \ufb01a\u00e9 that, their ev\u00e9dence as ":3 {he acwse\ufb01 being the<\/p>\n
 assa\u00e9\u00e9ar\u00e9i has remained zmv\u00e9mpeached. \ufb01xd\u00e9e\u00e9 ta this, if<\/p>\n
y"\n<\/p>\n
E62<\/p>\n
we zons\u00e9ders the answers given mt Em accused wfz\u00e9ie
\nbeing qasest\u00e9cnad \u00a311166?’ 8.313 C:’.P.C. \u00e9nc\ufb01cate that; \u00e9se
\ns\u00e9mpiy warsts ts deny the antira Q:”0SECEJ’\u00a7\u00a7\u20ac}i”} casge an\ufb01<\/p>\n
evidence as faise. T\ufb01me and agar: this Ceurt as W’e3i:’a4$’-tyne<\/p>\n
Apex Coart haw heid that the stage of  <\/p>\n
answermg the acczssad un\ufb01es” S_V.33.3′ Cz\u00e9;7\u00a5’?’\u00a7\u00a5\u20ac.’;.:’_s’;,*:\u00bb ‘%:hV\u00e9. Ea-\ufb01t””\u00bb <\/p>\n
spportun\u00e9ty far the accused to c\u00e9xme;’_”up’ v\u00e9T\u00a3%h”~%:\u00a3\u00a7’s :\u00e9*\u20ac\u00a7t’i\u00a7\u00a7’a3\u00a3}e<\/p>\n
and if he \ufb02ees not came u%*.._ 94%??? his. *\u00a7’&;”‘.Si83f.’:E,  1ie\u00a7_*ee:.\u00a73:;s-53\u00a7\u00a7er\u00a7’i:V.L’<\/p>\n
gr en\u00e9y \u00e9en\u00e9es we arasecutiga,”:c.ase__as \u00a73%se,_ thv\u00e9 ieurt we<\/p>\n
the faf%: t?.~: Va’;2<\u00a7{5.:%:*t\u00a7:'\u00a7\u00a7t2:'=;_1\u00a73\u00bb:f\u00a7;f;es z::_'I"" 'E\u00a79aa case is e\ufb01\u00e9iitie\ufb01 ts draw<\/p>\n
an \u00a7r2f\u00e9r".e%ace th$': \u00a7;:\u00a2i:s\u00a7d\u00bb..%:'s–~h\u00e9ci\u00e9rsg scmething bases} 03% t\u00e9se<\/p>\n
prav\u00e9s\u00e9en  $S ;1\u00a33;63– cf=EP tf.'I Ccrzs\u00e9dar\u00e9ng the game evidence,<\/p>\n
 '*\u00abv\u00e9. '%"%r4_fdV: that t\u00a7ie""c'<3hc\u00a7us\u00a7on cf the gz\u00e9iit 9? the accasse\u00e9<\/p>\n
  i_-be Yriai Ceurt canrsai be by any stretch af<\/p>\n
\u00e9\u00a3';\u00a7\u00a7i'g\u00a7::ati'5of*:\u00a7f;V.Ezaiied as either mega: or perverse. \ufb01xer:<\/p>\n
 etherz\ufb01s-1e, on indeperzdent assessment Q? the antire<\/p>\n
 \u00a7$:\u00a7 &a%'aca, we find that the ev\u00e9deace 93' the 9;"cseca:t%e\ufb01 cas\u00e9<\/p>\n
 Es tragthfm and accepta\ufb01ie and as such we \ufb01nd the<\/p>\n
aenaias\u00e9a\ufb01 cf guiit G?' the accused arrived at by aha "ma?<\/p>\n
Caasrt is giast an\u00e9 \ufb01rsgaer and needs me \u00e9nte\ufb01e <\/p>\n
17<\/span><\/p>\n
12. This takes us to the next ques\u00e9ic\ufb01<\/p>\n
adequacy cf the sentence as it EsI-:h’a\u00bb%\u00a7e’ng–\u00e9\u00a73\ufb0253f t’\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9”$\u00a7;ai:a,,  V<\/p>\n
in the csmgan\u00e9an appea\u00e9. Under <\/p>\n
\ufb01tmishment \u00e9mpcsabie is 15\u00a7~.\u00a7fi\u00e9\ufb01%?% \u00e9hd. \u00e9’nVVAji’?\u00a7\u00a7”A:.\/fvatts”jams ” L’<\/p>\n
tzircumstareces of the vrzase aftez’-. q;*;:s\u00e9st\u00a7s::\u00a7:ig~*;he#\u00e9_,i\u00a7’c\u00a7_’r:7g part.<\/p>\n
.-‘:3,  VZ:”: \u00a7h’\u00e9 r\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01gf an\u00e9 far the far the fcregci\ufb01g<\/p>\n
 \u00a7’eE:a7\u00a5s\u00a73r:E’\u00a2*.’.\u00a7,;A b}l:s~\u20aci_\u00a7f_z t%a\u00e9v”‘\u00e9: ;3:;3eais stand dismissed, af\ufb01yming the<\/p>\n
&j\u00a7a2\u00e9_\u00a7;\u00a5;~;v\u00e94s\u00a7%’5:._\u00bb\u00bbV_\u00e9if-fzonvicticn am? seatenca passad $3; the<\/p>\n
ie’a~:.*:*:e\u00a7’ Fa%A.<:1;'*'aA'T'%';"a:c%<, Bangaiare in S.C.39';?;'2Q03.<\/p>\n
Sdli
\nJudge<\/p>\n
sai-g,
\nEu\u00e9ge<\/p>\n
K33,"<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court State By Basaveshwara Nagar … vs Raju on 29 January, 2009 Author: S.R.Bannurmath & Gowda EN ‘YHE %-%\u00a7G%”% CQUR’? Q? KARNATAK\u00a7. A? DATES THIS THE 29?” my GP JANuAm%,;’_:::’as.\u00a72;f _ 7 _ ?F{ESENT % A “ms !\u00bb\u00e9G?\u00e9”3LE MR. 3z.;sTIcEl.\u00a7.R; ?z@~.r~:\u00a7a\u00a7\u00a7i\u00a7;:~#%\u00e9;*\u00a7’z4;:\u00bb–}:_’%_VA&’v, ‘ Am? \u00abA A r THE HUMBLE MR. 3USTICE \u00a7{;v!;\u00a7i1v;’JEN\u00a7}G{\u00a7V\u00a7\u00a7’L$\\ #$QW\ufb01A CRE%V\u00a3E%\\i&L […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-118472","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nState By Basaveshwara Nagar ... vs Raju on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State By Basaveshwara Nagar ... vs Raju on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-26T22:00:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State By Basaveshwara Nagar … vs Raju on 29 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-26T22:00:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2\"},\"wordCount\":2351,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2\",\"name\":\"State By Basaveshwara Nagar ... vs Raju on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-26T22:00:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State By Basaveshwara Nagar … vs Raju on 29 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State By Basaveshwara Nagar ... vs Raju on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State By Basaveshwara Nagar ... vs Raju on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-26T22:00:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State By Basaveshwara Nagar … vs Raju on 29 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-26T22:00:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2"},"wordCount":2351,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2","name":"State By Basaveshwara Nagar ... vs Raju on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-26T22:00:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-basaveshwara-nagar-vs-raju-on-29-january-2009-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State By Basaveshwara Nagar … vs Raju on 29 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118472","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=118472"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118472\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=118472"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=118472"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=118472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}